Methodological considerations of investigating adherence to using offloading devices among people with diabetes

Gustav Jarl, Gustav Jarl

Abstract

Foot ulcers are a diabetic complication associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and amputation risk. Offloading devices prevent and heal foot ulcers, but adherence to using these devices is low. The reasons for nonadherence are unclear, and study results are difficult to compare due to methodological heterogeneity. This paper explores aspects of investigating adherence to using offloading devices among people with diabetes and provides recommendations for future studies, focusing on study designs, definitions of adherence, measurement methods, and conceptual frameworks. Most studies use a cross-sectional observational study design, limiting the potential to establish the temporal sequence between predictors and adherence, rule out confounding factors, and establish causality. Studies defining adherence as the length of time the device is worn have often used self-report to measure adherence, which may be unreliable. Studies using activity monitors to measure adherence have defined adherence as the number of steps taken with the device, which excludes weight-bearing activities where no steps are taken. Conceptual frameworks are not made explicit in the current quantitative research. It is concluded that future studies should use a longitudinal design with observational studies to identify patient groups prone to nonadherence and factors that influence adherence and experimental studies to evaluate interventions to improve adherence, focusing on these patient groups and factors. Furthermore, adherence should be defined in terms of relative adherence to using offloading devices during all weight-bearing activities, and objective measurement of adherence (using accelerometers and temperature monitors) should be used whenever possible. Clearly defined conceptual frameworks should guide the choice of factors to include in the study and the analysis of their interactions. By implementing these recommendations, research could provide a stronger evidence base in the future, supporting interventions to increase adherence and thereby improve outcomes for people with diabetic foot complications.

Keywords: diabetic foot; orthotic devices; patient compliance; research design; shoes; treatment adherence and compliance.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The author is a consultant for Novo Nordisk but does not consider this to be a conflict of interest in this work. The author reports no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367–2375.
    1. Armstrong DG, Wrobel J, Robbins JM. Guest Editorial: are diabetes-related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? Int Wound J. 2007;4(4):286–287.
    1. Wukich DK, Raspovic KM. Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Diabetic Foot Disease: Why Is It Important and How Can We Improve? The 2017 Roger E. Pecoraro Award Lecture. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(3):391–397.
    1. Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1719–1724.
    1. Pecoraro RE, Reiber GE, Burgess EM. Pathways to diabetic limb amputation. Basis for prevention. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(5):513–521.
    1. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007;50(1):18–25.
    1. Paton JS, Stenhouse EA, Bruce G, Zahra D, Jones RB. A comparison of customised and prefabricated insoles to reduce risk factors for neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: a participant-blinded randomised controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2012;5(1):31.
    1. Macfarlane DJ, Jensen JL. Factors in diabetic footwear compliance. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(6):485–491.
    1. Ehrmann D, Spengler M, Jahn M, et al. Adherence Over Time: The Course of Adherence to Customized Diabetic Insoles as Objectively Assessed by a Temperature Sensor. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12(3):695–700.
    1. Armstrong DG, Abu-Rumman PL, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. Continuous activity monitoring in persons at high risk for diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91(9):451–455.
    1. Knowles EA, Boulton AJ. Do people with diabetes wear their prescribed footwear? Diabet Med. 1996;13(12):1064–1068.
    1. Bus SA, Waaijman R, Arts M, et al. Effect of custom-made footwear on foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):4109–4116.
    1. Chantelau E, Haage P. An audit of cushioned diabetic footwear: relation to patient compliance. Diabet Med. 1994;11(1):114–116.
    1. Waaijman R, Keukenkamp R, de Haart M, Polomski WP, Nollet F, Bus SA. Adherence to wearing prescription custom-made footwear in patients with diabetes at high risk for plantar foot ulceration. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(6):1613–1618.
    1. Mccabe CJ, Stevenson RC, Dolan AM. Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening and protection programme. Diabet Med. 1998;15(1):80–84.
    1. Crews RT, Shen BJ, Campbell L, et al. Role and Determinants of Adherence to Off-loading in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Prospective Investigation. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(8):1371–1377.
    1. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Kimbriel HR, Nixon BP, Boulton AJ. Activity patterns of patients with diabetic foot ulceration: patients with active ulceration may not adhere to a standard pressure off-loading regimen. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(9):2595–2597.
    1. Ha van G, Siney H, Hartmann-Heurtier A, Jacqueminet S, Greau F, Grimaldi A. Nonremovable, windowed, fiberglass cast boot in the treatment of diabetic plantar ulcers: efficacy, safety, and compliance. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(10):2848–2852.
    1. Bus SA, Armstrong DG, van Deursen RW, et al. IWGDF guidance on footwear and offloading interventions to prevent and heal foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(Suppl 1(Suppl 1)):25–36.
    1. Hingorani A, Lamuraglia GM, Henke P, et al. The management of diabetic foot: A clinical practice guideline by the Society for Vascular Surgery in collaboration with the American Podiatric Medical Association and the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(2 Suppl):3S–21S.
    1. Cavanagh P. Footwear for people with diabetes: where are we now? Diabetic Foot J. 2007;10(4):193–194.
    1. Breuer U. Diabetic patient’s compliance with bespoke footwear after healing of neuropathic foot ulcers. Diabete Metab. 1994;20(4):415–419.
    1. Arts ML, de Haart M, Bus SA, Bakker JP, Hacking HG, Nollet F. Perceived usability and use of custom-made footwear in diabetic patients at high risk for foot ulceration. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(4):357–362.
    1. Paton JS, Roberts A, Bruce GK, Marsden J. Patients’ Experience of therapeutic footwear whilst living at risk of neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) J Foot Ankle Res. 2014;7(1):16.
    1. Johnson M, Newton P, Goyder E. Patient and professional perspectives on prescribed therapeutic footwear for people with diabetes: a vignette study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):167–172.
    1. van Netten JJ, Jannink MJ, Hijmans JM, Geertzen JH, Postema K. Patients’ expectations and actual use of custom-made orthopaedic shoes. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(10):919–927.
    1. van Netten JJ, Jannink MJ, Hijmans JM, Geertzen JH, Postema K. Long-term use of custom-made orthopedic shoes: 1.5-year follow-up study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(7):643–649.
    1. van Netten JJ, Jannink MJ, Hijmans JM, Geertzen JH, Postema K. Use and usability of custom-made orthopedic shoes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(1):73–81.
    1. Williams AE, Nester CJ. Patient perceptions of stock footwear design features. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006;30(1):61–71.
    1. Jarl G, Lundqvist LO. Adherence to wearing therapeutic shoes among people with diabetes: a systematic review and reflections. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1521–1528.
    1. Kossioris A, Tentolouris N, Kyriazopoulou V, et al. Initial and continued adherence to wearing appropriate footwear in people with diabetic foot disease: results of a pilot study. Hellenic Journal of Nursing Science. 2017;10(4):21–28.
    1. Keukenkamp R, Merkx MJ, Busch-Westbroek TE, Bus SA. An Explorative Study on the Efficacy and Feasibility of the Use of Motivational Interviewing to Improve Footwear Adherence in Persons with Diabetes at High Risk for Foot Ulceration. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2018;108(2):90–99.
    1. Jarl G, Lundqvist LO. Beyond dichotomous thinking: a process perspective on diabetic foot disease. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2017;8(1):1380477.
    1. Churchman N. A retrospective audit of footwear use by high-risk individuals in North Derbyshire. Diabetic Foot J. 2008;11(1):10–18.
    1. Rothman KJ. Epidemiology: an introduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
    1. van Netten JJ, van Baal JG, Bril A, Wissink M, Bus SA. An exploratory study on differences in cumulative plantar tissue stress between healing and non-healing plantar neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Clin Biomech. 2018;53:86–92.
    1. Bus SA, van Netten JJ, Kottink AI, et al. The efficacy of removable devices to offload and heal neuropathic plantar forefoot ulcers in people with diabetes: a single-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J. 2018;15(1):65–74.
    1. Pollard JP, Le Quesne LP, Tappin JW. Forces under the foot. J Biomed Eng. 1983;5(1):37–40.
    1. Sarnow MR, Veves A, Giurini JM, Rosenblum BI, Chrzan JS, Habershaw GM. In-shoe foot pressure measurements in diabetic patients with at-risk feet and in healthy subjects. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(9):1002–1006.
    1. Soames RW. Foot pressure patterns during gait. J Biomed Eng. 1985;7(2):120–126.
    1. van de Weg B. Compliance with orthopaedic footwear in patients with diabetes. Diabetic Foot J. 2002;5(1):32–36.
    1. Connor H, Mahdi OZ. Repetitive ulceration in neuropathic patients. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2004;20(Suppl 1):S23–S28.
    1. Jarl G, Tranberg R. An innovative sealed shoe to off-load and heal diabetic forefoot ulcers – a feasibility study. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2017;8(1):1348178.
    1. Bus SA, Waaijman R, Nollet F. New monitoring technology to objectively assess adherence to prescribed footwear and assistive devices during ambulatory activity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(11):2075–2079.
    1. Waaijman R, de Haart M, Arts ML, et al. Risk factors for plantar foot ulcer recurrence in neuropathic diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1697–1705.
    1. Sangiorgio SN, Ho NC, Morgan RD, Ebramzadeh E, Zionts LE. The Objective Measurement of Brace-Use Adherence in the Treatment of Idiopathic Clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(19):1598–1605.
    1. Morton A, Riddle R, Buchanan R, Katz D, Birch J. Accuracy in the prediction and estimation of adherence to bracewear before and during treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(3):336–341.
    1. Donzelli S, Zaina F, Negrini S. In defense of adolescents: They really do use braces for the hours prescribed, if good help is provided. Results from a prospective everyday clinic cohort using thermobrace. Scoliosis. 2012;7(1):12.
    1. Najafi B, Crews RT, Wrobel JS. Importance of time spent standing for those at risk of diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(11):2448–2450.
    1. Proano E, Määttänen H, Perbeck L, Solders G, Turan I. The effect of weight-bearing pressure on the plantar circulation in diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1992;9(8):722–729.
    1. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM, Iiboshi A. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle. 1987;7(5):262–278.
    1. Rozema A, Ulbrecht JS, Pammer SE, Cavanagh PR. In-shoe plantar pressures during activities of daily living: implications for therapeutic footwear design. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17(6):352–359.
    1. Hills AP, Hennig EM, Mcdonald M, Bar-Or O. Plantar pressure differences between obese and non-obese adults: a biomechanical analysis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25(11):1674–1679.
    1. Simoneau GG, Ulbrecht JS, Derr JA, Becker MB, Cavanagh PR. Postural instability in patients with diabetic sensory neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(12):1411–1421.
    1. Brown SJ, Handsaker JC, Bowling FL, Boulton AJ, Reeves ND. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy compromises balance during daily activities. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):1116–1122.
    1. Najafi B, Grewal GS, Bharara M, Menzies R, Talal TK, Armstrong DG. Can’t Stand the Pressure: The Association Between Unprotected Standing, Walking, and Wound Healing in People With Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(4):657–667.
    1. Jao YL, Gardner SE, Carr LJ. Measuring Weight-Bearing Activities in Patients With Previous Diabetic Foot Ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017;44(1):34–40.
    1. Crews RT, Yalla SV, Dhatt N, Burdi D, Hwang S. Monitoring Location-Specific Physical Activity via Integration of Accelerometry and Geo-technology Within Patients With or At Risk of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Technological Report. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):899–903.
    1. Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(12):992–997.
    1. Skotte J, Korshøj M, Kristiansen J, Hanisch C, Holtermann A. Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(1):76–84.
    1. Levine RJ. Monitoring for adherence: ethical considerations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149(2 Pt 1):287–288.
    1. Patel NU, Moore BA, Craver RF, Feldman SR. Ethical considerations in adherence research. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:2429–2435.
    1. Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
    1. Paton J, Roberts A, Glasser S, Collings R, Marsden J. “All I wanted was a pair of shoes”: a qualitative case study. Diabetic Foot J. 2014;17(3):100–106.
    1. Rosenstock IM. Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2(4):328–335.
    1. Chin YF, Huang TT, Hsu BR. Impact of action cues, self-efficacy and perceived barriers on daily foot exam practice in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with peripheral neuropathy. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(1–2):61–68.
    1. Pham DT, Fortin F, Thibaudeau MF. The role of the Health Belief Model in amputees’ self-evaluation of adherence to diabetes self-care behaviors. Diabetes Educ. 1996;22(2):126–132.
    1. Robinson-Whelen S, Bodenheimer C. Health practices of veterans with unilateral lower-limb loss: Identifying correlates. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(3B):453.
    1. Sharifirad G, Hazavehi M, Baghianimoghadam M, Mohebi S. The effect of a Health Belief Model based education program for foot care in diabetic patients type II in Kermanshah, Iran (2005) Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2007;2:82–90.
    1. Hagger MS, Orbell S. A Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations. Psychol Health. 2003;18(2):141–184.
    1. Nie R, Han Y, Xu J, Huang Q, Mao J, Perception I. Illness perception, risk perception and health promotion self-care behaviors among Chinese patient with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional survey. Appl Nurs Res. 2018;39:89–96.
    1. Vedhara K, Dawe K, Wetherell MA, et al. Illness beliefs predict self-care behaviours in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;106(1):67–72.
    1. Vileikyte L. Psychosocial and behavioral aspects of diabetic foot lesions. Curr Diab Rep. 2008;8(2):119–125.
    1. Vileikyte L, Gonzalez JS, Leventhal H, et al. Patient Interpretation of Neuropathy (PIN) questionnaire: an instrument for assessment of cognitive and emotional factors associated with foot self-care. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(12):2617–2624.
    1. Perrin BM, Swerissen H, Payne CB, Skinner TC. Cognitive representations of peripheral neuropathy and self-reported foot-care behaviour of people at high risk of diabetes-related foot complications. Diabet Med. 2014;31(1):102–106.
    1. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80(1):1–28.
    1. Abredari H, Bolourchifard F, Rassouli M, Nasiri N, Taher M, Abedi A. Health locus of control and self-care behaviors in diabetic foot patients. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015;29:283.
    1. van Netten JJ, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Postema K. What influences a patient’s decision to use custom-made orthopaedic shoes? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:92.
    1. Lenker JA, Paquet VL. A new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol. 2004;16(1):1–10.
    1. van Deursen R. Footwear for the neuropathic patient: offloading and stability. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(Suppl 1):S96–S100.
    1. Needleman RL. Successes and pitfalls in the healing of neuropathic forefoot ulcerations with the IPOS postoperative shoe. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(7):412–417.
    1. Andersen MØ, Andersen GR, Thomsen K, Christensen SB. Early weaning might reduce the psychological strain of Boston bracing: a study of 136 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at 3.5 years after termination of brace treatment. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2002;11(2):96–99.
    1. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Nozoe S. Psychological effects of brace therapy on patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 1997;2(6):391–395.
    1. Liskey-Fitzwater N, Moore CL, Gurel LM. Clothing Importance and Self-Perception of Female Adolescents with and without Scoliosis. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 1993;11(3):16–22.
    1. Crews RT, Bowling FL, Boulton AJ. Controversies in off-loading: should big brother be watching? Curr Diab Rep. 2009;9(6):417–419.
    1. Campbell JI, Eyal N, Musiimenta A, Haberer JE. Ethical Questions in Medical Electronic Adherence Monitoring. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(3):338–342.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir