Predictors of web-based follow-up response in the Prevention Of Low Back Pain In The Military Trial (POLM)

John D Childs, Deydre S Teyhen, Joshua J Van Wyngaarden, Brett F Dougherty, Bryan J Ladislas, Gary L Helton, Michael E Robinson, Samuel S Wu, Steven Z George, John D Childs, Deydre S Teyhen, Joshua J Van Wyngaarden, Brett F Dougherty, Bryan J Ladislas, Gary L Helton, Michael E Robinson, Samuel S Wu, Steven Z George

Abstract

Background: Achieving adequate follow-up in clinical trials is essential to establish the validity of the findings. Achieving adequate response rates reduces bias and increases probability that the findings can be generalized to the population of interest. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of attention, demographic, psychological, and health status factors on web-based response rates in the ongoing Prevention of Low Back Pain in the Military (POLM) trial.

Methods: Twenty companies of Soldiers (n = 4,325) were cluster randomized to complete a traditional exercise program including sit-ups (TEP) with or without a psychosocial educational program (PSEP) or a core stabilization exercise program (CSEP) with or without PSEP. A subgroup of Soldiers (n = 371) was randomized to receive an additional physical and ultrasound imaging (USI) examination of key trunk musculature. As part of the surveillance program, all Soldiers were encouraged to complete monthly surveys via email during the first year. Descriptive statistics of the predictor variables were obtained and compared between responders and non-responders using two sample t-tests or chi-square test, as appropriate. Generalized linear mixed models were subsequently fitted for the dichotomous outcomes to estimate the effects of the predictor variables. The significance level was set at .05 a priori.

Results: The overall response rate was 18.9% (811 subjects) for the first year. Responders were more likely to be older, Caucasian, have higher levels of education and income, reservist military status, non smoker, lower BMI, and have received individualized attention via the physical/USI examination (p < .05). Age, race/ethnicity, education, military status, smoking history, BMI, and whether a Soldier received the physical/USI examination remained statistically significant (p < .05) when considered in a full multivariate model.

Conclusion: The overall web based response rate during the first year of the POLM trial was consistent with studies that used similar methodology, but lower when compared to rates expected for standard clinical trials. One year response rate was significantly associated with demographic characteristics, health status, and individualized attention via additional testing. These data may assist for planning of future trials that use web based response systems.

Trial registration: This study has been registered at reports at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00373009" title="See in ClinicalTrials.gov">NCT00373009).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for subject recruitment and email responders one year after the conclusion of the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Monthly response rate during the first year follow up.

References

    1. Robiner W. Enhancing adherence in clinical research. Contemp Clin Trials. 2005;26(1):59–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.11.015.
    1. Straus SE, Glasqiou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 3. 2005. pp. 104–106.
    1. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hebert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ. 2002;325:652–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652.
    1. Dias L, Thomas J. Reasons for high retention in pediatric clinical trials: comparison of participant and staff responses in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial. Clin Trials. 2005;2(5):443–52. doi: 10.1191/1740774505cn113oa.
    1. Loftin WA, Barnett SK, Bunn PS, Sullivan P. Recruitment and retention of rural African Americans in diabetes research: lessons learned. Diabetes Educ. 2000;31(2):251–9.
    1. Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Kearney KA, Reid R, Ritzwoller DP, Strecher VJ, Couper MP, Green B, Wildenhaus K. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e11.
    1. Janson SL, Alioto ME, Boushey HA. Asthma Clinical Trials Network. Attrition and retention of ethnically diverse subjects in a multicenter randomized controlled research trial. Control Clin Trials. 2001;22(6):236S–43S. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00171-4.
    1. George SZ, Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Wu SS, Wright AC, Dugan JL, Robinson ME. Rationale, design, and protocol for the prevention of low back pain in the military (POLM) trial (NCT00373009) BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-92.
    1. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomized trials. BMJ. 2004;328:702–708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702.
    1. Metzelthin SF, van Rossum E, de Witte LP, Hendriks MR, Kempen GI. The reduction of disability in community-dwelling frail older people: design of a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(511)
    1. Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Benedict TM, Morris JB, Fortenberry AD, McQueen RM, Preston JB, Wright AC, Dugan JL, George SZ. Effects of sit-up training versus core stabilization exercises on sit-up performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(11):2072–83. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a84db2.
    1. Childs JD, Teyhen DS, Casey PR, McCoy-Singh KA, Feldtmann AW, Wright AC, Dugan JL, Wu SS, George SZ. Effects of traditional sit-up training versus core stabilization exercises on short-term musculoskeletal injuries in US Army soldiers: a cluster randomized trial. Phys Ther. 2010;90(10):1404–12. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090389.
    1. George SZ, Fritz JM, Bialosky JE, Donald DA. The effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention for patients with acute low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial. Spine. 2003;28(23):2551–60. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000096677.84605.A2.
    1. Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Effects of a Campaign on Back Pain Beliefs and Its Potential Influence on Management of Low Back Pain in General Practice. Spine. 2001;26(23):2535–2542. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00005.
    1. Smith EA, Malone RE. "Everywhere the Soldier Will Be": Wartime Tobacco Promotion in the US Military. American Journal of Public Health. 2009. pp. 1595–1602.
    1. Bosnjak M, Tuten TL. Classifying Response Behaviors in Web-based Surveys. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2001;6(3)
    1. Vilella A, Bayas JM, Diaz MT, Guinovart C, Diez C, Simó D, Muñoz A, Cerezo J. The role of mobile phones in improving vaccination rates in travelers. Prev Med. 2004;38(4):503–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.005.
    1. Britt TW, Adler AB. Military life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat. Vol. 1. Military performance; 2006.
    1. Stellman JM. Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. 4. III. Overview of Infectious Disease; 1998.

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir