Study protocol for a multicentre, cluster randomised, superiority trial evaluating the impact of computerised decision support, audit and feedback on antibiotic use: the COMPuterized Antibiotic Stewardship Study (COMPASS)

Gaud Catho, Marlieke De Kraker, Brigitte Waldispühl Suter, Roberta Valotti, Stephan Harbarth, Laurent Kaiser, Luigia Elzi, Rodolphe Meyer, Enos Bernasconi, Benedikt D Huttner, Gaud Catho, Marlieke De Kraker, Brigitte Waldispühl Suter, Roberta Valotti, Stephan Harbarth, Laurent Kaiser, Luigia Elzi, Rodolphe Meyer, Enos Bernasconi, Benedikt D Huttner

Abstract

Introduction: Inappropriate use of antimicrobials in hospitals contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions aim to improve antimicrobial prescribing, but they are often resource and personnel intensive. Computerised decision supportsystems (CDSSs) seem a promising tool to improve antimicrobial prescribing but have been insufficiently studied in clinical trials.

Methods and analysis: The COMPuterized Antibiotic Stewardship Study trial, is a publicly funded, open-label, cluster randomised, controlled superiority trial which aims to determine whether a multimodal CDSS intervention integrated in the electronic health record (EHR) reduces overall antibiotic exposure in adult patients hospitalised in wards of two secondary and one tertiary care centre in Switzerland compared with 'standard-of-care' AMS. Twenty-four hospital wards will be randomised 1:1 to either intervention or control, using a 'pair-matching' approach based on baseline antibiotic use, specialty and centre. The intervention will consist of (1) decision support for the choice of antimicrobial treatment and duration of treatment for selected indications (based on indication entry), (2) accountable justification for deviation from the local guidelines (with regard to the choice of molecules and duration), (3) alerts for self-guided re-evaluation of treatment on calendar day 4 of antimicrobial therapy and (4) monthly ward-level feedback of antimicrobial prescribing indicators. The primary outcome will be the difference in overall systemic antibiotic use measured in days of therapy per admission based on administration data recorded in the EHR over the whole intervention period (12 months), taking into account clustering. Secondary outcomes include qualitative and quantitative antimicrobial use indicators, economic outcomes and clinical, microbiological and patient safety indicators.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained for all participating sites (Comission Cantonale d'Éthique de la Recherche (CCER)2017-00454). The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Further dissemination activities will be presentations/posters at national and international conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT03120975; Pre-results.

Keywords: antimicrobial stewardship; cluster randomised trial; computerised decision support system.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
COMPASS interventions. COMPASS, COMPuterized Antibiotic Stewardship Study; CPOE, computerised physician order entry system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Randomisation scheme. Twenty-four acute wards fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be recruited (16 wards at HUG, 4 wards at ORL and OSG each). Acute wards will be paired according to centre, specialty (eg, medicine, surgery, geriatrics) and baseline antibiotic use in days of therapy/admission. Wards will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention or control arm within each pair using an online random sequence generator. EOC, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale; HUG, Geneva University Hospitals; ORL, Regional Hospital of Lugano; OSG, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona.

References

    1. Dyar OJ, Huttner B, Schouten J, et al. . What is antimicrobial stewardship? Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:793–8. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.026
    1. Trivedi KK, Dumartin C, Gilchrist M, et al. . Identifying best practices across three countries: hospital antimicrobial stewardship in the United Kingdom, France, and the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59(Suppl 3):S170–8. 10.1093/cid/ciu538
    1. Howard P, Pulcini C, Levy Hara G, et al. . An international cross-sectional survey of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother 2015;70:1245–55. 10.1093/jac/dku497
    1. Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, et al. . Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2:CD003543 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4
    1. Baur D, Gladstone BP, Burkert F, et al. . Effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017;17:990–1001. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30325-0
    1. Naylor NR, Zhu N, Hulscher M, et al. . Is antimicrobial stewardship cost-effective? A narrative review of the evidence. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:806–11. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.06.011
    1. Lesprit P, de Pontfarcy A, Esposito-Farese M, et al. . Postprescription review improves in-hospital antibiotic use: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:180.e1–7. 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.08.015
    1. Senn L, Burnand B, Francioli P, et al. . Improving appropriateness of antibiotic therapy: randomized trial of an intervention to foster reassessment of prescription after 3 days. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004;53:1062–7. 10.1093/jac/dkh236
    1. Manuel O, Burnand B, Bady P, et al. . Impact of standardised review of intravenous antibiotic therapy 72 hours after prescription in two internal medicine wards. J Hosp Infect 2010;74:326–31. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.011
    1. Cosgrove SE, Seo SK, Bolon MK, et al. . Evaluation of postprescription review and feedback as a method of promoting rational antimicrobial use: a multicenter intervention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:374–80. 10.1086/664771
    1. Uçkay I, Vernaz-Hegi N, Harbarth S, et al. . Activity and impact on antibiotic use and costs of a dedicated infectious diseases consultant on a septic orthopaedic unit. J Infect 2009;58:205–12. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.01.012
    1. Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, et al. . Implementing an Antibiotic Stewardship Program: Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis 2016;62:1197–202. 10.1093/cid/ciw217
    1. de Kraker MEA, Abbas M, Huttner B, et al. . Good epidemiological practice: a narrative review of appropriate scientific methods to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:819–25. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.05.019
    1. Curtis CE, Al Bahar F, Marriott JF. The effectiveness of computerised decision support on antibiotic use in hospitals: A systematic review. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183062 10.1371/journal.pone.0183062
    1. Baysari MT, Lehnbom EC, Li L, et al. . The effectiveness of information technology to improve antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform 2016;92:15–34. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.008
    1. Demonchy E, Dufour JC, Gaudart J, et al. . Impact of a computerized decision support system on compliance with guidelines on antibiotics prescribed for urinary tract infections in emergency departments: a multicentre prospective before-and-after controlled interventional study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2014;69:2857–63. 10.1093/jac/dku191
    1. Nachtigall I, Tafelski S, Deja M, et al. . Long-term effect of computer-assisted decision support for antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients: a prospective ’before/after' cohort study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005370 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005370
    1. Paul M, Andreassen S, Tacconelli E, et al. . Improving empirical antibiotic treatment using TREAT, a computerized decision support system: cluster randomized trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58:1238–45. 10.1093/jac/dkl372
    1. Rawson TM, Moore LSP, Hernandez B, et al. . A systematic review of clinical decision support systems for antimicrobial management: are we failing to investigate these interventions appropriately? Clin Microbiol Infect 2017;23:524–32. 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.028
    1. HUG en bref. chiffres clés. 2014.
    1. Iten A, Perrier A, Lovis C. [Deployment of a computerized physician order entry: description of the process and challenges]. Rev Med Suisse 2006;2:2344–6.
    1. Hayes RJ, Bennett S. Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:319–26. 10.1093/ije/28.2.319
    1. Moehring RW, Anderson DJ, Cochran RL, et al. . Expert Consensus on Metrics to Assess the Impact of Patient-Level Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions in Acute-Care Settings. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:377–83. 10.1093/cid/ciw787
    1. Versporten A, Gyssens IC, Pulcini C, et al. . Metrics to assess the quantity of antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: a systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure. J°Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:vi59–vi66. 10.1093/jac/dky119
    1. Le Maréchal M, Tebano G, Monnier AA, et al. . Quality indicators assessing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: a systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018;73:vi40-vi49 10.1093/jac/dky117
    1. Meeker D, Linder JA, Fox CR, et al. . Effect of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing Among Primary Care Practices: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2016;315:562–70. 10.1001/jama.2016.0275
    1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. . Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012:CD000259 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
    1. Dik JW, Hendrix R, Poelman R, et al. . Measuring the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2016;14:569–75. 10.1080/14787210.2016.1178064
    1. Morris AM, Brener S, Dresser L, et al. . Use of a structured panel process to define quality metrics for antimicrobial stewardship programs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:500–6. 10.1086/665324
    1. Morris AM. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Appropriate Measures and Metrics to Study their Impact. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 2014;6:101–12. 10.1007/s40506-014-0015-3
    1. Proposals for EU guidelines on the prudent use of antimicrobials in humans. 2017. (accessed 27 Feb 2018).
    1. Akpan MR, Ahmad R, Shebl NA, et al. . A Review of Quality Measures for Assessing the Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Hospitals. Antibiotics 2016;5:5 10.3390/antibiotics5010005
    1. Ibrahim NH, Maruan K, Mohd Khairy HA, et al. . Economic Evaluations on Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme: A Systematic Review. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2017;20:397–406. 10.18433/J3NW7G
    1. Schmitt S, McQuillen DP, Nahass R, et al. . Infectious diseases specialty intervention is associated with decreased mortality and lower healthcare costs. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:22–8. 10.1093/cid/cit610
    1. Polk RE, Hohmann SF, Medvedev S, et al. . Benchmarking risk-adjusted adult antibacterial drug use in 70 US academic medical center hospitals. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:1100–10. 10.1093/cid/cir672

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir