Efficacy of high doses of oral penicillin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of adults with non-severe pneumonia attended in the community: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Carl Llor, Javier Arranz, Rosa Morros, Anna García-Sangenís, Helena Pera, Joan Llobera, Mireia Guillén-Solà, Eugenia Carandell, Jesús Ortega, Silvia Hernández, Marc Miravitlles, Carl Llor, Javier Arranz, Rosa Morros, Anna García-Sangenís, Helena Pera, Joan Llobera, Mireia Guillén-Solà, Eugenia Carandell, Jesús Ortega, Silvia Hernández, Marc Miravitlles

Abstract

Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae is the bacterial agent which most frequently causes pneumonia. In some Scandinavian countries, this infection is treated with penicillin V since the resistances of pneumococci to this antibiotic are low. Four reasons justify the undertaking of this study; firstly, the cut-off points which determine whether a pneumococcus is susceptible or resistant to penicillin have changed in 2008 and according to some studies published recently the pneumococcal resistances to penicillin in Spain have fallen drastically, with only 0.9% of the strains being resistant to oral penicillin (minimum inhibitory concentration>2 μg/ml); secondly, there is no correlation between pneumococcal infection by a strain resistant to penicillin and therapeutic failure in pneumonia; thirdly, the use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics is urgently needed because of the dearth of new antimicrobials and the link observed between consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics and emergence and spread of antibacterial resistance; and fourthly, no clinical study comparing amoxicillin and penicillin V in pneumonia in adults has been published. Our aim is to determine whether high-dose penicillin V is as effective as high-dose amoxicillin for the treatment of uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods: We will perform a parallel group, randomised, double-blind, trial in primary healthcare centres in Spain. Patients aged 18 to 65 without significant associated comorbidity attending the physician with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection and radiological confirmation of the diagnosis of pneumonia will be randomly assigned to either penicillin V 1.6 million units thrice-daily during 10 days or amoxicillin 1,000 mg thrice-daily during 10 days. The main outcome will be clinical cure at 14 days, defined as absence of fever, resolution or improvement of cough, improvement of general wellbeing and resolution or reduction of crackles indicating that no other antimicrobial treatment will be necessary. Any clinical result other than the anterior will be considered as treatment failure. A total of 210 patients will be recruited to detect a non-inferiority margin of 15% between the two treatments with a minimum power of 80% considering an alpha error of 2.5% for a unilateral hypothesis and maximum possible losses of 15%.

Discussion: This pragmatic trial addresses the long-standing hypothesis that the administration of high doses of a narrow-spectrum antibiotic (penicillin V) in patients with non-severe pneumonia attended in the community is not less effective than high doses of amoxicillin (treatment currently recommended) in patients under the age of 65 years.

Trial registration: EudraCT number 2012-003511-63.

References

    1. Spindler C, Strålin K, Eriksson L, Hjerdt-Goscinski G, Holmberg H, Lidman C. The community acquired pneumonia working group of the Swedish Society of infectious diseases. Swedish guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults – Swedish Society of Infectious Diseases 2012. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44:885–902. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2012.700120.
    1. Llor C, Cots JM, Gaspar MJ, Alay M, Rams N. Antibiotic prescribing over the last 16 years: fewer antibiotics but the spectrum is broadening. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:893–897. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0719-3.
    1. Ministerio de Sanidad. Uso de Antibióticos en España. 2010. Available at: .
    1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; eighteenth informational supplement. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008. (CLSI document M100-S18).
    1. Pérez-Trallero E, Herrero JE, Mazón A, García-Delafuente C, Robles P, Iriarte V. Spanish Surveillance Group for Respiratory Pathogens. Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory pathogens in Spain: latest data and changes over 11 years (1996–1997 to 2006–2007) Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2953–2959. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01548-09.
    1. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:S27–S72. doi: 10.1086/511159.
    1. Garau J. The hidden impact of antibacterial resistance in respiratory tract infection. Clinical failures: the tip of the iceberg? Respir Med. 2001;95(Suppl A):S5–S11.
    1. Pallarés R, Linares J, Vadillo M, Cabellos C, Manresa F, Viladrich PF. Resistance to penicillin and cephalosporin and mortality from severe pneumococcal pneumonia in Barcelona, Spain. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:474–480. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199508243330802.
    1. Metlay JP, Hofmann J, Cetron MS, Fine MJ, Farley MM, Whitney C. Impact of penicillin susceptibility on medical outcomes for adult patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:520–528. doi: 10.1086/313716.
    1. Bronzwaer SL, Cars O, Buchholz U, Mölstad S, Goettsch W, Veldhuijzen IK. European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System. A European study on the relationship between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:278–282. doi: 10.3201/eid0803.010192.
    1. Baxter R, Ray GT, Fireman BH. Case–control study of antibiotic use and subsequent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:44–50. doi: 10.1086/524320.
    1. Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria. Infecciones del aparato respiratorio inferior. Barcelona: semFYC Ediciones; 2010. pp. 45–56. (En: Manual de Enfermedades Infecciosas en Atención Primaria. 3ª Ed).
    1. Torres A, Barberán J, Falguera M, Menéndez R, Molina J, Olaechea P. Grupo de la Guía Multidisciplinar para el Manejo de la Neumonía Adquirida en la Comunidad: Guía multidisciplinar para el manejo de la neumonía adquirida en la comunidad. Med Clin (Barc) 2013;140:223.e1-e19.
    1. Lim WS, Levy ML, Macfarlane JT. British Thoracic Society Community Acquired Pneumonia Guidelines Committee. Community acquired pneumonia. Management in primary care. BMJ. 2010;341:c4469. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4469.
    1. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, Garau J, Huchon G, Ieven M. Joint Taskforce of the European Respiratory Society and European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections – Full version. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(Suppl. 6):E1–E59.
    1. Atkinson M, Lakhanpaul M, Smyth A, Vyas H, Weston V, Sithole J. Comparison of oral amoxicillin and intravenous benzyl penicillin for community acquired pneumonia in children (PIVOT trial): a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2007;62:1102–1106. doi: 10.1136/thx.2006.074906.
    1. Addo-Yobo E, Chisaka N, Hassan M, Hibberd P, Lozano JM, Jeena P. Oral amoxicillin versus injectable penicillin for severe pneumonia in children aged 3 to 59 months: a randomised multicentre equivalency study. Lancet. 2004;364:1141–1148. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17100-6.
    1. Tsarouhas N, Shaw KN, Hodinka RL, Bell LM. Effectiveness of intramuscular penicillin versus oral amoxicillin in the early treatment of outpatient pediatric pneumonia. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1998;14:338–341.
    1. Rojas MX, Granados C. Oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotics for severe pneumonia in children (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2 CD004979.
    1. Aubier M, Verster R, Regamey C, Geslin P, Vercken JB. Once-daily sparfloxacin versus high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. Sparfloxacin European Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1312–1320. doi: 10.1086/516366.
    1. Petitpretz P, Arvis P, Marel M, Moita J, Urueta J. CAP5 Moxifloxacin Study Group. Oral moxifloxacin vs high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of mild-to-moderate, community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. Chest. 2001;119:185–195. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.185.
    1. Gilbert DN. Clinical end points of therapy for patients with mild community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:S140–S144. doi: 10.1086/591395.
    1. Oakes M, Human RP, Meers PD. Serum-levels of four antibiotics administered orally to patients in general practice. Lancet. 1973;1:222–224.
    1. Bryan CS, Talwani R, Stinson MS. Penicillin dosing for pneumococcal pneumonia. Chest. 1997;112:1657–1664. doi: 10.1378/chest.112.6.1657.
    1. Fredlund H, Bodin L, Bäck E, Holmberg H, Krook A, Rydman H. Antibiotic therapy in pneumonia: a comparative study of parenteral and oral administration of penicillin. Scand J Infect Dis. 1987;19:459–466. doi: 10.3109/00365548709021679.
    1. Knudsen JD, Odenholt I, Erlendsdottir H, Gottfredsson M, Cars O, Frimodt-Møller N. Selection of resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae during penicillin treatment in vitro and in three animal models. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:2499–2506. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2499-2506.2003.
    1. STRAMA. Clinical Guidelines: Treating Infections in Primary Care. South West Skåne; 2000. Available at: .
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates to Penicillins in Participating Countries in 2011 . .
    1. British Medical Association. British National Formulary 59. London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 2010. pp. 231–352.
    1. Rao GG. Risk factors for the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Drugs. 1998;55:323–330. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855030-00001.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir