Analyzing the multiple functions of stereotypical behavior for students with autism: implications for assessment and treatment

C H Kennedy, K A Meyer, T Knowles, S Shukla, C H Kennedy, K A Meyer, T Knowles, S Shukla

Abstract

We studied behavioral functions associated with stereotypical responses for students with autism. In Study 1, analogue functional analyses (attention, demand, no-attention, and recreation conditions) were conducted for 5 students. Results suggested that stereotypy was multiply determined or occurred across all assessment conditions. For 2 students, stereotypy was associated with positive and negative reinforcement and the absence of environmental stimulation. For 2 other students, stereotypy occurred at high levels across all experimental conditions. For the 5th student, stereotypy was associated with negative reinforcement and the absence of environmental stimulation. In Study 2, the stereotypy of 1 student was further analyzed on a function-by-function basis. Within a concurrent-schedules procedure, alternative responses were taught to the student using functional communication training. The results of Study 2 showed that similar topographies of stereotypy, based on qualitatively different reinforcers, were reduced only when differential reinforcement contingencies for alternative forms of communication were implemented for specific response-reinforcer relations. Our results suggest that the causes of stereotypy for students with autism are complex and that the presumed association between response topography and behavioral function may be less important than previously realized.

References

    1. Am J Ment Retard. 1999 May;104(3):279-88
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):111-26
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197-209
    1. Am J Ment Retard. 1991 Nov;96(3):299-319; discussion 321-44
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):129-32
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):485-506
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):45-68
    1. J Ment Defic Res. 1991 Oct;35 ( Pt 5):413-29
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):131-65
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Spring;28(1):27-37
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Summer;23(2):235-43
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1993 Summer;26(2):183-96
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Winter;28(4):561-76
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Summer;20(2):119-32
    1. Behav Modif. 1998 Jul;22(3):321-34
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):279-89
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):507-14
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):221-33
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Fall;21(3):281-9
    1. Am J Ment Retard. 1995 Sep;100(2):137-45
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):521-8
    1. Am J Ment Defic. 1962 May;66:849-52
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):117-20
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):437-49; quiz 449-50
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1976 WINTER;9(4):509-14

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir