Ultrasound-Assisted Thoracic Paravertebral Block Reduces Intraoperative Opioid Requirement and Improves Analgesia after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Center Trial

Lijian Pei, Yidong Zhou, Gang Tan, Feng Mao, Dongsheng Yang, Jinghong Guan, Yan Lin, Xuejing Wang, Yanna Zhang, Xiaohui Zhang, Songjie Shen, Zhonghuang Xu, Qiang Sun, Yuguang Huang, Outcomes Research Consortium, Lijian Pei, Yuguang Huang, Dongsheng Yang, Lijian Pei, Yidong Zhou, Gang Tan, Feng Mao, Dongsheng Yang, Jinghong Guan, Yan Lin, Xuejing Wang, Yanna Zhang, Xiaohui Zhang, Songjie Shen, Zhonghuang Xu, Qiang Sun, Yuguang Huang, Outcomes Research Consortium, Lijian Pei, Yuguang Huang, Dongsheng Yang

Abstract

Objectives: The contribution of ultrasound-assisted thoracic paravertebral block to postoperative analgesia remains unclear. We compared the effect of a combination of ultrasound assisted-thoracic paravertebral block and propofol general anesthesia with opioid and sevoflurane general anesthesia on volatile anesthetic, propofol and opioid consumption, and postoperative pain in patients having breast cancer surgery.

Methods: Patients undergoing breast cancer surgery were randomly assigned to ultrasound-assisted paravertebral block with propofol general anesthesia (PPA group, n = 121) or fentanyl with sevoflurane general anesthesia (GA group, n = 126). Volatile anesthetic, propofol and opioid consumption, and postoperative pain intensity were compared between the groups using noninferiority and superiority tests.

Results: Patients in the PPA group required less sevoflurane than those in the GA group (median [interquartile range] of 0 [0, 0] vs. 0.4 [0.3, 0.6] minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]-hours), less intraoperative fentanyl requirements (100 [50, 100] vs. 250 [200, 300]μg,), less intense postoperative pain (median visual analog scale score 2 [1, 3.5] vs. 3 [2, 4.5]), but more propofol (median 529 [424, 672] vs. 100 [100, 130] mg). Noninferiority was detected for all four outcomes; one-tailed superiority tests for each outcome were highly significant at P<0.001 in the expected directions.

Conclusions: The combination of propofol anesthesia with ultrasound-assisted paravertebral block reduces intraoperative volatile anesthetic and opioid requirements, and results in less post operative pain in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00418457.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Ultrasound image of thoracic transverse…
Fig 1. Ultrasound image of thoracic transverse process.
Transverse processes (TP) appear square and lie deeper than the ribs. The distance between the skin and the TP was measured and 5 mm added (distance A). The distance between the skin and the pleura was also measured (distance B). Distance A was used as the reference for needle depth, and the needle was not advanced beyond distance B.
Fig 2. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials…
Fig 2. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram depicting subject progress through the phases of the study.
PPA group: thoracic ultrasound-assisted thoracic paravertebral blocks at the T1–T5 thoracic levels with propofol-based general anesthesia; GA group: sham subcutaneous local anesthetic injections with sevoflurane-based general anesthesia and opioid-based analgesia (GA group).
Fig 3. Boxplots comparing randomized groups for…
Fig 3. Boxplots comparing randomized groups for each primary outcome.
The box represents the interquartile range, the horizontal line the median, the whiskers extend to the high and low values within 1.5 interquartile ranges of the box, the circles represent values beyond 1.5 interquartile ranges of the box and the diamond represents the mean.
Fig 4. Superiority plots showing the ratios…
Fig 4. Superiority plots showing the ratios of mean ranks (98.75% confidence intervals, CIs) between the regional and general groups for each primary outcome.
Parentheses indicate two-sided 98.75% CIs estimated using bootstrap resampling. Joint hypothesis testing of the four primary outcomes indicated effectiveness of paravertebral analgesia over general anesthesia, as all four CIs lie within the superiority regions: less pain, less intraoperative fentanyl use, less volatile anesthetic use, and increased propofol use.

References

    1. Kairaluoma PM, Bachmann MS, Korpinen AK, Rosenberg PH, Pere PJ. Single-injection paravertebral block before general anesthesia enhances analgesia after breast cancer surgery with and without associated lymph node biopsy. Anesth Analg.2004;99: 1837–1843.
    1. Stamatiou G, Athanasiou E, Simeoforidou M, Bakos P, Michaloudis D. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:723–724.
    1. Moller JF, Nikolajsen L, Rodt SA, Ronning H, Carlsson PS. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast cancer surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Anesth Analg.2007;105: 1848–1851.
    1. Oguz S, Kucuk C, Eskicirak E, Akaltan A, Kuru N, Kadiogullari N. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery in a patient with myasthenia gravis. J Anesth. 2007;21: 449
    1. Vila H Jr., Liu J, Kavasmaneck D. Paravertebral block: new benefits from an old procedure. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20: 316–318.
    1. Loop T, Scheiermann P, Doviakue D, Musshoff F, Humar M, Roesslein M, et al. Sevoflurane inhibits phorbol-myristate-acetate-induced activator protein-1 activation in human T lymphocytes in vitro: potential role of the p38-stress kinase pathway. Anesthesiology. 2004;101: 710–721.
    1. Loop T, Dovi-Akue D, Frick M, Roesslein M, Egger L, Humar M, et al. Volatile anesthetics induce caspase-dependent, mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in human T lymphocytes in vitro. Anesthesiology. 2005;102: 1147–1157.
    1. Vallejo R, de Leon-Casasola O, Benyamin R. Opioid therapy and immunosuppression: a review. Am J Ther. 2004;11: 354–365.
    1. Melamed R, Bar-Yosef S, Shakhar G, Shakhar K, Ben-Eliyahu S. Suppression of natural killer cell activity and promotion of tumor metastasis by ketamine, thiopental, and halothane, but not by propofol: mediating mechanisms and prophylactic measures. Anesth Analg. 2003;97: 1331–1339.
    1. Mammoto T, Mukai M, Mammoto A, Yamanaka Y, Hayashi Y, Mashimo T, et al. Intravenous anesthetic, propofol inhibits invasion of cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2002;184: 165–170.
    1. Page GG, Blakely WP, Ben-Eliyahu S. Evidence that postoperative pain is a mediator of the tumor-promoting effects of surgery in rats. Pain. 2001;90: 191–199.
    1. Exadaktylos A, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006;105: 660–664.
    1. Pei L, Tan G, Wang L, Guo W, Xiao B, Gao X, et al. Comparison of combined general-epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia effects on survival and cancer recurrence: a meta-analysis of retrospective and prospective studies. PLoS One. 2014;9: e114667 10.1371/journal.pone.0114667
    1. Sessler DI. Does regional analgesia reduce the risk of cancer recurrence? A hypothesis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2008;17: 269–272. 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3282f0c005
    1. Sessler DI, Ben-Eliyahu S, Mascha EJ, Parat MO, Buggy DJ. Can regional analgesia reduce the risk of recurrence after breast cancer? Methodology of a multicenter randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008;29: 517–526. 10.1016/j.cct.2008.01.002
    1. Wu J, Buggy D, Fleischmann E, Parra-Sanchez I, Treschan T, Kurz A, et al. Thoracic paravertebral regional anesthesia improves analgesia after breast cancer surgery: A randomized, controlled, multicentre clinical trial. Can J Anesth. 2015;62: 241–251. 10.1007/s12630-014-0285-8
    1. Mascha EJ, Turan A. Joint hypothesis testing and gatekeeping procedures for studies with multiple endpoints.Anesth Analg. 2012; 114: 1304–1317. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182504435
    1. Rohmel J, Gerlinger C, Benda N, Lauter J. On testing simultaneously non-inferiority in two multiple primary endpoints and superiority in at least one of them. Bio J. 2006; 48: 916–933.
    1. Erskine R, Janicki PK, Ellis P, James MF. Neutrophils from patients undergoing hip surgery exhibit enhanced movement under spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth.1992;39: 905–910.
    1. Rittner HL, Brack A, Stein C. Pain and the immune system. Br J Anaes. 2008;101: 40–44.
    1. Rittner HL, Brack A, Stein C. Pain and the immune system: friend or foe? Anaesthesist. 2002;51: 351–358, in German.
    1. Lewis JW, Shavit Y, Terman GW, Gale RP, Liebeskind JC. Stress and morphine affect survival of rats challenged with a mammary ascites tumor (MAT 13762B). Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul. 1983–1984;3: 43–50.
    1. Beilin B, Martin FC, Shavit Y, Gale RP, Liebeskind JC. Suppression of natural killer cell activity by high-dose narcotic anesthesia in rats. Brain Behav Immun.1989;3: 129–137.
    1. Markovic SN, Knight PR, Murasko DM. Inhibition of interferon stimulation of natural killer cell activity in mice anesthetized with halothane or isoflurane. Anesthesiology.1993;78: 700–706.
    1. Fodale, D'Arrigo MG, Triolo S, Mondello S, La Torre D. Anesthetic techniques and cancer recurrence after surgery. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014: 328513 10.1155/2014/328513
    1. Exadaktylos A, Buggy DJ, Moriarty DC, Mascha E, Sessler DI. Can anesthetic technique for primary breast cancer surgery affect recurrence or metastasis? Anesthesiology. 2006;105: 660–664.
    1. Zhou D, Gu FM, Gao Q, Li QL, Zhou J, Miao CH. Effects of anesthetic methods on preserving anti-tumor T-helper polarization following hepatectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18: 3089–3098. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3089
    1. Luyet C, Eichenberger U, Greif R, Vogt A, Szücs Farkas Z, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: an imaging study. Br J Anaesth.2009;102: 534–539. 10.1093/bja/aep015
    1. Cowie B, McGlade D, Ivanusic J, Barrington MJ. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a cadaveric study. Anesth Analg.2010;110: 1735–1739. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181dd58b0
    1. O Riain SC, Donnell BO, Cuffe T, Harmon DC, Fraher JP, Shorten G. Thoracic paravertebral block using real-time ultrasound guidance. Anesth Analg.2010;110: 248–251. 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c35906
    1. Luyet C, Herrmann G, Ross S, Vogt A, Greif R, Moriggl B, et al. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: where do catheters go? Br J Anaesth. 2011;106: 246–254. 10.1093/bja/aeq309
    1. Raft J, Rangeard O, Fritz C, Leufflen L, Bouaziz H, Meistelman C. Early surgical reintervention for haemostasis after breast surgery using persistent sensory block of a paravertebral block. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111: 1031–1032. 10.1093/bja/aet398
    1. Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Kranke P, Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Zahn PK. Efficacy and safety of paravertebral blocks in breast surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth.2010;106: 842–852.
    1. Belzarena SD. Comparative study between thoracic epidural block and general anesthesia for oncologic mastectomy. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2008;58: 561–568.
    1. Okutani H, Okutani R, Nakamura T. Asystole developed during total gastrectomy under general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia. Osaka City Med J.2012;58: 83–86.
    1. Kranke P, Diemunsch P. The 2014 consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A leapfrog towards a postoperative nausea and vomiting-free hospital. Eur J Anaesthesiol.2014;31: 651–653. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000080
    1. Skolnik A, Gan TJ. Update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27: 605–609. 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000128

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir