Intensified hand-hygiene campaign including soap-and-water wash may prevent acute infections in office workers, as shown by a recognized-exposure -adjusted analysis of a randomized trial

Tapani Hovi, Jukka Ollgren, Carita Savolainen-Kopra, Tapani Hovi, Jukka Ollgren, Carita Savolainen-Kopra

Abstract

Background: Variable exposure to causative agents of acute respiratory (RTI) or gastrointestinal tract infections (GTI) is a significant confounding factor in the analysis of the efficacy of interventions concerning these infections. We had an exceptional opportunity to reanalyze a previously published dataset from a trial assessing the effect of enhanced hand hygiene on the occurrence of RTI or GTI in adults, after adjustment for reported exposure and other covariates.

Methods: Twenty-one working units (designated clusters) each including at least 50 office employees, totaling 1,270 persons, were randomized into two intervention arms (either using water-and-soap or alcohol-rub in hand cleansing), or in the control arm. Self-reported data was collected through weekly emails and included own symptoms of RTI or GTI, and exposures to other persons with similar symptoms. Differences in the weekly occurrences of RTI and GTI symptoms between the arms were analyzed using multilevel binary regression model with log link with personal and cluster specific random effects, self-reported exposure to homologous disease, randomization triplet, and seasonality as covariates in the Bayesian framework.

Results: Over the 16 months duration of the trial, 297 persons in the soap and water arm, 238 persons in the alcohol-based hand rub arm, and 230 controls sent reports. The arms were similar in age distribution and gender ratios. A temporally-associated reported exposure strongly increased the risk of both types of infection in all trial arms. Persons in the soap-and-water arm reported a significantly - about 24% lower weekly prevalence of GTI than the controls whether they had observed an exposure or not during the preceding week, while for RTI, this intervention reduced the prevalence only during weeks without a reported exposure. Alcohol-rub did not affect the symptom prevalence.

Conclusions: We conclude that while frequent and careful hand washing with soap and water partially protected office-working adults from GTI, the effect on RTI was only marginal in this study. Potential reasons for this difference include partially different transmission routes and a difference in the virus load. In this trial, frequent standardized hand rubbing with ethanol-based disinfectant did not reduce the weekly prevalence of either type of infections.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00821509, 12 March 2009.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis methods; Cluster-randomized trial; Exposure to infected persons; Gastrointestinal infections; Hand-hygiene; Longitudinal data; Office work; Respiratory infections; Seasonality; Self-reported data.

References

    1. Pittet D, Allegranzi B, Sax H, Dharan S, Pessoa-Silva CL, Donaldson L, et al. Evidence-based model for hand transmission during patient care and the role of improved practices. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6(10):641–52. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70600-4.
    1. Uhari M, Mottonen M. An open randomized controlled trial of infection prevention in child day-care centers. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18(8):672–7. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199908000-00004.
    1. Ponka A, Poussa T, Laosmaa M. The effect of enhanced hygiene practices on absences due to infectious diseases among children in day care centers in Helsinki. Infection. 2004;32(1):2–7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-004-3036-x.
    1. Lennell A, Kuhlmann-Berenzon S, Geli P, Hedin K, Petersson C, Cars O, et al. Alcohol-based hand-disinfection reduced children’s absence from Swedish day care centers. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(12):1672–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01057.x.
    1. Carabin H, Gyorkos TW, Soto JC, Joseph L, Payment P, Collet JP. Effectiveness of a training program in reducing infections in toddlers attending day care centers. Epidemiology. 1999;10(3):219–27. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199905000-00005.
    1. Larson EL. Warned, but not well armed: preventing viral upper respiratory infections in households. Public Health Nurs. 2006;24:48–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.00607.x.
    1. Talaat M, Afifi S, Dueger E, El-Ashry N, Marfin A, Kandeel A, et al. Effects of hand hygiene campaigns on incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza and absenteeism in schoolchildren, Cairo, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(4):619–25. doi: 10.3201/eid1704.101353.
    1. Mott PJ, Sisk BW, Arbogast JW, Ferrazzano-Yaussy C, Bondi CA, Sheehan JJ. Alcohol-based instant hand sanitizer use in military settings: a prospective cohort study of Army basic trainees. Mil Med. 2007;172(11):1170–6. doi: 10.7205/MILMED.172.11.1170.
    1. Jefferson T, Foxlee R, Del Mar C, Dooley L, Ferroni E, Hewak B, et al. Interventions for the interruption or reduction of the spread of respiratory viruses (Review) Cochrane Library. 2007;4:1–54.
    1. Aiello AE, Coulborn RM, Perez V, Larson EL. Effect of hand hygiene on infectious disease risk in the community setting: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(8):1372–81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.124610.
    1. Cowling BJ, Chan KH, Fang VJ, Cheng CK, Fung RO, Wai W, et al. Facemasks and hand hygiene to prevent influenza transmission in households: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(7):437–46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00142.
    1. Simmerman JM, Suntarattiwong P, Levy J, Jarman RG, Kaewchana S, Gibbons RV, et al. Findings from a household randomized controlled trial of hand washing and face masks to reduce influenza transmission in Bangkok, Thailand. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2011;5(4):256–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00205.x.
    1. Savolainen-Kopra C, Haapakoski J, Peltola PA, Ziegler T, Korpela T, Anttila P, et al. STOPFLU: is it possible to reduce the number of days off in office work by improved hand-hygiene? Trials. 2010;11:69. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-69.
    1. Savolainen-Kopra C, Haapakoski J, Peltola PA, Ziegler T, Korpela T, Anttila P, et al. Hand washing with soap and water together with behavioural recommendations prevents infections in common work environment: an open cluster-randomized trial. Trials. 2012;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-10.
    1. Hovi T, Ollgren J, Haapakoski J, Amiryousefi A, Savolainen-Kopra C. Exposure to persons with symptoms of respiratory or gastrointestinal infection and relative risk of disease: self-reported observations by controls in a randomized intervention trial. Trials. 2015;16:168–77. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0691-4.
    1. Hovi T, Savolainen-Kopra C, Huvinen M. Käsienpesua ajatuksissa ja teoissa: väheneekö infektioiden kierto työpaikalla? Työterveyslääkäri. 2012;4:72–7.
    1. Turner RM, Omar RZ, Thompson SG. Bayesian methods of analysis for cluster randomized trials with binary outcome data. Stat Med. 2001;20(3):453–72. doi: 10.1002/1097-0258(20010215)20:3<453::AID-SIM803>;2-L.
    1. Schisterman EF, Cole SR, Platt RW. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4):488–95. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181a819a1.
    1. Choi SH, Chung JW, Kim HR. Clinical relevance of multiple respiratory virus detection in adult patients with acute respiratory illness. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(4):1172–7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03298-14.
    1. Lessler J, Reich NG, Brookmeyer R, Perl TM, Nelson KE, Cummings DA. Incubation periods of acute respiratory viral infections: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(5):291–300. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70069-6.
    1. Kampf G, Kramer A. Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(4):863–93. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.
    1. Stout A, Ritchie K, Macpherson K. Clinical effectiveness of alcohol-based products in increasing hand hygiene compliance and reducing infection rates: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2007;66(4):308–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.04.017.
    1. Savolainen-Kopra C, Korpela T, Simonen-Tikka ML, Amiryousefi A, Ziegler T, Roivainen M, et al. Single treatment with ethanol hand rub is ineffective against human rhinovirus--hand washing with soap and water removes the virus efficiently. J Med Virol. 2012;84(3):543–7. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23222.
    1. Tung G, Macinga D, Arbogast J, Jaykus LA. Efficacy of commonly used disinfectants for inactivation of human noroviruses and their surrogates. J Food Prot. 2013;76(7):1210–7. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-532.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir