No more hypoglycaemia on days with physical activity and unrestricted diet when using a closed-loop system for 12 weeks: A post hoc secondary analysis of the multicentre, randomized controlled Diabeloop WP7 trial

Sylvia Franc, Pierre-Yves Benhamou, Sophie Borot, Lucy Chaillous, Brigitte Delemer, Maeva Doron, Bruno Guerci, Hélène Hanaire, Erik Huneker, Nathalie Jeandidier, Coralie Amadou, Eric Renard, Yves Reznik, Pauline Schaepelynck, Chantal Simon, Charles Thivolet, Claire Thomas, Patrick Hannaert, Guillaume Charpentier, Sylvia Franc, Pierre-Yves Benhamou, Sophie Borot, Lucy Chaillous, Brigitte Delemer, Maeva Doron, Bruno Guerci, Hélène Hanaire, Erik Huneker, Nathalie Jeandidier, Coralie Amadou, Eric Renard, Yves Reznik, Pauline Schaepelynck, Chantal Simon, Charles Thivolet, Claire Thomas, Patrick Hannaert, Guillaume Charpentier

Abstract

A post hoc analysis of the Diabeloop WP7 multicentre, randomized controlled trial was performed to investigate the efficacy of the Diabeloop Generation-1 (DBLG1) closed-loop system in controlling the hypoglycaemia induced by physical activity (PA) in real-life conditions. Glycaemic outcomes were compared between days with and without PA in 56 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using DBLG1 for 12 weeks. After the patient announces a PA, DBLG1 reduces insulin delivery and, if necessary, calculates the amount of preventive carbohydrates (CHO). Daily time spent in the interstitial glucose range less than 70 mg/dL was not significantly different between days with and without PA (2.0% ± 1.5% vs. 2.2% ± 1.1%), regardless of the intensity or duration of the PA. Preventive CHO intake recommended by the system was significantly higher in days with PA (41.1 ± 35.5 vs. 21.8 ± 28.5 g/day; P < .0001), and insulin delivery was significantly lower (31.5 ± 10.5 vs. 34.0 ± 10.5 U/day; P < .0001). The time spent in hyperglycaemia and the glycaemic variation coefficient increased significantly on days with PA. In real-life conditions, the use of DBLG1 avoids PA-induced hypoglycaemia. Insulin adjustments and preventive CHO recommendation may explain this therapeutic benefit.

Keywords: artificial pancreas; closed-loop system; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; hypoglycaemia; insulin pump therapy; physical activity; physical intervention; randomized controlled trial; type 1 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

SF declares congress invitations from Sanofi, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Abbott and Boehringer; she has received speaker honoraria from Lilly and Novo Nordisk, and served on advisory board panels for Novo Nordisk, Diabeloop, Roche, Sanofi, Janssen and Lifescan. She also owns shares in Diabeloop SA. PYB has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Roche, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi, and has served on advisory board panels for Abbott, Diabeloop, Roche, Medtronic, Dexcom, Insulet, Lifescan, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. SB has received personal compensation for board participation and speaking fees from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic and Sanofi Aventis. LC has received personal compensation for board participation and speaking fees from Eli Lilly, Lifescan, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Medtronic and Sanofi Aventis. BD has received personal compensation for board participation and speaking fees from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi Aventis, MSD and Astra Zeneca. MD is employed by Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA LETI, F‐38000 Grenoble. BG participated as an advisory panel/board member of Sanofi, Eli Lilly, NovoNordisk, Novartis, GSK, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Abbott, Medtronic and Roche Diagnostics; he also participated as a clinical investigator for Sanofi, Eli Lilly, NovoNordisk, GSK, BMS, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, MSD, Novartis, Janssen and Boehringer Ingelheim, and received research support from Medtronic, Vitalaire, Sanofi, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. HH has received personal compensation for board participation and speaking fees from Abbott, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Lifescan, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics, Medtronic, Sanofi Aventis and BD. EH is an employee of Diabeloop S.A. NJ received personal compensation for board participation and speaking fees from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi Aventis and Roche. CA has received congress invitations from Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca, and has received speaker honoraria from Diabeloop. ER is a consultant/advisor for Abbott, Air Liquide SI, Bastide Médical, Beckton‐Dickinson, Cellnovo, Dexcom, Eli‐Lilly, Hillo, Insulet, Johnson & Johnson (Animas, LifeScan), Medirio, Medtronic, Novo‐Nordisk, Roche Diagnostics and Sanofi‐Aventis, and has received research grant/material support from Abbott, Dexcom, Insulet, Roche Diagnostics and Tandem Diabetes Care. YR has received personal compensation for board participation and speaking fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Takeda, Abbott and Roche. PS has received speaking fees from Sanofi, Abbott and Lilly, and for participation on the boards of Novo‐Nordisk and Sanofi. C. Thivolet received personal compensation for board participation and speaking fees from Medtronic, Insulet, Sanofi, Lilly, Novo‐Nordisk and Abbott. CS, C. Thomas and PH have no conflicts of interest to declare. GC is CMO of Diabeloop SA, owns shares in Diabeloop SA, is employed by CERITD and received personal compensation for board participation, research funding and speaking fees from Astra‐Zeneca, Boehringer, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Novo‐Nordisk, Sanofi‐Aventis and Voluntis.

© 2021 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Time spent in hypoglycaemia during days with or without physical activity, and associated changes in carbohydrate (CHO) intake and insulin delivery. (Top) Time spent in hypoglycaemia (interstitial glucose

References

    1. Weisman A, Bai JW, Cardinez M, et al. Effect of artificial pancreas systems on glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of outpatient randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:501‐512.
    1. Cockcroft EJ, Narendran P, Andrews RC. Exercise‐induced hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. Exp Physiol. 2020;105:590‐599.
    1. Tagougui S, Taleb N, Molvau J, et al. Artificial pancreas systems and physical activity in patients with type 1 diabetes: challenges, adopted approaches, and future perspectives. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019;13:1077‐1090.
    1. Zaharieva DP, Messer LH, Paldus B, et al. Glucose control during physical activity and exercise using closed loop technology in adults and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2020;44:740‐749.
    1. Patel NS, Van Name MA, Cengiz E, et al. Mitigating reductions in glucose during exercise on closed‐loop insulin delivery: the ex‐snacks study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18:794‐799.
    1. de Bock M, Dart J, Roy A, et al. Exploration of the performance of a hybrid closed loop insulin delivery algorithm that includes insulin delivery limits designed to protect against hypoglycemia. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11:68‐73.
    1. Turksoy K, Samadi S, Feng J, et al. Meal detection in patients with type 1 diabetes: a new module for the multivariable adaptive artificial pancreas control system. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;20:47‐54.
    1. Benhamou PY, Franc S, Reznik Y, et al. Closed‐loop insulin delivery in adults with type 1 diabetes in real‐life conditions: a 12‐week multicentre, open‐label randomised controlled crossover trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1:e17‐e25.
    1. Hanaire H, Franc S, Borot S, et al. Efficacy of the Diabeloop closed‐loop system to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes exposed to gastronomic dinners or to sustained physical exercise. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22:324‐334.
    1. Bohn B, Herbst A, Pfeifer M, et al. Impact of physical activity on glycemic control and prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross‐sectional multicenter study of 18,028 patients. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:1536‐1543.
    1. Riddell MC, Gallen IW, Smart CE, et al. Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:377‐390.
    1. Franc S, Daoudi A, Pochat A, et al. Insulin‐based strategies to prevent hypoglycaemia during and after exercise in adult patients with type 1 diabetes on pump therapy: the DIABRASPORT randomized study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:1150‐1157.
    1. Quemerais MA, Doron M, Dutrech F, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a new semi‐closed‐loop insulin therapy system over the prandial period in adult patients with type 1 diabetes: the WP6.0 Diabeloop study. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:1177‐1184.
    1. Benhamou PY, Huneker E, Franc S, et al. Customization of home closed‐loop insulin delivery in adult patients with type 1 diabetes, assisted with structured remote monitoring: the pilot WP7 Diabeloop study. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55:549‐556.
    1. Maahs DM, Buckingham BA, Castle JR, et al. Outcome measures for artificial pancreas clinical trials: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1175‐1179.
    1. American Diabetes A. 5. Facilitating behavior change and well‐being to improve health outcomes: standards of medical Care in Diabetes‐2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S48‐S65.
    1. Roy‐Fleming A, Taleb N, Messier V, et al. Timing of insulin basal rate reduction to reduce hypoglycemia during late post‐prandial exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy: a randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Metab. 2019;45:294‐300.
    1. Zaharieva DP, McGaugh S, Pooni R, et al. Improved open‐loop glucose control with basal insulin reduction 90 minutes before aerobic exercise in patients with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:824‐831.
    1. Elliott L, Fidler C, Ditchfield A, et al. Hypoglycemia event rates: a comparison between real‐world data and randomized controlled trial populations in insulin‐treated Diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7:45‐60.
    1. Rickels MR, DuBose SN, Toschi E, et al. Mini‐dose glucagon as a novel approach to prevent exercise‐induced hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:1909‐1916.
    1. Marliss EB, Vranic M. Intense exercise has unique effects on both insulin release and its roles in glucoregulation: implications for diabetes. Diabetes. 2002;51(Suppl 1):S271‐S283.
    1. Zaharieva DP, Riddell MC. Prevention of exercise‐associated dysglycemia: a case study‐based approach. Diabetes Spectr. 2015;28:55‐62.
    1. Lee MH, Vogrin S, Paldus B, et al. Glucose and counterregulatory responses to exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia using closed‐loop insulin delivery: a randomized crossover study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:480‐483.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir