Basis for spinal manipulative therapy: a physical therapist perspective
Joel E Bialosky, Corey B Simon, Mark D Bishop, Steven Z George, Joel E Bialosky, Corey B Simon, Mark D Bishop, Steven Z George
Abstract
Physical therapists internationally provide spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) to patients with musculoskeletal pain complaints. SMT has been a part of physical therapist practice since the profession's beginning. Early physical therapist clinical decision making for SMT was influenced by the approaches of osteopathic and orthopedic physicians at the time. Currently a segmental clinical decision making approach and a responder clinical decision making approach are two of the more common models through which physical therapist clinical use of SMT is directed. The focus of segmental clinical decision making is upon identifying a dysfunctional vertebral segment with the application of SMT to restore mobility and/or alleviate pain. The responder clinical decision making approach attempts to categorize individuals based on a pattern of signs and symptoms suggesting a likely positive response to SMT. The present manuscript provides an overview of common physical therapist clinical decision making approaches to SMT and presents areas requiring further study in order to optimize patient response.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
We acknowledge we have no conflict of interest or financial involvement with any commercial organization that has a direct interest in any matter included in this manuscript.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed