The preference for an endoscopist specific sex: a link between ethnic origin, religious belief, socioeconomic status, and procedure type

Adi Lahat, Yehudith Assouline-Dayan, Lior H Katz, Herma H Fidder, Adi Lahat, Yehudith Assouline-Dayan, Lior H Katz, Herma H Fidder

Abstract

Background and aim: The sex of the physician performing the endoscopic procedure is one of the parameters influencing patient satisfaction. Our aim was to characterize patients' preferences according to their sex, socioeconomic status, and religious beliefs and according to procedure-related variables.

Methods: All patients undergoing an endoscopic procedure at Sheba Hospital between April 2012 and September 2012 were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their sex, ethnic background, socioeconomic status, religious practice, and preference for an endoscopist of a specific sex. Questionnaires were included for analysis only when more than 95% of the items were addressed.

Results: A total of 1,009 patients agreed to complete the questionnaires; of these 946 (94% [59% male]) were eligible for inclusion. Most patients (675 [70%]) expressed no preference for sex of the endoscopist, while 234 patients (25%) preferred a same-sex endoscopist, and only 55 (6%) preferred an other-sex endoscopist. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that in female patients, lower education (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28), non-Jewish religion (OR = 4.86), orthodox religious practice (OR = 2.28), African or Asian ethnic origin (OR = 2.44), scheduled for colonoscopy (OR = 1.90), and no previous endoscopy experience (OR = 1.88) were all associated with a preference for a same-sex endoscopist.

Conclusion: One-quarter of patients preferred the physician performing their examination to be of particular sex. Most of these patients preferred a same-sex endoscopist. Education level, intensity of religious practice, ethnic origin, and type of endoscopic examination were associated with a preference for a same-sex endoscopist. Addressing patients' preferences may improve the atmosphere in the clinical environment, reduce stress, and facilitate better treatment and adherence to endoscopic surveillance programs.

Keywords: compliance; endoscopy; patients’ satisfaction; patient’s preference.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Male endoscopist/female endoscopist preference in male and female patients.

References

    1. Yacavone RF, Locke GR, Gostout CJ, Rockwood TH, Thieling S, Zinsmeister AR. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53(7):703–710.
    1. Ko HH, Zhang H, Telford JJ, Enns R. Factors influencing patient satisfaction when undergoing endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(4):883–891.
    1. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(12):3186–3194.
    1. Varadarajulu S, Petruff C, Ramsey WH. Patient preferences for gender of endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(2):170–173.
    1. Lee SY, Yu SK, Kim JH, et al. Link between a preference for women colonoscopists and social status in Korean women. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(2):273–277.
    1. Kerssens JJ, Bensing JM, Andela MG. Patient preference for genders of health professionals. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(10):1531–1540.
    1. Fennema K, Meyer DL, Owen N. Sex of physician: patients’ preferences and stereotypes. J Fam Pract. 1990;30(4):441–446.
    1. Weyrauch KF, Boiko PE, Alvin B. Patient sex role and preference for a male or female physician. J Fam Pract. 1990;30(5):559–562.
    1. Reid I. Patients’ preference for male or female breast surgeons: questionnaire study. BMJ. 1998;317:1051.
    1. Zapatier JA, Kumar AR, Perez A, Guevara R, Schneider A. Preferences for ethnicity and sex of endoscopists in a Hispanic population in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(1):89–97.
    1. Menees SB, Inadomi JM, Korsnes S, Elta GH. Women patients’ preference for women physicians is a barrier to colon cancer screening. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(2):219–223.
    1. Fidler H, Hartnett A, Cheng Man K, Derbyshire I, Sheil M. Sex and familiarity of colonoscopists: patient preferences. Endoscopy. 2000;32(6):481–482.
    1. Howell EA, Gardiner B, Concato J. Do women prefer female obstetricians? Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(6):1031–1035.
    1. Sheikh RA, Kapre S, Calof OM, Ward C, Raina A. Screening preferences for colorectal cancer: a patient demographic study. South Med J. 2004;97(3):224–230.
    1. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(2):99–119.
    1. Allison JE, Lawson M. Screening tests for colorectal cancer: a menu of options remains relevant. Curr Oncol Rep. 2006;8(6):492–498.
    1. Becker M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
    1. Macrae FA, Hill DJ, St John DJ, Ambikapathy A, Garner JF. Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs. Prev Med. 1984;13(1):115–126.
    1. Spector MH, Applegate WB, Olmstead SJ, DiVasto PV, Skipper B. Assessment of attitudes toward mass screening for colorectal cancer and polyps. Prev Med. 1981;10(1):105–109.
    1. Price JH. Perceptions of colorectal cancer in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. J Community Health. 1993;18(6):347–362.
    1. Kelly RB, Shank JC. Adherence to screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Med Care. 1992;30(11):1029–1042.
    1. Neale AV, Demers RY, Herman S. Compliance with colorectal cancer screening in a high-risk occupational group. J Occup Med. 1989;31(12):1007–1012.
    1. Olynyk JK, Aquilia S, Fletcher DR, Dickinson JA. Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk subjects: a community-based pilot project. Med J Aust. 1996;165(2):74–76.
    1. Vernon SW, Acquavella JF, Yarborough CM, Hughes JI, Thar WE. Reasons for participation and nonparticipation in a colorectal cancer screening program for a cohort of high risk polypropylene workers. J Occup Med. 1990;32(1):46–51.
    1. Bejes C, Marvel MK. Attempting the improbable: offering colorectal cancer screening to all appropriate patients. Fam Pract Res J. 1992;12(1):83–90.
    1. Farrands PA, Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain J, Moss S. Factors affecting compliance with screening for colorectal cancer. Community Med. 1984;6(1):12–19.
    1. Rabin C, editor. Being Different in Israel – Ethnical Origin, Gender and Treatment. Tel Aviv: Ramot Publishing; 1999. Hebrew.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir