A RE-AIM evaluation of Healthy Together: a family-centred program to support children's healthy weights

Joan L Bottorff, Anne Huisken, Michele Hopkins, Catherine Nesmith, Joan L Bottorff, Anne Huisken, Michele Hopkins, Catherine Nesmith

Abstract

Background: Healthy Together (HT) is family-centered program to support healthy eating and physical activity designed for implementation in community organizations serving families who may be experiencing vulnerabilities (e.g., related to low income, isolation, ethnicity, immigrant/refugee status, and/or Indigenous background). The purpose of this study was to conduct an evaluation of HT in a real-world, scale-up phase using the RE-AIM framework.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional, non-comparative design, a community-based program evaluation was conducted in 29 organizations implementing HT as part of their core service programs. Data were collected using questionnaires with program participants and facilitators, and interviews with directors of participating organizations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were content analyzed.

Results: With regards to Reach, over 3400 caregivers, children and youth attended community programming that offered HT. Among those attending on the scheduled day for the evaluation, 663 completed the questionnaires. The majority of caregiver respondents (n = 431) were female (92%) and attended with children 0-6 years. Respondents also included children 4-6 years (n = 142) and 7-12 years (n = 65), and youth 13-18 years (n = 25). Effectiveness was demonstrated in reported improvements in physical activity, healthy eating, and strengthened social connections. HT was also widely supported by participants and facilitators. Adoption was influenced by the desire to enrich core service programs for families, HT's fit within existing programs, organizational commitment, and funding support. Implementation experiences indicated that fidelity to the HT program was generally maintained, with some setting specific adaptations. Maintenance of HT was influenced by financial and non-financial resources within community organizations. Most organizations also introduced new initiatives to extend support for healthy eating and physical activity.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate improvements in healthy eating and physical activity, and social connections among program participants, as well as efforts by community organizations to create environments to support healthy weights. HT was successfully delivered in "real-world" community settings across multiple contexts and with families with diverse backgrounds. This along with strategies to support program implementation and sustainability indicate that HT provides a model for other public health interventions to promote family health and wellbeing.

Trial registration: ClincialTrials.gov NCT03550248. Registered May 25, 2018.

Keywords: Family health; Family-focused intervention; Health behavior; Health promotion; Healthy lifestyles; Healthy weights; Obesity prevention; Parenting; Pediatric obesity; Program evaluation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Ward ZJ, Long MW, Resch SC, Giles CM, Cradock AL, Gortmaker SL. Simulation of growth trajectories of childhood obesity into adulthood. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2145–2153. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703860.
    1. Lobstein T, Brinsden H. Atlas of childhood obesity. Report. London: World Obesity; 2019.
    1. Weihrauch-Blüher S, Schwarz P, Klusmann J. Childhood obesity: increased risk for cardiometabolic disease and cancer in adulthood. Metabolism. 2019;92:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.12.001.
    1. Small L, Aplasca A. Child obesity and mental health: a complex interaction. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016;25:269–282. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.008.
    1. Xu H, Wen LM, Rissel C. Associations of parental influences with physical activity and screen time among young children: a systematic review. J Obes. 2015;2015:1–23. doi: 10.1155/2015/546925.
    1. Yee AZ, Lwin MO, Ho SS. The influence of parental practices on child promotive and preventive food consumption behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys. 2017;14:47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0501-3.
    1. Davison KK, Jurkowski JM, Li K, Kranz S, Lawson HA. A childhood obesity intervention developed by families for families: results from a pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-3.
    1. White AA, Colby SE, Franzen-Castle L, Kattelmann KK, Olfert MD, Gould TA, Hagedorn RL, Mathews DR, Moyer J, Wilson K. The iCook 4-H study: an intervention and dissemination test of a youth/adult out-of-school program. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019;51:S2–S20. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.11.012.
    1. Ash T, Agaronov A, Aftosmes-Tobio A, Davison KK. Family-based childhood obesity prevention interventions: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys. 2017;14:113. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0571-2.
    1. Bottorff JL, Huisken A, Hopkins M, Friesen L. Scaling up a community-led health promotion initiative lessons learned and promising practices from the healthy weights for children project. Eval Program Planning. In review.
    1. Jung ME, Bourne JE, Gainforth HL. Evaluation of a community-based, family focused healthy weights initiative using the RE-AIM framework. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15:13. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0638-0.
    1. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the re-aim framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–1377. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322.
    1. Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33:77–84. doi: 10.1002/nur.20362.
    1. Population Center and Rural Classification [] Accessed on 02/11/20.
    1. Age and Sex Highlights Tables, Census 2016 [] Accessed on 02/11/2020.
    1. Focus on Geography Series, Census 2016 [] Accessed on 02/11/2020.
    1. Lane G, Farag M, White J, Nisbet C, Vatanparast H. Chronic health disparities among refugee and immigrant children in Canada. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2018;43:1043–1058. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0407.
    1. Jasmin B, Martin JC, Yanling G, Piotr W. The association of household food security, household characteristics and school environment with obesity status among off-reserve first nations and Métis children and youth in Canada: results from the 2012 Aboriginal peoples survey. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2017;37:77. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.37.3.03.
    1. Morgan PJ, Young MD. The influence of fathers on children’s physical activity and dietary behaviors: insights, recommendations and future directions. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6:324–333. doi: 10.1007/s13679-017-0275-6.
    1. Morgan PJ, Young MD, Lloyd AB, Wang ML, Eather N, Miller A, Murtagh EM, Barnes AT, Pagoto SL. Involvement of fathers in pediatric obesity treatment and prevention trials: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20162635. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2635.
    1. Chen X, Goodson P, Acosta S. Blending health literacy with an English as a second language curriculum: a systematic literature review. J Health Commun. 2015;20(Suppl 2):101–111. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1066467.
    1. Bopp M, Saunders RP, Lattimore D. The tug-of-war: fidelity versus adaptation throughout the health promotion program life cycle. J Prim Prev. 2013;34:193–207. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0299-y.
    1. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2004;27:3–12. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2.
    1. Stirman SW, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019;14:58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y.
    1. Shelton RC, Cooper BR, Stirman SW. The sustainability of evidence-based interventions and practices in public health and health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39:55–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir