Nonlinguistic Cognitive Factors Predict Treatment-Induced Recovery in Chronic Poststroke Aphasia

Abstract

Objective: To determine if pretreatment nonlinguistic cognition predicted language treatment outcomes and if so, which specific nonlinguistic cognitive subskills predicted naming therapy outcomes.

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Research clinic.

Participants: Study 1 included data from 67 persons with aphasia who underwent language treatment and a pretreatment cognitive-linguistic assessment battery (N=67). Study 2 included data from 27 study 1 participants who completed additional pretreatment nonlinguistic cognitive assessments.

Interventions: 120-minute sessions of sentence comprehension (n=26) or naming treatment (n=41) 2 times per week for up to 10-12 weeks.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of potential maximal gain (PMG) (assessed immediately after treatment [10-12wk]; formula=mean posttreatment score-mean pretreatment score/total number of trained items-mean pretreatment score) and proportion of potential maximal gain maintained (PMGM) (assessed 12wk after posttreatment [22-24wk]; formula=mean maintenance score-mean pretreatment score/total number of trained items-mean pretreatment score) as outcome variables; and pretreatment assessment scores as predictor variables.

Results: In study 1, 37% of participants demonstrated nonlinguistic cognitive deficits. Principal component analyses reduced assessment data to 2 components: linguistic and nonlinguistic cognition. Backward elimination regression revealed that higher linguistic and nonlinguistic cognitive function significantly predicted higher PMG after language therapy. In study 2, principal component analysis of only the nonlinguistic cognitive measures identified 3 components: executive function, verbal short-term memory, and visual short-term memory. Controlling for pretreatment apraxia of speech and auditory comprehension deficits, regression analyses revealed that higher executive function and visual short-term memory significantly predicted higher PMG and PMGM after naming therapy.

Conclusions: Pretreatment nonlinguistic cognitive function significantly influenced language treatment outcomes and maintenance of therapy gains.

Keywords: Aphasia; Cognition; Rehabilitation; Speech therapy.

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest were identified.

Copyright © 2019 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1.

Flow chart of study 1 and 2 Note: Data from 27 participants in Study 1 who had undergone naming therapy were used in Study 2. No participants who had undergone sentence comprehension therapy were included in Study 2.