Design and impact evaluation of a digital reproductive health program in Rwanda using a cluster randomized design: study protocol

Cara Nolan, Laura Packel, Rebecca Hope, Jordan Levine, Laura Baringer, Emmyson Gatare, Aline Umubyeyi, Felix Sayinzoga, Michael Mugisha, Janepher Turatsinze, Aimee Naganza, Laiah Idelson, Stefano Bertozzi, Sandra McCoy, Cara Nolan, Laura Packel, Rebecca Hope, Jordan Levine, Laura Baringer, Emmyson Gatare, Aline Umubyeyi, Felix Sayinzoga, Michael Mugisha, Janepher Turatsinze, Aimee Naganza, Laiah Idelson, Stefano Bertozzi, Sandra McCoy

Abstract

Background: Rwandan adolescents have limited access to high-quality family planning and reproductive health (FP/RH) information and care to prevent unplanned pregnancy and HIV/STIs. In addition to the immediate implications for health and well-being, teenage pregnancy is a significant cause of school drop-out, limiting girls' future potential and employment opportunities. This study introduces a direct-to-consumer digital education program that uses storytelling to deliver age-appropriate FP/RH information and economic empowerment training to adolescents. It also facilitates access to high-quality, youth-friendly FP/RH care and products. We evaluate two different school-based models of its implementation to understand how to optimize the uptake of contraception and HIV testing among adolescents.

Methods: The study consists of two distinct phases. The first formative intervention design phase, conducted from 2016 to 2019, used a human-centered design methodology to develop the intervention alongside over 600 Rwandan adolescents, their parents, teachers, and healthcare providers. Through this methodology, we sought to maximize the fit between evidence-based practices (uptake of modern contraception and HIV testing) and the implementation context of adolescents in Rwanda. The second phase is an impact evaluation, in which we will use a Hybrid Trial Type 2 Effectiveness-Implementation study design to determine the overall effectiveness of this digital intervention as well as the relative effectiveness of the two different school-based implementation models. This takes the form of a 3-arm cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial, with a sample of 6000 youth aged 12-19 in 60 schools across 8 districts in Rwanda. Primary outcome measures include use of modern contraception, delayed initiation of childbearing, and uptake of HIV testing.

Discussion: This study will yield insights into not only whether this digital intervention is successful in achieving the intended sexual and reproductive health outcomes, but also which mechanisms are likely to drive this effectiveness. The methodologies used are broadly applicable to the design, implementation, and evaluation of other behavior-based health programs in low and middle-income countries.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198272 . Prospectively registered 13 December 2019.

Keywords: Adolescent sexual and reproductive health; Cluster randomized controlled trial; Digital health; Family planning and reproductive health; Human-centered design; Hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study; Rwanda; Uptake of modern contraceptive methods.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Design Principles. Design principles derived from initial design research and used to inform prototype development
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Prototype Development Process. Steps involved in prototyping both youth (a - c) and provider-facing (d - f) solutions ranged from co-designing key elements of the solution to low- and high-fidelity testing of prototype solutions. a: Youth Co-Design - Mapping site content based on young people’s key questions; b: Youth Low-Fidelity Prototyping - Testing paper prototypes of content and visual design; c: Youth High-Fidelity Prototyping - Testing wireframe prototypes of the app; d: Provider Co-Design - Exploring gamified approaches to learning with providers; e: Provider Low-Fidelity Prototyping - Testing pre-screening methods to expedite care for youth; f: Provider High-Fidelity Prototyping - Testing an interactive digital prototype of the training game
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Behavioral pathway leading to increased contraceptive use. Example behavioral pathway defined by the Theory of Planned Behavior, from knowledge to behavior change in usage of modern contraceptive methods
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CyberRwanda Intervention Design. a: Schematic describing the components of the CyberRwanda digital intervention including the youth-facing web application and pharmacist portal; b-e: Images of the youth-facing web application pages [‘Home’ (b); ‘Learn’ (c); ‘Shop’ (d); ‘Ask’ (e)]; f: Image of the pharmacist portal. Images are the property of YLabs and published with permission of author and YLabs Executive Director Rebecca Hope
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Cluster Randomized Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial Study Design. Schematic of the study design

References

    1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda], and ICF International . 2014–15 RDHS Key Findings. Rockville: NISR, MOH, and ICF International; 2015.
    1. McQueston K, Silverman R, Glassman A, et al. Adolescent fertility in low-and middle-income countries: effects and solutions. Cent Glob Dev Work Pap. 2012. 10.2139/ssrn.2102763.
    1. Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda] Adolescent sexual reproductive rights and policy. 2012.
    1. Michielsen K, Beauclair R, Delva W, Roelens K, Van Rossem R, Temmerman M. Effectiveness of a peer-led HIV prevention intervention in secondary schools in Rwanda: results from a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):729. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-729.
    1. Knopf AS, McNealy KR, Al-Khattab H, Carter-Harris L, Oruche UM, Naanyu V, Draucker CB. Sexual learning among East African adolescents in the context of generalized HIV epidemics: a systematic qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One. 2017. 10.1371/journal.pone.0173225.
    1. Wadham E, Green C, Debattista J, Somerset S, Sav A. New digital media interventions for sexual health promotion among young people: a systematic review. Sex Health. 2019;16:101–123.
    1. Conner M. Health behaviors. Int Encyclopedia Soc Behav Sci. 2001. 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03871-7.
    1. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004. 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40.
    1. Mann S, Bailey JV. Implementation of digital interventions for sexual health for young people. Front Public Health. 2016 doi: 10.3389/conf.FPUBH.2016.01.00008.
    1. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
    1. Lee P. Before the backlash, Let’s Redefine Human Centered Design. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 2015.
    1. Tolley EB. Traditional socio-behavioral research and HumanCentered design: similarities, unique contributions and synergies. 2017.
    1. Norton M, Chandra-Mouli V, Lane C. Interventions for preventing unintended, rapid repeat pregnancy among adolescents: a review of the evidence and lessons from high-quality evaluations. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(4):547–570. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00131.
    1. Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters GJ, Mullen PD, Parcel GS, Ruiter RA, Fernández ME, Markham C, Bartholomew LK. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an intervention mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(3):297–312. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155.
    1. Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons G, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2009;36(1):24–34. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4.
    1. MINEDUC Rwanda, UNICEF . Understanding dropout and repetition in Rwanda. 2017.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Research considerations. Geneva; 2019. (WHO/RHR/19.9) Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Accessed 1 Apr 2020 at: .
    1. Guse K, Levine D, Martins S, Lira A, Gaarde J, Westmorland W, Gilliam M. Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:535–543. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.03.014.
    1. Dopp AR, Parisi KE, Munson SA, et al. Aligning implementation and user-centered design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: results from a concept mapping study. Implement Sci Commun. 2020. 10.1186/s43058-020-00020-w.
    1. Gallant M, Maticka-Tyndale E. School-based HIV prevention Programmes for African youth. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(7):1337–1351. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00331-9.
    1. Medley A, Kennedy C, O'Reilly K, Sweat M. Effectiveness of peer education interventions for HIV prevention in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009;21(3):181–206. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.3.181.
    1. Michielsen K, Chersich MF, Luchters S, De Koker P, Van Rossem R, Temmerman M. Effectiveness of HIV prevention for youth in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials. AIDS. 2010. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283384791.
    1. Paul-Ebhohimhen V, Poobalan A, van Teijlingen ER. A Systematic Review of School-Based Sexual Health Interventions to Prevent STI/HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2008. 10.1186/1471-2458-8-4.
    1. Michielsen K, Remes P, Rugabo J, Van Rossem R, Temmerman M. Rwandan young people's perceptions on sexuality and relationships: results from a qualitative study using the ‘mailbox technique’. SAHARA J. 2014. 10.1080/17290376.2014.927950.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir