Safety, acceptability, and pharmacokinetics of a monoclonal antibody-based vaginal multipurpose prevention film (MB66): A Phase I randomized trial

Joseph A Politch, Susan Cu-Uvin, Thomas R Moench, Karen T Tashima, Jai G Marathe, Kate M Guthrie, Howard Cabral, Tara Nyhuis, Miles Brennan, Larry Zeitlin, Hans M L Spiegel, Kenneth H Mayer, Kevin J Whaley, Deborah J Anderson, Joseph A Politch, Susan Cu-Uvin, Thomas R Moench, Karen T Tashima, Jai G Marathe, Kate M Guthrie, Howard Cabral, Tara Nyhuis, Miles Brennan, Larry Zeitlin, Hans M L Spiegel, Kenneth H Mayer, Kevin J Whaley, Deborah J Anderson

Abstract

Background: MB66 film is a multipurpose prevention technology (MPT) product with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against HIV-1 (VRC01-N) and HSV-1 and 2 (HSV8-N). The mAbs were produced by transient expression in Nicotiana benthamiana (N). We conducted a Phase I clinical trial to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and ex vivo efficacy of single and repeated doses of MB66 when used intravaginally.

Methods and findings: The clinical trial enrolled healthy reproductive-aged, sexually abstinent women. In Segment A, 9 women received a single MB66 film which was inserted into the vaginal posterior fornix by a clinician. In Segment B, 29 women were randomly assigned to MB66 (Active) or Placebo film groups and were instructed to insert 1 film vaginally for 7 consecutive days. Visits and clinical sampling occurred predose and at various time points after single and repeated film doses. The primary endpoint was number of adverse events (AEs) Grade 2 or higher related to product use. Secondary endpoints included film dissolution rate, Nugent score (a Gram stain scoring system to diagnose bacterial vaginosis), vaginal pH, post-use survey results, cytokine concentrations in cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) specimens (assessed by Luminex assay), mAb concentrations in vaginal fluid collected from 4 sites (assessed by ELISA), and HIV and HSV neutralization activity of CVL samples ex vivo (assessed by TZM-bl and plaque reduction assay, respectively). The product was generally safe and well tolerated, with no serious AEs recorded in either segment. The AEs in this study were primarily genitourinary in nature with the most commonly reported AE being asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. There were no differences in vaginal pH or Nugent scores or significant increases in levels of proinflammatory cytokines for up to 7 days after film insertion in either segment or between Active and Placebo groups. Acceptability and willingness to use the product were judged to be high by post-use surveys. Concentrations of VRC01-N and HSV8-N in vaginal secretions were assessed over time to generate pharmacokinetic curves. Antibody levels peaked 1 hour postdosing with Active film (median: 35 μg/mL) and remained significantly elevated at 24 hours post first and seventh film (median: 1.8 μg/mL). Correcting for sample dilution (1:20), VRC01-N concentrations ranged from 36 to 700 μg/mL at the 24-hour time point, greater than 100-fold the IC50 for VRC01 (0.32 μg/mL); HSV8-N concentrations ranged from 80 to 601 μg/mL, well above the IC50 of 0.1 μg/m. CVL samples collected 24 hours after MB66 insertion significantly neutralized both HIV-1 and HSV-2 ex vivo. Study limitations include the small size of the study cohort, and the fact that no samples were collected between 24 hours and 7 days for pharmacokinetic evaluation.

Conclusions: Single and repeated intravaginal applications of MB66 film were safe, well tolerated, and acceptable. Concentrations and ex vivo bioactivity of both mAbs in vaginal secretions were significantly elevated and thus could provide protection for at least 24 hours postdose. However, further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of MB66 film in women at risk for HIV and HSV infection. Additional antibodies could be added to this platform to provide protection against other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and contraception.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02579083.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: KJW and LZ own Mapp Biopharmaceutical Inc., a company that intends to commercialize antibody-based products. TRM, TN and MB work for Mapp Biopharmaceutical Inc. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. MB66 film example and composition.
Fig 1. MB66 film example and composition.
Fig 2
Fig 2
MB66-01 study Segments A and B schemata with target enrollment.
Fig 3. Diagram of MB66-01 enrollment.
Fig 3. Diagram of MB66-01 enrollment.
Fig 4
Fig 4
VRC01-N and HSV8-N concentrations (represented by medians with interquartile ranges) in cervicovaginal TearFlo samples in Segments A and B (Active film group only). (A). Segment A, VRC01-N: All 4 sites significantly elevated at 1 hour (p < 0.001 for all site comparisons) and 4 hours (p < 0.001 for cervical os, ectocervix, and mid vagina sites; p = 0.007 for distal vagina) post single film insertion compared to respective baseline concentrations. Cervical os (p = 0.046) and ectocervix (p = 0.02) were elevated 24 hours post film insertion. Mid (p = 0.09) and distal vagina (p = 0.54) were not significantly elevated 24 hours post film insertion. (B). Segment A, HSV8-N: All sites were significantly elevated at 1 hour and 4 hours post single film insertion (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) but not at the 24-hour time point. (C). Segment B, VRC01-N: All 4 sites were significantly elevated at 1 (p < 0.001 for all site comparisons) and 4 (p < 0.001 for all site comparisons) hours following first film insertion compared to each site’s respective baseline concentration. Concentrations at all 4 sites 24 hours after first film and 24 hours after seventh film remained significantly elevated compared to Baseline (p < 0.001 for distal vagina, ectocervix, and mid vagina sites and p = 0.01 for cervical os for Baseline vs. 24 hours post first film, and p < 0.001 for distal vagina, ectocervix, and mid vagina sites and p = 0.0007 for cervical os for Baseline vs. 24 post seventh film). (D). Segment B, HSV8-N: All 4 sites were significantly elevated at 1 and 4 hours following first film insertion compared to Baseline concentrations. Concentrations at all 4 sites at 24 hours after first film and 24 hours after seventh film remained significantly elevated compared to Baseline (p < 0.001 for all comparisons).
Fig 5
Fig 5
Viral neutralization and antibody pharmacokinetics (represented by means ± SEMs) in CVLs in Segments A and B (Active film group only). Neutralization percent is represented by solid lines/circles () (left y axis), and antibody concentration is represented by dashed lines/open triangles () (right y axis) in each graph. (A). VRC01-N concentration and HIVQ23-17 neutralization in Segment A were significantly increased at 24 hours post single film insertion compared to both Baseline (p = 0.006 and 0.01, respectively) and 7 days post single film insertion (p = 0.006 and 0.02, respectively). (B). HSV8-N concentrations in Segment A were significantly increased at 24 hours post single film insertion compared to both Baseline (p = 0.04) and 7 days post single film insertion (p = 0.01). All CVL samples from 24 hours post film insertion exhibited 100% HSV neutralization; however, the omnibus F test p-value did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.052). (C). VRC01-N concentration and HIVQ23-17 neutralization in Segment B were significantly elevated 24 hours after first film and 24 hours after seventh film compared to Baseline (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). (D). In Segment B, HSV8-N concentrations 24 hours after first film and 24 hours after seventh film did not differ significantly from Baseline (p = 0.056, Group x Visit interaction), but HSV neutralization was significantly increased at 24 hours post first film (p = 0.003) and 24 hours post seventh film compared to Baseline (p = 0.001).
Fig 6
Fig 6
Forest plots of cytokines in CVLs: (A). The ratio (relative median ± 95% confidence interval) of Visit 3 (24 hours after single film) to Baseline concentrations in Segment A, and (B). The ratio (relative median ± 95% confidence interval) of Active film Visit 4 (24 hours after seventh film) to Placebo film Visit 4 concentrations in Segment B. No significant increases in cytokine concentrations were observed following Active film insertion or in Active film vs. Placebo film group comparisons.

References

    1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS: The Gap Report. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2014.
    1. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75 (1):3–17. 10.1136/sti.75.1.3
    1. Freeman EE, Weiss HA, Glynn JR, Cross PL, Whitworth JA, Hayes RJ. Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. AIDS. 2006;20 (1):73–83. 10.1097/01.aids.0000198081.09337.a7
    1. Davis KC, Schraufnagel TJ, Kajumulo KF, Gilmore AK, Norris J, George WH. A qualitative examination of men's condom use attitudes and resistance: "it's just part of the game". Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43 (3):631–43. 10.1007/s10508-013-0150-9
    1. Friend DR, Kiser PF. Assessment of topical microbicides to prevent HIV-1 transmission: concepts, testing, lessons learned. Antiviral Res. 2013;99 (3):391–400. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.06.021
    1. Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, Mansoor LE, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science 2010;329 (5996):1168–74. 10.1126/science.1193748
    1. Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G, et al. Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372 (6):509–18. 10.1056/NEJMoa1402269
    1. Rees H, Delany-Moretlwe SA, Lombard C, Baron D, Panchia R, Myer L, et al. FACTS 001 phase III trial of pericoital tenofovir 1% gel for HIV prevention in women. Boston: CROI; 2015.
    1. Baeten JM, Palanee-Phillips T, Brown ER, Schwartz K, Soto-Torres LE, Govender V, et al. Use of a Vaginal Ring Containing Dapivirine for HIV-1 Prevention in Women. N Engl J Med. 2016;375 (22):2121–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1506110
    1. Palanee-Phillips T, Baeten JM. Topical delivery of long-acting antiretrovirals to prevent HIV acquisition. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020;15 (1):42–8. 10.1097/COH.0000000000000598
    1. Weinrib R, Minnis A, Agot K, Ahmed K, Owino F, Manenzhe K, et al. End-Users' Product Preference Across Three Multipurpose Prevention Technology Delivery Forms: Baseline Results from Young Women in Kenya and South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2018;22 (1):133–45. 10.1007/s10461-017-1911-6
    1. Hynes JS, Sales JM, Sheth AN, Lathrop E, Haddad LB. Interest in multipurpose prevention technologies to prevent HIV/STIs and unintended pregnancy among young women in the United States. Contraception. 2018;97 (3):277–84. 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.006
    1. Minnis AM, Roberts ST, Agot K, Weinrib R, Ahmed K, Manenzhe K, et al. Young Women's Ratings of Three Placebo Multipurpose Prevention Technologies for HIV and Pregnancy Prevention in a Randomized, Cross-Over Study in Kenya and South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2018;22 (8):2662–73. 10.1007/s10461-018-2078-5
    1. Schreier J, Sales J, Sheth A, Lathrop E, Haddad L. Interest in multipurpose prevention technologies for protection against unintended pregnancy, human immunodeficiency virus and other sexually transmitted infections among women in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217 (6):731.
    1. Anderson DJ, Politch JA, Zeitlin L, Hiatt A, Kadasia K, Mayer KH, et al. Systemic and topical use of monoclonal antibodies to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV. AIDS. 2017;31 (11):1505–17. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001521
    1. Reichert JM. Marketed therapeutic antibodies compendium. MAbs. 2012;4 (3):413–5. 10.4161/mabs.19931
    1. Antibody therapeutics approved or in regulatory review in the EU or US: The Antibody Society; 2020 [Available from: .
    1. Mayer KH, Seaton KE, Huang Y, Grunenberg N, Isaacs A, Allen M, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunological activities of multiple intravenous or subcutaneous doses of an anti-HIV monoclonal antibody, VRC01, administered to HIV-uninfected adults: Results of a phase 1 randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2017;14 (11):e1002435 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002435
    1. Mestecky J, Fultz PN. Mucosal immune system of the human genital tract. J Infect Dis. 1999;179 (Suppl 3):S470–4. 10.1086/314806
    1. Ma JK, Drossard J, Lewis D, Altmann F, Boyle J, Christou P, et al. Regulatory approval and a first-in-human phase I clinical trial of a monoclonal antibody produced in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13 (8):1106–20. 10.1111/pbi.12416
    1. Morris GC, Wiggins RC, Woodhall SC, Bland JM, Taylor CR, Jespers V, et al. MABGEL 1: first phase 1 trial of the anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies 2F5, 4E10 and 2G12 as a vaginal microbicide. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(12):e116153 10.1371/journal.pone.0116153
    1. Zhou T, Georgiev I, Wu X, Yang ZY, Dai K, Finzi A, et al. Structural basis for broad and potent neutralization of HIV-1 by antibody VRC01. Science. 2010;329 (5993):811–7. 10.1126/science.1192819
    1. Zeitlin L, Whaley KJ, Sanna PP, Moench TR, Bastidas R, De Logu A, et al. Topically applied human recombinant monoclonal IgG1 antibody and its Fab and F(ab')2 fragments protect mice from vaginal transmission of HSV-2. Virology. 1996;225(1):213–5. 10.1006/viro.1996.0589
    1. Wu X, Yang ZY, Li Y, Hogerkorp CM, Schief WR, Seaman MS, et al. Rational design of envelope identifies broadly neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies to HIV-1. Science. 2010;329 (5993):856–61. 10.1126/science.1187659
    1. Burioni R, Williamson RA, Sanna PP, Bloom FE, Burton DR. Recombinant human Fab to glycoprotein D neutralizes infectivity and prevents cell-to-cell transmission of herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91 (1):355–9. 10.1073/pnas.91.1.355
    1. Sanna PP, De Logu A, Williamson RA, Hom YL, Straus SE, Bloom FE, et al. Protection of nude mice by passive immunization with a type-common human recombinant monoclonal antibody against HSV. Virology. 1996;215 (1):101–6. 10.1006/viro.1996.0011
    1. Hiatt A, Whaley KJ, Zeitlin L. Plant-Derived Monoclonal Antibodies for Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Disease. Microbiol Spectr. 2014;2(1):AID-0004–2012. 10.1128/microbiolspec.AID-0004-2012
    1. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29 (2):297–301. 10.1128/JCM.29.2.297-301.1991
    1. DAIDS. Female Genital Grading Table for Use in Microbicide Studies (Addendum 1 to the DAIDS Table for Grading Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events, Version 1.0, November, 2007 [Clarification dated August 2009]. 2009.
    1. DAIDS. Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events. Version. 2014;0(November, 2014):2.
    1. Montefiori DC, Measuring HIV. neutralization in a luciferase reporter gene assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;485:395–405. 10.1007/978-1-59745-170-3_26
    1. Farnham AE. The formation of microscopic plaques by herpes simplex virus in HeLa cells. Virology. 1958;6(2):317–27. 10.1016/0042-6822(58)90085-0
    1. Anderson DJ, Williams DL, Ballagh SA, Barnhart K, Creinin MD, Newman DR, et al. Safety analysis of the diaphragm in combination with lubricant or acidifying microbicide gels: effects on markers of inflammation and innate immunity in cervicovaginal fluid. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009;61(2):121–9. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00670.x
    1. Herold BC, Dezzutti CS, Richardson BA, Marrazzo J, Mesquita PM, Carpenter C, et al. Antiviral activity of genital tract secretions after oral or topical tenofovir pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66(1):65–73. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000110
    1. Kyongo JK, Crucitti T, Menten J, Hardy L, Cools P, Michiels J, et al. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Selected Genital Tract Immunological Markers and Molecular Vaginal Microbiota in Sub-Saharan African Women, with Relevance to HIV Risk and Prevention. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015;22(5):526–38. 10.1128/CVI.00762-14
    1. Liebenberg LJ, Masson L, Arnold KB, McKinnon LR, Werner L, Proctor E, et al. Genital-Systemic Chemokine Gradients and the Risk of HIV Acquisition in Women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;74(3):318–25. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001218
    1. Mauck CK, Lai JJ, Weiner DH, Chandra N, Fichorova RN, Dezzutti CS, et al. Toward early safety alert endpoints: exploring biomarkers suggestive of microbicide failure. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013;29(11):1475–86. 10.1089/aid.2012.0345
    1. Morrison C, Fichorova RN, Mauck C, Chen PL, Kwok C, Chipato T, et al. Cervical inflammation and immunity associated with hormonal contraception, pregnancy, and HIV-1 seroconversion. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66 (2):109–17. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000103
    1. Ellis PD. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretaton of Research Results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
    1. Andus T, Daig R, Vogl D, Aschenbrenner E, Lock G, Hollerbach S, et al. Imbalance of the interleukin 1 system in colonic mucosa—association with intestinal inflammation and interleukin 1 receptor antagonist [corrected] genotype 2. Gut. 1997;41(5):651–7. 10.1136/gut.41.5.651
    1. Casini-Raggi V, Kam L, Chong YJ, Fiocchi C, Pizarro TT, Cominelli F. Mucosal imbalance of IL-1 and IL-1 receptor antagonist in inflammatory bowel disease. A novel mechanism of chronic intestinal inflammation. J Immunol. 1995;154(5):2434–40.
    1. Fichorova RN, Tucker LD, Anderson DJ. The molecular basis of nonoxynol-9-induced vaginal inflammation and its possible relevance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission. J Infect Dis. 2001;184(4):418–28. 10.1086/322047
    1. Trifonova RT, Pasicznyk JM, Fichorova RN. Biocompatibility of solid-dosage forms of anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 microbicides with the human cervicovaginal mucosa modeled ex vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(12):4005–10. 10.1128/AAC.00588-06
    1. Morrow KM, Fava JL, Rosen RK, Vargas S, Shaw JG, Kojic EM, et al. Designing preclinical perceptibility measures to evaluate topical vaginal gel formulations: relating user sensory perceptions and experiences to formulation properties. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2014;30(1):78–91. 10.1089/AID.2013.0099
    1. Walker LM, Huber M, Doores KJ, Falkowska E, Pejchal R, Julien JP, et al. Broad neutralization coverage of HIV by multiple highly potent antibodies. Nature. 2011;477(7365):466–70. 10.1038/nature10373
    1. De Logu A, Williamson RA, Rozenshteyn R, Ramiro-Ibanez F, Simpson CD, Burton DR, et al. Characterization of a type-common human recombinant monoclonal antibody to herpes simplex virus with high therapeutic potential. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(11):3198–204. 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3198-3204.1998
    1. Anderson BL, Ghosh M, Raker C, Fahey J, Song Y, Rouse DJ, et al. In vitro anti-HIV-1 activity in cervicovaginal secretions from pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):65 e1–10. 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.029
    1. Ghosh M, Fahey JV, Shen Z, Lahey T, Cu-Uvin S, Wu Z, et al. Anti-HIV activity in cervical-vaginal secretions from HIV-positive and -negative women correlate with innate antimicrobial levels and IgG antibodies. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(6):e11366 10.1371/journal.pone.0011366
    1. McQuillan G, Kruszon-Moran D, Flagg EW, Paulose-Ram R. Prevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 in Persons Aged 14–49: United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2018;(304):1–8.
    1. Guthrie KM, Rosen RK, Vargas SE, Getz ML, Dawson L, Guillen M, et al. User evaluations offer promise for pod-intravaginal ring as a drug delivery platform: A mixed methods study of acceptability and use experiences. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0197269 10.1371/journal.pone.0197269
    1. Morrow Guthrie K, Vargas S, Shaw JG, Rosen RK, van den Berg JJ, Kiser PF, et al. The Promise of Intravaginal Rings for Prevention: User Perceptions of Biomechanical Properties and Implications for Prevention Product Development. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0145642 10.1371/journal.pone.0145642
    1. Stewart FH, Brown BA, Raine TR, Weitz TA, Harper CC. Adolescent and young women's experience with the vaginal ring and oral contraceptive pills. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2007;20(6):345–51. 10.1016/j.jpag.2007.06.001
    1. Anderson DJ, Politch JA, Cone RA, Zeitlin L, Lai SK, Santangelo PJ, et al. Engineering monoclonal antibody-based contraception and multipurpose prevention technologies. Biol Reprod. 2020;103(2):275–85. 10.1093/biolre/ioaa096

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir