Early benefits of a secondary fracture prevention programme

Gershon Zinger, Noa Sylvetsky, Yedin Levy, Kobi Steinberg, Alexander Bregman, Genady Yudkevich, Amos Peyser, Gershon Zinger, Noa Sylvetsky, Yedin Levy, Kobi Steinberg, Alexander Bregman, Genady Yudkevich, Amos Peyser

Abstract

Introduction: The most successful programme for secondary fracture prevention is the FLS (fracture liaison service) model. Our orthopaedic department carried out a prospective randomised study to measure the effectiveness of a 4-step intervention programme. The findings in this study reveal important additional clinical benefits to having an orthopaedic-based FLS programme and evaluates the usefulness of fracture risk tools.

Methods: We carried out a prospective study to evaluate patients with a fragility fracture of the hip. There were 2 groups, intervention and control (each 100 patients). Of these, 20 were either removed from the study or dropped out, leaving 180 for analysis. In addition to routine preoperative blood tests, albumin and thyroid function levels were obtained and PTH (parathyroid hormone) levels when indicated.The intervention group (83 patients) had a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan performed and fracture risk (FRAX) was calculated.

Results: 12 patients (6.7%) had blood results which showed a potentially treatable cause for osteoporosis and 36 (20%) had blood results that changed their medical care.FRAX scores (180 patients) showed that the major osteoporotic fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in only 49%. The hip fracture score correctly predicted the hip fracture in 83%.DEXA scores (65 patients) showed osteoporosis in only 46% of hips and in only 26% of spines.An abnormal FRAX score or DEXA scan would have predicted a fragility fracture 93% of the time.

Conclusions: In addition to reducing secondary fractures, FLS programmes can provide fundamental benefits to the health of the patient. The intervention programme in this study identified patients with underlying treatable causes, correctable clinical conditions and patients with an unusually low bone density. When used together, FRAX and DEXA are more sensitive predictors for hip fracture risk than either are individually.

Trial registry: 201497CTIL (https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02239523).

Keywords: FLS; fracture liaison service; fragility; osteoporosis; secondary prevention.

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Fragility hip fractures flow diagram.

References

    1. Gardner MJ, Brophy RH, Demetrakopoulos D, et al.. Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 3–7.
    1. Harrington JT, Deal CL. Successes and failures in improving osteoporosis care after fragility fracture: results of a multiple-site clinical improvement project Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 724–728.
    1. Marsh D, Akesson K, Beaton DE, et al.. Coordinator-based systems for secondary fracture prevention in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporosis Int 2011; 22: 2051–2065.
    1. Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, et al.. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 721–739.
    1. Zinger G, Sylvetsky S, Levy Y, et al.. Efficacy of orthopaedic-inspired osteoporosis management: a secondary fracture prevention program after a fracture of the hip in a prospective randomized study. OTA Intl 2021; 4: e122.
    1. Lyles KW, Colon-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS, et al.. Zolendronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 1799–1809.
    1. Rozental TD, Makhni EC, Day CS, et al.. Improving evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis following distal radius fractures. A prospective randomized intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 953–961.
    1. Lee YK, Lee YJ, Ha YC, et al.. Five-year relative survival of patients with osteoporotic hip fracture. Metabolism 2014; 99: 97–100.
    1. Cooper C. The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on the quality of life. Am J Med 1997; 103: 12S–19S.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir