Changes in Circulating ProAMH and Total AMH during Healthy Pregnancy and Post-Partum: A Longitudinal Study

Michael W Pankhurst, Christine A Clark, Judith Zarek, Carl A Laskin, Ian S McLennan, Michael W Pankhurst, Christine A Clark, Judith Zarek, Carl A Laskin, Ian S McLennan

Abstract

Circulating Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is derived from the gonads, and is a mixture of the prohormone (proAMH), which does not bind to AMH receptors, and receptor-competent AMH. The functions of a hormone are partially defined by the factors that control its levels. Ovarian reserve accounts for 55~75% of the woman-to-woman variation in AMH level, leaving over 25% of the biological variation to be explained. Pregnancy has been reported to decrease circulating AMH levels, but the observations are inconsistent, with the effect of pregnancy on the bioactivity of AMH being unknown. We have therefore undertaken a longitudinal study of circulating proAMH and total AMH during pregnancy. Serum samples were drawn at 6-8 gestational time-points (first trimester to post-partum) from 25 healthy women with prior uneventful pregnancies. The total AMH and proAMH levels were measured at each time-point using ELISA. The level of circulating total AMH progressively decreased during pregnancy, in all women (p<0.001). On average, the percentage decline between the first trimester and 36-39 weeks' gestation was 61.5%, with a standard deviation of 13.0% (range 30.4-81.2%). The percentage decline in total AMH levels associated with maternal age (R = -0.53, p = 0.024), but not with the women's first trimester AMH level. The postpartum total AMH levels showed no consistent relationship to the woman's first trimester values (range 31-273%). This raises the possibility that a fundamental determinant of circulating AMH levels is reset during pregnancy. The ratio of proAMH to total AMH levels exhibited little or no variation during pregnancy, indicating that the control of the cleavage/activation of AMH is distinct from the mechanisms that control the total level of AMH.

Conflict of interest statement

ISM and MWP have filed a patent pertaining to cleavage-state-specific AMH assays including the proAMH-specific assay used in this manuscript (WO 2014/204327 A1). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. CAC, JZ and CAL have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Change in total AMH levels…
Fig 1. Change in total AMH levels during gestation.
(A) Each woman’s individual levels are shown. (B) Box and whisker plots (medians, interquartile intervals, range) of AMH levels. (C) Percentage decline. Each woman’s values were normalized to her first trimester (6–11 weeks) sample, using log transformation. The data is the mean ± standard of error of the mean. There is a significant decline with gestational age, p

Fig 2. The magnitude of pregnancy-related decline…

Fig 2. The magnitude of pregnancy-related decline was dissociated from a woman’s level of AMH.

Fig 2. The magnitude of pregnancy-related decline was dissociated from a woman’s level of AMH.
Each woman’s level of total AMH during the first trimester is plotted against the extent to which her total AMH levels declined by 36–39 weeks gestation. The two measures showed no significant correlation (R = - 0.04). 1 ng/ml of AMH = 7.14 pmol/L (pM).

Fig 3. The influence of maternal age…

Fig 3. The influence of maternal age on the pregnancy-associated decline in total AMH level.

Fig 3. The influence of maternal age on the pregnancy-associated decline in total AMH level.
The percentage decrease in total AMH levels between the first trimester and the 36–39 week samples is plotted against the women’s ages. The two parameters were significantly correlated, R = -0.53, p = 0.024.

Fig 4. Change in the proportion of…

Fig 4. Change in the proportion of the AMH forms during gestation.

(A) ProAMH levels…

Fig 4. Change in the proportion of the AMH forms during gestation.
(A) ProAMH levels during pregnancy. Each woman’s values were normalized to her first trimester (6–11 weeks) sample, using log transformation. The data is the mean ± standard of error of the mean. There is a significant decline with gestational age, p
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Massague J. TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:616–30. 10.1038/nrm3434 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Griesinger G, Dafopoulos K, Buendgen N, Cascorbi I, Georgoulias P, Zavos A, et al. Elimination half-life of anti-müllerian hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2160–3. 10.1210/jc.2012-1070 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang J, Dicken C, Lustbader JW, Tortoriello DV. Evidence for a Mullerian-inhibiting substance autocrine/paracrine system in adult human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1195–203. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang PY, Koishi K, McGeachie AB, Kimber M, Maclaughlin DT, Donahoe PK, et al. Mullerian inhibiting substance acts as a motor neuron survival factor in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16421–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nykjaer A, Lee R, Teng KK, Jansen P, Madsen P, Nielsen MS, et al. Sortilin is essential for proNGF induced neuronal cell death. Nature. 2004;427:843–8. - PubMed
Show all 54 references
Related information
Grant support
This study was funded by the Health Research Council New Zealand (www.hrc.govt.nz/, 14-441 to ISM, MWP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Fig 2. The magnitude of pregnancy-related decline…
Fig 2. The magnitude of pregnancy-related decline was dissociated from a woman’s level of AMH.
Each woman’s level of total AMH during the first trimester is plotted against the extent to which her total AMH levels declined by 36–39 weeks gestation. The two measures showed no significant correlation (R = - 0.04). 1 ng/ml of AMH = 7.14 pmol/L (pM).
Fig 3. The influence of maternal age…
Fig 3. The influence of maternal age on the pregnancy-associated decline in total AMH level.
The percentage decrease in total AMH levels between the first trimester and the 36–39 week samples is plotted against the women’s ages. The two parameters were significantly correlated, R = -0.53, p = 0.024.
Fig 4. Change in the proportion of…
Fig 4. Change in the proportion of the AMH forms during gestation.
(A) ProAMH levels during pregnancy. Each woman’s values were normalized to her first trimester (6–11 weeks) sample, using log transformation. The data is the mean ± standard of error of the mean. There is a significant decline with gestational age, p

References

    1. Massague J. TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:616–30. 10.1038/nrm3434
    1. Griesinger G, Dafopoulos K, Buendgen N, Cascorbi I, Georgoulias P, Zavos A, et al. Elimination half-life of anti-müllerian hormone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2160–3. 10.1210/jc.2012-1070
    1. Wang J, Dicken C, Lustbader JW, Tortoriello DV. Evidence for a Mullerian-inhibiting substance autocrine/paracrine system in adult human endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1195–203. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.028
    1. Wang PY, Koishi K, McGeachie AB, Kimber M, Maclaughlin DT, Donahoe PK, et al. Mullerian inhibiting substance acts as a motor neuron survival factor in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:16421–5.
    1. Nykjaer A, Lee R, Teng KK, Jansen P, Madsen P, Nielsen MS, et al. Sortilin is essential for proNGF induced neuronal cell death. Nature. 2004;427:843–8.
    1. Hauburger A, von Einem S, Schwaerzer GK, Buttstedt A, Zebisch M, Schraml M, et al. The pro-form of BMP-2 interferes with BMP-2 signalling by competing with BMP-2 for IA receptor binding. FEBS J. 2009;276:6386–98. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07361.x
    1. Pankhurst MW, Chong YH, McLennan IS. Relative levels of the proprotein and cleavage-actived form of circulating human anti-Müllerian hormone are sexually dimorphic and variable during the life cycle. Physiol Rep. 2016;4:e12783 10.14814/phy2.12783
    1. Pankhurst MW, McLennan IS. Human blood contains both the uncleaved precursor of anti-Mullerian hormone and a complex of the NH2- and COOH-terminal peptides. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013;305:E1241–7. 10.1152/ajpendo.00395.2013
    1. Pankhurst MW, Chong YH, McLennan IS. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measurements of antimullerian hormone (AMH) in human blood are a composite of the uncleaved and bioactive cleaved forms of AMH. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:846–50. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.009
    1. di Clemente N, Jamin SP, Lugovskoy A, Carmillo P, Ehrenfels C, Picard JY, et al. Processing of anti-mullerian hormone regulates receptor activation by a mechanism distinct from TGF-beta. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:2193–206. 10.1210/me.2010-0273
    1. Pankhurst MW, A LB-L, Batchelor NJ, McLennan IS. The anti-Muüllerian hormone precursor (proAMH) is not converted to the receptor-competent form (AMHN,C) in the circulating blood of mice. Endocrinology. 2016;157:1622–9. 10.1210/en.2015-1834
    1. MacLaughlin DT, Donahoe PK. Sex determination and differentiation. New Eng J Med. 2004;350:367–78.
    1. McLennan IS, Pankhurst MW. Anti-Mullerian hormone is a gonadal cytokine with two circulating forms and cryptic actions. J Endocrinol. 2015;226:R45–57. 10.1530/JOE-15-0206
    1. Lee MM, Donahoe PK, Hasegawa T, Silverman B, Crist GB, Best S, et al. Mullerian inhibiting substance in humans: normal levels from infancy to adulthood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:571–6.
    1. Pfennig F, Standke A, Gutzeit HO. The role of Amh signaling in teleost fish—Multiple functions not restricted to the gonads. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015;223:87–107. 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.09.025
    1. Durlinger AL, Visser JA, Themmen AP. Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti-Mullerian hormone. Reproduction. 2002;124:601–9.
    1. Namkung J, Song JY, Jo HH, Kim MR, Lew YO, Donahoe PK, et al. Mullerian inhibiting substance induces apoptosis of human endometrial stromal cells in endometriosis. J Clin Endo Metab. 2012;97:3224–30.
    1. Segev DL, Ha TU, Tran TT, Kenneally M, Harkin P, Jung M, et al. Mullerian inhibiting substance inhibits breast cancer cell growth through an NFkappa B-mediated pathway. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:28371–9.
    1. Dewailly D, Andersen CY, Balen A, Broekmans F, Dilaver N, Fanchin R, et al. The physiology and clinical utility of anti-Mullerian hormone in women. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:370–85. 10.1093/humupd/dmt062
    1. Fanchin R, Schonauer LM, Righini C, Guibourdenche J, Frydman R, Taieb J. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone is more strongly related to ovarian follicular status than serum inhibin B, estradiol, FSH and LH on day 3. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:323–7.
    1. Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton N, Craig LB. Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:170–5. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.006
    1. Bentzen JG, Forman JL, Johannsen TH, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, Andersen AN. Ovarian antral follicle subclasses and anti-mullerian hormone during normal reproductive aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:1602–11. 10.1210/jc.2012-1829
    1. Dennis NA, Houghton LA, Jones GT, van Rij AM, Morgan K, McLennan IS. The level of serum anti-Mullerian hormone correlates with Vitamin D status in men and women but not in boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2450–5. 10.1210/jc.2012-1213
    1. Irani M, Merhi Z. Role of vitamin D in ovarian physiology and its implication in reproduction: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:460–8 e3. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.046
    1. Kissell KA, Danaher MR, Schisterman EF, Wactawski-Wende J, Ahrens KA, Schliep K, et al. Biological variability in serum anti-Mullerian hormone throughout the menstrual cycle in ovulatory and sporadic anovulatory cycles in eumenorrheic women. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1764–72. 10.1093/humrep/deu142
    1. La Marca A, Giulini S, Orvieto R, De Leo V, Volpe A. Anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations in maternal serum during pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1569–72.
    1. Lutterodt M, Byskov AG, Skouby SO, Tabor A, Yding Andersen C. Anti-Mullerian hormone in pregnant women in relation to other hormones, fetal sex and in circulation of second trimester fetuses. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:694–9.
    1. Nelson SM, Stewart F, Fleming R, Freeman DJ. Longitudinal assessment of anti-mullerian hormone during pregnancy—relationship wwith maternal adiposity, insulin, and adiponectin. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:1356–8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.1676
    1. Koninger A, Kauth A, Schmidt B, Schmidt M, Yerlikaya G, Kasimir-Bauer S, et al. Anti-Mullerian-hormone levels during pregnancy and postpartum. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:60 10.1186/1477-7827-11-60
    1. Gerli S, Favilli A, Brozzetti A, Torlone E, Pugliese B, Pericoli S, et al. Anti-mullerian hormone concentration during the third trimester of pregnancy and puerperium: a longitudinal case-control study in normal and diabetic pregnancy. Endocrine. 2015;50:250–5. 10.1007/s12020-014-0515-4
    1. Lockshin MD, Kim M, Laskin CA, Guerra M, Branch DW, Merrill J, et al. Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome by the presence of lupus anticoagulant, but not anticardiolipin antibody, in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2311–8. 10.1002/art.34402
    1. Vanky E, Carlsen SM. Androgens and antimullerian hormone in mothers with polycystic ovary syndrome and their newborns. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:509–15. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.021
    1. Al-Qahtani A, Muttukrishna S, Appasamy M, Johns J, Cranfield M, Visser JA, et al. Development of a sensitive enzyme immunoassay for anti-Mullerian hormone and the evaluation of potential clinical applications in males and females. Clin Endocrinol. 2005;63:267–73.
    1. Kumar A, Kalra B, Patel A, McDavid L, Roudebush WE. Development of a second generation anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) ELISA. J Immunol Methods. 2010;362:51–9. 10.1016/j.jim.2010.08.011
    1. Pankhurst MW, McLennan IS. A specific immunoassay for proAMH, the uncleaved proprotein precursor of anti-Mullerian hormone. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2016;419:165–71. 10.1016/j.mce.2015.10.013
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.
    1. La Marca A, Grisendi V, Griesinger G. How much does AMH really vary in normal women? Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:959487 10.1155/2013/959487
    1. Whittaker PG, Macphail S, Lind T. Serial hematologic changes and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:33–9.
    1. Durlinger AL, Kramer P, Karels B, de Jong FH, Uilenbroek JT, Grootegoed JA, et al. Control of primordial follicle recruitment by anti-Mullerian hormone in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 1999;140:5789–96.
    1. Pankhurst MW, Chong YH. Variation in circulating anti-Muüllerian hormone precursor (proAMH) during the peri-ovulatory and acute post-ovulatory phases of the human ovarian cycle. Fertil Steril. 2016; 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.010. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Smith R, Smith JI, Shen X, Engel PJ, Bowman ME, McGrath SA, et al. Patterns of plasma corticotropin-releasing hormone, progesterone, estradiol, and estriol change and the onset of human labor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2066–74. 10.1210/jc.2008-2257
    1. Faupel-Badger JM, Hsieh CC, Troisi R, Lagiou P, Potischman N. Plasma volume expansion in pregnancy: implications for biomarkers in population studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1720–3.
    1. Ouzounian JG, Elkayam U. Physiologic changes during normal pregnancy and delivery. Cardiol Clin. 2012;30:317–29. 10.1016/j.ccl.2012.05.004
    1. Pivarnik JM, Mauer MB, Ayres NA, Kirshon B, Dildy GA, Cotton DB. Effects of chronic exercise on blood volume expansion and hematologic indices during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:265–9.
    1. Govan AD. The human ovary in early pregnancy. J Endocrinol. 1968;40:421–8.
    1. Govan AD. Ovarian follicular activity in late pregnancy. J Endocrinol. 1970;48:235–41.
    1. Starup J, Visfeldt J. Ovarian morphology in early and late human pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1974;53:211–8.
    1. Jeppesen JV, Anderson RA, Kelsey TW, Christiansen SL, Kristensen SG, Jayaprakasan K, et al. Which follicles make the most anti-Mullerian hormone in humans? Evidence for an abrupt decline in AMH production at the time of follicle selection. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19:519–27. 10.1093/molehr/gat024
    1. Dekel N, David MP, Yedwab GA, Kraicer PF. Follicular development during late pregnancy. Int J Fertil. 1977;22:24–9.
    1. Grynberg M, Pierre A, Rey R, Leclerc A, Arouche N, Hesters L, et al. Differential regulation of ovarian anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) by estradiol through alpha- and beta-estrogen receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E1649–57. 10.1210/jc.2011-3133
    1. Lockwood GM, Muttukrishna S, Ledger WL. Inhibins and activins in human ovulation, conception and pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:284–95.
    1. McNeilly AS. Lactation and fertility. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 1997;2:291–8.
    1. Short RV. Lactational infertility in family planning. Ann Med. 1993;25:175–80.
    1. Novembri R, Funghi L, Voltolini C, Belmonte G, Vannuccini S, Torricelli M, et al. Placenta expresses anti-Mullerian hormone and its receptor: Sex-related difference in fetal membranes. Placenta. 2015;36:731–7. 10.1016/j.placenta.2015.04.009

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir