Impact of established cardiovascular disease on 10-year death after coronary revascularization for complex coronary artery disease

Rutao Wang, Scot Garg, Chao Gao, Hideyuki Kawashima, Masafumi Ono, Hironori Hara, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Marie-Claude Morice, Piroze M Davierwala, Arie Pieter Kappetein, David R Holmes, William Wijns, Ling Tao, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W Serruys, Rutao Wang, Scot Garg, Chao Gao, Hideyuki Kawashima, Masafumi Ono, Hironori Hara, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Marie-Claude Morice, Piroze M Davierwala, Arie Pieter Kappetein, David R Holmes, William Wijns, Ling Tao, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W Serruys

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the impact of established cardiovascular disease (CVD) on 10-year all-cause death following coronary revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: The SYNTAXES study assessed vital status out to 10 years of patients with complex CAD enrolled in the SYNTAX trial. The relative efficacy of PCI versus CABG in terms of 10-year all-cause death was assessed according to co-existing CVD.

Results: Established CVD status was recorded in 1771 (98.3%) patients, of whom 827 (46.7%) had established CVD. Compared to those without CVD, patients with CVD had a significantly higher risk of 10-year all-cause death (31.4% vs. 21.7%; adjusted HR: 1.40; 95% CI 1.08-1.80, p = 0.010). In patients with CVD, PCI had a non-significant numerically higher risk of 10-year all-cause death compared with CABG (35.9% vs. 27.2%; adjusted HR: 1.14; 95% CI 0.83-1.58, p = 0.412). The relative treatment effects of PCI versus CABG on 10-year all-cause death in patients with complex CAD were similar irrespective of the presence of CVD (p-interaction = 0.986). Only those patients with CVD in ≥ 2 territories had a higher risk of 10-year all-cause death (adjusted HR: 2.99, 95% CI 2.11-4.23, p < 0.001) compared to those without CVD.

Conclusions: The presence of CVD involving more than one territory was associated with a significantly increased risk of 10-year all-cause death, which was non-significantly higher in complex CAD patients treated with PCI compared with CABG. Acceptable long-term outcomes were observed, suggesting that patients with established CVD should not be precluded from undergoing invasive angiography or revascularization.

Trial registration: SYNTAX: ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT00114972. SYNTAX Extended Survival: ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT03417050.

Keywords: CABG; Cardiovascular disease; Left main coronary artery disease; PCI; Three-vessel disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Hara reports a grant for studying overseas from Japanese Circulation Society, a grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows and a grant from Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology. Dr. van Geuns reports grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants from InfraRedx, outside the submitted work. Dr. Morice reports to work as the CEO of CERC, a CRO which was never involved in the SYNTAX trial at any level, except that submitted the 10-year additional follow-up (for free) to French authorities to get approval. Dr. Morice also reports to work as minor shareholder of electroducer. Dr. Kappetein reports to work as an employee of Medtronic, outside the submitted work. Dr. Wijns reports research grant and honoraria from MicroPort; medical advisor Rede Optimus Research and co-founder Argonauts, an innovation facilitator. Dr. Serruys reports personal fees from Biosensors, Micel Technologies, Sinomedical Sciences Technology, Philips/Volcano, Xeltis, and HeartFlow, outside the submitted work. All the other authors have no disclosures.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ten-year all-cause death according to the extent of established CVD. a 10-year all-cause death in patients with established CVD versus those without; b 10-year all-cause death according to the extent of established CVD
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Ten-year all-cause death according to revascularization strategies and established CVD. a patients with established CVD; b patients without established CVD
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The individual difference between predicted mortality (dashed lines) using the SYNTAX Score II 2020 and the individual observed mortality (solid lines), between PCI and CABG in patients with established CVD. Blue dashed line represents the predicted mortality after PCI; red dashed line represents the predicted mortality after CABG; blue solid line represents the observed mortality after PCI; red solid line represents the observed mortality after CABG

References

    1. Bhatt DLSP, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Ikeda Y, Mas JL, Goto S, Liau CS, Richard AJ, Röther J, Wilson PW, REACH Registry Investigators International prevalence, recognition, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2006;295:180–189. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.180.
    1. Fernandez-Friera L, Penalvo JL, Fernandez-Ortiz A, et al. Prevalence, vascular distribution, and multiterritorial extent of subclinical atherosclerosis in a middle-aged cohort: the PESA (Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis) Study. Circulation. 2015;131(24):2104–2113. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014310.
    1. Bhatt DL, Peterson ED, Harrington RA, et al. Prior polyvascular disease: risk factor for adverse ischaemic outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(10):1195–1202. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp099.
    1. Bhatt DLEK, Ohman EM, Hirsch AT, Goto S, Mahoney EM, Wilson PW, Alberts MJ, D'Agostino R, Liau CS, Mas JL, Röther J, Smith SC, Jr, Salette G, Contant CF, Massaro JM, Steg PG, REACH Registry Investigators Comparative determinants of 4-year cardiovascular event rates in stable outpatients at risk of or with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2010;304:1350–1357. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1322.
    1. Jukema JW, Szarek M, Zijlstra LE, et al. Alirocumab in patients with polyvascular disease and recent acute coronary syndrome: ODYSSEY OUTCOMES Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(9):1167–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.013.
    1. Zeymer U, Parhofer KG, Pittrow D, et al. Risk factor profile, management and prognosis of patients with peripheral arterial disease with or without coronary artery disease: results of the prospective German REACH registry cohort. Clin Res Cardiol. 2009;98(4):249–256. doi: 10.1007/s00392-009-0754-1.
    1. Gutierrez JA, Aday AW, Patel MR, Jones WS. Polyvascular disease: reappraisal of the current clinical landscape. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(12):e007385. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.007385.
    1. Morikami Y, Natsuaki M, Morimoto T, et al. Impact of polyvascular disease on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: an observation from the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2. Atherosclerosis. 2013;228(2):426–431. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.04.005.
    1. Miura T, Soga Y, Doijiri T, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of polyvascular atherosclerotic disease in patients undergoing coronary intervention. Circ J. 2013;77(1):89–95. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-12-0535.
    1. Kobo O, Contractor T, Mohamed MO, et al. Impact of pre-existent vascular and poly-vascular disease on acute myocardial infarction management and outcomes: an analysis of 2 million patients from the National Inpatient Sample. Int J Cardiol. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.051.
    1. van der Meer MG, Cramer MJ, van der Graaf Y, et al. The impact of polyvascular disease on long-term outcome in percutaneous coronary intervention patients. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014;44(3):231–239. doi: 10.1111/eci.12222.
    1. Garg S, Chichareon P, Kogame N, et al. Impact of established cardiovascular disease on outcomes in the randomized global leaders trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96(7):1369–1378. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28649.
    1. Thuijs DJFM, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. The Lancet. 2019;394(10206):1325–1334. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31997-x.
    1. Ong AT, Serruys PW, Mohr FW, et al. The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. Am Heart J. 2006;151(6):1194–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.07.017.
    1. Serruys PWMM, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Stahle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, Van Dyck N, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, Investigators S. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–972. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626.
    1. Mohr FW, Morice M-C, Kappetein AP, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. The Lancet. 2013;381(9867):629–638. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60141-5.
    1. Pocock SJ, McMurray JJV, Collier TJ. Statistical controversies in reporting of clinical trials: part 2 of a 4-part series on statistics for clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(23):2648–2662. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.023.
    1. Wang R, Serruys PW, Gao C, et al. Ten-year all-cause death after percutaneous or surgical revascularization in diabetic patients with complex coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2021 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab441.
    1. Eagle KA, Rihal CS, Foster ED, Mickel MC, Gersh BJ. Long-term survival in patients with coronary artery disease: importance of peripheral vascular disease. The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(5):1091–1095. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90596-7.
    1. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Rihal C, Sellers MA, et al. Long-term prognostic value of clinically evident noncoronary vascular disease in patients undergoing coronary revascularization in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Am J Cardiol. 1998;81(4):375–381. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00934-x.
    1. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK, Leducq Transatlantic Network on A Inflammation in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(23):2129–2138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.009.
    1. Libby P, Buring JE, Badimon L, et al. Atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z.
    1. Hibi K, Kimura T, Kimura K, et al. Clinically evident polyvascular disease and regression of coronary atherosclerosis after intensive statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: serial intravascular ultrasound from the Japanese assessment of pitavastatin and atorvastatin in acute coronary syndrome (JAPAN-ACS) trial. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219(2):743–749. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.08.024.
    1. Modolo R, Tateishi H, Miyazaki Y, Pighi M, Abdelghani M, Roos MA, Wolff Q, Wykrzykowska JJ, de Winter RJ, Piazza N, Richardt G, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab O, Soliman YO, Van Mieghem NM, Serruys PW. Quantitative aortography for assessing aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results of the multicentre ASSESS-REGURGE Registry. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:420–426. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00362.
    1. Subherwal S, Bhatt DL, Li S, et al. Polyvascular disease and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in older patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):541–549. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964379.
    1. Nakamura T, Toda K, Miyagawa S, et al. Symptomatic peripheral artery disease is associated with decreased long-term survival after coronary artery bypass: a contemporary retrospective analysis. Surg Today. 2016;46(11):1334–1340. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1379-4.
    1. Chu D, Bakaeen FG, Wang XL, et al. The impact of peripheral vascular disease on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(4):1175–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.024.
    1. Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Mas JL, et al. Three-year follow-up and event rates in the international REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(19):2318–2326. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp355.
    1. Volis I, Saliba W, Jaffe R, Eitan A, Zafrir B. Effect of cerebrovascular and/or peripheral artery disease with or without attainment of lipid goals on long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2020;128:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.04.043.
    1. O'Rourke DJ, Quinton HB, Piper W, et al. Survival in patients with peripheral vascular disease after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(2):466–470. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.01.044.
    1. Takahashi K, Serruys PW, Fuster V, et al. Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation. Lancet. 2020;396(10260):1399–1412. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32114-0.
    1. Rothwell PM. Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet. 2005;365(9454):176–186. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17709-5.
    1. Li G, Taljaard M, Van den Heuvel ER, et al. An introduction to multiplicity issues in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(2):746–755. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw320.
    1. Achterberg S, Cramer MJ, Kappelle LJ, et al. Patients with coronary, cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial obstructive disease differ in risk for new vascular events and mortality: the SMART study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(4):424–430. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283361ce6.
    1. Stolker JM, Spertus JA, Cohen DJ, et al. Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists. Circulation. 2014;130(15):1254–1261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006588.
    1. Lauer MSBE, Young JB, Topol EJ. Cause of death in clinical research: time for a reassessment? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:618–620. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00250-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir