Intramuscular injection, intravenous infusion, and intravenous bolus of oxytocin in the third stage of labor for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage: a three-arm randomized control trial

Dyanna Charles, Holly Anger, Rasha Dabash, Emad Darwish, Mohamed Cherine Ramadan, Amr Mansy, Yomna Salem, Ilana G Dzuba, Meagan E Byrne, Miral Breebaart, Beverly Winikoff, Dyanna Charles, Holly Anger, Rasha Dabash, Emad Darwish, Mohamed Cherine Ramadan, Amr Mansy, Yomna Salem, Ilana G Dzuba, Meagan E Byrne, Miral Breebaart, Beverly Winikoff

Abstract

Background: Oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) prophylaxis is commonly administered by either intramuscular (IM) injection or intravenous (IV) infusion with both routes recommended equally and little discussion of potential differences between the two. This trial assesses the effectiveness and safety of 10 IU oxytocin administered as IM injection versus IV infusion and IV bolus during the third stage of labor for PPH prophylaxis.

Methods: In two tertiary level Egyptian maternity hospitals, women delivering vaginally without exposure to pre-delivery uterotonics were randomized to one of three prophylactic oxytocin administration groups after delivery of the baby. Blood loss was measured 1 h after delivery, and side effects were recorded. Primary outcomes were mean postpartum blood loss and proportion of women with postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in this open-label, three-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

Results: Four thousand nine hundred thirteen eligible, consenting women were randomized. Compared to IM injection, mean blood loss was 5.9% less in the IV infusion arm (95% CI: -8.5, - 3.3) and 11.1% less in the IV bolus arm (95% CI: -14.7, - 7.8). Risk of postpartum blood loss ≥500 ml in the IV infusion arm was significantly less compared to IM injection (0.8% vs. 1.5%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.91). No side effects were reported in any arm.

Conclusions: Intravenous oxytocin is more effective than intramuscular injection for the prevention of PPH in the third stage of labor. Oxytocin delivered by IV bolus presents no safety concerns after vaginal delivery and should be considered a safe option for PPH prophylaxis.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov # NCT01914419 , posted August 2, 2013.

Keywords: Bolus oxytocin; Intramuscular oxytocin; Intravenous oxytocin; Oxytocic; Oxytocin; Oxytocin prophylaxis; Postpartum blood loss; Postpartum hemorrhage; Route of administration; Third stage of labor.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved on July 3, 2013 by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine at Alexandria University and September 1, 2013 by the Ethics Committee of El Galaa Teaching Hospital. Written consent was obtained from all participants upon arrival to the labor ward.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram

References

    1. WHO . WHO recommendations for the prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Geneva: Dept. of reproductive health and research, WHO; 2012. pp. 1–41.
    1. Lalonde A, F.S.M.a.N.H. Committee Prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage in low-resource settings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(2):108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.001.
    1. Westhoff G, Cotter AM, Tolosa JE. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10(CD001808):i–90.
    1. NICE. Intrapartum care: Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth, Guideline 190. 2014 February [cited 2017 19 April ]; Available from: .
    1. ICM-FIGO. Joint statement: management of the third stage of labour to prevent post-partum haemorrhage. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004;49(1):76–7.
    1. Gizzo S, et al. Which uterotonic is better to prevent the postpartum hemorrhage? Latest news in terms of clinical efficacy, side effects, and contraindications: a systematic review. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(9):1011–9. doi: 10.1177/1933719112468951.
    1. Begley CM, et al. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD007412.
    1. Soltani H, Hutchon DR, Poulose TA. Timing of prophylactic uterotonics for the third stage of labour after vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;8(CD006173):i–20.
    1. Oladapo OT, Okusanya BO, Abalos E. Intramuscular versus intravenous prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9(CD009332):1–42.
    1. Roach MK, Abramovici A, Tita AT. Dose and duration of oxytocin to prevent postpartum hemorrhage: a review. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(7):523–528. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329184.
    1. WHO . Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth: a guide for midwives and, doctors. 2. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
    1. Prendiville, W.O.C., M., Active Management of the Third Stage of Labor. 1 ed. A Textbook of Postpartum Hemorrhage, ed. C.B.-L.L.G.K.A.B.L.M. Karoshi. 2006, Duncow: sapiens publishing. 462.
    1. Gibbens D, et al. The circulating levels of oxytocin following intravenous and intramuscular administration of Syntometrine. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972;79(7):644–646. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb14215.x.
    1. Breathnach F, Geary M. Standard medical therapy. In: B-Lynch C, Keith LG, Lalonde AB, Karoshi M, editors. A textbook of postpartum hemorrhage: a comprehensive guide to evaluation, management and surgical intervention. 1st edn. Duncow, Kirkmahoe, Dumfriesshire, UK: Sapiens Publishing; 2006. p. 256–262.
    1. Rashid M, Clark A, Rashid MH. A randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of intramuscular syntometrine and intravenous syntocinon, in preventing postpartum haemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(5):396–401. doi: 10.1080/01443610902946929.
    1. Huh WK, Chelmow D, Malone FD. A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial of oxytocin at the beginning versus the end of the third stage of labor for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2004;58(2):72–76. doi: 10.1159/000078095.
    1. Choy CM, et al. A randomised controlled trial of intramuscular syntometrine and intravenous oxytocin in the management of the third stage of labour. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;109(2):173–177.
    1. Soriano D, et al. A prospective cohort study of oxytocin plus ergometrine compared with oxytocin alone for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103(11):1068–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09584.x.
    1. Villar J, et al. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of misoprostol to prevent postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(6):1301–1312.
    1. Oguz Orhan E, et al. Prospective randomized trial of oxytocin administration for active management of the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127(2):175–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.05.022.
    1. Dagdeviren H, et al. Intramuscular versus intravenous prophylactic oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(5):911–916. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4060-7.
    1. Loytved-Hardegg JJ, et al. Replacement of oxytocin bolus administration by infusion: influences on postpartum outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;293(6):1219–1225. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3916-6.
    1. Davies GA, et al. Maternal hemodynamics after oxytocin bolus compared with infusion in the third stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):294–299. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Sheldon WR, et al. How effective are the components of active management of the third stage of labor? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-46.
    1. Sangkomkamhang U. Kruangpatee. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous versus intramuscular oxytocin in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage during the third stage of labor. J Health Sci. 2015;24(2):354–359.
    1. Thomas JS, Koh SH, Cooper GM. Haemodynamic effects of oxytocin given as i.V. Bolus or infusion on women undergoing caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98(1):116–119. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael302.
    1. Hendricks CH, Brenner WE. Cardiovascular effects of oxytocic drugs used post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;108(5):751–760. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90542-9.
    1. Secher NJ, Arnsbo P, Wallin L. Haemodynamic effects of oxytocin (syntocinon) and methyl ergometrine (methergin) on the systemic and pulmonary circulations of pregnant anaesthetized women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1978;57(2):97–103. doi: 10.3109/00016347809155884.
    1. Dzuba I, Durocher J, Dilbaz B, Gelisen O, Ngoc NTN, Montesinos R, et al. Route of administration of oxytocin in prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119(Suppl 3):S333. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(12)60637-7.
    1. Gulmezoglu AM, et al. WHO multicentre randomised trial of misoprostol in the management of the third stage of labour. Lancet. 2001;358(9283):689–695. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05835-4.
    1. Gulmezoglu AM, et al. Prostaglandins for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;3(CD000494):i–280.
    1. FIGO . Prevention of Post-partum Haemorrhage with Misoprostol: FIGO Guideline, Annotated Version. London: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; 2012.
    1. Tuncalp O, Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM. Prostaglandins for preventing postpartum haemorrhage (Review) Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8(CD000494):i–281.
    1. Oboro VO, Tabowei TO. A randomised controlled trial of misoprostol versus oxytocin in the active management of the third stage of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23(1):13–16. doi: 10.1080/0144361021000043146.
    1. El-ReFaey H. Use of misoprostol in third stage of labour. Lancet. 2002;359(9307):707–708. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07787-5.
    1. Balki M, et al. Comparative efficacy of uterotonic agents: in vitro contractions. in isolated myometrial strips of labouring and non-labouring. women. Can J Anesth. 2014;61:808–818. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0190-1.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir