The presence of GAD and IA-2 antibodies in youth with a type 2 diabetes phenotype: results from the TODAY study

Georgeanna J Klingensmith, Laura Pyle, Silva Arslanian, Kenneth C Copeland, Leona Cuttler, Francine Kaufman, Lori Laffel, Santica Marcovina, Sherida E Tollefsen, Ruth S Weinstock, Barbara Linder, TODAY Study Group, Georgeanna J Klingensmith, Laura Pyle, Silva Arslanian, Kenneth C Copeland, Leona Cuttler, Francine Kaufman, Lori Laffel, Santica Marcovina, Sherida E Tollefsen, Ruth S Weinstock, Barbara Linder, TODAY Study Group

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency of islet cell autoimmunity in youth clinically diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and describe associated clinical and laboratory findings.

Research design and methods: Children (10-17 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were screened for participation in the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) study. Measurements included GAD-65 and insulinoma-associated protein 2 autoantibodies using the new National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Institutes of Health (NIDDK/NIH) standardized assays, a physical examination, and fasting lipid, C-peptide, and A1C determinations.

Results: Of the 1,206 subjects screened and considered clinically to have type 2 diabetes, 118 (9.8%) were antibody positive; of these, 71 (5.9%) were positive for a single antibody, and 47 were positive (3.9%) for both antibodies. Diabetes autoantibody (DAA) positivity was significantly associated with race (P < 0.0001), with positive subjects more likely to be white (40.7 vs. 19%) (P < 0.0001) and male (51.7 vs. 35.7%) (P = 0.0007). BMI, BMI z score, C-peptide, A1C, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and blood pressure were significantly different by antibody status. The antibody-positive subjects were less likely to display characteristics clinically associated with type 2 diabetes and a metabolic syndrome phenotype, although the range for BMI z score, blood pressure, fasting C-peptide, and serum lipids overlapped between antibody-positive and antibody-negative subjects.

Conclusions: Obese youth with a clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes may have evidence of islet autoimmunity contributing to insulin deficiency. As a group, patients with DAA have clinical characteristics significantly different from those without DAA. However, without islet autoantibody analysis, these characteristics cannot reliably distinguish between obese young individuals with type 2 diabetes and those with autoimmune diabetes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00081328.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Fasting C-peptide vs. antibody titer. Antibody levels are represented in NIDDK/NIH standardized DK units, and C-peptide values are measured as nanograms per milliliter. A: GAD-65 antibody titers vs. fasting C-peptide. △, GAD-65 values for IA-2–negative subjects; +, GAD-65 values for IA-2–positive subjects. GAD-65 values ≥45 DK units/ml are positive. B: IA-2 antibody titers vs. fasting C-peptide. △, IA-2 values for GAD-65–negative subjects; +, IA-2 values for GAD-65–positive subjects. IA-2 values ≥5.0 DK units/ml are positive. The normal range for fasting C-peptide is 0.5–3.0 ng/ml.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box-and-whisker plots of BMI z score (A) and fasting C-peptide (B) by antibody (Ab) status. + identifies the mean, and the line through the middle of the box is the median. The upper and lower edges of the box are the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The upper whisker is drawn between the 75th percentile (upper edge of the box) and the largest observed value <1.5 times the interquartile range, above the 75th percentile. The lower whisker is drawn between the 25th percentile and the smallest observed value >1.5 times the interquartile range below the 25th percentile. ○, outliers.

References

    1. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Dolan LM, Daniels SR, Standiford D, Khoury PR, Zeitler P: Increased incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus among adolescents. J Pediatr 1996;128(5 Pt 1):608–615
    1. Dabelea D, Pettitt DJ, Jones KL, Arslanian SA: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in minority children and adolescents. An emerging problem. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1999;28:709–729, viii
    1. Fagot-Campagna A, Pettitt DJ, Engelgau MM, Burrows NR, Geiss LS, Valdez R, Beckles GL, Saaddine J, Gregg EW, Williamson DF, Narayan KM: Type 2 diabetes among North American children and adolescents: an epidemiologic review and a public health perspective. J Pediatr 2000;136:664–672
    1. Writing Group for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA 2007;297:2716–2724
    1. Vehik K, Hamman RF, Lezotte D, Norris JM, Klingensmith G, Bloch C, Rewers M, Dabelea D: Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes in 0- to 17-year-old Colorado youth. Diabetes Care 2007;30:503–509
    1. Harjutsalo V, Sjöberg L, Tuomilehto J: Time trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: a cohort study. Lancet 2008;371:1777–1782
    1. Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyürüs E, Green A, Soltész G: EURODIAB Study Group Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989–2003 and predicted new cases 2005–20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet 2009;373:2027–2033
    1. Scott CR, Smith JM, Cradock MM, Pihoker C: Characteristics of youth-onset noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus at diagnosis. Pediatrics 1997;100:84–91
    1. Libman IM, Pietropaolo M, Arslanian SA, LaPorte RE, Becker DJ: Changing prevalence of overweight children and adolescents at onset of insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:2871–2875
    1. Turner R, Stratton I, Horton V, Manley S, Zimmet P, Mackay IR, Shattock M, Bottazzo GF, Holman R: UKPDS 25: autoantibodies to islet-cell cytoplasm and glutamic acid decarboxylase for prediction of insulin requirement in type 2 diabetes. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Lancet 1997;350:1288–1293
    1. TODAY Study Group, Zeitler P, Epstein L, Grey M, Hirst K, Kaufman F, Tamborlane W, Wilfley D: Treatment options for type 2 diabetes in adolescents and youth: a study of the comparative efficacy of metformin alone or in combination with rosiglitazone or lifestyle intervention in adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2007;8:74–87
    1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl. 1):S5–S10
    1. Desai M, Clark A: Autoimmune diabetes in adults: lessons from the UKPDS. Diabet Med 2008;25(Suppl. 2):30–34
    1. Wenzlau JM, Moua O, Sarkar SA, Yu L, Rewers M, Eisenbarth GS, Davidson HW, Hutton JC: SlC30A8 is a major target of humoral autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes and a predictive marker in prediabetes. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008;1150:256–259
    1. Gottschalk M, Danne T, Fuerst-Recktenwald S: Ethnic origin is unrelated to autoimmunity and residual pancreatic function in 471 youth with clinically diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2009;10:240–247
    1. Pozzilli P, Guglielmi C: Double diabetes: a mixture of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in youth. Endocr Dev 2009;14:151–166
    1. Tfayli H, Bacha F, Gungor N, Arslanian S: Phenotypic type 2 diabetes in obese youth: insulin sensitivity and secretion in islet cell antibody-negative versus -positive patients. Diabetes 2009;58:738–744
    1. Zinman B, Kahn SE, Haffner SM, O'Neill MC, Heise MA, Freed MI: Phenotypic characteristics of GAD antibody-positive recently diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes in North America and Europe. Diabetes 2004;53:3193–3200
    1. Gilliam LK, Brooks-Worrell BM, Palmer JP, Greenbaum CJ, Pihoker C: Autoimmunity and clinical course in children with type 1, type 2, and type 1.5 diabetes. J Autoimmun 2005;25:244–250

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir