Patients' engagement with "Sweet Talk" - a text messaging support system for young people with diabetes

Victoria Louise Franklin, Alexandra Greene, Annalu Waller, Stephen Alan Greene, Claudia Pagliari, Victoria Louise Franklin, Alexandra Greene, Annalu Waller, Stephen Alan Greene, Claudia Pagliari

Abstract

Background: Guidelines for optimizing type 1 diabetes in young people advocate intensive insulin therapy coupled with personal support from the health care team. "Sweet Talk" is a novel intervention designed to support patients between clinic visits using text messages sent to a mobile phone. Scheduled messages are tailored to patient profiles and diabetes self-management goals, and generic messages include topical "newsletters" and anonymized tips from other participants. The system also allows patients to submit data and questions to the diabetes care team.

Objectives: The aim was to explore how patients with type 1 diabetes interact with the Sweet Talk system in order to understand its utility to this user group.

Methods: Subjects were 64 young people with diabetes who were participating in the intervention arms of a randomized controlled trial. All text messages submitted to Sweet Talk during a 12-month period were recorded. Messaging patterns and content were analyzed using mixed quantitative and qualitative methods.

Results: Patients submitted 1180 messages during the observation period (mean 18.4, median 6). Messaging frequency ranged widely between participants (0-240) with a subset of 5 high users contributing 52% of the total. Patients' clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were not associated with total messaging frequency, although girls sent significantly more messages unrelated to diabetes than did boys (P = .002). The content of patients' messages fell into 8 main categories: blood glucose readings, diabetes questions, diabetes information, personal health administration, social messages, technical messages, message errors, and message responses. Unprompted submission of blood glucose values was the most frequent incoming message type (35% of total). Responses to requests for personal experiences and tips generated 40% of all the incoming messages, while topical news items also generated good responses. Patients also used the service to ask questions, submit information about their self-management, and order supplies. No patients nominated supporters to receive text messages about their self-management goals. Another option that was not used was the birthday reminder service.

Conclusions: Automated, scheduled text messaging successfully engaged young people with diabetes. While the system was primarily designed to provide "push" support to patients, submission of clinical data and queries illustrates that it was seen as a trusted medium for communicating with care providers. Responses to the newsletters and submission of personal experiences and tips for circulation to other participants also illustrate the potential value of such interventions for establishing a sense of community. Although participants submitted relatively few messages, positive responses to the system suggest that most derived passive support from reading the messages. The Sweet Talk system could be readily adapted to suit other chronic disease models and age groups, and the results of this study may help to inform the design of future text message support interventions.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical basis of the Sweet Talk intervention
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of Sweet Talk
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sweet Talk information card
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of messages sent to Sweet Talk during the 12-month study

References

    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE), authors Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Children, Young People and Adults. Clinical Guideline 15. London, UK: NICE; 2004. [2008 Jun 24]. .
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), authors Management of Diabetes. Publication No. 55. Edinburgh, UK: SIGN; 2001. [2008 Jun 24]. .
    1. Farquhar J W. The use of a Teleport system in parent and adolescent support. Diabet Med. 1989;6(7):635–7.
    1. Hanestad B R, Albrektsen G. The effects of participation in a support group on self-assessed quality of life in people with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1993 Feb;19(2):163–73. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(93)90109-I.
    1. Skinner Harvey, Biscope Sherry, Poland Blake, Goldberg Eudice. How adolescents use technology for health information: implications for health professionals from focus group studies. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Dec 18;5(4):e32. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.4.e32.
    1. Ravert Russell D, Hancock Mary D, Ingersoll Gary M. Online forum messages posted by adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2004;30(5):827–34. doi: 10.1177/014572170403000518.
    1. Lenhart A, Madden M, Hitlin P. Teens and Technology: Youth are Leading the Transition to a Fully Wired and Mobile Nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2005. [2008 Jun 18]. .
    1. Livingstone S, Bober M. UK Children Go Online: Final Report of Key Project Findings. London: Economic and Social Research Council; 2005. [2008 Jun 18]. .
    1. Giménez-Pérez Gabriel, Gallach Maria, Acera Edita, Prieto Araceli, Carro Olga, Ortega Emilio, González-Clemente José-Miguel, Mauricio Dídac. Evaluation of accessibility and use of new communication technologies in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Med Internet Res. 2002 Dec 20;4(3):E16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4.3.e16.
    1. Franklin V L, Waller A, Pagliari C, Greene S A. A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text-messaging system to support young people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006 Dec;23(12):1332–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01989.x.DME1989
    1. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. Annals of Child Development. 1989;6:1–60.
    1. Cobb S. Presidential Address-1976. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 2002;38(5):300–14.
    1. Kyngas H, Rissanen M. Support as a crucial predictor of good compliance of adolescents with a chronic disease. J Clin Nurs. 2001 Nov;10(6):767–74. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00538.x.
    1. Waller Annalu, Franklin Victoria, Pagliari Claudia, Greene Stephen. Participatory design of a text message scheduling system to support young people with diabetes. Health Informatics J. 2006 Dec;12(4):304–18. doi: 10.1177/1460458206070023.12/4/304
    1. Preece J, Maloney-Krichmar D. Jacko J, Sears A, editors. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: CRC Press; 2003. Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability; pp. 596–620.
    1. Pal B. Email contact between doctor and patient . BMJ. 1999 May 22;318(7195):1428.
    1. Zrebiec J F, Jacobson A M. What attracts patients with diabetes to an internet support group? A 21-month longitudinal website study. Diabet Med. 2001 Feb;18(2):154–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00443.x.dme443
    1. Kirscht J P, Kirscht J L, Rosenstock I M. A test of interventions to increase adherence to hypertensive medical regimens. Health Educ Q. 1981;8(3):261–72.
    1. Glasgow R E, Anderson B J. Future directions for research on pediatric chronic disease management: lessons from diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 1995 Aug;20(4):389–402. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/20.4.389.
    1. Gustafson D H, Hawkins R, Boberg E, Pingree S, Serlin R E, Graziano F, Chan C L. Impact of a patient-centered, computer-based health information/support system. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00108-1.S0749379798001081
    1. Eysenbach Gunther, Powell John, Englesakis Marina, Rizo Carlos, Stern Anita. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166. 328/7449/1166
    1. Wilson Jenny L, Peebles Rebecka, Hardy Kristina K, Litt Iris F. Surfing for thinness: a pilot study of pro-eating disorder Web site usage in adolescents with eating disorders. Pediatrics . 2006 Dec;118(6):e1635–43. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1133.118/6/e1635
    1. Fogg JB. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kauffman Publishers; 2003.
    1. Glaser B, Strauss A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
    1. Hsieh Hsiu-Fang, Shannon Sarah E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277–88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.15/9/1277
    1. McKay H G, Feil E G, Glasgow R E, Brown J E. Feasibility and use of an Internet support service for diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educ. 2003;24(2):174–9.
    1. Vollrath M E, Landolt M A, Gnehm H E, Laimbacher J, Sennhauser Felix H. Child and parental personality are associated with glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2007 Sep;24(9):1028–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02215.x.DME2215
    1. Farmer A, Gibson O J, Tarassenko L, Neil A. A systematic review of telemedicine interventions to support blood glucose self-monitoring in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005 Oct;22(10):1372–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01627.x.DME1627
    1. Kane B, Sands D Z. Guidelines for the clinical use of electronic mail with patients. The AMIA Internet Working Group, Task Force on Guidelines for the Use of Clinic-Patient Electronic Mail. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(1):104–11.
    1. Neville Ron G, Marsden Wendy, McCowan Colin, Pagliari Claudia, Mullen Helen, Fannin Allison. Email consultations in general practice. Inform Prim Care. 2004;12(4):207–14.
    1. Joyce D, Weibelzahl S. Text-messaging as a means to lowering barriers to help seeking in students with depression . National College of Ireland. 2006. [2008 Jun 24]. .
    1. Kasesniemi EL, Rautiainen P. Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland. In: Katz JE, Aakhus MA, editors. Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 170–192.
    1. Howells L, Wilson A C, Skinner T C, Newton R, Morris A D, Greene S A. A randomized control trial of the effect of negotiated telephone support on glycaemic control in young people with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2002 Aug;19(8):643–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00791.x.791
    1. La Greca A M, Auslander W F, Greco P, Spetter D, Fisher E B, Santiago J V. I get by with a little help from my family and friends: adolescents' support for diabetes care. J Pediatr Psychol. 1995 Aug;20(4):449–76. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/20.4.449.
    1. Anderson B, Ho J, Brackett J, Finkelstein D, Laffel L. Parental involvement in diabetes management tasks: relationships to blood glucose monitoring adherence and metabolic control in young adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr. 1997 Feb;130(2):257–65. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(97)70352-4.S0022-3476(97)70352-4
    1. Pendley Jennifer Shroff, Kasmen Lori J, Miller Deborah L, Donze Jessica, Swenson Connie, Reeves Grafton. Peer and family support in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27(5):429–38. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/27.5.429.
    1. Obermayer Jami L, Riley William T, Asif Ofer, Jean-Mary Jersino. College smoking-cessation using cell phone text messaging. J Am Coll Health. 2004;53(2):71–8. doi: 10.3200/JACH.53.2.71-78.
    1. Gammon Deede, Arsand Eirik, Walseth Ole Anders, Andersson Niklas, Jenssen Martin, Taylor Ted. Parent-child interaction using a mobile and wireless system for blood glucose monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(5):e57. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e57. v7i5e57

Source: PubMed

Patrocinadores y Colaboradores

Condiciones médicas

Intervenciones de drogas

3
Suscribir