Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: a qualitative exploration

Madhavi R Patt, Thomas K Houston, Mollie W Jenckes, Daniel Z Sands, Daniel E Ford, Madhavi R Patt, Thomas K Houston, Mollie W Jenckes, Daniel Z Sands, Daniel E Ford

Abstract

Background: Despite the potential for rapid, asynchronous, documentable communication, the use of e-mail for physician-patient communication has not been widely adopted.

Objective: To survey physicians currently using e-mail with their patients daily to understand their experiences.

Methods: In-depth phone interviews of 45 physicians currently using e-mail with patients were audio taped and transcribed verbatim. Two investigators independently qualitatively coded comments. Differences were adjudicated by group consensus.

Results: Almost all of the 642 comments from these physicians who currently use e-mail with patients daily could be grouped into 1 of 4 broad domains: (1) e-mail access and content, (2) effects of e-mail on the doctor-patient relationship, (3) managing clinical issues by e-mail, and (4) integrating e-mail into office processes. The most consistent theme was that e-mail communication enhances chronic-disease management. Many physicians also reported improved continuity of care and increased flexibility in responding to nonurgent issues. Integration of e-mail into daily workflow, such as utilization of office personnel, appears to be a significant area of concern for many of the physicians. For other issues, such as content, efficiency of e-mail, and confidentiality, there were diverging experiences and opinions. Physicians appear to be selective in choosing which patients they will communicate with via e-mail, but the criteria for selection is unclear.

Conclusion: These physician respondents did perceive benefits to e-mail with a select group of patients. Several areas, such as identifying clinical situations where e-mail communication is effective, incorporating e-mail into office flow, and being reimbursed for online medical care/communication, need to be addressed before this mode of communication diffuses into most practices.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz M A. Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4(1):23–30.
    1. Kaplan S H, Greenfield S, Ware J E. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S110–27.
    1. US Dept of Health and Human Services, authors. Healthy People 2010 (2 Volume Set) Washington, DC: International Medical Publishing; 2000. Oct 30,
    1. Institute of Medicine, authors. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. Jun 1,
    1. Fridsma D B, Ford P, Altman R. A survey of patient access to electronic mail: attitudes, barriers, and opportunities. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:15–9.
    1. Mechanic D. How should hamsters run? Some observations about sufficient patient time in primary care. BMJ. 2001 Aug 4;323(7307):266–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7307.266.
    1. Fulcrum Analytics and Deloitte Research, authors. Fulcrum Analytics and Deloitte Research. Taking the pulse v 2.0: physicians and emerging technologies. New York, NY: Fulcrum Analytics; 2002. Jan, Taking technology's temperature: physicians still cool toward e-mail.
    1. Moyer C A, Stern D T, Katz S J, Fendrick A M. "We got mail": electronic communication between physicians and patients. Am J Manag Care. 1999 Dec;5(12):1513–22.
    1. Mold J W, Cacy J R, Barton E D. Patient-physician E-mail communication. J Okla State Med Assoc. 1998 Sep;91(6):331–4.
    1. Moyer Cheryl A, Stern David T, Dobias Karen S, Cox Douglas T, Katz Steven J. Bridging the electronic divide: patient and provider perspectives on e-mail communication in primary care. Am J Manag Care. 2002 May;8(5):427–33.
    1. Sittig D F, King S, Hazlehurst B L. A survey of patient-provider e-mail communication: what do patients think? Int J Med Inform. 2001 Apr;61(1):71–80. doi: 10.1016/S1386-5056(00)00134-9.S1386505600001349
    1. Lacher D, Nelson E, Bylsma W, Spena R. Computer use and needs of internists: a survey of members of the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:453–6. .D200043
    1. Baur C. Limiting factors on the transformative powers of e-mail in patient-physician relationships: a critical analysis. Health Commun. 2000;12(3):239–59. doi: 10.1207/S15327027HC1203_02.
    1. Physicians' Online, authors. Home page. [2003 Apr 1].
    1. Houston TK, Sands DZ, Nash BR, Ford DE. Experiences of physicians who frequently use email with patients. Health Commun. [in press]
    1. Winker M A, Flanagin A, Chi-lum B, White J, Andrews K, Kennett R L, Deangelis C D, Musacchio R A. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. JAMA. 2000 Mar 22;283(12):1600–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1600.jsc00054
    1. Katz SJ, Stern DT, Dobias K, Moyer CA, Cox D. Effect of a triage-based email system on clinic resource use in primary care. J Gen Int Med. 2002;17(Supp. 1):199. .
    1. Kane B, Sands D Z. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(1):104–11.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir