Efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with untreated or chemotherapy-refractory soft tissue sarcoma: a multicenter, phase 2 trial

Wenxi Yu, Hongmei Zhang, Jing Chen, Xing Zhang, Yong Chen, Guofan Qu, Gang Huang, Yuhong Zhou, Ting Ye, Zhengfu Fan, Yang Yao, Wenxi Yu, Hongmei Zhang, Jing Chen, Xing Zhang, Yong Chen, Guofan Qu, Gang Huang, Yuhong Zhou, Ting Ye, Zhengfu Fan, Yang Yao

Abstract

Background: Anti-angiogenic agents have been reported to exert promising clinical activity for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Apatinib, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective and safe for various solid tumors, but its role in STS remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with untreated or chemotherapy-refractory STS.

Methods: In this multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients aged 18-70 years with untreated or chemotherapy-refractory STS were enrolled and received 500 mg apatinib per day. During treatment, patients were followed up with imaging every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs), which were graded following the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for AEs version 4.03.

Results: From June 2017 to October 2018, 53 patients were enrolled, 51 of whom received at least one dose of apatinib. Of the 53 patients, 41 (77.4%) had chemotherapy-refractory disease. The median follow-up was 13.3 months. The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 46.8% and 25.2%, respectively, with a median PFS of 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.8-9.2 months]. The median PFS was 5.5 months for chemotherapy-refractory patients, 9.1 months for untreated patients, 13.9 months for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), and 3.7 months for patients with clear cell sarcoma (CCS). The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 58.6% and 44.9%, respectively, with a median OS of 20.0 months (95% CI: 9.2-31.1 months). The median OS was 10.7 months for chemotherapy-refractory patients and not estimated for untreated, ASPS, nor CCS patients. In 50 evaluable patients, the ORR was 18.0% and the disease control rate was 86.0%. These results were similar to those of the per-protocol set. The most common grade 3 or 4 AEs included hypertension [30 (58.8%) of 51 patients], leukopenia [12 (23.5%)], proteinuria [8 (15.69%)], and hematuria [8 (15.69%)]. One patient died of unknown cause.

Conclusions: This study suggested that apatinib might be effective and tolerable in patients with untreated or chemotherapy-refractory STS (NCT03064243).

Keywords: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS); angiogenesis; apatinib; neoplasm drug resistance.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-4229/coif). All authors report that the study was supported by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A flowchart showing the participant enrollment and follow-up process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curve of (A) PFS and (B) OS in the full analysis set. PFS, progression-free survival; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A Waterfall plot of tumor response (A), a swim lane plot (B), and a spider plot (C). UPS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma; PR, partial response; PD, progressive disease.

References

    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Version 2. 2018. Fort Washington: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2018.
    1. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group . Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014;25 Suppl 3:iii102-12. 10.1093/annonc/mdu254
    1. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC, 2013.
    1. Schöffski P, Cornillie J, Wozniak A, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma: an update on systemic treatment options for patients with advanced disease. Oncol Res Treat 2014;37:355-62. 10.1159/000362631
    1. Nystrom LM, Reimer NB, Reith JD, et al. Multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma. ScientificWorldJournal 2013;2013:852462. 10.1155/2013/852462
    1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Version 1.2021. Fort Washington: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2021.
    1. In GK, Hu JS, Tseng WW. Treatment of advanced, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: latest evidence and clinical considerations. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2017;9:533-50. 10.1177/1758834017712963
    1. Ogura K, Beppu Y, Chuman H, et al. Alveolar soft part sarcoma: a single-center 26-patient case series and review of the literature. Sarcoma 2012;2012:907179. 10.1155/2012/907179
    1. Chen S, Luo P, Yang L, et al. Prognostic analysis of surgically treated clear cell sarcoma: an analysis of a rare tumor from a single center. Int J Clin Oncol 2019;24:1605-11. 10.1007/s10147-019-01487-x
    1. Leahy M, Garcia Del Muro X, Reichardt P, et al. Chemotherapy treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. The SArcoma treatment and Burden of Illness in North America and Europe (SABINE) study. Ann Oncol 2012;23:2763-70. 10.1093/annonc/mds070
    1. Rocchi L, Caraffi S, Perris R, et al. The angiogenic asset of soft tissue sarcomas: a new tool to discover new therapeutic targets. Biosci Rep 2014;34:e00147. 10.1042/BSR20140075
    1. van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012;379:1879-86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60651-5
    1. Chi Y, Fang Z, Hong X, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib, a Multikinase Angiogenesis Inhibitor, in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:5233-8. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3766
    1. Kilvaer TK, Smeland E, Valkov A, et al. The VEGF- and PDGF-family of angiogenic markers have prognostic impact in soft tissue sarcomas arising in the extremities and trunk. BMC Clin Pathol 2014;14:5. 10.1186/1472-6890-14-5
    1. Peng L, Ye X, Hong Y, et al. Treatment-related toxicities of apatinib in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2018;9:32262-70. 10.18632/oncotarget.24215
    1. Chen J, Wang J. Efficacy and safety assessment of apatinib in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 2018;11:4149-58. 10.2147/OTT.S157466
    1. Wang F, Yuan X, Jia J, et al. Apatinib Monotherapy for Chemotherapy-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-centre, Single-Arm, Prospective Study. Sci Rep 2020;10:6058. 10.1038/s41598-020-62961-5
    1. Zhao D, Hou H, Zhang X. Progress in the treatment of solid tumors with apatinib: a systematic review. Onco Targets Ther 2018;11:4137-47. 10.2147/OTT.S172305
    1. Liao Z, Li F, Zhang C, et al. Phase II trial of VEGFR2 inhibitor apatinib for metastatic sarcoma: focus on efficacy and safety. Exp Mol Med 2019;51:1-11. 10.1038/s12276-019-0221-7
    1. Liu X, Xu J, Li F, et al. Efficacy and safety of the VEGFR2 inhibitor Apatinib for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: Chinese cohort data from NCT03121846. Biomed Pharmacother 2020;122:109587. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109587
    1. Chen L, Cheng X, Tu W, et al. Apatinib inhibits glycolysis by suppressing the VEGFR2/AKT1/SOX5/GLUT4 signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2019;42:679-90. 10.1007/s13402-019-00455-x
    1. Zhang H. Apatinib for molecular targeted therapy in tumor. Drug Des Devel Ther 2015;9:6075-81. 10.2147/DDDT.S97235
    1. Lu W, Ke H, Qianshan D, et al. Apatinib has anti-tumor effects and induces autophagy in colon cancer cells. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2017;20:990-5.
    1. Kilvaer TK, Valkov A, Sorbye S, et al. Profiling of VEGFs and VEGFRs as prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma: VEGFR-3 is an independent predictor of poor prognosis. PLoS One 2010;5:e15368. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015368
    1. Trojan A, Montemurro M, Kamel M, et al. Successful PDGFR-{alpha}/{beta} targeting with imatinib in uterine sarcoma. Ann Oncol 2009;20:1898-9. 10.1093/annonc/mdp431
    1. Martín J, Poveda A, Llombart-Bosch A, et al. Deletions affecting codons 557-558 of the c-KIT gene indicate a poor prognosis in patients with completely resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a study by the Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS). J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6190-8. 10.1200/JCO.2005.19.554
    1. Munshi N, Groopman JE, Gill PS, et al. c-Src mediates mitogenic signals and associates with cytoskeletal proteins upon vascular endothelial growth factor stimulation in Kaposi's sarcoma cells. J Immunol 2000;164:1169-74. 10.4049/jimmunol.164.3.1169
    1. Li F, Liao Z, Zhang C, et al. Apatinib as targeted therapy for sarcoma. Oncotarget 2018;9:24548-60. 10.18632/oncotarget.24647
    1. Wang Y, Lu M, Zhou Y, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib in Advanced Synovial Sarcoma: A Case Series of Twenty-One Patients in One Single Institution. Cancer Manag Res 2020;12:5255-64. 10.2147/CMAR.S254296
    1. Xie L, Guo W, Wang Y, et al. Apatinib for advanced sarcoma: results from multiple institutions' off-label use in China. BMC Cancer 2018;18:396. 10.1186/s12885-018-4303-z
    1. Tian Z, Wang X, Liu Z, et al. Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with apatinib and doxorubicin in metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: an observational study from multiple institutions. Cancer Manag Res 2019;11:5293-300. 10.2147/CMAR.S207150
    1. Maki RG, D'Adamo DR, Keohan ML, et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3133-40. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4495
    1. Sleijfer S, Ray-Coquard I, Papai Z, et al. Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043). J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3126-32. 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3223
    1. Chi Y, Yao Y, Wang S, et al. Anlotinib for metastasis soft tissue sarcoma: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and multi-centered clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:11503. 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.11503
    1. Nakano K, Funauchi Y, Hayakawa K, et al. Relative Dose Intensity of Induction-Phase Pazopanib Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Its Relationship with Prognoses of Pazopanib Responders. J Clin Med 2019;8:60. 10.3390/jcm8010060
    1. D'Adamo DR, Anderson SE, Albritton K, et al. Phase II study of doxorubicin and bevacizumab for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7135-42. 10.1200/JCO.2005.16.139
    1. Interiano RB, McCarville MB, Wu J, et al. Pneumothorax as a complication of combination antiangiogenic therapy in children and young adults with refractory/recurrent solid tumors. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:1484-9. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.01.005

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir