Brief Report: Efficacy and Safety of Switching to a Single-Tablet Regimen of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1/Hepatitis B-Coinfected Adults

Joel Gallant, Jason Brunetta, Gordon Crofoot, Paul Benson, Anthony Mills, Cynthia Brinson, Shinichi Oka, Andrew Cheng, Will Garner, Marshall Fordyce, Moupali Das, Scott McCallister, GS-US-292-1249 Study Investigators, Joel Gallant, Jason Brunetta, Gordon Crofoot, Paul Benson, Anthony Mills, Cynthia Brinson, Shinichi Oka, Andrew Cheng, Will Garner, Marshall Fordyce, Moupali Das, Scott McCallister, GS-US-292-1249 Study Investigators

Abstract

Coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) has high efficacy and improved renal and bone safety in multiple phase 3 trials; TAF single agent is being studied in 2 phase 3 trials in patients with chronic hepatitis B. We report the results of an open-label, noncomparative switch study evaluating the efficacy and safety of E/C/F/TAF in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected adults. At 48 weeks, 91.7% of the 72 participants maintained or achieved virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL; HBV DNA <29 IU/mL). Seroconversion occurred in 2.9% of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive participants and in 3.3% of HBV e antigen-positive participants; 40% of those with abnormal alanine aminotransferase normalized. E/C/F/TAF was associated with improved renal function and reduced bone turnover. These data support the use of E/C/F/TAF in treating HIV/HBV coinfection.

Conflict of interest statement

J.G. reports receiving consulting/advisory fees from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Gilead, Janssen Therapeutics, Merck, ViiV/GlaskoSmithKilne (GSK) and institutional grant support from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Sangamo BioSciences, and GSK/ViiV outside the submitted work. J.B. has received study-related reimbursement from Gilead during the conduct of the study; conference sponsorship from Gilead Canada, Merck Canada, ViiV Canada, and Janssen Canada; speaker fees from Gilead Canada and Merck Canada; and consultant fees from Gilead Canada, Merck Canada, ViiV Canada, and Abbvie Canada outside the submitted work. G.C. reports grants from Gilead during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Gilead, ViiV, Janssen, and Merck outside of the submitted work; and personal fees from Gilead and ViiV outside the submitted work. P.B. reports receiving other fees (Speakers Bureau, study-related reimbursement, advisory boards) from Gilead outside the submitted work. C.B. has received grants Gilead, Theratech, BMS, SlieaGen, ViiV/GSK, Daiichi Sankyo, Vertex, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Shionogi; advisory board fees from Gilead, Theratech, VMS, and ViiV/GSK; speaker fees from Gilead; and consultant fees from ViiV/GSK during the conduct of the study; and grants from Theratech, BMS, SlieaGen, ViiV/GSK, Daiichi Sankyo, Vertex, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Shionogi, Elcelyx; advisory board fees from Theratch and BMS; and speaker fees from Theratch outside the submitted work. S.O. has received research grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) and honoraria from MSD, ViiV, Trii Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Japan Tobacco, and Janssen outside the submitted work. A.C., W.G., M.F., M.D., and S.M. are employees of Gilead and hold stock interest in the company. J.G., J.B., G.C., P.B., A.M., C.B. were principal investigators and A.C., W.G., M.F., M.D., and S.M. were employees of Gilead Sciences and were the scientific, medical, and operational leaders responsible for this study's design, conduct, oversight, and analyses. All authors have reviewed the results of this study and approved the manuscript.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Virologic results and proteinuria at weeks 24 and 48.

References

    1. Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-infected Adults and Adolescents; 2015:1–166. Available at: . Accessed January 23, 2016.
    1. Huldrych F, Gunthard HF, Aberg JA, et al. Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2014 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel. JAMA. 2014;312:410–425.
    1. (EACS) EACS. EACS Guideline Version 8.0; 2015. European AIDS Clinical Society. Available at . Accessed January 23, 2016.
    1. Hall AM, Hendry BM, Nitsch D, et al. Tenofovir-associated kidney toxicity in HIV-infected patients: a review of the evidence. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57:773–780.
    1. Gupta SK. Tenofovir-associated Fanconi syndrome: review of the FDA adverse event reporting system. AIDS Patient Care and STDS. 2008;22:99–103.
    1. Post FA, Moyle GJ, Stellbrink HJ, et al. Randomized comparison of renal effects, efficacy, and safety with once-daily abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine, administered with efavirenz, in antiretroviral-naive, hiv-1-infected adults: 48-week results from the ASSERT Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;55:49–57.
    1. Stellbrink HJ, Orkin C, Arribas JR, et al. Comparison of changes in bone density and turnover with abacavir-lamivudine versus tenofovir-emtricitabine in HIV-infected adults: 48-week results from the ASSERT study. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51:963–972.
    1. Schafer JJ, Manlangit K, Squires KE. Bone health and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33:665–682.
    1. McComsey GA, Kitch D, Daar ES, et al. Bone mineral density and fractures in antiretroviral-naive persons randomized to receive abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine along with efavirenz or atazanavir-ritonavir: Aids Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a substudy of ACTG A5202. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1791–1801.
    1. Van Rompay KKA, Durand-Gasselin L, Brignolo LL, et al. Chronic administration of tenofovir to rhesus macaques from infancy through adulthood and pregnancy: summary of pharmacokinetics and biological and virological effects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3144–3160.
    1. Sax PE, Wohl D, Yin MT, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: two randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trials. Lancet. 2015;385:2606–2615.
    1. Mills A, Arribas JR, Andrade-Villanueva J, et al. Switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide in antiretroviral regimens for virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 infection: a randomised, active-controlled, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet. 2015;16:43–52.
    1. Pozniak A, Arribas JR, Gathe J, et al. Switching to tenofovir alafenamide, coformulated with elvitegravir, cobicistat, and emtricitabine, in HIV-infected patients with renal impairment: 48 week results from a single-arm, multi-center, open-label, Phase 3 study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;71:530–537.
    1. Gaur A, Fourie J, Chokephaibulkit K, et al. Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of an integrase inhibitor-based single-tablet regimen in HIV-infected treatment-naive adolescents [Poster 909]. Paper presented at: 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 3–6, 2014; Boston, MA.
    1. Agarwal K, Fung SK, Nguyen TT, et al. Twenty-eight day safety, antiviral activity, and pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide for treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. J Hepatol. 2015;62:533–540.
    1. Murakami E, Wang T, Park Y, et al. Implications of efficient hepatic delivery by tenofovir alafenamide (GS-7340) for hepatitis B virus therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:3563–3569.
    1. Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA. Gilead Submits New Drug Application to U.S. Food and Drug Administration for Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B. Foster City, CA; 2016.
    1. METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1994;20(1 pt 1):15–20.
    1. Fung S, Kwan P, Fabri M, et al. Randomized comparison of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2014;146:980–988.
    1. Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442–2455.
    1. Martin-Carbonero L, Teixeira T, Poveda E, et al. Clinical and virological outcomes in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B on long-term nucleos(t)ide analogues. AIDS. 2011;25:73–79.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir