Sustained reduction of serum neurofilament light chain over 7 years by alemtuzumab in early relapsing-remitting MS

Jens Kuhle, Nadia Daizadeh, Pascal Benkert, Aleksandra Maceski, Christian Barro, Zuzanna Michalak, Maria Pia Sormani, Jean Godin, Srinivas Shankara, Tarek A Samad, Alan Jacobs, Luke Chung, Nora Rӧsch, Carina Kaiser, Colin P Mitchell, David Leppert, Evis Havari, Ludwig Kappos, Jens Kuhle, Nadia Daizadeh, Pascal Benkert, Aleksandra Maceski, Christian Barro, Zuzanna Michalak, Maria Pia Sormani, Jean Godin, Srinivas Shankara, Tarek A Samad, Alan Jacobs, Luke Chung, Nora Rӧsch, Carina Kaiser, Colin P Mitchell, David Leppert, Evis Havari, Ludwig Kappos

Abstract

Background: Alemtuzumab efficacy and safety was demonstrated in CARE-MS I and extension studies (CAMMS03409; TOPAZ).

Objective: Evaluate serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in CARE-MS I patients and highly active disease (HAD) subgroup, over 7 and 2 years for alemtuzumab and subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a), respectively.

Methods: Patients received SC IFNB-1a 44 µg 3×/week or alemtuzumab 12 mg/day at baseline and month 12, with further as-needed 3-day courses. sNfL was measured using single-molecule array (Simoa™). HAD definition was ⩾2 relapses in year before randomization and ⩾1 baseline gadolinium-enhancing lesion.

Results: Baseline median sNfL levels were similar in alemtuzumab (n = 354) and SC IFNB-1a-treated (n = 159) patients (31.7 vs 31.4 pg/mL), but decreased with alemtuzumab versus SC IFNB-1a until year 2 (Y2; 13.2 vs 18.7 pg/mL; p < 0.0001); 12.7 pg/mL for alemtuzumab at Y7. Alemtuzumab-treated patients had sNfL at/below healthy control median at Y2 (72% vs 47%; p < 0.0001); 73% for alemtuzumab at Y7. HAD patients (n = 102) had higher baseline sNfL (49.4 pg/mL) versus overall population; alemtuzumab HAD patients attained similar levels (Y2, 12.8 pg/mL; Y7, 12.7 pg/mL; 75% were at/below control median at Y7).

Conclusion: Alemtuzumab was superior to SC IFNB-1a in reducing sNfL, with levels in alemtuzumab patients remaining stable through Y7.

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00530348, NCT00930553, NCT02255656.

Keywords: Alemtuzumab; NfL/neurofilament light chain; biomarkers; clinical trials randomized controlled; highly active disease; multiple sclerosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: J.K. reports his institution (University Hospital Basel) received and used exclusively for research support: consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis, Protagen AG, Roche, and Teva, speaker fees from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis, Roche, and Swiss MS Society, travel expenses from Merck Serono, Novartis, and Roche, and grants from Bayer AG, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, ECTRIMS Research Fellowship Program, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Swiss MS Society, Swiss National Research Foundation (320030_160221), and University of Basel. P.B., A.M., and Z.M. have nothing to disclose. C.B. reports travel support from Novartis and Teva. M.P.S. reports consulting fees from Biogen, Celgene, GeNeuro, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. N.D., J.G., E.H., C.K., C.P.M., N.R., and S.S. are employees of Sanofi. L.C., A.J., and T.A.S. were employees of Sanofi during study conduct and analysis. D.L. reports personal fees from Novartis, Orion, Roche, and Sanofi; he is chief medical officer at GeNeuro. L.K. reports his institution (University Hospital Basel) received in the last 3 years the following, which was used exclusively for research support: steering committee, advisory board, consultancy fees, and support of educational activities from: Actelion, Allergan, Almirall, Baxalta, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, CSL Behring, Desitin, EXCEMED, Eisai, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genzyme, Japan Tobacco, Merck, Minoryx, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Santhera, and Teva; license fees for Neurostatus-UHB products; the Research of the MS Center in Basel has been supported by grants from Bayer, Biogen, European Union, Innosuisse, Novartis, Roche Research Foundations, Swiss MS Society, and Swiss National Research Foundation.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Unadjusted analyses showing the relationship between sNfL levels and (a) Gd-enhancing lesion count, (b) T2 hyperintense lesion volume, and (c) T1 hypointense lesion volume at baseline. Gd: gadolinium; IQR: interquartile range; sNfL: serum neurofilament light chain. aT2 hyperintense lesion volume Tertile 1: ⩽1.997 cm3; Tertile 2: >1.997 and ⩽6.520 cm3; Tertile 3: >6.520 cm3. bT1 hypointense lesion volume Tertile 1: ⩽0.117 cm3; Tertile 2: >0.117 and ⩽0.804 cm3; Tertile 3: >0.804 cm3.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
sNfL levels over time in patients treated with alemtuzumab or SC IFNB-1a in (a) the overall CARE-MS I population and (b) the CARE-MS I HAD subgroup. ANCOVA: analysis of covariance; HAD: highly active disease; IQR: interquartile range; SC IFNB-1a: subcutaneous interferon beta-1a; sNfL: serum neurofilament light chain. Plot shows unadjusted sNfL values. p-Values indicate comparison between treatment groups (baseline: Wilcoxon rank sum test; post-baseline: rank ANCOVA adjusted for age and baseline sNfL). *p < 0.0001 for comparison of baseline with each post-baseline time point (Wilcoxon signed rank test). sNfL values below the lower limit of quantification were imputed; this represented 86/7100 (1.2%) alemtuzumab samples and 5/721 (0.7%) SC IFNB-1a samples. Solid line and shaded area represent median and IQR (20.6 pg/mL (15.6−27.1) sNfL level for healthy controls aged 18–53 years (the age range of CARE-MS I patients).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportions of patients with sNfL level at or below the median level for age-matched healthy controls (left panels) and at or below the 80th percentile of age-matched healthy controls (right panels) for (a) the overall CARE-MS I population and (b) the CARE-MS I HAD subgroup. CI: confidence interval; HAD: highly active disease; HC: healthy controls; SC IFNB-1a: subcutaneous interferon beta-1a; sNfL: serum neurofilament light chain. p-Values indicate comparison between treatment groups and are based on chi-square test.

References

    1. Gafson AR, Barthelemy NR, Bomont P, et al.. Neurofilaments: Neurobiological foundations for biomarker applications. Brain 2020; 143(7): 1975–1998.
    1. Barro C, Benkert P, Disanto G, et al.. Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2018; 141(8): 2382–2391.
    1. Chitnis T, Gonzalez C, Healy BC, et al.. Neurofilament light chain serum levels correlate with 10-year MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2018; 5(12): 1478–1491.
    1. Delcoigne B, Manouchehrinia A, Barro C, et al.. Blood neurofilament light levels segregate treatment effects in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2020; 94(11): e1201–e1212.
    1. Kuhle J, Nourbakhsh B, Grant D, et al.. Serum neurofilament is associated with progression of brain atrophy and disability in early MS. Neurology 2017; 88(9): 826–831.
    1. Piehl F, Kockum I, Khademi M, et al.. Plasma neurofilament light chain levels in patients with MS switching from injectable therapies to fingolimod. Mult Scler 2018; 24(8): 1046–1054.
    1. Akgun K, Kretschmann N, Haase R, et al.. Profiling individual clinical responses by high-frequency serum neurofilament assessment in MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2019; 6(3): e555.
    1. Kuhle J, Barro C, Disanto G, et al.. Serum neurofilament light chain in early relapsing remitting MS is increased and correlates with CSF levels and with MRI measures of disease severity. Mult Scler 2016; 22(12): 1550–1559.
    1. Kuhle J, Kropshofer H, Barro C, et al.. Siponimod reduces neurofilament light chain blood levels in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology 2018; 90(Suppl. 15): S8.006.
    1. Kuhle J, Kropshofer H, Haering DA, et al.. Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of MS disease activity and treatment response. Neurology 2019; 92(10): e1007–e1015.
    1. Novakova L, Zetterberg H, Sundstrom P, et al.. Monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis using serum neurofilament light protein. Neurology 2017; 89(22): 2230–2237.
    1. Cohen JA, Coles AJ, Arnold DL, et al.. Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012; 380(9856): 1819–1828.
    1. Arnold DL, Barnett M, Comi G, et al.. Durable reduction in MRI disease activity and slowing of brain volume loss with alemtuzumab in patients with active RRMS: 7-year follow-up of CARE-MS I patients (TOPAZ study). Mult Scler 2017; 23(Suppl. 3): P1189.
    1. Coles AJ, Arnold DL, Bass A, et al.. Efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab over 6 years: final results of the 4-year CARE-MS extension trial. Ther Adv Neurol Dis. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2021. DOI: 10.1177/1756286420982134.
    1. Coles AJ, Boyko AN, De Seze J, et al.. Alemtuzumab durably improves clinical outcomes in patients with active RRMS in the absence of continuous treatment: 7-year follow-up of CARE-MS I patients (TOPAZ study). Mult Scler 2017; 23(Suppl. 3): P1188.
    1. Havrdova E, Arnold DL, Cohen JA, et al.. Alemtuzumab CARE-MS I 5-year follow-up: Durable efficacy in the absence of continuous MS therapy. Neurology 2017; 89(11): 1107–1116.
    1. Cuker A, Bass AD, Nadj C, et al.. Immune thrombocytopenia in alemtuzumab-treated MS patients: Incidence, detection, and management. Mult Scler 2020; 26(1): 48–56.
    1. Sanofi Genzyme. LEMTRADA® (alemtuzumab) [prescribing information]. Cambridge, MA: Sanofi Genzyme.
    1. Phelps R, Winston JA, Wynn D, et al.. Incidence, management, and outcomes of autoimmune nephropathies following alemtuzumab treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2019; 25(9): 1273–1288.
    1. Singer BA, Alroughani R, Broadley S, et al.. Improved clinical and MRI disease activity outcomes, including slowing of brain volume loss, in alemtuzumab-treated RRMS patients: 8-year follow-up of CARE-MS II (TOPAZ study). Neurology 2019; 92(Suppl. 15): P3.2–058.
    1. Wray S, Havrdova E, Snydman DR, et al.. Infection risk with alemtuzumab decreases over time: Pooled analysis of 6-year data from the CAMMS223, CARE-MS I, and CARE-MS II studies and the CAMMS03409 extension study. Mult Scler 2018; 25(12): 1605–1617.
    1. Disanto G, Barro C, Benkert P, et al.. Serum neurofilament light: A biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2017; 81(6): 857–870.
    1. Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Smooth centile curves for skew and kurtotic data modelled using the Box-Cox power exponential distribution. Stat Med 2004; 23(19): 3053–3076.
    1. Dalla Costa G, Martinelli V, Sangalli F, et al.. Prognostic value of serum neurofilaments in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 2019; 92(7): e733–e741.
    1. Schippling S, Amato MP, Arnold DL, et al.. Alemtuzumab reduces brain atrophy in patients with neither relapses nor MRI disease activity: A pooled CARE-MS I and II analysis. In: 5th Congress of the European Academy of Neurology, Oslo, June 29–July 2, 2019.
    1. Limmroth V, Achiron A, Bass AD, et al.. Alemtuzumab efficacy and safety were maintained over 8 years in RRMS patients with highly active disease from CARE-MS I: TOPAZ study follow-up. Mult Scler 2019; 25: P1012.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir