The subgroups of the phase III RECOURSE trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) versus placebo with best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Eric Van Cutsem, Robert J Mayer, Stéphanie Laurent, Robert Winkler, Cristina Grávalos, Manuel Benavides, Federico Longo-Munoz, Fabienne Portales, Fortunato Ciardiello, Salvatore Siena, Kensei Yamaguchi, Kei Muro, Tadamichi Denda, Yasushi Tsuji, Lukas Makris, Patrick Loehrer, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Atsushi Ohtsu, RECOURSE Study Group, Eric Van Cutsem, Robert J Mayer, Stéphanie Laurent, Robert Winkler, Cristina Grávalos, Manuel Benavides, Federico Longo-Munoz, Fabienne Portales, Fortunato Ciardiello, Salvatore Siena, Kensei Yamaguchi, Kei Muro, Tadamichi Denda, Yasushi Tsuji, Lukas Makris, Patrick Loehrer, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Atsushi Ohtsu, RECOURSE Study Group

Abstract

Background: In the phase III RECOURSE trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) extended overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. The present analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in RECOURSE subgroups.

Methods: Primary and key secondary end-points were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model in prespecified subgroups, including geographical subregion (United States of America [USA], European Union [EU], Japan), age (<65 years, ≥65 years) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) status (wild type, mutant). Safety and tolerability were reported with descriptive statistics.

Results: Eight-hundred patients were enrolled: USA, n = 99; EU, n = 403; Japan, n = 266. Patients aged ≥65 years and those with mutant KRAS tumours comprised 44% and 51% of all patients in the subregions, respectively. Final OS analysis (including 89% of events, compared with 72% in the initial analysis) confirmed the survival benefit associated with trifluridine/tipiracil, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.81; P = 0.0001). Median OS in the three regions was 6.5-7.8 months in the trifluridine/tipiracil arm and 4.3-6.7 months in the placebo arm (USA: HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.94; P = 0.0277; EU: HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.80; P = 0.0002; Japan: HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-1.00; P = 0.0470). Median PFS was 2.0-2.8 months for trifluridine/tipiracil and 1.7-1.8 months for placebo; HRs favoured trifluridine/tipiracil in all regions. Similar clinical benefits of trifluridine/tipiracil were observed in elderly patients and in those with mutant KRAS tumours. There were no marked differences among subregions in terms of safety and tolerability.

Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil was effective in all subgroups, regardless of age, geographical origin or KRAS status. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01607957.

Keywords: Fluoropyrimidine; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Randomised controlled trial; TAS-102; Tipiracil; Trifluridine.

Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1.. Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots…
Fig. 1.. Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
(A) Kaplan–Meier curve for OS by geographical subregion; (B) forest plot for OS by geographical subregion; (C) Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS by geographical subregion; (D) forest plot for PFS by geographical subregion. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FTD/TPI, trifluridine/tipiracil; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat.
Fig. 1.. Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots…
Fig. 1.. Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
(A) Kaplan–Meier curve for OS by geographical subregion; (B) forest plot for OS by geographical subregion; (C) Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS by geographical subregion; (D) forest plot for PFS by geographical subregion. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FTD/TPI, trifluridine/tipiracil; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat.
Fig. 2.. Overall survival as of 8th…
Fig. 2.. Overall survival as of 8th October 2014 (intention-to-treat population).
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FTD/TPI, trifluridine/tipiracil; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival.

References

    1. Tanaka N, Sakamoto K, Okabe H, Fujioka A, Yamamura K, Nakagawa F, et al. Repeated oral dosing of TAS-102 confers high trifluridine incorporation into DNA and sustained antitumor activity in mouse models. Oncol Rep 2014;32:2319–26.
    1. Sakamoto K, Yokogawa T, Ueno H, Oguchi K, Kazuno H, Ishida K, et al. Crucial roles of thymidine kinase 1 and deoxyUTPase in incorporating the antineoplastic nucleosides trifluridine and 2’-deoxy-5-fluorouridine into DNA. Int J Oncol 2015;46:2327–34.
    1. Emura T, Murakami Y, Nakagawa F, Fukushima M, Kitazato K. A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 2004;13:545–9.
    1. Emura T, Suzuki N, Fujioka A, Ohshimo H, Fukushima M. Potentiation of the antitumor activity of α, α, α-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo. Int J Oncol 2005;27:449–55.
    1. Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, Yoshino T, Garcia-Carbonero R, Mizunuma N, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1909–19. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414325.
    1. Bendell JC, Rosen LS, Mayer RJ, Goldman JW, Infante JR, Benedetti F, et al. Phase 1 study of oral TAS-102 in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2015;76:925–32.
    1. Doi T, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T, Boku N, Onozawa Y, Fukutomi A, et al. Phase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer 2012;107:429–34.
    1. Overman MJ, Kopetz S, Varadhachary G, Fukushima M, Kuwata K, Mita A, et al. Phase I clinical study of three times a day oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Invest 2008;26:794–9.
    1. Overman MJ, Varadhachary G, Kopetz S, Thomas MB, Fukushima M, Kuwata K, et al. Phase 1 study of TAS-102 administered once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule in patients with solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 2008;26:445–54.
    1. Yoshino T, Mizunuma N, Yamazaki K, Nishina T, Komatsu Y, Baba H, et al. TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:993–1001.
    1. Mayer RJ, Ohtsu A, Yoshino T, Falcone A, Garcia-Carbonero R, Tabernero J, et al. TAS-102 versus placebo plus best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: final survival results of the Phase 3 RECOURSE trial. J Clin Oncol 2016;34(suppl 4S), abstract 634.
    1. De Divitiis C, Nasti G, Montano M, Fisichella R, Iaffaioli RV, Berretta M. Prognostic and predictive response factors in colorectal cancer patients: between hope and reality. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:15049–59.
    1. Stillwell AP, Ho YH, Veitch C. Systematic review of prognostic factors related to overall survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases. World J Surg 2011;35:684–92.
    1. Petrelli F, Coinu A, Cabiddu M, Borgonovo K, Lonati V, Ghilardi M, et al. Prognostic factors for survival with bevacizumab-based therapy in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and pooled analysis of 11,585 patients. Med Oncol 2015;32:456.
    1. Wilkinson KJ, Chua W, Ng W, Roohullah A. Management of asymptomatic primary tumours in stage IV colorectal cancer: review of outcomes. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015;7:513–23.
    1. Andreyev HJN, Norman AR, Cunningham D, Oates J, Dix BR, Iacopetta BJ, et al. Kirsten ras mutations in patients with colorectal cancer: the ‘RASCAL II’ study. Br J Cancer 2001;85:692–6.
    1. Nash GM, Gimbel M, Shia J, Nathanson DR, Ndubuisi MI, Zeng ZS, et al. KRAS mutation correlates with accelerated metastatic progression in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:572–8.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir