Does visceral osteopathic treatment accelerate meconium passage in very low birth weight infants?- A prospective randomized controlled trial

Nadja Haiden, Birgit Pimpel, Alexandra Kreissl, Bernd Jilma, Angelika Berger, Nadja Haiden, Birgit Pimpel, Alexandra Kreissl, Bernd Jilma, Angelika Berger

Abstract

Background: To determine whether the complementary approach of visceral manipulative osteopathic treatment accelerates complete meconium excretion and improves feeding tolerance in very low birth weight infants.

Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in premature infants with a birth weight <1500 g and a gestational age <32 weeks who received a visceral osteopathic treatment 3 times during their first week of life or no treatment.

Results: Passage of the last meconium occurred after a median of 7.5 days (95% confidence interval: 6-9 days, n = 21) in the intervention group and after 6 days (95% confidence interval: 5-9 days, n = 20,) in the control group (p = 0.11). However, osteopathic treatment was associated with a 8 day longer time to full enteral feedings (p = 0.02), and a 34 day longer hospital stay (Median = 66 vs. 100 days i.e.; p=0.14). Osteopathic treatment was tolerated well and no adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: Visceral osteopathic treatment of the abdomen did not accelerate meconium excretion in VLBW (very low birth weight)-infants. However infants in the osteopathic group had a longer time to full enteral feedings and a longer hospital stay, which could represent adverse effects. Based on our trial results, we cannot recommend visceral osteopathic techniques in VLBW-infants.

Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov: NCT02140710.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Consort form.
Fig 1. Consort form.

References

    1. Neu J. Gastrointestinal development and meeting the nutritional needs of premature infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(2):629S–34S. .
    1. Meetze WH, Palazzolo VL, Bowling D, Behnke M, Burchfield DJ, Neu J. Meconium passage in very-low-birth-weight infants. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1993;17(6):537–40. Epub 1993/11/01. .
    1. Wang PA, Huang FY. Time of the first defaecation and urination in very low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1994;153(4):279–83. Epub 1994/04/01. .
    1. Mihatsch WA, Franz AR, Lindner W, Pohlandt F. Meconium passage in extremely low birthweight infants and its relation to very early enteral nutrition. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90(4):409–11. Epub 2001/05/03. .
    1. Haiden N, Jilma B, Gerhold B, Klebermass K, Prusa AR, Kuhle S, et al. Small volume enemas do not accelerate meconium evacuation in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44(2):270–3. Epub 2007/01/27. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31802c685a00005176-200702000-00021 [pii]. .
    1. Haiden N, Norooz F, Klebermass-Schrehof K, Horak AS, Jilma B, Berger A, et al. The effect of an osmotic contrast agent on complete meconium evacuation in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;130(6):e1600–6. 10.1542/peds.2011-3634 .
    1. Ward RC, editor. Foundations for osteopathic medicine 2nd edition ed. Philadelphia, PA 19106 USA: Lippincott Williams and Willkins; 2003.
    1. Tarsuslu T, Bol H, Simşek IE, Toylan IE, Cam S. The effects of osteopathic treatment on constipation in children with cerebral palsy: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(8):648–53. 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.08.016 .
    1. Hebgen E. Visceral Manipulation in Osteopathy. Stuttgart Germany: Thieme; 2011.
    1. Moeckel Eva MN. Textbook of Pediatric Osteopathy: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008.
    1. Tsang R, Uauy R, Koletzko B, Zlotkin S. Nutrition of the Preterm Infant—Scientific Basis and Practical Guidelines. Second ed. Cincinnati, Ohio: Digital Educational Publishing, Inc.; 2005.
    1. Mihatsch WA, Högel J, Pohlandt F. Hydrolysed protein accelerates the gastrointestinal transport of formula in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90(2):196–8. .
    1. Meetze WH, Valentine C, McGuigan JE, Conlon M, Sacks N, Neu J. Gastrointestinal priming prior to full enteral nutrition in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1992;15(2):163–70. Epub 1992/08/01. .
    1. McGuire W, Bombell S. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD001241 Epub 2008/04/22. 10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub2 .
    1. Agostoni C, Buonocore G, Carnielli VP, De Curtis M, Darmaun D, Decsi T, et al. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: commentary from the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 50(1):85–91. Epub 2009/11/03. 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181adaee0 .
    1. Bell MJ. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. N Engl J Med. 1978;298(5):281–2. Epub 1978/02/02. .
    1. Stolley PD, Strom BL. Sample size calculations for clinical pharmacology studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1986;39(5):489–90. Epub 1986/05/01. .
    1. Glossary of Osteopathic Terminology [Internet]. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine 2011. Available from: .
    1. Newell SJ. Enteral feeding of the micropremie. Clin Perinatol. 2000;27(1):221–34, viii. .
    1. Klebermass-Schrehof K, Wald M, Schwindt J, Grill A, Prusa AR, Haiden N, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration in extremely preterm infants: impact on mortality and morbidity. Neonatology. 2013;103(4):252–8. 10.1159/000346521 .
    1. Field T, Diego MA, Hernandez-Reif M, Deeds O, Figuereido B. Moderate versus light pressure massage therapy leads to greater weight gain in preterm infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2006;29(4):574–8. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.07.011
    1. Field T, Diego M, Hernandez-Reif M. Potential underlying mechanisms for greater weight gain in massaged preterm infants. Infant Behav Dev. 2011;34(3):383–9. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.12.001
    1. Posadzki P, Lee MS, Ernst E. Osteopathic manipulative treatment for pediatric conditions: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2013;132(1):140–52. 10.1542/peds.2012-3959 .

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir