The future vision of simulation in health care

D M Gaba, D M Gaba

Abstract

Simulation is a technique-not a technology-to replace or amplify real experiences with guided experiences that evoke or replicate substantial aspects of the real world in a fully interactive manner. The diverse applications of simulation in health care can be categorised by 11 dimensions: aims and purposes of the simulation activity; unit of participation; experience level of participants; health care domain; professional discipline of participants; type of knowledge, skill, attitudes, or behaviours addressed; the simulated patient's age; technology applicable or required; site of simulation; extent of direct participation; and method of feedback used. Using simulation to improve safety will require full integration of its applications into the routine structures and practices of health care. The costs and benefits of simulation are difficult to determine, especially for the most challenging applications, where long term use may be required. Various driving forces and implementation mechanisms can be expected to propel simulation forward, including professional societies, liability insurers, health care payers, and ultimately the public. The future of simulation in health care depends on the commitment and ingenuity of the health care simulation community to see that improved patient safety using this tool becomes a reality.

References

    1. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;70:59-65
    1. Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct;31(10):2437-43
    1. Biomed Sci Instrum. 1999;35:141-5
    1. J Clin Anesth. 2000 Dec;12(8):633-8
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Mar;192(3):372-84
    1. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1484-9
    1. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;9(1):78-87
    1. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;19(5):478-83
    1. Hum Factors. 2001 Winter;43(4):641-74
    1. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):45-50
    1. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Sep;28(9):472-93
    1. Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1403-13
    1. Anesthesiology. 2003 Dec;99(6):1270-80
    1. Med Educ. 2003 Nov;37 Suppl 1:72-8
    1. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):127-9
    1. Daedalus. 1977 Winter;:105-23
    1. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1984 Oct;55(10):960-5
    1. Comput Biomed Res. 1987 Feb;20(1):64-75
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1987 Jun;147(6):1049-52
    1. Anesthesiology. 1988 Sep;69(3):387-94
    1. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1989 Fall;27(3):161-8
    1. Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7
    1. Acad Med. 1993 Jun;68(6):443-51; discussion 451-3
    1. JAMA. 1993 Sep 1;270(9):1041-5
    1. Anesthesiol Rev. 1993 Sep-Oct;20(5):185-9
    1. Artif Intell Med. 1994 Aug;6(4):281-8
    1. Fam Pract. 1997 Feb;14(1):58-62
    1. Acad Med. 1998 Jan;73(1):84-91
    1. Anesthesiology. 1998 Jul;89(1):8-18
    1. Ann Surg. 1998 Nov;228(5):635-7
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Feb;172(2):301-4
    1. Comput Aided Surg. 1998;3(5):211-27
    1. Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Apr;6(4):312-23
    1. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19-32
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;187(3 Suppl):S37-40
    1. Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;9(11):1310-8
    1. Anesthesiology. 2002 Dec;97(6):1434-44
    1. Surg Endosc. 2003 Feb;17(2):220-6
    1. Ann Surg. 2003 Mar;237(3):442-8
    1. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Apr;10(4):386-9
    1. Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):580-8
    1. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jun;98(6):1345-55; discussion 5A
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jun;196(6):933-7
    1. J Clin Anesth. 2000 May;12(3):256-61

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir