A research protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial designed to examine the feasibility of a couple-based mind-body intervention for patients with metastatic lung cancer and their partners

Kathrin Milbury, Anne S Tsao, Zhongxing Liao, April Owns, Rosalinda Engle, Edrea A Gonzalez, Eduardo Bruera, Lorenzo Cohen, Kathrin Milbury, Anne S Tsao, Zhongxing Liao, April Owns, Rosalinda Engle, Edrea A Gonzalez, Eduardo Bruera, Lorenzo Cohen

Abstract

Background: Given the generally incurable nature of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), patients and their romantic partners are at risk for existential/spiritual distress. Although a handful of dyadic psychosocial interventions for lung cancer patients and their caregivers exist, none of them target spiritual well-being. Informed by the mindfulness-based intervention literature and our pilot work in couples affected by lung cancer, we developed a brief couple-based mind-body (CBMB) intervention. The primary aim of this research protocol is to determine the feasibility of implementing the CBMB intervention versus an active control (AC) or wait list control (WLC) group in patients with mNSCLC and their partners using a randomized controlled trial design.

Methods: Seventy-five patients with mNSCLC receiving treatment and their partners are randomized to the CBMB intervention, an AC or a WLC group. Those in the CBMB intervention and AC groups receive four intervention sessions of 60 min each over 4 weeks and complete weekly homework assignments. The first session is delivered in person, and the remaining sessions are delivered via videoconference. The dyads in the AC group discuss cancer-related and personal growth concerns with the interventionist but are not taught coping skills. Patients and partners in all groups complete baseline assessments of quality of life (QOL) prior to randomization. Follow-up assessments are performed 4 weeks and then again 3 months later. The primary outcome is feasibility (i.e., ≥ 30% of eligible couples consent, ≥ 70% of enrolled couples are retained, and ≥ 50% of all CBMB and AC sessions are attended). We will also perform primarily descriptive analyses of the self-reported outcomes (e.g., spiritual well-being and psychological distress) and explore potential intervention mediators (i.e., compassion, communication, mindfulness, and closeness) to inform a larger, future trial.

Discussion: This trial will provide important information regarding the feasibility of a behavioral intervention in a vulnerable yet understudied population using videoconferencing and descriptive data regarding spiritual well-being and other indices of QOL in both mNSCLC patients and their partners.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02596490.

Keywords: Couples; Feasibility; Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer; Mind-body intervention; Quality of life; Randomized control trial; Study protocol.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval of this protocol was granted by the MD Anderson Institutional Review Board. The trial will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed written consent will be obtained from all participants. The research team has received approval from the sponsors (National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society) to amend the original protocol regarding delivery of the CBMB intervention. The original protocol intervention all CBMB and AC sessions were delivered face-to-face. The protocol was amended prior to enrollment of any participants.Not applicableThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Delgado-Guay MO, et al. Spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain in advanced cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41(6):986–994. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.09.017.
    1. Pearce MJ, et al. Unmet spiritual care needs impact emotional and spiritual well-being in advanced cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(10):2269–2276. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1335-1.
    1. Hui D, et al. The frequency and correlates of spiritual distress among patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011;28(4):264–270. doi: 10.1177/1049909110385917.
    1. McClain CS, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W. Effect of spiritual well-being on end-of-life despair in terminally-ill cancer patients. Lancet. 2003;361(9369):1603–1607. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13310-7.
    1. Delgado-Guay MO, et al. Spirituality, religiosity, and spiritual pain among caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2013;30(5):455–461. doi: 10.1177/1049909112458030.
    1. Maguire R, et al. A systematic review of supportive care needs of people living with lung cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(4):449–464. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.10.013.
    1. Bakas T, Lewis RR, Parsons JE. Caregiving tasks among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28(5):847–854.
    1. Kim Y, et al. Individual and dyadic relations between spiritual well-being and quality of life among cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Psychooncology. 2011;20(7):762–770. doi: 10.1002/pon.1778.
    1. Badr H, Krebs P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psychooncology. 2013;22(8):1688–1704. doi: 10.1002/pon.3200.
    1. Carlson LE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based cancer recovery versus supportive expressive group therapy for distressed survivors of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(25):3119–3126. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.5210.
    1. Milbury K, et al. Couple-based Tibetan yoga program for lung cancer patients and their caregivers. Psychooncology. 2015;24(1):117–20.
    1. Porter LS, et al. Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with gastrointestinal cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2009;115(18 Suppl):4326–4338. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24578.
    1. Cohen L, et al. Psychological adjustment and sleep quality in a randomized trial of the effects of a Tibetan yoga intervention in patients with lymphoma. Cancer. 2004;100(10):2253–2260. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20236.
    1. Milbury K, et al. Tibetan sound meditation for cognitive dysfunction: results of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Psychooncology. 2013;22(10):2354–63.
    1. Chambers SK, et al. Mindfulness groups for men with advanced prostate cancer: a pilot study to assess feasibility and effectiveness and the role of peer support. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(6):1183–92.
    1. Carlson LE, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction in relation to quality of life, mood, symptoms of stress, and immune parameters in breast and prostate cancer outpatients. Psychosom Med. 2003;65(4):571–581. doi: 10.1097/01.PSY.0000074003.35911.41.
    1. Hoffman CJ, et al. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction in mood, breast- and endocrine-related quality of life, and well-being in stage 0 to III breast cancer: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1335–1342. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.0331.
    1. Fredrickson BL, et al. Open hearts build lives: positive emotions, induced through loving-kindness meditation, build consequential personal resources. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008;95(5):1045–1062. doi: 10.1037/a0013262.
    1. Galante J, et al. Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(6):1101–1114. doi: 10.1037/a0037249.
    1. Maliski SL, Heilemann MV, McCorkle R. Mastery of postprostatectomy incontinence and impotence: his work, her work, our work. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28(6):985–992.
    1. Zeng X, et al. The effect of loving-kindness meditation on positive emotions: a meta-analytic review. Front Psychol. 2015;6:1693. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01693.
    1. Breitbart W, et al. Meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2010;19(1):21–28. doi: 10.1002/pon.1556.
    1. Keefe FJ, et al. Spouse-assisted coping skills training in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain. Arthritis Care Res. 1996;9(4):279–291. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199608)9:4<279::AID-ANR1790090413>;2-6.
    1. Helgeson VS, et al. Education and peer discussion group interventions and adjustment to breast cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(4):340–347. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.340.
    1. Peterman AH, et al. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp) Ann Behav Med. 2002;24(1):49–58. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2401_06.
    1. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a new self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.
    1. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of events scale: measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979;41:209–218. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004.
    1. Buysse DJ, et al. Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
    1. Mendoza TR, et al. Measuring the symptom burden of lung cancer: the validity and utility of the lung cancer module of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncologist. 2011;16(2):217–227. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0193.
    1. Ware JE, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the health insurance study (mental health R-1987/3-HEW: 3) Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 1994.
    1. Carlson LE, Brown KW. Validation of the mindful attention awareness scale in a cancer population. J Psychosom Res. 2005;58(1):29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.04.366.
    1. Raes F, et al. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(3):250–255. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702.
    1. Pistrang N, Barker C. The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(6):789–797. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00136-H.
    1. Porter LS, et al. Partner-assisted emotional disclosure for patients with GI cancer: 8-week follow-up and processes associated with change. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(8):1755–1762. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1272-z.
    1. Porter LS, et al. Disclosure between patients with gastrointestinal cancer and their spouses. Psychooncology. 2005;14(12):1030–1042. doi: 10.1002/pon.915.
    1. Manne S, et al. Holding back sharing concerns, dispositional emotional expressivity, perceived unsupportive responses and distress among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36(1):81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.10.001.
    1. Laurenceau J, Barrett L, Peitromonaco P. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure and partner disclosure and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(5):1238–51.
    1. Manne S, et al. The interpersonal process model of intimacy: the role of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and partner responsiveness in interactions between breast cancer patients and their partners. J Fam Psychol. 2004;18(4):589–599. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.589.
    1. Wei M, Russell DW, Mallinckrodt B, Vogel DL. The experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 2007;88:187–204. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268041.
    1. Kernan WN, et al. Stratified randomization for clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(1):19–26. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00138-3.
    1. Wang XS, et al. Prognostic value of symptom burden for overall survival in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(1):137–145.
    1. Vodermaier A, et al. Disease stage predicts post-diagnosis anxiety and depression only in some types of cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(12):1814–1817. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.503.
    1. Oken MM, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–655. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198212000-00014.
    1. Holland JC, Bultz BD, National comprehensive Cancer N. The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007;5:3–7.
    1. Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–312. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
    1. Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(5):626–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008.
    1. Arnold DM, et al. The design and interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research in critical care. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1 Suppl):S69–S74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181920e33.
    1. Badr H, et al. Dyadic psychosocial intervention for advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers: results of a randomized pilot trial. Cancer. 2015;121(1):150–158. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29009.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir