Changes in Medical Therapy and Lifestyle After Anatomical or Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease

Joseph A Ladapo, Udo Hoffmann, Kerry L Lee, Adrian Coles, Megan Huang, Daniel B Mark, Rowena J Dolor, Robert A Pelberg, Matthew Budoff, Gardar Sigurdsson, Harry W Severance, Pamela S Douglas, Joseph A Ladapo, Udo Hoffmann, Kerry L Lee, Adrian Coles, Megan Huang, Daniel B Mark, Rowena J Dolor, Robert A Pelberg, Matthew Budoff, Gardar Sigurdsson, Harry W Severance, Pamela S Douglas

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic testing in the care of patients newly presenting with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease may influence risk factor management, independent of test type or test results. However, little is known about changes in medications and lifestyle after anatomical or functional testing.

Methods and results: We examined what factors influenced preventive medical therapy and lifestyle practices at 60 days among 10 003 symptomatic patients (53% women; mean age 61 years) randomly assigned to anatomical testing with coronary computed tomographic angiography or functional testing (NCT01174550). We also assessed the association of preventive changes with major cardiovascular events. There were no differences in medications/lifestyle at baseline. At 60 days, relative to baseline, the computed tomographic angiography strategy was associated with a higher proportion of patients newly initiating aspirin (11.8% versus 7.8%), statins (12.7% versus 6.2%), and β-blockers (8.1% versus 5.3%), compared to functional testing (P<0.0001 for each). No significant differences between computed tomographic angiography and functional testing strategies were observed for initiation of exercise, quitting smoking, or weight loss in overweight/obese patients, though overall prevalence of healthy eating was higher after computed tomographic angiography (P=0.002) while obese/overweight status was lower (P=0.040). Positive initial test results and revascularization demonstrated stronger associations with preventive medications and lifestyle than test type. Medication initiation was not associated with fewer cardiovascular events.

Conclusions: Positive initial test results and revascularization are primary drivers of changes in preventive medical and lifestyle practices, with test type making secondary contributions. However, substantial opportunities exist to further reduce cardiovascular risk.

Clinical trial registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

Keywords: angina; coronary disease; diagnosis; prevention.

© 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in preventive medical therapy and lifestyle practices from baseline to 60‐day visit (unadjusted). ACEi indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CTA, computed tomographic angiography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted odds ratios of preventive medical therapy and lifestyle practices at 60‐day visit, comparing anatomical testing (computed tomographic angiography) to functional testing (adjusted for patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics and physician specialty). Note: Odds ratios for smoking and overweight/obese status were inverted to represent beneficial outcomes (smoking abstinence and normal weight, respectively) and retain consistency with other beneficial measures in the figure. ACEi indicates angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker.

References

    1. Ladapo JA, Blecker S, Douglas PS. Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross‐sectional data. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:482–490.
    1. Ladapo JA, Goldfeld KS, Douglas PS. Projected morbidity and mortality from missed diagnoses of coronary artery disease in the United States. Int J Cardiol. 2015;195:250–252.
    1. Williams MC, Hunter A, Shah AS, Assi V, Lewis S, Smith J, Berry C, Boon NA, Clark E, Flather M, Forbes J, McLean S, Roditi G, van Beek EJ, Timmis AD, Newby DE; Investigators S‐H . Use of coronary computed tomographic angiography to guide management of patients with coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1759–1768.
    1. The SCOT‐HEART investigators . CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT‐HEART): an open‐label, parallel‐group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2383–2391.
    1. Young LH, Wackers FJ, Chyun DA, Davey JA, Barrett EJ, Taillefer R, Heller GV, Iskandrian AE, Wittlin SD, Filipchuk N, Ratner RE, Inzucchi SE, Investigators D. Cardiac outcomes after screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: the DIAD study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301:1547–1555.
    1. Hachamovitch R, Nutter B, Hlatky MA, Shaw LJ, Ridner ML, Dorbala S, Beanlands RS, Chow BJ, Branscomb E, Chareonthaitawee P, Weigold WG, Voros S, Abbara S, Yasuda T, Jacobs JE, Lesser J, Berman DS, Thomson LE, Raman S, Heller GV, Schussheim A, Brunken R, Williams KA, Farkas S, Delbeke D, Schoepf UJ, Reichek N, Rabinowitz S, Sigman SR, Patterson R, Corn CR, White R, Kazerooni E, Corbett J, Bokhari S, Machac J, Guarneri E, Borges‐Neto S, Millstine JW, Caldwell J, Arrighi J, Hoffmann U, Budoff M, Lima J, Johnson JR, Johnson B, Gaber M, Williams JA, Foster C, Hainer J, Di Carli MF. Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:462–474.
    1. Cheezum MK, Hulten EA, Smith RM, Taylor AJ, Kircher J, Surry L, York M, Villines TC. Changes in preventive medical therapies and CV risk factors after CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:574–581.
    1. Hulten E, Bittencourt MS, Singh A, O'Leary D, Christman MP, Osmani W, Abbara S, Steigner ML, Truong QA, Nasir K, Rybicki FF, Klein J, Hainer J, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U, Ghoshhajra BB, Hachamovitch R, Di Carli MF, Blankstein R. Coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomographic angiography is associated with intensification of preventive medical therapy and lower low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:629–638.
    1. Muhlestein JB, Lappe DL, Lima JA, Rosen BD, May HT, Knight S, Bluemke DA, Towner SR, Le V, Bair TL, Vavere AL, Anderson JL. Effect of screening for coronary artery disease using CT angiography on mortality and cardiac events in high‐risk patients with diabetes: the FACTOR‐64 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312:2234–2243.
    1. Min JK, Koduru S, Dunning AM, Cole JH, Hines JL, Greenwell D, Biga C, Fanning G, LaBounty TM, Gomez M, Horowitz JM, Hadimitzsky M, Hausleiter J, Callister TQ, Rosanski AR, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Lin FY. Coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging for near‐term quality of life, cost and radiation exposure: a prospective multicenter randomized pilot trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6:274–283.
    1. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Mark DB, Al‐Khalidi HR, Cavanaugh B, Cole J, Dolor RJ, Fordyce CB, Huang M, Khan MA, Kosinski AS, Krucoff MW, Malhotra V, Picard MH, Udelson JE, Velazquez EJ, Yow E, Cooper LS, Lee KL. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1291–1300.
    1. Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Lee KL, Mark DB, Al‐Khalidi HR, Anstrom K, Dolor RJ, Kosinski A, Krucoff MW, Mudrick DW, Patel MR, Picard MH, Udelson JE, Velazquez EJ, Cooper L. PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial. Am Heart J. 2014;167:796–803.e1.
    1. Jackson R, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Milne RJ, Rodgers A. Treatment with drugs to lower blood pressure and blood cholesterol based on an individual's absolute cardiovascular risk. Lancet. 2005;365:434–441.
    1. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case‐control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–952.
    1. McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika. 1947;12:153–157.
    1. Holford TR. Multivariate Methods in Epidemiology. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
    1. Goff DC Jr, Lloyd‐Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D'Agostino RB, Gibbons R, Greenland P, Lackland DT, Levy D, O'Donnell CJ, Robinson JG, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Sorlie P, Stone NJ, Wilson PW, Jordan HS, Nevo L, Wnek J, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Smith SC Jr, Tomaselli GF. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129:S49–S73.
    1. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1:43–46.
    1. Rozanski A, Gransar H, Hayes SW, Min J, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, Berman DS. Temporal trends in the frequency of inducible myocardial ischemia during cardiac stress testing: 1991 to 2009. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1054–1065.
    1. Ladapo JA, Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Nagurney JT, Cutler DM, Weinstein MC, Gazelle GS. Cost‐effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:455–463.
    1. Ladapo JA, Jaffer FA, Hoffmann U, Thomson CC, Bamberg F, Dec W, Cutler DM, Weinstein MC, Gazelle GS. Clinical outcomes and cost‐effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2409–2422.
    1. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Gilmore A, Kang N. Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:672–678.
    1. Lee SP, Jang EJ, Kim YJ, Cha MJ, Park SY, Song HJ, Choi JE, Shim JI, Ahn J, Lee HJ. Cost‐effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with chest pain: comparison with myocardial single photon emission tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015;9:428–437.
    1. Halpern EJ, Savage MP, Fischman DL, Levin DC. Cost‐effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in evaluation of patients without symptoms who have positive stress test results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1257–1262.
    1. Min JK, Gilmore A, Budoff MJ, Berman DS, O'Day K. Cost‐effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2010;254:801–808.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir