Chemotherapy plus Erlotinib versus Chemotherapy Alone for Treating Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

J L Xu, B Jin, Z H Ren, Y Q Lou, Z R Zhou, Q Z Yang, B H Han, J L Xu, B Jin, Z H Ren, Y Q Lou, Z R Zhou, Q Z Yang, B H Han

Abstract

Background: Whether a combination of chemotherapy and erlotinib is beneficial for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study aimed to summarize the currently available evidence and compare the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy plus erlotinib versus chemotherapy alone for treating advanced NSCLC.

Methods: EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant studies. Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42014015015).

Results: Nine randomized controlled trials with a total of 3599 patients were included. Compared to chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus erlotinib was superior in PFS (HR = 0.76 [95% CI 0.62, 0.92], P = 0.006), and no statistically significant difference was observed in OS (HR = 0.94 [95% CI 0.86, 1.03], P = 0.16). Intercalated erlotinib plus chemotherapy demonstrated improvements in PFS (HR = 0.67 [95% CI 0.50, 0.91], P = 0.009) and OS (HR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.69, 0.98], P = 0.03). Continuous erlotinib plus chemotherapy treatment failed to demonstrate improvements in PFS (HR = 0.91 [95% CI 0.80, 1.04], P = 0.16) and OS (HR = 0.98 [95% CI 0.89, 1.09], P = 0.75). The association of chemotherapy plus erlotinib with improvement in PFS was significant in never smoking patients (HR = 0.46 [95% CI 0.37, 0.56], P<0.00001) but not in smoking patients (HR = 0.70 [95% CI 0.49, 1.00], P = 0.05). Among patients with EGFR mutant tumors, chemotherapy plus erlotinib demonstrated significant improvements in PFS (HR = 0.31 [95% CI 0.17, 0.58], P = 0.0002) and OS (HR = 0.52 [95% CI 0.30, 0.88], P = 0.01). Among patients with EGFR wild-type tumors, no statistically significant difference was observed with respect to PFS (HR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.70, 1.08], P = 0.21) and OS (HR = 0.78 [95% CI 0.59, 1.01], P = 0.06).

Conclusion: Combination of chemotherapy and erlotinib is a viable treatment option for patients with NSCLC, especially for patients who never smoked and patients with EGFR mutation-positive disease. In addition, intercalated administration is an effective combinatorial strategy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow Diagram of Included and…
Fig 1. Flow Diagram of Included and Excluded Studies.
Fig 2. Forest Plot of Meta-analysis for…
Fig 2. Forest Plot of Meta-analysis for PFS.
Fig 3. Forest Plot of Subgroup Analysis…
Fig 3. Forest Plot of Subgroup Analysis for PFS.
Fig 4. Forest Plot of Meta-analysis for…
Fig 4. Forest Plot of Meta-analysis for OS.
Fig 5. Forest Plot of Subgroup Analysis…
Fig 5. Forest Plot of Subgroup Analysis for OS.

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63: 11–30. 10.3322/caac.21166
    1. Reck M, Popat S, Reinmuth N, De Ruysscher D, Kerr KM, Peters S, et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2014;25 Suppl 3: iii27–39. 10.1093/annonc/mdu199
    1. Cataldo VD, Gibbons DL, Pérez-Soler R, Quintás-Cardama A. Treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer with erlotinib or gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2011;364: 947–955. 10.1056/NEJMct0807960
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61: 69–90. 10.3322/caac.20107
    1. Zhang W, Lei P, Dong X, Xu C. The new concepts on overcoming drug resistance in lung cancer. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014;8: 735 10.2147/DDDT.S60672
    1. Rossi A, Chiodini P, Sun J-M, O'Brien ME, von Plessen C, Barata F, et al. Six versus fewer planned cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15: 1254–1262. 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70402-4
    1. Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353: 123–132.
    1. Michael M, White SC, Abdi E, Nott L, Clingan P, Zimet A, et al. Multicenter randomized, open-label phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy as first-line therapy in elderly or ECOG PS two patients with advanced NSCLC. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2014.
    1. Dittrich C, Papai-Szekely Z, Vinolas N, Sederholm C, Hartmann JT, Behringer D, et al. A randomised phase II study of pemetrexed versus pemetrexed+erlotinib as second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50: 1571–1580. 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.007
    1. Auliac JB, Chouaid C, Greiller L, Monnet I, Le Caer H, Falchero L, et al. Randomized open-label non-comparative multicenter phase II trial of sequential erlotinib and docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy: GFPC 10.02 study. Lung Cancer. 2014;85: 415–419. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.07.006
    1. Wu YL, Lee JS, Thongprasert S, Yu CJ, Zhang L, Ladrera G, et al. Intercalated combination of chemotherapy and erlotinib for patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer (FASTACT-2): a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14: 777–786. 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70254-7
    1. Stinchcombe TE, Roder J, Peterman AH, Grigorieva J, Lee CB, Moore DT, et al. A retrospective analysis of VeriStrat status on outcome of a randomized phase II trial of first-line therapy with gemcitabine, erlotinib, or the combination in elderly patients (age 70 years or older) with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8: 443–451. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182835577
    1. Lee DH, Lee JS, Kim SW, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Han B, Song XQ, et al. Three-arm randomised controlled phase 2 study comparing pemetrexed and erlotinib to either pemetrexed or erlotinib alone as second-line treatment for never-smokers with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49: 3111–3121. 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.035
    1. Mok TS, Wu YL, Yu CJ, Zhou C, Chen YM, Zhang L, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of sequential erlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27: 5080–5087. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5541
    1. Gatzemeier U, Pluzanska A, Szczesna A, Kaukel E, Roubec J, De Rosa F, et al. Phase III study of erlotinib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25: 1545–1552.
    1. Herbst RS, Prager D, Hermann R, Fehrenbacher L, Johnson BE, Sandler A, et al. TRIBUTE: a phase III trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSI-774) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: 5892–5899.
    1. Li T, Piperdi B, Walsh WV, Kim M, Gucalp R, Haigentz M, et al. Randomized phase II study of pharmacodynamic separation (PDS) of pemetrexed (Pem) and erlotinib (Erl) versus pem alone in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2013;31.
    1. Zheng Y, Xu N, Zhou J. Intercalated chemotherapy and erlotinib: a viable first-line option for patients with advanced NSCLC? Lancet Oncol. 2013;14: e438.
    1. Xu J, Ren Z, Lou Y, Zhou Z, Huang L, Li Q, et al. Chemotherapy plus erlotinib versus chemotherapy for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prospero. 2014;CRD42014015015.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151: 264–269.
    1. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8: 16
    1. Stinchcombe TE, Peterman AH, Lee CB, Moore DT, Beaumont JL, Bradford DS, et al. A randomized phase II trial of first-line treatment with gemcitabine, erlotinib, or gemcitabine and erlotinib in elderly patients (age≥ 70 years) with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6: 1569–1577. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182210430
    1. Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC, Goddard AD, Heldens SL, Herbst RS, et al. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23: 5900–5909.
    1. Zhou JG, Tian X, Wang X, Tian JH, Wang Y, Wang F, et al. Treatment on advanced NSCLC: platinum-based chemotherapy plus erlotinib or platinum-based chemotherapy alone? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Med Oncol. 2015;32: 471 10.1007/s12032-014-0471-0
    1. Qi WX, Shen Z, Lin F, Sun YJ, Min DL, Tang LN, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of EFGR tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy with standard second-line chemotherapy in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13: 5177–5182.
    1. Aerts J, Codrington H, Lankheet N, Burgers S, Biesma B, Dingemans A-M, et al. A randomized phase II study comparing erlotinib versus erlotinib with alternating chemotherapy in relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer patients: the NVALT-10 study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24: 2860–2865. 10.1093/annonc/mdt341
    1. Li T, Ling Y-H, Goldman ID, Perez-Soler R. Schedule-dependent cytotoxic synergism of pemetrexed and erlotinib in human non–small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13: 3413–3422.
    1. Feld R, Sridhar SS, Shepherd FA, Mackay JA, Evans WK. Use of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1: 367–376.
    1. Ahn M-J, Lee J, Park Y-H, Ahn J-S, Ziogas A, Zell JA, et al. Korean ethnicity as compared with white ethnicity is an independent favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer before and after the oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor era. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5: 1185–1196. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e2f624
    1. Zwitter M, Rajer M, Kovac V, Kern I, Vrankar M, Smrdel U. Intermittent chemotherapy and erlotinib for nonsmokers or light smokers with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung: a phase II clinical trial. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011: 185646 10.1155/2011/185646
    1. Zhou C, Wu Y-L, Chen G, Feng J, Liu X-Q, Wang C, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12: 735–742. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-X
    1. Minami S, Kijima T, Hamaguchi M, Nakatani T, Koba T, Takahashi R, et al. Phase II study of pemetrexed plus intermittent erlotinib combination therapy for pretreated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with documentation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status. Lung Cancer. 2013;82: 271–275. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.022
    1. Boutsikou E, Kontakiotis T, Zarogoulidis P, Darwiche K, Eleptheriadou E, Porpodis K, et al. Docetaxel-carboplatin in combination with erlotinib and/or bevacizumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2013;6: 125 10.2147/OTT.S42245

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir