The impact of sanitation interventions on latrine coverage and latrine use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Joshua V Garn, Gloria D Sclar, Matthew C Freeman, Gauthami Penakalapati, Kelly T Alexander, Patrick Brooks, Eva A Rehfuess, Sophie Boisson, Kate O Medlicott, Thomas F Clasen, Joshua V Garn, Gloria D Sclar, Matthew C Freeman, Gauthami Penakalapati, Kelly T Alexander, Patrick Brooks, Eva A Rehfuess, Sophie Boisson, Kate O Medlicott, Thomas F Clasen

Abstract

Background: An estimated 2.4 billion people still lack access to improved sanitation and 946 million still practice open defecation. The World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned this review to assess the impact of sanitation on coverage and use, as part of its effort to develop a set of guidelines on sanitation and health.

Methods and findings: We systematically reviewed the literature and used meta-analysis to quantitatively characterize how different sanitation interventions impact latrine coverage and use. We also assessed both qualitative and quantitative studies to understand how different structural and design characteristics of sanitation are associated with individual latrine use. A total of 64 studies met our eligibility criteria. Of 27 intervention studies that reported on household latrine coverage and provided a point estimate with confidence interval, the average increase in coverage was 14% (95% CI: 10%, 19%). The intervention types with the largest absolute increases in coverage included the Indian government's "Total Sanitation Campaign" (27%; 95% CI: 14%, 39%), latrine subsidy/provision interventions (16%; 95% CI: 8%, 24%), latrine subsidy/provision interventions that also incorporated education components (17%; 95% CI: -5%, 38%), sewerage interventions (14%; 95% CI: 1%, 28%), sanitation education interventions (14%; 95% CI: 3%, 26%), and community-led total sanitation interventions (12%; 95% CI: -2%, 27%). Of 10 intervention studies that reported on household latrine use, the average increase was 13% (95% CI: 4%, 21%). The sanitation interventions and contexts in which they were implemented varied, leading to high heterogeneity across studies. We found 24 studies that examined the association between structural and design characteristics of sanitation facilities and facility use. These studies reported that better maintenance, accessibility, privacy, facility type, cleanliness, newer latrines, and better hygiene access were all frequently associated with higher use, whereas poorer sanitation conditions were associated with lower use.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that most sanitation interventions only had a modest impact on increasing latrine coverage and use. A further understanding of how different sanitation characteristics and sanitation interventions impact coverage and use is essential in order to more effectively attain sanitation access for all, eliminate open defecation, and ultimately improve health.

Keywords: Latrine coverage; Latrine use; Sanitation; Sanitation uptake.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of publications considered in this review.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot showing the impact of different sanitation interventions on latrine coverage. Int = Mean prevalence of latrine coverage in the intervention arm. Con = Mean prevalence of latrine coverage in the in control arm. na = not applicable (i.e. pre-post study design). nr = not reported.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot showing the impact of different sanitation interventions on latrine use. Int = Mean prevalence of use by study participants in intervention arm. Con = Mean prevalence of use by study participants in control arm. na = not applicable (i.e. pre-post study design). nr = not reported.

References

    1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015. United Nations, General Assembly.
    1. Ahmed M., Begum A., Chowdhury M.A. Social constraints before sanitation improvement in tea gardens of Sylhet, Bangladesh. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010;164:263–271.
    1. Arnold B.F., Khush R.S., Ramaswamy P., London A.G., Rajkumar P., Ramaprabha P., Durairaj N., Hubbard A.E., Balakrishnan K., Colford J.M., Jr. Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:22605–22610.
    1. Barnard S., Routray P., Majorin F., Peletz R., Boisson S., Sinha A., Clasen T. Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on latrine coverage and use: a cross-sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71438.
    1. Barreto M.L., Genser B., Strina A., Teixeira M.G., Assis A.M., Rego R.F., Teles C.A., Prado M.S., Matos S.M., Santos D.N., dos Santos L.A., Cairncross S. Effect of city-wide sanitation programme on reduction in rate of childhood diarrhoea in northeast Brazil: assessment by two cohort studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1622–1628.
    1. Biran A., Jenkins M.W., Dabrase P., Bhagwat I. Patterns and determinants of communal latrine usage in urban poverty pockets in Bhopal: India. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2011;16:854–862.
    1. Briceño B., Coville A., Martinez S. Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank; 2015. Promoting handwashing and sanitation: evidence from a large-scale randomized trial in rural Tanzania. 58 pp.
    1. Caldwell D.M., Welton N.J. Approaches for synthesising complex mental health interventions in meta-analysis. Evid. Based Ment. Health. 2016;19:16–21.
    1. Cameron L., Shah M., Olivia S. The World Bank; 2013. Impact Evaluation of a Large-Scale Rural Sanitation Project in Indonesia.
    1. Caruso B.A., Dreibelbis R., Ogutu E.A., Rheingans R. If you build it will they come? Factors influencing rural primary pupils’ urination and defecation practices at school in western Kenya. J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 2014;4:642–653.
    1. Caruso B.A., Freeman M.C., Garn J.V., Dreibelbis R., Saboori S., Muga R., Rheingans R. Assessing the impact of a school-based latrine cleaning and handwashing program on pupil absence in Nyanza Province, Kenya: a cluster-randomized trial. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2014;19:1185–1197.
    1. Chase C., Ziulu V., Lall P., Kov P., Smets S., Chan V., Lun Y. Addressing the behavioural constraints to latrine uptake: effectiveness of a behaviour-change campaign in rural Cambodia. Waterlines. 2015;34:365–378.
    1. Choudhury N., Hossain M.A. BRAC Centre; Dhaka, Bangladesh: 2006. Exploring the Current Status of Sanitary Latrine Use in Shibpur Upazila, Narsingdi District.
    1. Clasen T., Boisson S., Routray P., Torondel B., Bell M., Cumming O., Ensink J., Freeman M., Jenkins M., Odagiri M., Ray S., Sinha A., Suar M., Schmidt W.P. Effectiveness of a rural sanitation programme on diarrhoea, soil-transmitted helminth infection, and child malnutrition in Odisha, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Global Health. 2014;2:e645–e653.
    1. Coffey D., Gupta A., Hathi P., Khurana N., Srivastav N., Vyas S., Spears D. Open defecation: evidence from a new survey in rural north India. Econ. Political Wkly. 2014;49:43–55.
    1. Cumberland P., Edwards T., Hailu G., Harding-Esch E., Andreasen A., Mabey D., Todd J. The impact of community level treatment and preventative interventions on trachoma prevalence in rural Ethiopia. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2008;37:549–558.
    1. Devine J., Sijbesma C. Sustainability of rural sanitation marketing in Vietnam: findings from a new case study. Waterlines. 2011;30:52–60.
    1. Drangert J.O., Nawab B. A cultural-spatial analysis of excreting, recirculation of human excreta and health-the case of North West Frontier Province, Pakistan. Health Place. 2011;17:57–66.
    1. Dreibelbis R., Freeman M.C., Greene L.E., Saboori S., Rheingans R. The impact of school water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions on the health of younger siblings of pupils: a cluster-randomized trial in Kenya. Am. J. Public Health. 2014;104:e91–97.
    1. Elbers, C., Godfrey, S., Gunning, J.W., van der Velden, M., Vigh, M., 2012. Effectiveness of Large Scale Water and Sanitation Interventions: The One Million Initiative in Mozambique.
    1. Fenn B., Bulti A.T., Nduna T., Duffield A., Watson F. An evaluation of an operations research project to reduce childhood stunting in a food-insecure area in Ethiopia. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:1746–1754.
    1. Ferriman A. BMJ readers choose the sanitary revolution as greatest medical advance since 1840. BMJ. 2007;334:111.
    1. Freeman M.C., Clasen T., Brooker S.J., Akoko D.O., Rheingans R. The impact of a school-based hygiene, water quality and sanitation intervention on soil-transmitted helminth reinfection: a cluster-randomized trial. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013;89:875–883.
    1. Freeman, M.C., Erhard, L., Fehr, A., Ogden, S., Ahmed, S., Sahin, M., Dooley, 2013. Equity of Access to WASH in Schools: A Comparative Study of Policy and Service Delivery in Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, the Philippines, Timor-Leste, Uganda and Uzbekistan.
    1. Freeman M.C., Clasen T., Dreibelbis R., Saboori S., Greene L.E., Brumback B., Muga R., Rheingans R. The impact of a school-based water supply and treatment, hygiene, and sanitation programme on pupil diarrhoea: a cluster-randomized trial. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014;142:340–351.
    1. Freeman, M.C., Garn, J.V., Sclar, G.D., Boisson, S., Medlicott, K., Alexander, K.T., Penakalapati, G., Anderson, D., Grimes, J., Mahtani, A., Rehfuess, E.A., Clasen, T.F., submitted. The impact of sanitation on infectious disease and nutritional status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    1. Garn J.V., Caruso B.A., Drews-Botsch C.D., Kramer M.R., Brumback B.A., Rheingans R.D., Freeman M.C. Factors associated with pupil toilet use in kenyan primary schools. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2014;11:9694–9711.
    1. Gross, E., Günther, I., 2014. Why don’t households invest in latrines: health, prestige, or safety?
    1. Guiteras R., Levinsohn J., Mobarak A.M. Sanitation subsidies. Encouraging sanitation investment in the developing world: a cluster-randomized trial. Science. 2015;348:903–906.
    1. Guyatt G., Oxman A.D., Akl E.A., Kunz R., Vist G., Brozek J., Norris Falck-Ytter S., Y, Glasziou P., deBeer H., Jaeschke R., Rind D., Meerpohl J., Dahm P., Schünemann H.J. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011;64:383–394.
    1. Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Montori V., Vist G., Kunz R., Brozek J., Alonso-Coello P., Djulbegovic B., Atkins D., Falck-Ytter Y., Williams J.W., Jr., Meerpohl J., Norris S.L., Akl E.A., Schunemann H.J. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2011;64:1277–1282.
    1. Gyorkos T.W., Maheu-Giroux M., Blouin B., Casapia M. Impact of health education on soil-transmitted helminth infections in schoolchildren of the Peruvian Amazon: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013;7:e2397.
    1. Hammer, J., Spears, D., 2013. Village sanitation and children’s human capital: evidence from a randomized experiment by the Maharashtra government.
    1. Harvey P.A. Zero subsidy strategies for accelerating access to rural water and sanitation services. Water Sci. Technol. J. Int. Assoc. Water Pollut. Res. 2011;63:1037–1043.
    1. Heijnen M., Routray P., Torondel B., Clasen T. Neighbour-shared versus communal latrines in urban slums: a cross-sectional study in Orissa, India exploring household demographics, accessibility, privacy, use and cleanliness. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015;109:690–699.
    1. Heijnen M., Routray P., Torondel B., Clasen T. Shared sanitation versus individual household latrines in urban slums: a cross-sectional study in orissa, India. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015;93:263–268.
    1. Huda T.M., Unicomb L., Johnston R.B., Halder A.K., Yushuf Sharker M.A., Luby S.P. Interim evaluation of a large scale sanitation, hygiene and water improvement programme on childhood diarrhea and respiratory disease in rural Bangladesh. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012;75:604–611.
    1. Hulland, K., Martin, N., Dreibelbis, R., DeBruicker, V., Winch, P., 2015. What factors affect sustained adoption of safe water, hygiene and sanitation technologies? 3ie Systematic Review Summary 2. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), London.
    1. Jinadu M.K., Adegbenro C.A., Esmai A.O., Ojo A.A., Oyeleye B.A. Health promotion intervention for hygienic disposal of children’s faeces in a rural area of Nigeria. Health Educ. J. 2007;66:222–228.
    1. Kema K., Semali I., Mkuwa S., Kagonji I., Temu F., Ilako F., Mkuye M. Factors affecting the utilisation of improved ventilated latrines among communities in Mtwara Rural District, Tanzania. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2012;13(Suppl. 1):4.
    1. King J.D., Endeshaw T., Escher E., Alemtaye G., Melaku S., Gelaye W., Worku A., Adugna M., Melak B., Teferi T., Zerihun M., Gesese D., Tadesse Z., Mosher A.W., Odermatt P., Utzinger J., Marti H., Ngondi J., Hopkins D.R., Emerson P.M. Intestinal parasite prevalence in an area of ethiopia after implementing the SAFE strategy, enhanced outreach services, and health extension program. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013;7:e2223.
    1. Kiwanuka S.N., Tetui M., George A., Kisakye A.N., Walugembe D.R., Kiracho E.E. What lessons for sustainability of maternal health interventions can be drawn from rural water and sanitation projects? Perspectives from Eastern Uganda. J. Manage. Sustainability. 2015;5
    1. Kullman C., Ahmed R., Hanchett S., Khan M.H., Perez E., Devine J., So J., Costain C.J. Long Term Sustainability of Improved Sanitation in Rural Bangladesh. In: Grossman A., editor. Water and Sanitation Program; 2011.
    1. London T., Esper H. Assessing poverty-alleviation outcomes of an enterprise-led approach to sanitation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2014;1331:90–105.
    1. Luby, S.P. 2015. Using behavior change messaging to improve shared toilets in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    1. Malebo, H.M., Makundi, E.A., Mussa, R., Mushi, A.K., A., M.M., Mrisho, M., Senkoro, K.P., Mshana, J.M., Urassa, J., Msimbe, V., Tenu, P., 2012. Outcome and impact monitoring for scaling up Mtumba sanitation and hygiene participatory approach in Tanzania.
    1. Mathew, K., Zachariah, S., Shordt, K., Snel, M., Cairncross, S., Biran, A., Schmidt, W., 2008. The sustainability and impact of school sanitation, water and hygiene education in Kerala, Southern India, Unpublished report.
    1. Mathews S., Kumari B. Socio Economic Unit Foundation; Kerala, India: 2004. Sustaining Changes in Hygiene Behaviour: Findings from Kerala Study 2001–2004.
    1. Moraes L.R., Cancio J.A., Cairncross S., Huttly S. Impact of drainage and sewerage on diarrhoea in poor urban areas in Salvador, Brazil. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2003;97:153–158.
    1. Murthy G.V., Goswami A., Narayanan S., Amar S. Effect of educational intervention on defaecation habits in an Indian urban slum. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1990;93:189–193.
    1. Ness S.J. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. University of South Florida Scholar Commons, Scholar Commons; 2015. Evaluation of School VIP Latrines and User Preferences and Motivations for Adopting Communal Sanitation Technologies in Zwedru, Liberia.
    1. Ngondi J., Teferi T., Gebre T., Shargie E.B., Zerihun M., Ayele B., Adamu L., King J.D., Cromwell E.A., Emerson P.M. Effect of a community intervention with pit latrines in five districts of Amhara, Ethiopia. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2010;15:592–599.
    1. Njuguna, V., Karanja, B., Thuranira, M., Shordt, K., Snel, M., Cairncross, S., Biran, A., Schmidt, W., 2008. The sustainability and impact of school sanitation, water and hygiene education in Kenya.
    1. Olsen A., Samuelsen H., Onyango-Ouma W. A study of risk factors for intestinal helminth infections using epidemiological and anthropological approaches. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2001;33:569–584.
    1. Patil S.R., Arnold B.F., Salvatore A.L., Briceno B., Ganguly S., Colford J.M., Jr., Gertler P.J. The effect of India's total sanitation campaign on defecation behaviors and child health in rural Madhya Pradesh: a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2014;11:e1001709.
    1. Pattanayak S.K., Yang J.C., Dickinson K.L., Poulos C., Patil S.R., Mallick R.K., Blitstein J.L., Praharaj P. Shame or subsidy revisited: social mobilization for sanitation in Orissa, India. Bull. World Health Organ. 2009;87:580–587.
    1. Pfadenhauer L.M., Rehfuess E. Towards effective and socio-culturally appropriate sanitation and hygiene interventions in the Philippines: a mixed method approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12:1902–1927.
    1. Pickering A.J., Djebbari H., Lopez C., Coulibaly M., Alzua M.L. Effect of a community-led sanitation intervention on child diarrhoea and child growth in rural Mali: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3:e701–711.
    1. Pope, D., Bruce, N., Irving, G., Rehfuess, E., unpublished. Methodological quality of individual studies was assessed using Liverpool Quality Assessment Tools, in: Liverpool, U.o. (Ed.).
    1. Pradhan M., Rawlings L.B. The impact and targeting of social infrastructure investments: lessons from the Nicaraguan Social Fund. World Bank Econ. Rev. 2002;16:275–295.
    1. Pronyk P.M., Muniz M., Nemser B., Somers M.A., McClellan L., Palm C.A., Huynh U.K., Amor Ben, Begashaw Y., McArthur B., Niang J.W., Sachs A., Singh S.E., Teklehaimanot P., Sachs A., Millennium Villages J.D., Study G. The effect of an integrated multisector model for achieving the Millennium Development Goals and improving child survival in rural Sub-Saharan Africa: a non-randomised controlled assessment. Lancet. 2012;379:2179–2188.
    1. Rauniyar G., Orbeta A., Jr, Sugiyarto G. Impact of water supply and sanitation assistance on human welfare in rural Pakistan. J. Dev. Eff. 2011;3:62–102.
    1. Rheinlander T., Samuelsen H., Dalsgaard A., Konradsen F. Hygiene and sanitation among ethnic minorities in Northern Vietnam: does government promotion match community priorities? Soc. Sci. Med. 2010;71:994–1001.
    1. Roma E., Buckley C., Jefferson B., Jeffrey P. Assessing users’ experience of shared sanitation facilities: a case study of community ablution blocks in Durban, South Africa. Water SA. 2010;36:589–594.
    1. Routray P., Schmidt W.P., Boisson S., Clasen T., Jenkins M.W. Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:880.
    1. Sah S., Negussie A. Community led total sanitation (CLTS): addressing the challenges of scale and sustainability in rural Africa. Desalination. 2009;248:666–672.
    1. Saowakontha S., Pipitgool V., Pariyanonda S., Tesana S., Rojsathaporn K., Intarakhao C. Field trials in the control of Opisthorchis viverrini with an integrated programme in endemic areas of northeast Thailand. Parasitology. 1993;106(Pt. 3):283–288.
    1. Schmidlin T., Hurlimann E., Silue K.D., Yapi R.B., Houngbedji C., Kouadio B.A., Acka-Douabele C.A., Kouassi D., Ouattara M., Zouzou F., Bonfoh B., N'Goran E.K., Utzinger J., Raso G. Effects of hygiene and defecation behavior on helminths and intestinal protozoa infections in Taabo, Cote d'Ivoire. PLoS One. 2013;8:e65722.
    1. Sclar G.D., Penakalapati G., Amato H.K., Garn J.V., Alexander K., Freeman M.C., Clasen, T., (in press). Assessing the Impact of Sanitation on Indicators of Fecal Exposure Along Principal Transmission Pathways: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2016, DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.09.021.
    1. Sclar, G.D., Penakalapati, G., Garn, J.V., Alexander, K.T., Freeman, M.C., Clasen, T., unpublished. Mixed methods systematic review exploring the relationship between sanitation and education outcomes and personal well being.
    1. Simms V.M., Makalo P., Bailey R.L., Emerson P.M. Sustainability and acceptability of latrine provision in The Gambia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005;99:631–637.
    1. Thys S., Mwape K.E., Lefevre P., Dorny P., Marcotty T., Phiri A.M., Phiri I.K., Gabriel S. Why latrines are not used: communities' perceptions and practices regarding latrines in a Taenia solium endemic rural area in Eastern Zambia. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015;9:e0003570.
    1. Trinies V., Garn J.V., Chang H.H., Freeman M.C. The impact of a school-based water, sanitation, and hygiene program on absenteeism, diarrhea, and respiratory infection: a matched-control trial in Mali. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016;94:1418–1425.
    1. UNICEF, WHO, 2015. 25 years progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2015 update and MDG assessment, WHO Press, Geneva, Switzerland.
    1. Wagner E.G., Lanoix J.N. WHO; Geneva: 1958. Excreta Disposal for Rural Areas and Small Communities, Who Monograph Series.
    1. Waterkeyn J., Cairncross S. Creating demand for sanitation and hygiene through Community Health Clubs: a cost-effective intervention in two districts in Zimbabwe. Soc. Sci. Med. 2005;61:1958–1970.
    1. Whaley L., Webster J. The effectiveness and sustainability of two demand driven sanitation and hygiene approaches in Zimbabwe. J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev. 2011;1:20–36.
    1. Wilbur J., Danquah L. Undoing inequity: water, sanitation and hygiene programmes that deliver for all in Uganda and Zambia—an early indication of trends. 38th WEDC International Conference; Loughborough University, UK; 2015.
    1. Yimam Y.T., Gelaye K.A., Chercos D.H. Latrine utilization and associated factors among people living in rural areas of Denbia district, Northwest Ethiopia, 2013, a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2014;18:334.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir