Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomised trial

Joel A Radford, Karl B Landorf, Rachelle Buchbinder, Catherine Cook, Joel A Radford, Karl B Landorf, Rachelle Buchbinder, Catherine Cook

Abstract

Background: Plantar heel pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders of the foot and ankle. Treatment of the condition is usually conservative, however the effectiveness of many treatments frequently used in clinical practice, including supportive taping of the foot, has not been established. We performed a participant-blinded randomised trial to assess the effectiveness of low-Dye taping, a commonly used short-term treatment for plantar heel pain.

Methods: Ninety-two participants with plantar heel pain (mean age 50 +/- 14 years; mean body mass index 30 +/- 6; and median self-reported duration of symptoms 10 months, range of 2 to 240 months) were recruited from the general public between February and June 2005. Participants were randomly allocated to (i) low-Dye taping and sham ultrasound or (ii) sham ultrasound alone. The duration of follow-up for each participant was one week. No participants were lost to follow-up. Outcome measures included 'first-step' pain (measured on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale) and the Foot Health Status Questionnaire domains of foot pain, foot function and general foot health.

Results: Participants treated with low-Dye taping reported a small improvement in 'first-step' pain after one week of treatment compared to those who did not receive taping. The estimate of effect on 'first-step' pain favoured the low-Dye tape (ANCOVA adjusted mean difference -12.3 mm; 95% CI -22.4 to -2.2; P = 0.017). There were no other statistically significant differences between groups. Thirteen participants in the taping group experienced an adverse event however most were mild to moderate and short-lived.

Conclusion: When used for the short-term treatment of plantar heel pain, low-Dye taping provides a small improvement in 'first-step' pain compared with a sham intervention after a one-week period.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Low-Dye taping.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of adjusted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals for outcomes.

References

    1. Agosta J. Epidemiology of a podiatric sports medicine clinic. Aust Podiatrist. 1994;28:93–96.
    1. Dunn JE, Link CL, Felson DT, Crincoli MG, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:491–498. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh071.
    1. Badlissi F, Dunn JE, Link CL, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB, Felson DT. Foot musculoskeletal disorders, pain, and foot-related functional limitations in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:1029–1033. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53315.x.
    1. Buchbinder R. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2159–2166. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp032745.
    1. Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:303–310.
    1. Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Pidcoe P, Johnson RE. Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matched case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:872–877.
    1. Crawford F, Thomson C. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;3
    1. Martin JE, Hosch JC, Goforth WP, Murff RT, Lynch DM, Odom RD. Mechanical treatment of plantar fasciitis: A prospective study. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001;91:55–62.
    1. Dye RW. A strapping. Journal of the National Association of Chiropodists. 1939;29:11–12.
    1. Radford JA, Burns J, Buchbinder R, Landorf KB, Cook C. The effect of low-Dye taping on kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic variables: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:232–241.
    1. Kogler GF, Veer FB, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. The influence of medial and lateral placement of orthotic wedges on loading of the plantar aponeurosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1403–1413.
    1. Saxelby J, Betts RP, Bygrave CJ. 'Low-Dye' taping of the foot in the management of plantar-fasciitis. Foot. 1997;7:205–209. doi: 10.1016/S0958-2592(97)90037-7.
    1. Landorf KB, Radford JA, Keenan AM, Redmond AC. Effectiveness of low-Dye taping for short-term management of plantar fasciitis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:525–530.
    1. De Angelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, Kotzin S, Laine C, Marusic A, Overbeke AJPM, Schroeder TV, Sox HC, Van Der Weyden MB. Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA. 2005;293:2927–2929. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.23.jed50037.
    1. Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998;88:419–428.
    1. Landorf KB, Radford JA. Minimal Important Difference: Values for the Foot Health Status Questionnaire, Foot Function Index and Visual Analogue Scale. Foot. SUBMITTED.
    1. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323:1123–1124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1123.
    1. Twisk J, Proper K. Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:223–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.009.
    1. Raab GM, Day S, Sales J. How to select covariates to include in the analysis of a clinical trial. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:330–342. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00061-1.
    1. James KE, Bloch DA, Lee KK, Kraemer HC, Fuller RK. An index for assessing blindness in a multi-centre clinical trial: Disulfiram for alcohol cessation - a VA cooperative study. Stat Med. 1996;15:1421–1434. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1421::AID-SIM266>;2-H.
    1. Kelly AM. Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:1086–1090.
    1. Powell CV, Kelly AM, Williams A. Determining the minimum clinically significant difference in visual analog pain score for children. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37:28–31. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.111517.
    1. Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J. 2001;18:205–207. doi: 10.1136/emj.18.3.205.
    1. Pfeffer G, Bacchetti P, Deland J, Lewis A, Anderson R, Davis W, Alvarez R, Brodsky J, Cooper P, Frey C, Herrick R, Myerson M, Sammarco J, Janecki C, Ross S, Bowman M, Smith R. Comparison of custom and prefabricated orthoses in the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:214–221.
    1. Landorf KB, Keenan AM, Herbert RD. Effectiveness of three foot orthoses for plantar fasciitis: a randomised trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1305–1310. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.12.1305.
    1. Menz HB. Analysis of paired data in physical therapy research: Time to stop double-dipping? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:477–478.
    1. Lange B, Chipchase L, Evans A. The effect of low-Dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004;34:201–209.
    1. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring foot posture: the Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006;21:89–98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002.
    1. Khan KM, Bennell K, Ng S, Matthews B, Roberts P, Nattrass C, Way S, Brown J. Can 16-18-year-old elite ballet dancers improve their hip and ankle range of motion over a 12-month period? Clin J Sport Med. 2000;10:98–103. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200004000-00003.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir