Feasibility and acceptability of technology-based caregiver engagement strategies delivered in a summertime childhood obesity prevention intervention: results from an internal pilot of the Camp NERF (Nutrition, Education, Recreation, and Fitness) study

Laura C Hopkins, Mary Fristad, Jacqueline D Goodway, Bernadette Melnyk, Ihuoma Eneli, Chris Holloman, Julie A Kennel, Alison Webster, Amy R Sharn, Carolyn Gunther, Laura C Hopkins, Mary Fristad, Jacqueline D Goodway, Bernadette Melnyk, Ihuoma Eneli, Chris Holloman, Julie A Kennel, Alison Webster, Amy R Sharn, Carolyn Gunther

Abstract

Background: The most efficacious childhood obesity prevention interventions have involved caregivers directly or indirectly. Due to the high reliance on technology, research examining technological intervention approaches is warranted, particularly during the summer when parents may be more difficult to engage and the risk for excess weight gain among children is high.

Methods: The feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component childhood obesity prevention intervention incorporating a caregiver component utilizing technology-based approaches-texting and social media-was explored. This was an internal pilot of the Camp Nutrition Education Recreation and Fitness (NERF) study, a group RCT for school-age children coupled to the USDA Summer Food Service Program. Feasibility and acceptability of the technology caregiver engagement component were assessed via process outcomes (participation rates) and in-depth interviews.

Results: Participants (n = 37) were 91.9% female, 91.8% Black, 58.7% low-income, and 75.0% overweight/obese. Participation rates in texting and social media were 62.2% and < 3%, respectively. Themes emerged from the in-depth interviews were texting provides connection; desire more involvement with program; fear social media privacy intrusion.

Conclusions: Results will be used to inform changes to technology-based caregiver engagement strategies to be tested in future interventions.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials, NCT02908230/09-19-2016. Registered 20 September 2016.

Keywords: Caregivers; Childhood obesity; Privacy; Social media; Summer; Text messaging.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was approved by The Ohio State University Behavioral and Social Sciences Institutional Review Board. Caregiver consent was received from participants prior to enrollment.No applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6158889/bin/40814_2018_340_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Fig. 1 Enhanced Care Text Messaging Pilot Weekly Schematic
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/6158889/bin/40814_2018_340_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Fig. 2 Overview of Affirmative vs. Negative Response Texts among Enhanced Care Texting Responders

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–814. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732.
    1. Lytle LA. Examining the etiology of childhood obesity: the IDEA study. Am J Community Psycology. 2010;44:1–19. doi: 10.1007/s10464-009-9269-1.Examining.
    1. Bluford DAA, Sherry B, Scanlon KS. Interventions to prevent or treat obesity in preschool children: a review of evaluated programs. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007;15(6):1356–1372. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.163.
    1. van der Kruk JJ, Kortekaas F, Lucas C, Jager-Wittenaar H. Obesity: a systematic review on parental involvement in long-term European childhood weight control interventions with a nutritional focus. Obes Rev. 2013;14(9):745–760. doi: 10.1111/obr.12046.
    1. Davison KK, Jurkowski JM, Li K, Kranz S, Lawson HA. A childhood obesity intervention developed by families for families: results from a pilot study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-3.
    1. Welk GJ, Chen S, Nam YH, Weber TE. A formative evaluation of the SWITCH® obesity prevention program: print versus online programming. BMC Obes. 2015;2:20. doi: 10.1186/s40608-015-0049-1.
    1. Fassnacht DB, Ali K, Silva C, Gonçalves S, Machado PPP. Use of text messaging services to promote health behaviors in children. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47(1):75–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.006.
    1. Keating SR, McCurry MK. Systematic review of text messaging as an intervention for adolescent obesity. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2015;27:714–720. doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12264.
    1. Lau PW, Lau EY, Wong DP, Ransdell L. A systematic review of information and communication technology-based interventions for promoting physical activity behavior change in children and adolescents. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):1–18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1533.
    1. Militello LK, Kelly SA, Melnyk BM. Systematic review of text messaging interventions to promote healthy behaviors in pediatric and adolescent populations: implications for clinical practice and research. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2012;9(2):66–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00239.x.
    1. Smith AJ, Skow A, Bodurtha J, Kinra S. Health information technology in screening and treatment of child obesity: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2016;131(3):e894–e902. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2011.
    1. Turner T, Spruijt-Metz D, Wen CKF, Hingle MD. Prevention and treatment of pediatric obesity using mobile and wireless technologies: a systematic review. Pediatr Obes. 2015;10:403–409. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12002.
    1. Hopkins LC, Fristad M, Goodway JD, et al. Camp NERF: methods of a theory-based nutrition education recreation and fitness program aimed at preventing unhealthy weight gain in underserved elementary children during summer months. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1122. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3765-7.
    1. Duggan M, Lenhart A, Lampe C, Ellison N. Parents and social media. Washington, DC. 2015.
    1. Pottier N, Newcomer E, Kwizera N. TextIt. 2014.
    1. Gittelsohn J, Anderson Steeves E, Mui Y, Kharmats AY, Hopkins LC, Dennis D. B’More healthy communities for kids: design of a multi-level intervention for obesity prevention for low-income African American children. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:942. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-942.
    1. Speirs Katherine E, Grutzmacher Stephanie K, Munger Ashley L, Messina Lauren A. Recruitment and retention in an SMS-based health education program: Lessons learned from Text2BHealthy. Health Informatics Journal. 2016;22(3):651–658. doi: 10.1177/1460458215577995.
    1. Pew Research Center. Social Media Fact Sheet. .
    1. Department of Health and Human Services. 2015 U.S. Federal Poverty Guidelines used to Determine Financial Eligibility for Certain Federal Programs. .
    1. Charmez K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
    1. Fade S. Using interpretative phenomenological analysis for public health nutrition and dietetic research: a practical guide. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63(04):647–653. doi: 10.1079/PNS2004398.
    1. Gruver RS, Bishop-Gilyard CT, Lieberman A, et al. A social media peer group intervention for mothers to prevent obesity and promote healthy growth from infancy: development and pilot trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(3):e159. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5276.
    1. Balmford J, Borland R, Benda P, Howard S. Factors associated with use of automated smoking cessation interventions: findings from the eQuit study. Health Educ Res. 2013;28(2):288–299. doi: 10.1093/her/cys104.
    1. Takahashi Y, Ohura T, Ishizaki T, et al. Internet use for health-related information via personal computers and cell phones in Japan: a cross-sectional population-based survey. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1796.
    1. Quelly SB, Norris AE, DiPietro JL. Impact of mobile apps to combat obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2016;21(1):5–17. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12134.
    1. Phillips DL, Clancy KJ. Some effects of “social desirability” in survey studies. Am J Sociol. 1972;77(5):921–940. doi: 10.1086/225231.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir