Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel noninvasive test to diagnose and stratify the severity of human diabetic neuropathy

Mitra Tavakoli, Cristian Quattrini, Caroline Abbott, Panagiotis Kallinikos, Andrew Marshall, Joanne Finnigan, Philip Morgan, Nathan Efron, Andrew J M Boulton, Rayaz A Malik, Mitra Tavakoli, Cristian Quattrini, Caroline Abbott, Panagiotis Kallinikos, Andrew Marshall, Joanne Finnigan, Philip Morgan, Nathan Efron, Andrew J M Boulton, Rayaz A Malik

Abstract

Objective: The accurate quantification of human diabetic neuropathy is important to define at-risk patients, anticipate deterioration, and assess new therapies.

Research design and methods: A total of 101 diabetic patients and 17 age-matched control subjects underwent neurological evaluation, neurophysiology tests, quantitative sensory testing, and evaluation of corneal sensation and corneal nerve morphology using corneal confocal microscopy (CCM).

Results: Corneal sensation decreased significantly (P = 0.0001) with increasing neuropathic severity and correlated with the neuropathy disability score (NDS) (r = 0.441, P < 0.0001). Corneal nerve fiber density (NFD) (P < 0.0001), nerve fiber length (NFL), (P < 0.0001), and nerve branch density (NBD) (P < 0.0001) decreased significantly with increasing neuropathic severity and correlated with NDS (NFD r = -0.475, P < 0.0001; NBD r = -0.511, P < 0.0001; and NFL r = -0.581, P < 0.0001). NBD and NFL demonstrated a significant and progressive reduction with worsening heat pain thresholds (P = 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the diagnosis of neuropathy (NDS >3) defined an NFD of <27.8/mm(2) with a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.92) and specificity of 0.52 (0.40-0.64) and for detecting patients at risk of foot ulceration (NDS >6) defined a NFD cutoff of <20.8/mm(2) with a sensitivity of 0.71 (0.42-0.92) and specificity of 0.64 (0.54-0.74).

Conclusions: CCM is a noninvasive clinical technique that may be used to detect early nerve damage and stratify diabetic patients with increasing neuropathic severity.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Images of corneal nerves in Bowman layer, showing abundant nerve fibers and adequate branching in a control subject (A) with a typical image from a diabetic patient with mild (B), moderate (C), and severe (D) neuropathy showing a progressive loss of nerve fibers.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Corneal nerve morphology in control subjects and diabetic patients with increasing neuropathic severity: A: NFD (P < 0.0001); B: NBD (P < 0.0001); C: NFL (P < 0.0001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves for NFD, NBD, and NFL for (A) NDS >3 and (B) NDS >6. Diagonal segments are produced by ties.

References

    1. Dyck PJ, Norell JE, Tritschler H, Schuette K, Samigullin R, Ziegler D, Bastyr EJ, 3rd, Litchy WJ, O'Brien PC. Challenges in design of multicenter trials: end points assessed longitudinally for change and monotonicity. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2619–2625
    1. Umapathi T, Tan WL, Loke SC, Soon PC, Tavintharan S, Chan YH. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density as a marker of early diabetic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2007;35:591–598
    1. Løseth S, Stålberg E, Jorde R, Mellgren SI. Early diabetic neuropathy: thermal thresholds and intraepidermal nerve fibre density in patients with normal nerve conduction studies. J Neurol 2008;255:1197–1202
    1. Malik RA, Tesfaye S, Newrick PG, Walker D, Rajbhandari SM, Siddique I, Sharma AK, Boulton AJ, King RH, Thomas PK, Ward JD. Sural nerve pathology in diabetic patients with minimal but progressive neuropathy. Diabetologia 2005;48:578–585
    1. Malik RA, Veves A, Walker D, Siddique I, Lye RH, Schady W, Boulton AJ. Sural nerve fibre pathology in diabetic patients with mild neuropathy: relationship to pain, quantitative sensory testing and peripheral nerve electrophysiology. Acta Neuropathol 2001;101:367–374
    1. Novella SP, Inzucchi SE, Goldstein JM. The frequency of undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in patients with idiopathic sensory neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2001;24:1229–1231
    1. Singleton JR, Smith AG, Bromberg MB. Increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance in patients with painful sensory neuropathy. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1448–1453
    1. Sumner CJ, Sheth S, Griffin JW, Cornblath DR, Polydefkis M. The spectrum of neuropathy in diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance. Neurology 2003;60:108–111
    1. Kallinikos P, Berhanu M, O'Donnell C, Boulton AJ, Efron N, Malik RA. Corneal nerve tortuosity in diabetic patients with neuropathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:418–422
    1. Malik RA, Kallinikos P, Abbott CA, van Schie CH, Morgan P, Efron N, Boulton AJ. Corneal confocal microscopy: a non-invasive surrogate of nerve fibre damage and repair in diabetic patients. Diabetologia 2003;46:683–688
    1. Hossain P, Sachdev A, Malik RA. Early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with corneal confocal microscopy. Lancet 2005;366:1340–1343
    1. Quattrini C, Tavakoli M, Jeziorska M, Kallinikos P, Tesfaye S, Finnigan J, Marshall A, Boulton AJ, Efron N, Malik RA. Surrogate markers of small fiber damage in human diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 2007;56:2148–2154
    1. Tavakoli M, Kallinikos PA, Efron N, Boulton AJ, Malik RA. Corneal sensitivity is reduced and relates to the severity of neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:1895–1897
    1. Mehra S, Tavakoli M, Kallinikos PA, Efron N, Boulton AJ, Augustine T, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration after pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2608–2612
    1. Tavakoli M, Marshall A, Thompson L, Kenny M, Waldek S, Efron N, Malik RA: Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel noninvasive means to diagnose neuropathy in patients with Fabry disease. Muscle Nerve 2009;40:976–984
    1. Tavakoli M, Marshall A, Pitceathly R, Fadavi H, Gow D, Roberts ME, Efron N, Boulton AJ, Malik RA: Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel means to detect nerve fibre damage in idiopathic small fibre neuropathy. Exp Neurol 2010;223:245–250
    1. Abbott CA, Carrington AL, Ashe H, Bath S, Every LC, Griffiths J, Hann AW, Hussein A, Jackson N, Johnson KE, Ryder CH, Torkington R, Van Ross ER, Whalley AM, Widdows P, Williamson S, Boulton AJ. The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort. Diabet Med 2002;19:377–384
    1. Young MJ, Boulton AJ, MacLeod AF, Williams DR, Sonksen PH. A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the United Kingdom hospital clinic population. Diabetologia 1993;36:150–154
    1. Bretzel RG. Intensive insulin regimens: evidence for benefit. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28(Suppl. 2):S8–S13
    1. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:580–591
    1. Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, Eaton SE, Ward JD, Manes C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Witte DR, Fuller JH: EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Group. Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med 2005;352:341–350
    1. Dyck PJ, Karnes JL, O'Brien PC, Litchy WJ, Low PA, Melton LJ, 3rd: The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: reassessment of tests and criteria for diagnosis and staged severity. Neurology 1992;42:1164–1170
    1. Lauria G, Lombardi R, Camozzi F, Devigili G. Skin biopsy for the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy. Histopathology 2009;54:273–285
    1. Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Immonen IJ, Müller LJ, Grönhagen-Riska C, Vesaluoma MH. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2915–2921
    1. Tavakoli M, Marshall A, Thompson L, Kenny M, Waldek S, Efron N, Malik RA: Corneal confocal microscopy: a novel noninvasive means to diagnose neuropathy in patients with Fabry disease. Muscle Nerve 2009;40:976–984

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir