Chiropractic management of dominating one-sided pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women; a randomized controlled trial

Anne Marie Gausel, Inger Kjærmann, Stefan Malmqvist, Knut Andersen, Ingvild Dalen, Jan Petter Larsen, Inger Økland, Anne Marie Gausel, Inger Kjærmann, Stefan Malmqvist, Knut Andersen, Ingvild Dalen, Jan Petter Larsen, Inger Økland

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of chiropractic management for a subgroup of pregnant women with dominating one-sided pelvic girdle pain (PGP).

Methods: The study population was recruited from a prospective longitudinal cohort study of pregnant women. Women reporting pelvic pain (PP), and who were diagnosed with dominating one-sided PGP after a clinical examination, were invited to participate in the intervention study. Recruitment took place either at 18 weeks, or after an SMS-tracking up to week 29. The women were randomized into a treatment group or a control group. The treatment group received chiropractic treatment individualized to each woman with regards to treatment modality and number of treatments. The control group was asked to return to conventional primary health care. The primary outcome measure was new occurrence of full time and/or graded sick leave due to PP and/or low back pain. Secondary outcome measures were self-reported PP, physical disability and general health status. Proportion of women reporting new occurrence of sick leave were compared using Chi squared tests. Differences in secondary outcome measures were estimated using linear regression analyses.

Results: Fifty-Six women were recruited, and 28 of them were randomized into the treatment group, and 28 into the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in sick leave, PP, disability or general health status between the two groups during pregnancy or after delivery.

Conclusion: The study did not demonstrate superiority of chiropractic management over conventional care for dominating one-sided PGP during pregnancy. However, the analyses revealed wide confidence intervals containing both positive and negative clinically relevant effects.

Trial registration: The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01098136 ; 22/03/2010).

Keywords: Manual therapy; Pregnancy; SMS track; Sick leave; Subgroups.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The women signed an informed consent prior to participation in the study. The study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee of Northern Norway (no. 2010/174).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the inclusion process into the randomized controlled trial. a 3 women did not meet for scheduled appointment for treatment and did not respond to several attempts of contact. They were included in the intention-to- treat analyses, but excluded from per-protocol subanalyses. b 7 women underwent chiropractic treatment as conventional care. They were included in the control group in the intention-to-treat analyses but excluded in the per protocol subanalyses. c 1 missing observation. The woman did not fill in questionnaires nor meet for clinical examination at 30 weeks of pregnancy, but returned to the study six weeks after delivery. d 2 missing observations. The women woman did not fill in questionnaires nor meet for clinical examination at 30 weeks of pregnancy, but returned to the study six weeks after delivery

References

    1. Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract. 2010;10(1):60–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00327.x.
    1. Wu WH, Meijer OG, Uegaki K, Mens JM, van Dieen JH, Wuisman PI, Ostgaard HC. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J. 2004;13(7):575–589. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0615-y.
    1. Malmqvist S, Kjaermann I, Andersen K, Okland I, Bronnick K, Larsen JP. Prevalence of low back and pelvic pain during pregnancy in a Norwegian population. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2012;35(4):272–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.004.
    1. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(6):794–819. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4.
    1. Kanakaris NK, Roberts CS, Giannoudis PV. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update. BMC Med. 2011;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-15.
    1. Dorheim SK, Bjorvatn B, Eberhard-Gran M. Sick leave during pregnancy: a longitudinal study of rates and risk factors in a Norwegian population. BJOG. 2013;120(5):521–530. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12035.
    1. Malmqvist S, Kjaermann I, Andersen K, Okland I, Larsen JP, Bronnick K. The association between pelvic girdle pain and sick leave during pregnancy; a retrospective study of a Norwegian population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0667-0.
    1. Gausel AM, Kjaermann I, Malmqvist S, Dalen I, Larsen JP, Okland I. Pelvic girdle pain 3–6 months after delivery in an unselected cohort of Norwegian women. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(6):1953–9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3959-1.
    1. Khorsan R, Hawk C, Lisi AJ, Kizhakkeveettil A. Manipulative therapy for pregnancy and related conditions: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;64(6):416–427. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31819f9ddf.
    1. Stuber KJ, Wynd S, Weis CA. Adverse events from spinal manipulation in the pregnant and postpartum periods: a critical review of the literature. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012;20:8. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-8.
    1. Stuber KJ, Smith DL. Chiropractic treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain: a systematic review of the evidence. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2008;31(6):447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.06.009.
    1. Liddle SD, Pennick V. Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:Cd001139.
    1. Axen I, Bodin L, Bergstrom G, Halasz L, Lange F, Lovgren PW, Rosenbaum A, Leboeuf-Yde C, Jensen I. The use of weekly text messaging over 6 months was a feasible method for monitoring the clinical course of low back pain in patients seeking chiropractic care. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(4):454–461. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.012.
    1. Christie A, Dagfinrud H, Dale O, Schulz T, Hagen KB. Collection of patient-reported outcomes;--text messages on mobile phones provide valid scores and high response rates. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-52.
    1. Kew S. Text messaging: an innovative method of data collection in medical research. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:342. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-342.
    1. Casagrande D, Gugala Z, Clark SM, Lindsey RW. Low Back Pain and Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnancy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(9):539–549. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00248.
    1. Albert H, Godskesen M, Westergaard J. Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(6):505–510. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2001.080006505.x.
    1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S192–S300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1.
    1. Persson M, Winkvist A, Dahlgren L, Mogren I. "Struggling with daily life and enduring pain": a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant women living with pelvic girdle pain. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-111.
    1. Chaibi A, Saltyte Benth J, Bjorn RM. Validation of Placebo in a Manual Therapy Randomized Controlled Trial. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11774. doi: 10.1038/srep11774.
    1. Groeneweg R, Rubinstein SM, Oostendorp RA, Ostelo RW, van Tulder MW. Guideline for Reporting Interventions on Spinal Manipulative Therapy: Consensus on Interventions Reporting Criteria List for Spinal Manipulative Therapy (CIRCLe SMT) J Manip Physiol Ther. 2017;40(2):61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.013.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir