UK population norms for the modified dental anxiety scale with percentile calculator: adult dental health survey 2009 results

Gerry Humphris, John R Crawford, Kirsty Hill, Angela Gilbert, Ruth Freeman, Gerry Humphris, John R Crawford, Kirsty Hill, Angela Gilbert, Ruth Freeman

Abstract

Background: A recent UK population survey of oral health included questions to assess dental anxiety to provide mean and prevalence estimates of this important psychological construct.

Methods: A two-stage cluster sample was used for the survey across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. The survey took place between October-December 2009, and January-April 2010. All interviewers were trained on survey procedures. Within the 7,233 households sampled there were 13,509 adults who were asked to participate in the survey and 11,382 participated (84%).

Results: The scale was reliable and showed some evidence of unidimensionality. Estimated proportion of participants with high dental anxiety (cut-off score = 19) was 11.6%. Percentiles and confidence intervals were presented and can be estimated for individual patients across various age ranges and gender using an on-line tool.

Conclusions: The largest reported data set on the MDAS from a representative UK sample was presented. The scale's psychometrics is supportive for the routine assessment of patient dental anxiety to compare against a number of major demographic groups categorised by age and sex. Practitioners within the UK have a resource to estimate the rarity of a particular patient's level of dental anxiety, with confidence intervals, when using the on-line percentile calculator.

References

    1. Todd JE, Lader D. Adult dental health 1988. London: HMSO; 1990.
    1. Walker A, Cooper I. Adult dental health survey: oral health in the united kingdom United Kingdom 1998. London: The Stationary Office; 2000.
    1. Humphris G, Morrison T, Lindsay SJE. The modified dental anxiety scale: UK norms and evidence for validity. Community Dent Health. 1995;12(3):143–150.
    1. Humphris G, Freeman R, Campbell J, Tuutti H, D'Souza V. Further evidence for the reliability and validity of the modified dental anxiety scale. Int Dent J. 2000;50(6):370–376.
    1. Dailey Y, Humphris G, Lennon M. The use of dental anxiety questionnaires: a survey of a group of UK dental practitioners. Br Dent J. 2001;190(8):450–453.
    1. Humphris G, Hull P. Do dental anxiety questionnaires raise anxiety in dentally anxious adult patients? A two wave panel study. Primary Dent Care. 2007;14(1):7–11.
    1. Humphris G, Clarke H, Freeman R. Does completing a dental anxiety questionnaire increase anxiety? A randomised controlled trial with adults in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 2006;201(1):33–35.
    1. Dailey Y, Humphris G, Lennon M. Reducing patients' state anxiety in general dental practice: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res. 2002;81(5):319–322.
    1. Nuttall N, Freeman R, Beavan-Seymour C, Hill K. In: Adult dental health survey 2009. O’ Sullivan I, Lader D, editor. Leeds: The Health and Social Care Information Centre, Dental and Eye Care Team; 2011. Access and barriers to care - a report from the adult dental health survey 2009; p. 52.
    1. Newton J, Edwards J. Psychometric properties of the modified dental anxiety scale: an independent replication. Community Dent Health. 2005;22(1):40–42.
    1. King K, Humphris G. Evidence to confirm the cut-off for screening dental phobia using the modified dental anxiety scale. Soc Sci Dent. 2010;1(1):21–28.
    1. Pekkan G, Kilicoglu A, Hatipoglu H. Relationship between dental anxiety, general anxiety level and depression in patients attending a university hospital dental clinic in turkey. Community Dent Health. 2011;28(2):149–153.
    1. O'Sullivan I, Lader D, Beavan-Seymour C, Chenery V, Fuller E, Sadler K. In: Adult dental health survey 2009. 1. O'Sullivan I, editor. Leeds: The Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2011. Foundation report: adult dental health survey 2009 (technical information) p. 138.
    1. Do Nascimento DL, Da Silva Araujo AC, Gusmao ES, Cimoes R. Anxiety and fear of dental treatment among users of public health services. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2011;9(4):329–337.
    1. Chen F, Curran PJ, Bollen KA, Kirby J, Paxton P. An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Soc Meth Res. 2008;36(4):462–494.
    1. Newton J, Buck D. Anxiety and pain measures in dentistry: a guide to their quality and application. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131(10):1449–1457.
    1. Corah NL. Development of a dental anxiety scale. J Dent Res. 1969;48:596.
    1. Freeman R, Clarke H, Humphris G. Conversion tables for the corah and modified dental anxiety scales. Community Dent Health. 2007;24(1):49–55.
    1. Coolidge T, Chambers M, Garcia L, Heaton L, Coldwell S. Psychometric properties of spanish-language adult dental fear measures. BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:15.
    1. Tunc E, Firat D, Onur O, Sar V. Reliability and validity of the modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS) in a turkish population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005;33(5):357–362.
    1. Coolidge T, Arapostathis K, Emmanouil D, Dabarakis N, Patrikiou A, Economides N, Kotsanos N. Psychometric properties of greek versions of the modified corah dental anxiety scale (MDAS) and the dental fear survey (DFS) BMC Oral Health. 2008;8:29.
    1. Yuan S, Freeman R, Lahti S, Lloyd-Williams F, Humphris G. Some psychometric properties of the chinese version of the modified dental anxiety scale with cross validation. Health Qual Life Out. 2008;6:22.
    1. Wilson S, Alcaino EA. Survey on sedation in paediatric dentistry: a global perspective. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011;21(5):321–332.
    1. Abu-Ghazaleh SB, Rajab LD, Sonbol HN, Aljafari AK, Elkarmi RE, Humphris G. The arabic version of the modified dental anxiety scale psychometrics and normative data for 15–16 year olds. Saudi Med J. 2011;32(7):725–729.
    1. Humphris G, Dyer T, Robinson P. The modified dental anxiety scale: UK general public population norms in 2008 with further psychometrics and effects of age. BMC Oral Health. 2009;9:20–28.
    1. Crawford J, Garthwaite P, Lawrie C, Henry J, MacDonald M, Sutherland J, Sinha P. A convenient method of obtaining percentile norms and accompanying interval estimates for self-report mood scales (DASS, DASS-21, HADS, PANAS, and sAD) Br J Clin Psychol. 2009;48(2):163–180.
    1. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1196–1208. 12, 323–330.
    1. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Statistics with confidence- confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: British Medical Journal; 1989.
    1. Integrated Household Survey User Guide. IHS background & methodology 2012. Integr Household Surv. 2012;1:27.
    1. Arbuckle J. Amos 17 User's guide. 170. Spring House: Amos Development Corporation; 2008.
    1. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Slick DJ. On percentile norms in neuropsychology: proposed reporting standards and methods for quantifying the uncertainty over the percentile ranks of test scores. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(7):1173–1195. 7 (4), 467–471.
    1. Ley P. Quantitative aspects of psychological assessment. London: Duckworth; 1972.
    1. Crawford J, Cayley C, Wilson PH, Lovibond PF, Hartley C. Percentile norms and accompanying interval estimates for self report mood scales (BAI, BDI, CRSD, CES-D, DASS, DASS-21, STAI-X, STAI-Y, SRDS, and SRAS) Aust Psychol. 2011;46(1):3–14. 29, 38–40.
    1. Van Der Werf SP, Vos SH. Memory worries and self-reported daily forgetfulness: a psychometric evaluation of the dutch translation of the multifactorial memory questionnaire. Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;25(2):244–268. 7 (4), 467–471.
    1. Quintana M, Pena-Casanova J, Sanchez-Benavides G, Langohr K, MR M, Aguilar M, Badenes D, Molinuevo JL, Robles A, Barquero MS. et al.Spanish multicenter normative studies (neuronorma project): norms for the abbreviated barcelona test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;26:144–157. 7, 135–144.
    1. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH, Betkowska K. Bayes' Theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(4):624–644.
    1. Garthwaite PH, Crawford JR. Confidence intervals for a binomial proportion in the presence of ties. J Appl Stat. 2011;38(9):1915–1934.
    1. Nunnaly J. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
    1. Hu L, Bentler P. Cut-off criteria for fit indixes in covariance criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.
    1. Schienle A, Kochel A, Leutgeb V. Frontal late positivity in dental phobia: a study on gender differences. Biol Psychol. 2011;88(2–3):263–269.
    1. Heft MW, Meng X, Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Gender differences in reported dental fear and fear of dental pain. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(6):421–428.
    1. Taani D. Dental anxiety and regularity of dental attendance in younger adults. J Oral Rehab. 2002;29(6):604–608.
    1. Sohn W, Ismail A. Regular dental visits and dental anxiety in an adult dentate population. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(1):58–66.
    1. Armfield JM, Spencer AJ, Stewart JF. Dental fear in australia: who's afraid of the dentist? Aust Dent J. 2006;51(1):78–85.
    1. Antelman G. Elementary bayesian statistics. Cheltenam, UK: Elgar; 1997.
    1. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Comparison of a single case to a control or normative sample in neuropsychology: development of a bayesian approach. Cog Neuropsychol. 2007;24(4):343–372. 13, 391–413.
    1. Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology. 5. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press; 2002.
    1. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Percentiles please: the case for expressing neuropsychological test scores and accompanying confidence limits as percentile ranks. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23:193–204. 7 (4), 467–471.
    1. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. On the "optimal" size for normative samples in neuropsychology: capturing the uncertainty associated with the use of normative data to quantify the standing of a neuropsychological test score. Child Neuropsychol. 2008;14(2):99–117.
    1. Crawford JR. In: Clinical neuropsychology: a practical guide to assessment and management for clinicians. 2. Goldstein LH, McNeil JE, editor. Chichester: Wiley; 2012. Quantitative aspects of neuropsychological assessment; pp. 129–155.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir