Gene Signatures Stratify Computed Tomography Screening Detected Lung Cancer in High-Risk Populations

Jiangting Hu, Mattia Boeri, Gabriella Sozzi, Dongxia Liu, Alfonso Marchianò, Luca Roz, Giuseppe Pelosi, Kevin Gatter, Ugo Pastorino, Francesco Pezzella, Jiangting Hu, Mattia Boeri, Gabriella Sozzi, Dongxia Liu, Alfonso Marchianò, Luca Roz, Giuseppe Pelosi, Kevin Gatter, Ugo Pastorino, Francesco Pezzella

Abstract

Background: Although screening programmes of smokers have detected resectable early lung cancers more frequently than expected, their efficacy in reducing mortality remains debatable. To elucidate the biological features of computed tomography (CT) screening detected lung cancer, we examined the mRNA signatures on tumours according to the year of detection, stage and survival.

Methods: Gene expression profiles were analysed on 28 patients (INT-IEO training cohort) and 24 patients of Multicentre Italian Lung Detection (MILD validation cohort). The gene signatures generated from the training set were validated on the MILD set and a public deposited DNA microarray data set (GSE11969). Expression of selected genes and proteins was validated by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Enriched core pathway and pathway networks were explored by GeneSpring GX10.

Findings: A 239-gene signature was identified according to the year of tumour detection in the training INT-IEO set and correlated with the patients' outcomes. These signatures divided the MILD patients into two distinct survival groups independently of tumour stage, size, histopathological type and screening year. The signatures can also predict survival in the clinically detected cancers (GSE11969). Pathway analyses revealed tumours detected in later years enrichment of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway, with up-regulation of PDPK1, ITGB1 and down-regulation of FOXO1A. Analysis of normal lung tissue from INT-IEO cohort produced signatures distinguishing patients with early from late detected tumours.

Interpretation: The distinct pattern of "indolent" and "aggressive" tumour exists in CT-screening detected lung cancer according to the gene expression profiles. The early development of an aggressive phenotype may account for the lack of mortality reduction by screening observed in some cohorts.

Keywords: Aggressive; CT screening; Gene signature; Indolent; Lung cancer; PI3K/PTEN/AKT signalling pathway.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 17 tumours detected in years 1 and 2 (T) and 11 cases detected in years 3, 4 and 5 (T*) using 239 differentially expressed genes.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Survival analysis of 24 MILD patients grouped according to the signature of CT-year of screening. These survival curves are based on (a) overall survival analysis and (b) disease free survival analysis. The (two-sided) p value is from by Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall survival analysis of in silico data (GSE11969) considering (a) all the 79 patients or (b) the 40 stage I alone, grouped according to the signature of CT-year of screening. The (two-sided) p value is from by Log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The 239-gene of differentially expressed genes according to the CT screening year were imported into the GeneSpring GX10 for searching the common regulators of these genes. The connection between these genes was built up and unlinked nodes (genes) were removed. Blue lines and squares signify that a defined regulatory relationship exits between genes. Grey lines and squares signify that a putative regulatory relationship between genes has been identified but not biochemically defined. +, positive regulation; −, negative regulation.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pathway enrichment analysis reveals PI3K/PTEN/AKT signalling and apoptosis pathway as the most significantly related pathway. ITGB1 has higher level of expression in the late year tumours while FOXO1A has higher levels in the tumours detected at first two years.

References

    1. Akiyama S.K., Olden K., Yamada K.M. Fibronectin and integrins in invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1995;14(3):173–189. (Epub 1995/09/01)
    1. Anon. Screening for lung cancer. Too many uncertainties, even for smokers. Prescrire Int. 2014;23(145):19–23. (Jan)
    1. Bach P.B. Is our natural-history model of lung cancer wrong? Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):693–697. (Epub 2008/07/05)
    1. Bach P.B., Kelley M.J., Tate R.C., McCrory D.C. Screening for lung cancer: a review of the current literature. Chest. 2003;123(1 Suppl.):72S–82S.
    1. Balsara B.R., Pei J., Mitsuuchi Y. Frequent activation of AKT in non-small cell lung carcinomas and preneoplastic bronchial lesions. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25(11):2053–2059. (Epub 2004/07/09)
    1. Basson M.D. An intracellular signal pathway that regulates cancer cell adhesion in response to extracellular forces. Cancer Res. 2008;68(1):2–4. (Epub 2008/01/04)
    1. Bianchi F., Hu J., Pelosi G. Lung cancers detected by screening with spiral computed tomography have a malignant phenotype when analyzed by cDNA microarray. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:6023–6028.
    1. Bloom L., Calabro V. FN3: a new protein scaffold reaches the clinic. Drug Discov. Today. 2009;14(19–20):949–955. (Epub 2009/07/07)
    1. Boeri M., Verri C., Conte D., Roz L. MicroRNA signatures in tissues and plasma predict development and prognosis of computed tomography detected lung cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011;108(9):3713–3718. (Epub 2011/02/09)
    1. Bravou V., Klironomos G., Papadaki E. ILK over-expression in human colon cancer progression correlates with activation of beta-catenin, down-regulation of E-cadherin and activation of the Akt-FKHR pathway. J. Pathol. 2006;208(1):91–99. (Epub 2005/11/10)
    1. Cen L., Hsieh F.C., Lin H.J. PDK-1/AKT pathway as a novel therapeutic target in rhabdomyosarcoma cells using OSU-03012 compound. Br. J. Cancer. 2007;97(6):785–791. (Epub 2007/09/13)
    1. Cheong J.W., Eom J.I., Maeng H.Y. Constitutive phosphorylation of FKHR transcription factor as a prognostic variable in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2003;27(12):1159–1162. (Epub 2003/08/19)
    1. Fang W., Li X., Jiang Q. Transcriptional patterns, biomarkers and pathways characterizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma of Southern China. J. Transl. Med. 2008;6:32.
    1. Goldstraw P., Crowley J., Chansky K. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2007;2(8):706–714. (Epub 2007/09/01)
    1. Henschke C.I., Yankelevitz D.F., Libby D.M. Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;355(17):1763–1771. (Epub 2006/10/27)
    1. Horning S.J., Rosenberg S.A. The natural history of initially untreated low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 1984;311:1471–1475.
    1. Huang Da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57. (Epub 2009/01/10)
    1. Infante M., Cavuto S., Lutman F.R. A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009;180(5):445–453. (Epub 2009/06/13)
    1. Leek R.D., Hunt N.C., Landers R.J. Macrophage infiltration is associated with VEGF and EGFR expression in breast cancer. J. Pathol. 2000;190(4):430–436.
    1. Li R., Erdamar S., Dai H. Forkhead protein FKHR and its phosphorylated form p-FKHR in human prostate cancer. Hum. Pathol. 2007;38(10):1501–1507. (Epub 2007/06/29)
    1. Li J., Yang L., Song L. Astrocyte elevated gene-1 is a proliferation promoter in breast cancer via suppressing transcriptional factor FOXO1. Oncogene. 2009;28(36):3188–3196. (Epub 2009/07/28)
    1. Lochhead P., Chan A., Nishihara R. Etiologic field effect: reappraisal of the field effect concept in cancer predisposition and progression. Mod. Pathol. 2015;28:14–29.
    1. Maekawa T., Maniwa Y., Doi T. Expression and localization of FOXO1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2009;22(1):57–64. (Epub 2009/06/11)
    1. Marcus P.M., Bergstralh E.J., Zweig M.H. Extended lung cancer incidence follow-up in the Mayo Lung Project and overdiagnosis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006;98(11):748–756. (Epub 2006/06/08)
    1. Melamed M.R., Flehinger B.J., Zaman M.B. Screening for early lung cancer. Results of the Memorial Sloan–Kettering study in New York. Chest. 1984;86(1):44–53. (Epub 1984/07/01)
    1. Myatt S.S., Wang J., Monteiro L.J. Definition of microRNAs that repress expression of the tumor suppressor gene FOXO1 in endometrial cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(1):367–377. (Epub 2009/12/24)
    1. Pastorino U. Early detection of lung cancer. Respiration. 2006;73(1):5–13. (Epub 2006/02/25)
    1. Pastorino U., Bellomi M., Landoni C. Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet. 2003;362(9384):593–597.
    1. Pastorino U., Landoni C., Marchiano A. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake measured by positron emission tomography and standardized uptake value predicts long-term survival of CT screening detected lung cancer in heavy smokers. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2009;4(11):1352–1356. (Epub 2009/10/29)
    1. Pastorino U., Rossi M., Rosato V. Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2012;21(3):308–315. (May)
    1. Ritzenthaler J.D., Han S., Roman J. Stimulation of lung carcinoma cell growth by fibronectin–integrin signalling. Mol. BioSyst. 2008;4(12):1160–1169. (Epub 2009/04/28)
    1. Saghir Z., Dirksen A., Ashraf H. CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish lung cancer screening trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT. Thorax. 2012;67:296e301.
    1. Sozzi G., Boeri M., Rossi M. Clinical utility of a plasma-based miRNA signature classifier within computed tomography lung cancer screening: a correlative MILD trial study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:768–773.
    1. Takeuchi T., Tomida S., Yatabe Y. Expression profile-defined classification of lung adenocarcinoma shows close relationship with underlying major genetic changes and clinicopathologic behaviors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006;24(11):1679–1688. (Epub 2006/03/22)
    1. Testa J.R., Bellacosa A. AKT plays a central role in tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98(20):10983–10985. (Epub 2001/09/27)
    1. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:395–409.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir