Pharmacokinetics of DFN-15, a Novel Oral Solution of Celecoxib, Versus Celecoxib 400-mg Capsules: A Randomized Crossover Study in Fasting Healthy Volunteers

Arindam Pal, Srinivas Shenoy, Anirudh Gautam, Sagar Munjal, Jing Niu, Mathangi Gopalakrishnan, Joga Gobburru, Arindam Pal, Srinivas Shenoy, Anirudh Gautam, Sagar Munjal, Jing Niu, Mathangi Gopalakrishnan, Joga Gobburru

Abstract

Background: COX-2 inhibitors can be effective for acute migraine, but none is supplied in a rapidly absorbed, ready-to-use oral liquid formulation. DFN-15, a novel oral liquid formulation of celecoxib, is being developed for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura. Clinical studies with this formulation are ongoing.

Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to compare the bioavailability of DFN-15 with that of the commercial formulation of celecoxib 400-mg oral capsules (Celebrex®) and to determine the dose proportionality of DFN-15 in healthy fasted volunteers.

Methods: This single-dose randomized crossover study in 16 healthy fasted volunteers evaluated the pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of DFN-15 at doses of 120, 180, and 240 mg against the commercial formulation of celecoxib 400-mg oral capsules and determined the dose proportionality of DFN-15.

Results: The maximum observed plasma concentrations (C max) of celecoxib after the administration of DFN-15 120, 180, and 240 mg (1062-1933 ng/ml) were higher than for the 400-mg oral capsules (611 ng/ml). The median time to peak concentration (T max) was within 1 h for DFN-15 and 2.5 h for the oral capsules. The pharmacokinetics of DFN-15 were dose proportional from 120 to 240 mg. Partial area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) from 15 min to 2 h for DFN-15 120 mg were at least threefold higher than for the oral capsules, and the relative bioavailability of DFN-15 was approximately 140% that of the oral capsules. DFN-15 was well tolerated, with no new or unexpected adverse events.

Conclusions: Based on a faster rate of absorption and increased bioavailability, DFN-15 is being evaluated as an abortive medication for acute treatment in patients with migraine.

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

This study was sponsored by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., which developed DFN-15.

Conflict of interest

AP, SS, AG, and SM are employees of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, developer of DFN-15; JN, MG, and JG were paid consultants of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (7th revision, 2013), the International Council for Harmonisation Guideline E6 for Good Clinical Practice, and the US FDA Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 (part 56). The protocol and the informed consent form were reviewed and approved by Quorum Review IRB (Seattle, WA, USA).

Informed consent

All subjects voluntarily participated in this study. They signed an informed consent form, which explained the nature and objectives of the study as well as any known side effects and/or adverse reactions associated with study medications, after having fully comprehended its contents.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean plasma concentration-time profile of DFN-15 and celecoxib oral capsules through 72 h post-dose on a semi-logarithmic scale, with an inset showing the same measurements through 3 h post-dose. Note at each time point post-dose, individual plasma concentrations were averaged to obtain mean concentrations. Averaging of individual concentrations from five subjects (all concentrations are above the limit of quantitation) on DFN-15 180 mg at 5 min post-dose resulted in a value of 5.8 ng/ml

References

    1. Silberstein SD. Practice parameter: Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000;55:754–762. doi: 10.1212/WNL.55.6.754.
    1. Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ. The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the American Headache Society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache. 2015;55:3–20. doi: 10.1111/head.12499.
    1. Lipton RB, Diamond S, Reed M, et al. Migraine diagnosis and treatment: results from the American Migraine Study II. Headache. 2001;41:638–645. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007638.x.
    1. Lipton RB, Scher AI, Steiner TJ, et al. Patterns of health care utilization for migraine in England and in the United States. Neurology. 2003;60:441–448. doi: 10.1212/WNL.60.3.441.
    1. Lanas A, Garcia-Rodriguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al. Risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding associated with selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, traditional non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin and combinations. Gut. 2006;55:1731–1738. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.080754.
    1. Misra UK, Jose M, Kalita J. Rofecoxib versus ibuprofen for acute treatment of migraine: A randomised placebo controlled trial. Postgrad Med J. 2004;80:720–723. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.012393.
    1. Laine L, Harper S, Simon T, et al. A randomized trial comparing the effect of rofecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, with that of ibuprofen on the gastroduodenal mucosa of patients with osteoarthritis. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:776–783. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70334-3.
    1. Hawkey CJ, Laine L, Simon T, et al. Incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after 12 weeks of rofecoxib, naproxen, or placebo: A multicentre, randomised, double blind study. Gut. 2003;52:820–826. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.6.820.
    1. Loo CY, Tan HJ, Teh HS, et al. Randomised, open label, controlled trial of celecoxib in the treatment of acute migraine. Singap Med J. 2007;48:834–839.
    1. Silberstein S, Tepper S, Brandes J, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rofecoxib in the acute treatment of migraine. Neurology. 2004;62:1552–1557. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000123260.61631.C4.
    1. Kudrow D, Thomas HM, Ruoff G, et al. Valdecoxib for treatment of a single, acute, moderate to severe migraine headache. Headache. 2005;45:1151–1162. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.00238.x.
    1. Pfizer Inc. Celebrex (celecoxib capsule) [prescribing information]. . Accessed 26 May 2017
    1. Lipton RB, Hamelsky SW, Dayno JM. What do patients with migraine want from acute migraine treatment? Headache. 2002;42(Suppl 1):3–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2002.0420s1003.x.
    1. Aurora SK, Papapetropoulos S, Kori SH, et al. Gastric stasis in migraineurs: etiology, characteristics, and clinical and therapeutic implications. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:408–415. doi: 10.1177/0333102412473371.
    1. Volans GN. Migraine and drug absorption. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1978;3:313–318. doi: 10.2165/00003088-197803040-00004.
    1. Tokola RA, Neuvonen PJ. Effect of migraine attacks on paracetamol absorption. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1984;18:867–871. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1984.tb02557.x.
    1. Aurora S, Kori S, Barrodale P, et al. Gastric stasis occurs in spontaneous, visually induced, and interictal migraine. Headache. 2007;47:1443–1446. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00853.x.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Inactive ingredients database. . Accessed 26 May 2017
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: bioanalytical method validation. . Accessed 26 May 2017
    1. Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987;15:657–680. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419.
    1. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Clinical pharmacology/biopharmaceutics review: Imitrex® (sumatriptan) tablets, NDA 20-132. . Accessed 26 May 2017
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Clinical pharmacology review: rizatriptan benzoate (MAXALT-MLT®, sNDA 20-865/-020. . Accessed 26 May 2017
    1. Itthipanichpong C, Chompootaweep S, Wittayalertpanya S, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetic of celecoxib in healthy Thai volunteers. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:632–638.
    1. Jayasagar G, Krishna Kumar M, Chandrasekhar K, et al. Influence of rifampicin pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of celecoxib in healthy male volunteers. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 2003;19:287–295. doi: 10.1515/DMDI.2003.19.4.287.
    1. Lee CR, Goldstein JA, Pieper JA. Cytochrome p450 2c9 polymorphisms: a comprehensive review of the in-vitro and human data. Pharmacogenetics. 2002;12:251–263. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200204000-00010.
    1. Scordo MG, Aklillu E, Yasar U, et al. Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome p450 2c9 in a caucasian and a black african population. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:447–450. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01460.x.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products — general considerations. . Accessed 26 May 2017
    1. Solomon SD, Wittes J, Finn PV, et al. Cardiovascular risk of celecoxib in 6 randomized placebo-controlled trials: the cross trial safety analysis. Circulation. 2008;117:2104–2113. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.764530.
    1. Shechter A, Stewart WF, Silberstein SD, et al. Migraine and autonomic nervous system function: a population-based, case-control study. Neurology. 2002;58:422–427. doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.3.422.
    1. Aurora SK, Kori SH, Barrodale P, et al. Gastric stasis in migraine: more than just a paroxysmal abnormality during a migraine attack. Headache. 2006;46:57–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00311.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir