Addition of lenalidomide to melphalan in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group MY.11 trial

D J White, N Paul, D A Macdonald, R M Meyer, L E Shepherd, D J White, N Paul, D A Macdonald, R M Meyer, L E Shepherd

Abstract

Oral melphalan and prednisone remain an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with multiple myeloma. For approximately 40 years, this combination has been the standard of care for patients not proceeding to stem cell transplant. Within the last 10 years, new agents have been found to be efficacious in the relapsed/refractory setting. Within the last year, two trials of added thalidomide in the newly diagnosed setting have demonstrated outcomes superior to those achieved with melphalan and prednisone alone. This improved outcome comes at the cost of increased toxicity.The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) has recently developed a randomized phase ii trial (MY.11) that uses a combination of lenalidomide with melphalan for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Lenalidomide is a thalidomide analogue and, like thalidomide, is thought to work through immunomodulatory effects. It was shown to have activity in patients with relapsed or refractory disease and, in combination with dexamethasone, is superior to dexamethasone alone. Lenalidomide holds promise as a more effective and potentially less toxic derivative of thalidomide. Experience with lenalidomide in combination with chemotherapy is very limited, and the purpose of MY.11 is to establish tolerability and to gain knowledge about efficacy. The information gained from MY.11 is expected to help inform dosing levels and schedules for a large phase iii trial being developed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group that will include participation by the NCIC CTG.

References

    1. Ries LAG, Hankey BF, Miller BA, et al., eds. Cancer Statistics Review 1973–88. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; 1991.
    1. Osgood EE. The survival time of patients with plasmocytic myeloma. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1960;9:1–10.
    1. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Caravita T, et al. Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;367:825–31.
    1. Facon T, Mary J, Harousseau J, et al. on behalf of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Superiority of melphalan–prednisone (mp) + thalidomide (thal) over mp and autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of newly diagnosed elderly patients with multiple myeloma [abstract 1] J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(pt 1 suppl 18S):1s.
    1. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:91–7.
    1. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1875–83.
    1. Fermand JP, Katsahian S, Divine M, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem-cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long term results of a randomized controlled trial from the Group Myelome–Autogreffe. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:9227–33.
    1. Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, et al. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase iii US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:929–36.
    1. Anderson KC, Shaughnessy JD, Jr, Barlogie B, Harousseau JL, Roodman GD. Multiple myeloma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2002:214–40.
    1. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, et al. Antitumour activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1565–71.
    1. Richardson PG, Schlossman RL, Weller E, et al. Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 overcomes drug resistance and is well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2002;100:3063–7.
    1. Richardson PG, Jagannath S, Schlossman R, et al. A multi-centre, randomized, phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 CDC-5013 dose regimens when used alone or in combination with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [abstract] Blood. 2003;102:825a.
    1. Zangari M, Barlogie B, Jacobson J, et al. Revlimid 25 mg × 20 versus 50 mg × 10 q 28 days with bridging of 5 mg × 10 versus 10 mg × 5 as post-transplant salvage therapy for multiple myeloma [abstract] Blood. 2003;102:1642a.
    1. Wang M, Knight R, Dimopoulos M, et al. Comparison of lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone to dexamethasone alone in patients who have received prior thalidomide in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma [abstract 7522] J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(pt 1 suppl 18S):427s.
    1. Roy V, Bergsagel PL, Allred J, Greipp R. Melphalan, prednisone and lenalidomide combination (mpr) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who are not candidates for stem cell transplantation [abstract] Blood. 2006;108:1016a.
    1. Palumbo A, Falco P, Benevolo G, et al. Oral lenalidomide plus melphalan and prednisone (r-mp) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [abstract 7518] J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(pt 1 suppl 18S):426s.
    1. Berenson JR, Crowley JJ, Grogan TM, et al. Maintenance therapy with alternate-day prednisone improves survival in multiple myeloma patients. Blood. 2002;99:3163–8.
    1. Shustik C, Belch A, Robinson S, et al. A randomised comparison of melphalan with prednisone or dexamethasone as induction therapy and dexamethasone or observation as maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: ncic ctg MY.7. Brit J Haematol. 2007;136:203–11.
    1. Weber DM, Chen C, Niesvizky R, et al. Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone provides improved overall survival compared to high-dose dexamethasone alone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (mm): results of a North American phase iii study (MM-009) [abstract 7521] J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(pt 1 suppl 18S):427s.
    1. Geerts Wh, Pineo GF, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh accp Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;126(suppl):338S–400S.
    1. Prevention of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis with low dose aspirin. Pulmonary Embolism Prevention (pep) trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1295–302.
    1. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy—iii: reduction in venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism by antiplatelet prophylaxis among surgical and medical patients. Antiplatelet Trialists’ Collaboration. BMJ. 1994;308:235–46.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir