Genomic investigation of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from Gambian women and newborns following an oral dose of intra-partum azithromycin

Abdoulie Bojang, Sarah L Baines, Liam Donovan, Romain Guerillot, Kerrie Stevens, Charlie Higgs, Christian Bottomley, Ousman Secka, Mark B Schultz, Anders Gonçalves da Silva, Torsten Seemann, Timothy P Stinear, Anna Roca, Benjamin P Howden, Abdoulie Bojang, Sarah L Baines, Liam Donovan, Romain Guerillot, Kerrie Stevens, Charlie Higgs, Christian Bottomley, Ousman Secka, Mark B Schultz, Anders Gonçalves da Silva, Torsten Seemann, Timothy P Stinear, Anna Roca, Benjamin P Howden

Abstract

Background: Oral azithromycin given during labour reduces carriage of bacteria responsible for neonatal sepsis, including Staphylococcus aureus. However, there is concern that this may promote drug resistance.

Objectives: Here, we combine genomic and epidemiological data on S. aureus isolated from mothers and babies in a randomized intra-partum azithromycin trial (PregnAnZI) to describe bacterial population dynamics and resistance mechanisms.

Methods: Participants from both arms of the trial, who carried S. aureus in day 3 and day 28 samples post-intervention, were included. Sixty-six S. aureus isolates (from 7 mothers and 10 babies) underwent comparative genome analyses and the data were then combined with epidemiological data. Trial registration (main trial): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01800942.

Results: Seven S. aureus STs were identified, with ST5 dominant (n = 40, 61.0%), followed by ST15 (n = 11, 17.0%). ST5 predominated in the placebo arm (73.0% versus 49.0%, P = 0.039) and ST15 in the azithromycin arm (27.0% versus 6.0%, P = 0.022). In azithromycin-resistant isolates, msr(A) was the main macrolide resistance gene (n = 36, 80%). Ten study participants, from both trial arms, acquired azithromycin-resistant S. aureus after initially harbouring a susceptible isolate. In nine (90%) of these cases, the acquired clone was an msr(A)-containing ST5 S. aureus. Long-read sequencing demonstrated that in ST5, msr(A) was found on an MDR plasmid.

Conclusions: Our data reveal in this Gambian population the presence of a dominant clone of S. aureus harbouring plasmid-encoded azithromycin resistance, which was acquired by participants in both arms of the study. Understanding these resistance dynamics is crucial to defining the public health drug resistance impacts of azithromycin prophylaxis given during labour in Africa.

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart showing the sample selection criteria from women and babies in the PregnAnZI trial. NPS, nasopharyngeal swab; AZMR, azithromycin resistant; AZMS, azithromycin susceptible. Resistance Etest cut-off values: azithromycin ≥8 mg/L.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distribution and phylogenetic relatedness of participant isolates. Illustrated are ML phylogenetic trees for each ST identified in the study population (excluding the ST1-SLV), inferred from whole-genome alignments. Branch tips are coloured based on phenotypic susceptibility to azithromycin (blue=susceptible and red=resistant, as determined by Etest). Scale bar indicates the estimated substitutions per site. Isolates recovered from the same participant are indicated by a larger circle, labelled with the participant ID and coloured based on the treatment arm to which the participant was assigned (purple=azithromycin and green=placebo). Participants with isolates representing multi-STs are connected by a dotted line. Isolates belonging to ST1 and ST152 were found to harbour the PVL toxin-encoding gene, lukFS.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Individual participant timelines. Illustrated are the isolate timelines for each participant selected for the study, grouped based on the selection criteria outlined in Figure 1. Each participant is indicated by their participant ID and the adjacent circles represent the isolates recovered from samples taken prior to the intervention (day 0 for mothers) and following the intervention on days 3, 6, 14 and 28 (for mothers and babies). Isolate circles are coloured based on the phenotypic susceptibility to azithromycin (blue=susceptible and red=resistant, as determined by Etest). The internal number indicates the in silico MLST of the isolate and the superscript letter indicates the macrolide resistance gene detected, ‘m’ for msr(A) and ‘e’ for erm(C). Black lines connecting adjacent isolates indicate that the same clone has probably been maintained, with the pairwise core SNP distance provided. Alternatively, gaps between adjacent isolates indicate a potential clonal replacement event. AZMR, azithromycin resistant; AZMS, azithromycin susceptible.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Schematic for the structure of pS80062MN28. Illustrated is the structure of pS80062MN28 (central sequence PRJEB31151) with genes of interest annotated. pS800262MN28 has been aligned with S. aureus plasmid pJSA01 (accession AP014922.1) and S. epidermidis plasmid pSE95_1 (accession CP024438.1). Connecting lines indicate sequences that share >99% nucleotide sequence homology, coloured red or blue if the sequence was present in the same or reverse orientation, respectively.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Phylogenetic contextualization of study isolates. (a) Illustrated is an ML phylogenetic tree for a global population of 7192 S. aureus isolates. The Gambian isolates identified in this study are indicated by white circles located at the branch tips. (b) A subtree of CC5 isolates and (c) a subtree of CC15 isolates. In both subtrees, branches with <85% support (approximate likelihood ratio test) are labelled with a red circle. The Gambian isolates identified in this study are indicated by circles located at the branch tips, coloured based on phenotypic susceptibility to azithromycin (blue=susceptible and red=resistant, as determined by Etest). Adjacent to each subtree is a vertical line of circles indicating the countries from which the isolates were recovered (refer to key); the heatmap indicates the presence or absence of three macrolide resistance genes: erm(C) (1), msr(A) (2) and mph/ere (3). The scale bar indicates the estimated number of core genome substitutions.

References

    1. Parnham MJ, Erakovic Haber V, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ. et al. Azithromycin: mechanisms of action and their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol Ther 2014; 143: 225–45.
    1. Bignell C, Garley J.. Azithromycin in the treatment of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect 2010; 86: 422–6.
    1. Harding-Esch EM, Sillah A, Edwards T. et al. Mass treatment with azithromycin for trachoma: when is one round enough? Results from the PRET trial in The Gambia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7: e2115..
    1. Yohannan J, Munoz B, Mkocha H. et al. Can we stop mass drug administration prior to 3 annual rounds in communities with low prevalence of trachoma? PRET Ziada trial results. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013; 131: 431–6.
    1. Gebre T, Ayele B, Zerihun M. et al. Comparison of annual versus twice-yearly mass azithromycin treatment for hyperendemic trachoma in Ethiopia: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 143–51.
    1. Schemann JF, Guinot C, Traore L. et al. Longitudinal evaluation of three azithromycin distribution strategies for treatment of trachoma in a sub-Saharan African country, Mali. Acta Tropica 2007; 101: 40–53.
    1. Lee JS, Munoz BE, Mkocha H. et al. The effect of multiple rounds of mass drug administration on the association between ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection and follicular trachoma in preschool-aged children. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8: e2761..
    1. Biebesheimer JB, House J, Hong KC. et al. Complete local elimination of infectious trachoma from severely affected communities after six biannual mass azithromycin distributions. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2047–50.
    1. Burr SE, Milne S, Jafali J. et al. Mass administration of azithromycin and Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage: cross-sectional surveys in the Gambia. Bull World Health Organ 2014; 92: 490–8.
    1. Porco TC, Gebre T, Ayele B. et al. Effect of mass distribution of azithromycin for trachoma control on overall mortality in Ethiopian children: a randomized trial. JAMA 2009; 302: 962–8.
    1. Keenan JD, Bailey RL, West SK. et al. Azithromycin to reduce childhood mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1583–92.
    1. Roca A, Oluwalana C, Bojang A. et al. Oral azithromycin given during labour decreases bacterial carriage in the mothers and their offspring: a double-blind randomized trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22: 565.e1–9.
    1. Unger HW, Aho C, Ome-Kaius M. et al. Impact of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy with azithromycin-containing regimens on maternal nasopharyngeal carriage and antibiotic sensitivity of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus: a cross-sectional survey at delivery. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53: 1317–23.
    1. Fessler AT, Wang Y, Wu C. et al. Mobile macrolide resistance genes in staphylococci. Plasmid 2018; 99: 2–10.
    1. Westh H, Hougaard DM, Vuust J. et al. Prevalence of erm gene classes in erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated between 1959 and 1988. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 369–73.
    1. Schmitz FJ, Sadurski R, Kray A. et al. Prevalence of macrolide-resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium isolates from 24 European university hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 45: 891–4.
    1. Ross JI, Eady EA, Cove JH. et al. Inducible erythromycin resistance in staphylococci is encoded by a member of the ATP-binding transport super-gene family. Mol Microbiol 1990; 4: 1207–14.
    1. Leclercq R. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 482–92.
    1. Matsuoka M, Inoue M, Endo Y. et al. Characteristic expression of three genes, msr(A), mph(C) and erm(Y), that confer resistance to macrolide antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003; 220: 287–93.
    1. Prunier AL, Malbruny B, Tande D. et al. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus with ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 3054–6.
    1. Bojang E, Jafali J, Perreten V. et al. Short-term increase in prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus following mass drug administration with azithromycin for trachoma control. BMC Microbiol 2017; 17: 75..
    1. Schaumburg F, Alabi AS, Peters G. et al. New epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infection in Africa. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20: 589–96.
    1. Senghore M, Bayliss SC, Kwambana-Adams BA. et al. Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus from humans to green monkeys in The Gambia as revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Appl Environ Microbiol 2016; 82: 5910–7.
    1. Ebruke C, Dione MM, Walter B. et al. High genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus strains colonising the nasopharynx of Gambian villagers before widespread use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines. BMC Microbiol 2016; 16: 38..
    1. Bojang A, Camara B, Jagne Cox I. et al. Long-term impact of oral azithromycin taken by Gambian women during labour on prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of S. pneumoniae and S. aureus in their infants: follow up of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67: 1191–7.
    1. Roca A, Oluwalana C, Camara B. et al. Prevention of bacterial infections in the newborn by pre-delivery administration of azithromycin: study protocol of a randomized efficacy trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 302..
    1. Drinkovic D, Fuller ER, Shore KP. et al. Clindamycin treatment of Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48: 315–6.
    1. Hisatsune J, Hagiya H, Shiota S. et al. Complete genome sequence of systemically disseminated sequence type 8 staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVl community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Genome Announc 2017; 5: e00852-17.
    1. Sugai M, Enomoto T, Hashimoto K. et al. A novel epidermal cell differentiation inhibitor (EDIN): purification and characterization from Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1990; 173: 92–8.
    1. Argemi X, Nanoukon C, Affolabi D. et al. Comparative genomics and identification of an enterotoxin-bearing pathogenicity island, SEPI-1/SECI-1, in Staphylococcus epidermidis pathogenic strains. Toxins 2018; 10: E93..
    1. Helle L, Kull M, Mayer S. et al. Vectors for improved Tet repressor-dependent gradual gene induction or silencing in Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiology 2011; 157: 3314–23.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir