Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine with documented inadequate response to 2 to 4 classes of migraine preventive medications over 6 months of treatment in the phase 3b FOCUS study

Messoud Ashina, Joshua M Cohen, Maja Galic, Verena Ramirez Campos, Steve Barash, Xiaoping Ning, Yoel Kessler, Lindsay Janka, Hans-Christoph Diener, Messoud Ashina, Joshua M Cohen, Maja Galic, Verena Ramirez Campos, Steve Barash, Xiaoping Ning, Yoel Kessler, Lindsay Janka, Hans-Christoph Diener

Abstract

Background: Fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) selectively targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide and has proven efficacy for the preventive treatment of migraine. In this study, we evaluated the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of monthly and quarterly fremanezumab.

Methods: Episodic migraine and chronic migraine patients completing the 12-week double-blind period of the FOCUS trial entered the 12-week open-label extension and received 3 monthly doses of fremanezumab (225 mg). Changes from baseline in monthly migraine days, monthly headache days of at least moderate severity, days of acute headache medication use, days with photophobia/phonophobia, days with nausea or vomiting, disability scores, and proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% or ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days were evaluated.

Results: Of the 807 patients who completed the 12-week double-blind treatment period and entered the open-label extension, 772 patients completed the study. In the placebo, quarterly fremanezumab, and monthly fremanezumab dosing regimens, respectively, patients had fewer average monthly migraine days (mean [standard deviation] change from baseline: - 4.7 [5.4]; - 5.1 [4.7]; - 5.5 [5.0]), monthly headache days of at least moderate severity (- 4.5 [5.0]; - 4.8 [4.5]; - 5.2 [4.9]), days per month of acute headache medication use (- 4.3 [5.2]; - 4.9 [4.6]; - 4.8 [4.9]), days with photophobia/phonophobia (- 3.1 [5.3]; - 3.4 [5.3]; - 4.0 [5.2]), and days with nausea or vomiting (- 2.3 [4.6]; - 3.1 [4.5]; - 3.0 [4.4]). During the 12-week open-label extension, 38%, 45%, and 46% of patients, respectively, achieved a ≥50% reduction and 16%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, achieved a ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days. Disability scores were substantially improved in all 3 treatment groups. There were low rates of adverse events leading to discontinuation (<1%).

Conclusion: Fremanezumab demonstrated sustained efficacy up to 6 months and was well tolerated in patients with episodic migraine or chronic migraine and documented inadequate response to multiple migraine preventive medication classes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03308968 (FOCUS).

Keywords: CGRP; Calcitonin gene-related peptide; Long-term efficacy; Long-term safety; Migraine.

Conflict of interest statement

MA has received personal fees from AbbVie/Allergan, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. MA is the principal investigator for ongoing AbbVie/Allergan, Amgen and Lundbeck trials. MA has no ownership interest and does not own stocks of any pharmaceutical company. MA serves as associate editor of Cephalalgia and associate editor of The Journal of Headache and Pain. MA is president of the International Headache Society (IHS). JMC, MG, VRC, SB, XN, YK, and LJ are employees of Teva Pharmaceuticals. H-CD has received honoraria for participation in clinical trials, contribution to advisory boards, or oral presentations from Alder BioPharmaceuticals, Allergan, Amgen, electroCore, Ipsen, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Weber & Weber; electroCore provided financial support for research projects. H-CD has received research support from the German Research Council, the German Ministry of Education and Research, and the European Union. H-CD serves on the editorial boards of Cephalalgia and The Lancet Neurology. H-CD chairs the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the German Society of Neurology and is a member of the Clinical Trials Committee of the IHS.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
FOCUS study design. PBO, placebo; EM, episodic migraine; CM, chronic migraine; V, visit; DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean change from BL in the monthly average number of migraine days over 6 months (mITT).a BL, baseline; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension. aAll patients in the OLE received fremanezumab 225 mg monthly
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean change from BL in the number of headache days of at least moderate severity in the DB period and the OLE (mITT).a BL, baseline; DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension; mITT, modified intent-to-treat. aAll patients in the OLE received fremanezumab 225 mg monthly
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction and b ≥75% reduction in the monthly average number of migraine days in the DB period and the OLE (mITT).a DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension; mITT, modified intent-to-treat. aAll patients in the OLE received fremanezumab 225 mg monthly
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in the monthly average number of migraine days over 6 months (mITT).a mITT, modified intent-to-treat; DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension. aAll patients in the OLE received fremanezumab 225 mg monthly
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean change from BL in days of acute headache medication use in the DB period and the OLE (mITT).a BL, baseline; DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension; mITT, modified intent-to-treat. aAll patients in the OLE received fremanezumab 225 mg monthly
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mean change from BL in days with a photophobia/phonophobia and b nausea/vomiting in the DB period and the OLE (mITT).a BL, baseline; DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension; mITT, modified intent-to-treat. aAll patients in the OLE received fremanezumab 225 mg monthly
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Mean change in disability in the DB period and the OLE as measured by a HIT-6 and b MIDAS (mITT).a,b BL, baseline; DB, double-blind; OLE, open-label extension; HIT-6, Headache Impact Test; MIDAS, Migraine Disability Assessment; mITT, modified intent-to-treat. aAll patients in the OLE received fremanezumab 225 mg monthly

References

    1. Deuschl G, Beghi E, Fazekas F, Varga T, Christoforidi KA, Sipido E, Bassetti CL, Vos T, Feigin VL (2020) The burden of neurological diseases in Europe: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Public Health. 5(10):e551–e567. 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30190-0
    1. Feigin VL, Vos T, Nichols E, Owolabi MO, Carroll WM, Dichgans M, Deuschl G, Parmar P, Brainin M, Murray C (2020) The global burden of neurological disorders: translating evidence into policy. Lancet Neurol 19(3):255–265. 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30411-9
    1. Martelletti P, Schwedt TJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Quintana R, Carboni V, Diener HC, Ruiz de la Torre E, Craven A, Rasmussen AV, Evans S, Laflamme AK, Fink R, Walsh D, Dumas P, Vo P (2018) My Migraine Voice survey: a global study of disease burden among individuals with migraine for whom preventive treatments have failed. J Headache Pain. 19(1):115. 10.1186/s10194-018-0946-z
    1. American Headache Society The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2019;59:1–18.
    1. Lipton RB, Munjal S, Alam A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, Schwedt TJ, Dodick DW. Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) study: baseline study methods, treatment patterns, and gender differences. Headache. 2018;58(9):1408–1426. doi: 10.1111/head.13407.
    1. Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, Becker WJ, Buse DC, Varon SF, Maglinte GA, Wilcox TK, Kawata AK, Lipton RB. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS-II) Headache. 2013;53(4):644–655. doi: 10.1111/head.12055.
    1. Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, Chia J, Matthew N, Gillard P, Hansen RN, Devine EB. Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(5):470–485. doi: 10.1177/0333102416678382.
    1. Global Burden of Disease 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32647-8.
    1. Hargreaves R, Olesen J. Calcitonin gene-related peptide modulators – the history and renaissance of a new migraine drug class. Headache. 2019;59(6):951–970. doi: 10.1111/head.13510.
    1. Silberstein SD, Cohen JM, Yeung PP. Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019;19(8):763–771. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1627323.
    1. Tepper SJ. History and review of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) therapies: from translational research to treatment. Headache. 2018;58(Suppl 3):238–275. doi: 10.1111/head.13379.
    1. Hoy SM. Fremanezumab: first global approval. Drugs. 2018;78(17):1829–1834. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1004-5.
    1. AJOVY (fremanezumab-vfrm) [prescribing information]. North Wales: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Revised 2020. Available from: . Accessed 18 Jan 2021
    1. Bigal ME, Edvinsson L, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, Spierings EL, Diener HC et al (2015) Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol. 14(11):1091–1100. 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00245-8
    1. Bigal ME, Dodick DW, Rapoport AM, Silberstein SD, Ma Y, Yang R, Loupe PS, Burstein R, Newman LC, Lipton RB. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(11):1081–1090. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00249-5.
    1. Silberstein SD, Dodick DW, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, Grozinski-Wolff M, Yang R, Ma Y, Aycardi E. Fremanezumab for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(22):2113–2122. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709038.
    1. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T, Grozinski-Wolff M, Yang R, Ma Y, Aycardi E. Effect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(19):1999–2008. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4853.
    1. Ferrari MD, Diener HC, Ning X, Galic M, Cohen JM, Yang R, Mueller M, Ahn AH, Schwartz YC, Grozinski-Wolff M, Janka L, Ashina M. Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10203):1030–1040. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31946-4.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Silberstein SD, Yeung PP, Cohen JM, Ning X, Yang R, Dodick DW. Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fremanezumab in migraine: a randomized study. Neurology. 2020;95(18):e2487–e2499. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010600.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) (2018) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 38:1–211
    1. Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ, Sawyer J. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology. 2001;56(Supplement 1):S20–S28. doi: 10.1212/WNL.56.suppl_1.S20.
    1. Yang M, Rendas-Baum R, Varon SF, Kosinski M. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(3):357–367. doi: 10.1177/0333102410379890.
    1. Mulleners W, Kim B-K, Lainez M, Lanteri-Minet M, Aurora S, Nichols R et al (2020) A randomized, placebo-controlled study of galcanezumab in patients with treatment-resistant migraine: double-blind results from the CONQUER study. Neurology. 94:162
    1. Ashina M, Tepper S, Brandes JL, Reuter U, Boudreau G, Dolezil D, Cheng S, Zhang F, Lenz R, Klatt J, Mikol DD. Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(10):1611–1621. doi: 10.1177/0333102418788347.
    1. Reuter U, Goadsby PJ, Lanteri-Minet M, Wen S, Hours-Zesiger P, Ferrari MD, Klatt J. Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2280–2287. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32534-0.
    1. Silberstein SD, McAllister P, Ning X, Faulhaber N, Lang N, Yeung P, Schiemann J, Aycardi E, Cohen JM, Janka L, Yang R. Safety and tolerability of fremanezumab for the prevention of migraine: a pooled analysis of phases 2b and 3 clinical trials. Headache. 2019;59(6):880–890. doi: 10.1111/head.13534.
    1. Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm. 20(1):22–33. 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.22

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir