Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care

Alex H Krist, Eric Peele, Steven H Woolf, Stephen F Rothemich, John F Loomis, Daniel R Longo, Anton J Kuzel, Alex H Krist, Eric Peele, Steven H Woolf, Stephen F Rothemich, John F Loomis, Daniel R Longo, Anton J Kuzel

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based preventive services offer profound health benefits, yet Americans receive only half of indicated care. A variety of government and specialty society policy initiatives are promoting the adoption of information technologies to engage patients in their care, such as personal health records, but current systems may not utilize the technology's full potential.

Methods: Using a previously described model to make information technology more patient-centered, we developed an interactive preventive health record (IPHR) designed to more deeply engage patients in preventive care and health promotion. We recruited 14 primary care practices to promote the IPHR to all adult patients and sought practice and patient input in designing the IPHR to ensure its usability, salience, and generalizability. The input involved patient usability tests, practice workflow observations, learning collaboratives, and patient feedback. Use of the IPHR was measured using practice appointment and IPHR databases.

Results: The IPHR that emerged from this process generates tailored patient recommendations based on guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other organizations. It extracts clinical data from the practices' electronic medical record and obtains health risk assessment information from patients. Clinical content is translated and explained in lay language. Recommendations review the benefits and uncertainties of services and possible actions for patients and clinicians. Embedded in recommendations are self management tools, risk calculators, decision aids, and community resources--selected to match patient's clinical circumstances. Within six months, practices had encouraged 14.4% of patients to use the IPHR (ranging from 1.5% to 28.3% across the 14 practices). Practices successfully incorporated the IPHR into workflow, using it to prepare patients for visits, augment health behavior counseling, explain test results, automatically issue patient reminders for overdue services, prompt clinicians about needed services, and formulate personalized prevention plans.

Conclusions: The IPHR demonstrates that a patient-centered personal health record that interfaces with the electronic medical record can give patients a high level of individualized guidance and be successfully adopted by busy primary care practices. Further study and refinement are necessary to make information systems even more patient-centered and to demonstrate their impact on care.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00589173.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of the Primary Care Practices Participating in the Efficacy, Adoption, and Dissemination Trials. E = Efficacy trial, A = Adoption Trial, D = Dissemination trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preventive Services Addressed by the IPHR.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Minimum Clinical Dataset Required by IPHR to Generate Personalized Prevention Recommendations. The above elements are necessary to determine applicability of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. CT = computed tomography, HDL = high-density lipoproteins, LDL = low-density lipoproteins, PSA = prostate specific antigen.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The IPHR General Summary Page. After completing the health risk assessment patients are directed to the IPHR general summary page. This page is intended to both provide patients an overview of how they are doing and allow them to access detailed personalized messages about any prevention top by simply clicking on the blue hyperlinked topics.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Detailed Personal Prevention. This is an example of a patient's detailed personal message about cholesterol. Content is modeled after HealthFinder.gov and framed to promote patient action. Specific elements include: (1) An explicit guideline-based recommendation presented in patient language; (2) Content is personalized for each patient, both summarizing the patient's individual profile and highlighting patient characteristics to make the content more relevant; (3) Positive aspects are emphasized to make the message motivational; (4) Patients are provided a personalized library of non-commercial, evidence-based, and patient-centered tools to guide their next steps and manage their preventive care; (5) Patients can view all available past values, which are graphically displayed and trended to demonstrate any changes; and (6) All content is framed to link the patient back to their personal clinician. For preventive services with a balance of risks and benefits, messages also contain (a) a description of the risks of the preventive services and (b) information about how to decide if the preventive service is appropriate for an individual.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Patient and Practice Use of the IPHR During the First Six Months of Availability.

References

    1. Prevention and Care Management. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Accessed July, 2011.
    1. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658.
    1. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):727–737. W237-742.
    1. Dear K, Holden J, Andrews R, Tatham D. Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. p. CD000422.
    1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291(10):1238–1245. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.
    1. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J. et al.The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–2645. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
    1. Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making "time" for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(8):785–791.
    1. Jaen CR, Stange KC, Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract. 1994;38(2):166–171.
    1. Woolf SH, Krist AH, Rothemich SF. Joining Hands: Partnerships Between Physicians and the Community in the Delivery of Preventive Care. Washington D.C.: Center for American Progress; 2006.
    1. Public Law 111-148. 2nd Session 2010. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Section 4103.
    1. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(6):501–504. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006114.
    1. Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home. American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatricians, American Osteopathic Association. Accessed May, 2011.
    1. Health IT. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Accessed July, 2011.
    1. Tang PC, Lansky D. The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24(5):1290–1295. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1290.
    1. Google Health. Google. Accessed May, 2011.
    1. HealthVault. Microsoft. Accessed May, 2011.
    1. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(2):121–126. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2025.
    1. Tang PC, Lee TH. Your doctor's office or the Internet? Two paths to personal health records. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1276–1278. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0810264.
    1. Kahn JS, Aulakh V, Bosworth A. What it takes: characteristics of the ideal personal health record. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(2):369–376. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.369.
    1. Ralston S, Kellett N, Williams RL, Schmitt C, North CQ. Practice-based assessment of tobacco usage in southwestern primary care patients: a Research Involving Outpatient Settings Network (RIOS Net) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(2):174–180. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060018.
    1. Silvestre AL, Sue VM, Allen JY. If you build it, will they come? The Kaiser Permanente model of online health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(2):334–344. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.334.
    1. Hing E, Hsiao CJ. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. pp. 1–11.
    1. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26(1):56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011.
    1. . Kaiser Permanente. Colorado Region - Institute for Health Research. Accessed July, 2011.
    1. Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(5):688–694. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl081.
    1. Virginia Ambulatory Outcomes Research Network. Department of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University. Accessed Oct, 2011.
    1. Krist AH, Woolf SH. A vision for patient-centered health information systems. JAMA. 2011;305(3):300–301. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2011.
    1. Vol NIH Pub. No. 04-5239. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2004. Complete Report: the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee of Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
    1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR. et al.The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. Jama. 2003;289(19):2560–2572. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560.
    1. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN. et al.Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110(2):227–239. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133317.49796.0E.
    1. National Cholesterol Education Program. Vol NIH Pub. No. 02-5215. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 2002. Third report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults.
    1. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of medical care in diabetes. II. Testing for pre-diabetes and diabetes in asymptomatic patients. Diabetes care. 2008;31(Suppl 1):S13–14.
    1. Recommendation and Guidelines. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed January, 2010.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office; 2000.
    1. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture. Accessed July, 2011.
    1. Sirovich BE, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence? Jama. 2003;289(11):1414–1420. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.11.1414.
    1. Woolf SH. The power of prevention and what it requires. Jama. 2008;299(20):2437–2439. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.20.2437.
    1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.
    1. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ Jr, Welch HG. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291(1):71–78. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.71.
    1. Health IT Strategic Plan 2011-2015. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Accessed May, 2011.
    1. The National Prevention Strategy. National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council; Accessed July, 2011.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir