Test and Treat TB: a pilot trial of GeneXpert MTB/RIF screening on a mobile HIV testing unit in South Africa

Ingrid V Bassett, Leah S Forman, Sabina Govere, Hilary Thulare, Simone C Frank, Bright Mhlongo, Elena Losina, Ingrid V Bassett, Leah S Forman, Sabina Govere, Hilary Thulare, Simone C Frank, Bright Mhlongo, Elena Losina

Abstract

Background: Community-based GeneXpert MTB/RIF testing may increase detection of prevalent TB in the community and improve rates of TB treatment completion.

Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized trial to evaluate the impact of GeneXpert screening on a mobile HIV testing unit. Adults (≥18y) underwent rapid HIV testing and TB symptom screening and were randomized to usual mobile unit care (providing sputum on the mobile unit sent out for GeneXpert testing) or the "Test & Treat TB" intervention with immediate GeneXpert testing. Symptomatic participants in usual care produced sputum that was sent for hospital-based GeneXpert testing; participants were contacted ~ 7 days later with results. In the "Test & Treat TB" intervention, HIV-infected or HIV-uninfected/TB symptomatic participants underwent GeneXpert testing on the mobile unit. GeneXpert+ participants received expedited TB treatment initiation, monthly SMS reminders and non-cash incentives. We assessed 6-month TB treatment outcomes.

Results: 4815 were eligible and enrolled; median age was 27 years (IQR 22 to 35). TB symptoms included cough (5%), weight loss (4%), night sweats (4%), and fever (3%). 42% of eligible participants produced sputum (intervention: 56%; usual care: 26%). Seven participants tested GeneXpert+, six in the intervention (3%, 95% CI 1%, 5%) and one in usual care (1%, 95% CI 0%, 6%). 5 of 6 intervention participants completed TB treatment; the GeneXpert+ participant in usual care did not.

Conclusion: GeneXpert MTB/RIF screening on a mobile HIV testing unit is feasible. Yield for GeneXpert+ TB was low, however, the "Test & Treat TB" strategy led to high rates of TB treatment completion.

Trial registration: This study was registered on November 21, 2014 at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02298309 ).

Keywords: Community-based screening; GeneXpert MTB/RIF; Test & Treat; Tuberculosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Participants provided written consent for study participation. The study was approved by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (BE421/14, Durban, South Africa) and the Partners Institutional Review Board (2014P001173, Boston, MA).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant Flow. Of 7361 individuals (intervention: 3478; usual care: 3883) screened over 20 months, 4815 (intervention: 2441; usual care: 2374) were eligible and enrolled. The main reason for ineligibility was unwillingness to visit one of the follow-up clinics (2119, 88%). Other reasons for ineligibility included: age 

References

    1. Lawn SD, et al. Early mortality among adults accessing a community-based antiretroviral service in South Africa: implications for programme design. AIDS. 2005;19(18):2141–2148. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000194802.89540.e1.
    1. MacPherson P, et al. Mortality and loss to follow-up among HAART initiators in rural South Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009;103(6):588–593. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2008.10.001.
    1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2016. Available at: . Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
    1. Bekker LG, Wood R. The changing natural history of tuberculosis and HIV coinfection in an urban area of hyperendemicity. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(Suppl 3):S208–S214. doi: 10.1086/651493.
    1. Lawn SD, Kerkhoff AD, Wood R. Location of Xpert(R) MTB/RIF in centralised laboratories in South Africa undermines potential impact. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(5):701. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0131.
    1. Chawla KS, et al. Policy to practice: impact of GeneXpert MTB/RIF implementation on the TB spectrum of care in Lilongwe, Malawi. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016;110(5):305–311. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trw030.
    1. Lessells RJ, Cooke GS, McGrath N, Nicol MP, Newell ML, Godfrey-Faussett P. Impact of Point-of-Care Xpert MTB/RIF on Tuberculosis Treatment Initiation. A Cluster-randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(7):901–10.
    1. Cohen MS, et al. Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(9):830–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600693.
    1. Bendavid E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of HIV testing and treatment in highly endemic regions. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1347–1354. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.249.
    1. Geng EH, et al. The effect of a "universal antiretroviral therapy" recommendation on HIV RNA levels among HIV-infected patients entering care with a CD4 count greater than 500/muL in a public health setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(12):1690–1697. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis750.
    1. Chamie G, et al. Leveraging rapid community-based HIV testing campaigns for non-communicable diseases in rural Uganda. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043400.
    1. Govindasamy D, et al. Linkage to HIV care from a mobile testing unit in South Africa by different CD4 count strata. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;58(3):344–352. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31822e0c4c.
    1. Massyn N, Peer N, Padarath A, Barron P, Day C. District Health Barometer 2014/15. Durban: Health Systems Trust; 2015.
    1. Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, Zuma K, Jooste S, Zungu N, Labadarios D, Onoya D, et al. South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey, 2012. Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2014.
    1. National Tuberculosis and Management Guidelines 2014. South African Department of Health. Available at: . Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
    1. Jeena L, Naidoo K. Tuberculosis treatment outcomes among peri-urban children receiving doorstep tuberculosis care. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20(2):235–239. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0090.
    1. Bassett IV, et al. Linkage to care following community-based mobile HIV testing compared with clinic-based testing in Umlazi township, Durban, South Africa. HIV Med. 2014;15(6):367–372. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12115.
    1. Kranzer K, et al. Feasibility, yield, and cost of active tuberculosis case finding linked to a mobile HIV service in Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(8):e1001281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001281.
    1. Shapiro AE, van Heerden A, Schaafsma TT, et al. Completion of the tuberculosis care cascade in a community-based HIV linkage-to-care study in South Africa and Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21(1):e25065.
    1. Govender S, et al. CD4 counts and viral loads of newly diagnosed HIV-infected individuals: implications for treatment as prevention. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090754.
    1. Kranzer K, et al. Community viral load and CD4 count distribution among people living with HIV in a south African township: implications for treatment as prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(4):498–505. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318293ae48.
    1. Budgell EP, et al. Outcomes of treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis at public sector primary healthcare clinics in Johannesburg, South Africa: a retrospective cohort study. S Afr Med J. 2016;106(10):1002–1009. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i10.10745.
    1. Shenoi SV, et al. Integrated tuberculosis/human immunodeficiency virus community-based case finding in rural South Africa: implications for tuberculosis control efforts. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(3):ofx092. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx092.
    1. Boehme CC, Nicol MP, Nabeta P, et al. Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: a multicentre implementation study. Lancet. 2011;377(9776):1495–1505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60438-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir