Patients' and clinicians' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial cancer: an ANZGOG substudy of the PORTEC-3 intergroup randomised trial

ANZGOG and PORTEC Group, Prunella Blinman, Linda Mileshkin, Pearly Khaw, Geraldine Goss, Carol Johnson, Anne Capp, Susan Brooks, Gerard Wain, Ilka Kolodziej, Anne-Sophie Veillard, Rachel O'Connell, Carien L Creutzberg, Martin R Stockler, ANZGOG and PORTEC Group, Prunella Blinman, Linda Mileshkin, Pearly Khaw, Geraldine Goss, Carol Johnson, Anne Capp, Susan Brooks, Gerard Wain, Ilka Kolodziej, Anne-Sophie Veillard, Rachel O'Connell, Carien L Creutzberg, Martin R Stockler

Abstract

Background: To determine the minimum survival benefits that patients, and their clinicians, judged sufficient to make adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) worthwhile, in addition to pelvic radiotherapy, for women with high risk and advanced stage endometrial cancer.

Methods: Eighty-three participants in the PORTEC-3 trial completed a time trade-off questionnaire before and after adjuvant therapy; 44 of their clinicians completed it once only. The questionnaire used four hypothetical scenarios including baseline survival times without ACT of 5 and 8 years, and baseline survival rates at 5 years without ACT of 50 and 65%.

Results: Over 50% of patients judged an extra 1 year of survival time or an extra 5% in survival rate sufficient to make ACT worthwhile. Over 50% of clinicians judged an extra 1 year of survival time, or an extra 10% in survival rate, sufficient to make ACT worthwhile. Compared with patients, clinicians required similar survival time benefits (medians both 1 year, P=0.4), but larger survival rate benefits (medians 8.5% vs 5%, P=0.03), and clinicians' preferences varied less (IQR 0.5-1.5 years vs 0.4-2 years, P=0.0007; 5-10% vs 1-13%, P=0.004). Patients' preferences changed over time for the survival rate scenarios depending on whether they had ACT or not (change in median benefit - 3 months vs 2.5 months respectively, P=0.028). There were no strong predictors of patients' or clinicians' preferences.

Conclusions: Patients and clinicians judged moderate survival benefits sufficient to make ACT worthwhile after pelvic radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. These benefits are larger than those judged sufficient by patients with breast or colon cancers, but similar to those judged sufficient by patients with lung or ovarian cancers.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Cumulative proportions of patients considering whether chemotherapy would be worthwhile for various improvements in 5- and 8-year baseline survival times. (B) Cumulative proportions of patients considering whether chemotherapy would be worthwhile for various improvements in 50 and 65% baseline survival rates (at 5 years).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Cumulative proportions of clinicians considering whether chemotherapy would be worthwhile for various improvements in 5- and 8-year baseline survival times. (B) Cumulative proportions of clinicians considering whether chemotherapy would be worthwhile for various improvements in 50 and 65% baseline survival rates (at 5 years).

References

    1. Blinman P, Duric V, Nowak AK, Beale P, Clarke S, Briscoe K, Boyce A, Goldstein D, Hudson M, Stockler M (2010) Adjuvant chemotherapy for early colon cancer: what survival benefits make it worthwhile? Eur J Cancer 46: 1800–1807.
    1. Blinman P, Gainford C, Donoghoe M, Martyn J, Blomfield P, Grant P, Kichenadasse G, Vaughan M, Brand A, Shannon C, Gebski V, Stockler M, Friedlander M (2013) Feasibility, acceptability and preferences for intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin after optimal debulking surgery for ovarian and related cancers: an ANZGOG study. J Gynecol Oncol 24: 359–366.
    1. Blinman P, Hughes B, Crombie C, Christmas T, Hudson M, Veillard A-S, Muljadi N, Millward M, Wright G, Flynn P, Windsor M, Stockler M, Mclachlan S-A (2015) Patients' and doctors' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer: what makes it worthwhile? Eur J Cancer 51: 1529–1537.
    1. Blinman P, King M, Norman R, Viney R, Stockler MR (2012) Preferences for cancer treatments: an overview of methods and applications in oncology. Ann Oncol 23(5): 1104–1110.
    1. Duric VM, Stockler MR, Heritier S, Boyle F, Beith J, Sullivan A, Wilcken N, Coates AS, Simes RJ (2005) Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: what makes AC and CMF worthwhile now? Ann Oncol 16: 1786–1794.
    1. Gibbons JD, Chakraborti S (2011) Nonparametric statistical inference. Springer: New York, NY.
    1. Hogberg T, Signorelli M, De Oliveira CF, Fossati R, Lissoni AA, Sorbe B, Andersson H, Grenman S, Lundgren C, Rosenberg P, Boman K, Tholander B, Scambia G, Reed N, Cormio G, Tognon G, Clarke J, Sawicki T, Zola P, Kristensen G (2010) Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in endometrial cancer – results from two randomised studies. Eur J Cancer 46: 2422–2431.
    1. Jansen SJ, Kievit J, Nooij MA, Stiggelbout AM (2001) Stability of patients' preferences for chemotherapy the impact of experience. Med Decis Making 21: 295–306.
    1. Jansen SJT, Otten W, Stiggelbout AM (2004) Review of determinants of patients' preferences for adjuvant therapy in cancer. J Clin Oncol 22: 3181–3190.
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61: 69–90.
    1. Keys HM, Roberts JA, Brunetto VL, Zaino RJ, Spirtos NM, Bloss JD, Pearlman A, Maiman MA, Bell JG (2004) A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 92: 744–751.
    1. Maggi R, Lissoni A, Spina F, Melpignano M, Zola P, Favalli G, Colombo A, Fossati R (2006) Adjuvant chemotherapy vs radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial carcinoma: results of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 95: 266–271.
    1. Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Creasman WT, Hornback NB, Kurman R, Thigpen JT (1990) Doxorubicin as an adjuvant following surgery and radiation therapy in patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma, stage I and occult stage II: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 36: 166–171.
    1. Nout RA, Van De Poll-Franse LV, Lybeert MLM, Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC, Jobsen JJ, Mens JWM, Lutgens LCHW, Pras B, Van Putten WLJ, Creutzberg CL (2011) Long-term outcome and quality of life of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated with or without pelvic radiotherapy in the post operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma 1 (PORTEC-1) trial. J Clin Oncol 29: 1692–1700.
    1. Randall ME, Filiaci VL, Muss H, Spirtos NM, Mannel RS, Fowler J, Thigpen JT, Benda JA (2006) Randomized phase III trial of whole-abdominal irradiation versus doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 24: 36–44.
    1. Slevin ML, Stubbs L, Plant HJ, Wilson P, Gregory WM, Armes PJ, Downer SM (1990) Attitudes to chemotherapy: comparing views of patients with cancer with those of doctors, nurses, and general public. BMJ 300: 1458–1460.
    1. Stockler MR, O'connell R, Nowak AK, Goldstein D, Turner J, Wilcken NRC, Wyld D, Abdi EA, Glasgow A, Beale PJ, Jefford M, Dhillon H, Heritier S, Carter C, Hickie IB, Simes RJ (2007) Effect of sertraline on symptoms and survival in patients with advanced cancer, but without major depression: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 8: 603–612.
    1. Susumu N, Sagae S, Udagawa Y, Niwa K, Kuramoto H, Satoh S, Kudo R (2008) Randomized phase III trial of pelvic radiotherapy versus cisplatin-based combined chemotherapy in patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 108: 226–233.
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65: 87–108.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67: 361–370.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir