A Randomized 2x2 Factorial Clinical Trial of Renal Transplantation: Steroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression with Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal after Six Months Associates with Improved Renal Function and Reduced Chronic Histopathology

R Brian Stevens, Kirk W Foster, Clifford D Miles, Andre C Kalil, Diana F Florescu, John P Sandoz, Theodore H Rigley, Tamer Malik, Lucile E Wrenshall, R Brian Stevens, Kirk W Foster, Clifford D Miles, Andre C Kalil, Diana F Florescu, John P Sandoz, Theodore H Rigley, Tamer Malik, Lucile E Wrenshall

Abstract

Introduction: The two most significant impediments to renal allograft survival are rejection and the direct nephrotoxicity of the immunosuppressant drugs required to prevent it. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), a mainstay of most immunosuppression regimens, are particularly nephrotoxic. Until less toxic antirejection agents become available, the only option is to optimize our use of those at hand.

Aim: To determine whether intensive rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction followed by CNI withdrawal would individually or combined improve graft function and reduce graft chronic histopathology-surrogates for graft and, therefore, patient survival. As previously reported, a single large rATG dose over 24 hours was well-tolerated and associated with better renal function, fewer infections, and improved patient survival. Here we report testing whether complete CNI discontinuation would improve renal function and decrease graft pathology.

Methods: Between April 20, 2004 and 4-14-2009 we conducted a prospective, randomized, non-blinded renal transplantation trial of two rATG dosing protocols (single dose, 6 mg/kg vs. divided doses, 1.5 mg/kg every other day x 4; target enrollment = 180). Subsequent maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, a CNI, and sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. We report here the outcome of converting patients after six months either to minimized tacrolimus/sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil/sirolimus. Primary endpoints were graft function and chronic histopathology from protocol kidney biopsies at 12 and 24 months.

Results: CNI withdrawal (on-treatment analysis) associated with better graft function (p <0.001) and lower chronic histopathology composite scores in protocol biopsies at 12 (p = 0.003) and 24 (p = 0.013) months, without affecting patient (p = 0.81) or graft (p = 0.93) survival, or rejection rate (p = 0.17).

Conclusion: CNI (tacrolimus) withdrawal at six months may provide a strategy for decreased nephrotoxicity and improved long-term function in steroid-free low immunological risk renal transplant patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00556933.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: This study was partly funded by a research grant from Genzyme Corporation, which partially funded statistical analysis and clinical research nurse time. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram of randomized…
Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram of randomized 2x2 trial of rATG induction dosing and delayed CNI withdrawal [52].
The study statisticians provided computer-generated randomized assignments in sequentially-numbered, sealed opaque envelopes opened after obtaining consent for trial participation. Randomization included stratification by race (Caucasian/Asian vs. non-Caucasian/Asian), donor type (living vs. deceased), and whether listed for eventual pancreas transplantation. Study patients were identified and enrolled by attending transplant physicians and study coordinators. The integrity of the treatment arm assignments made by this system was monitored and confirmed by the study statisticians. Two patients not meeting enrollment criteria were consented and randomized in error, but were identified before transplantation and removed from participation in the trial.
Fig 2. Immunosuppression induction regimens and maintenance…
Fig 2. Immunosuppression induction regimens and maintenance target blood levels.
Fig 3. Effect of CNI withdrawal on…
Fig 3. Effect of CNI withdrawal on renal function.
The impact of CNI withdrawal on GFR was detected both by intent-to-treat (for all donors, p

Fig 4. Chronic Banff injury score distributions…

Fig 4. Chronic Banff injury score distributions by on-treatment CNI withdrawal status.

Protocol biopsies collected…

Fig 4. Chronic Banff injury score distributions by on-treatment CNI withdrawal status.
Protocol biopsies collected at approximately 12 and 24 months were scored by a transplant renal pathologist blinded to treatment group assignment (author K.F.) for evidence of rejection, BK virus nephropathy, antibody-mediated rejection, recurrent disease, inflammation, and Banff 2005 categories of chronic renal injury. Chronic injury categories were arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah), allograft glomerulopathy (cg), interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), and vascular fibrous intimal thickening (cv). A chronic injury composite score for each group was also created from the five individual injury category scores. Severity scores within each category could be 0 (5%—25%—50%, severe). The composite scores shown are the total numbers of ah, cg, ci, ct, and cv scores in each severity grade (0, 1, 2, or 3). The proportions of patients in each severity grade (0, 1, 2, and 3) for both the individual categories and the composite were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Intent-to-treat (ITT) p-values are included in the figure.

Fig 5. Post hoc on-treatment analysis of…

Fig 5. Post hoc on-treatment analysis of graft inflammation (i IFTA & i Total).

Inflammation…

Fig 5. Post hoc on-treatment analysis of graft inflammation (i IFTA & i Total).
Inflammation was scored both within areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (i IFTA) and throughout the biopsy (i Total). Severity scores within each category could be 0 (5%—25%—50%, severe). The proportions of patients in each score category (0, 1, 2, and 3) were compared using Fisher’s exact test.

Fig 6. On-treatment patient and death-censored graft…

Fig 6. On-treatment patient and death-censored graft survival after CNI withdrawal.

P-values for the intent-to-treat…

Fig 6. On-treatment patient and death-censored graft survival after CNI withdrawal.
P-values for the intent-to-treat analyses are also shown.

Fig 7. Rejection after CNI withdrawal.

On-treatment…

Fig 7. Rejection after CNI withdrawal.

On-treatment Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests (CNI minimized, n…

Fig 7. Rejection after CNI withdrawal.
On-treatment Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests (CNI minimized, n = 77; withdrawn, n = 64); intent-to-treat (ITT) p-values are included in the figures. (A) All biopsy findings of rejection ≥Grade 1A. The majority of rejection episodes after six months were low-grade Banff 1A: CNI minimized, 73% (4/7); CNI withdrawn, 70% (7/10). The number of higher-grade rejection episodes was similar between the two groups: CNI minimized, 27% (3-IB); CNI withdrawn, 30% (2-IB, 1-IIA). (B) Rejection ≥Grade 1A accompanied by clinically elevated serum creatinine (>30% above baseline). Only 18% of all rejection events in the CNI-minimized group were associated with an increase in serum creatinine. In contrast, 60% of rejection events in the CNI-withdrawn group associated with elevated serum creatinine (p = 0.10).

Fig 8. Combined impact of single-dose rATG…

Fig 8. Combined impact of single-dose rATG induction with CNI withdrawal.

On-treatment comparison of best…

Fig 8. Combined impact of single-dose rATG induction with CNI withdrawal.
On-treatment comparison of best and worst treatment combinations (single-dose rATG with delayed CNI withdrawal vs. divided-dose rATG with delayed CNI minimization). (A) Renal function analyzed as in Fig 3. (B) Chronic Banff renal graft histopathology as in Fig 4.
All figures (8)
Fig 4. Chronic Banff injury score distributions…
Fig 4. Chronic Banff injury score distributions by on-treatment CNI withdrawal status.
Protocol biopsies collected at approximately 12 and 24 months were scored by a transplant renal pathologist blinded to treatment group assignment (author K.F.) for evidence of rejection, BK virus nephropathy, antibody-mediated rejection, recurrent disease, inflammation, and Banff 2005 categories of chronic renal injury. Chronic injury categories were arteriolar hyaline thickening (ah), allograft glomerulopathy (cg), interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), and vascular fibrous intimal thickening (cv). A chronic injury composite score for each group was also created from the five individual injury category scores. Severity scores within each category could be 0 (5%—25%—50%, severe). The composite scores shown are the total numbers of ah, cg, ci, ct, and cv scores in each severity grade (0, 1, 2, or 3). The proportions of patients in each severity grade (0, 1, 2, and 3) for both the individual categories and the composite were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Intent-to-treat (ITT) p-values are included in the figure.
Fig 5. Post hoc on-treatment analysis of…
Fig 5. Post hoc on-treatment analysis of graft inflammation (i IFTA & i Total).
Inflammation was scored both within areas of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (i IFTA) and throughout the biopsy (i Total). Severity scores within each category could be 0 (5%—25%—50%, severe). The proportions of patients in each score category (0, 1, 2, and 3) were compared using Fisher’s exact test.
Fig 6. On-treatment patient and death-censored graft…
Fig 6. On-treatment patient and death-censored graft survival after CNI withdrawal.
P-values for the intent-to-treat analyses are also shown.
Fig 7. Rejection after CNI withdrawal.
Fig 7. Rejection after CNI withdrawal.
On-treatment Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests (CNI minimized, n = 77; withdrawn, n = 64); intent-to-treat (ITT) p-values are included in the figures. (A) All biopsy findings of rejection ≥Grade 1A. The majority of rejection episodes after six months were low-grade Banff 1A: CNI minimized, 73% (4/7); CNI withdrawn, 70% (7/10). The number of higher-grade rejection episodes was similar between the two groups: CNI minimized, 27% (3-IB); CNI withdrawn, 30% (2-IB, 1-IIA). (B) Rejection ≥Grade 1A accompanied by clinically elevated serum creatinine (>30% above baseline). Only 18% of all rejection events in the CNI-minimized group were associated with an increase in serum creatinine. In contrast, 60% of rejection events in the CNI-withdrawn group associated with elevated serum creatinine (p = 0.10).
Fig 8. Combined impact of single-dose rATG…
Fig 8. Combined impact of single-dose rATG induction with CNI withdrawal.
On-treatment comparison of best and worst treatment combinations (single-dose rATG with delayed CNI withdrawal vs. divided-dose rATG with delayed CNI minimization). (A) Renal function analyzed as in Fig 3. (B) Chronic Banff renal graft histopathology as in Fig 4.

References

    1. Matas AJ. Minimization of steroids in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2009;22(1):38–48. 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00728.x
    1. Woodle ES, First MR, Pirsch J, Shihab F, Gaber AO, Van Veldhuisen P. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial comparing early (7 day) corticosteroid cessation versus long-term, low-dose corticosteroid therapy. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):564–77. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318187d1da
    1. Kasiske BL, Gaston RS, Gourishankar S, Halloran PF, Matas AJ, Jeffery J, et al. Long-term deterioration of kidney allograft function. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(6):1405–14. .
    1. Naesens M, Kuypers DR, Sarwal M. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(2):481–508. 10.2215/CJN.04800908
    1. Meier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B. Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(3):378–83. .
    1. Hariharan S, Johnson CP, Bresnahan BA, Taranto SE, McIntosh MJ, Stablein D. Improved graft survival after renal transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996. The New England journal of medicine. 2000;342(9):605–12. .
    1. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O'Connell PJ, Allen RD, Chapman JR. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349(24):2326–33. .
    1. Chapman JR. Chronic calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity-lest we forget. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(4):693–7. Epub 2011/03/31. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03504.x .
    1. Chapman JR, O'Connell PJ, Nankivell BJ. Chronic renal allograft dysfunction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(10):3015–26. Epub 2005/08/27. ASN.2005050463 [pii] 10.1681/ASN.2005050463 .
    1. Mourer JS, Ewe SH, Mallat MJ, Ng AC, Rabelink TJ, Bax JJ, et al. Late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal prevents progressive left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2012;94(7):721–8. Epub 2012/09/08. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182603297 .
    1. Alarrayed SM, El-Agroudy AE, Alarrayed AS, Al Ghareeb SM, Garadah TS, El-Sharqawi SY, et al. Sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal immunosuppressive regimen in kidney transplantation: a single center experience. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2010;14(3):248–55. Epub 2010/03/17. 10.1007/s10157-010-0269-0 .
    1. Calne RY, White DJ, Thiru S, Evans DB, McMaster P, Dunn DC, et al. Cyclosporin A in patients receiving renal allografts from cadaver donors. Lancet. 1978;2(8104–5):1323–7. .
    1. Starzl TE, Klintmalm GB, Weil R 3rd, Porter KA, Iwatsuki S, Schroter GP, et al. Cyclosporin A and steroid therapy in sixty-six cadaver kidney recipients. Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics. 1981;153(4):486–94.
    1. A randomized clinical trial of cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. The New England journal of medicine. 1983;309(14):809–15. 10.1056/NEJM198310063091401 .
    1. Schena FP, Pascoe MD, Alberu J, del Carmen Rial M, Oberbauer R, Brennan DC, et al. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus maintenance therapy in renal allograft recipients: 24-month efficacy and safety results from the CONVERT trial. Transplantation. 2009;87(2):233–42. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181927a41
    1. Flechner SM, Kobashigawa J, Klintmalm G. Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in solid organ transplantation: focus on improving renal function and nephrotoxicity. Clin Transplant. 2008;22(1):1–15. 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00739.x
    1. Lim WH, Eris J, Kanellis J, Pussell B, Wiid Z, Witcombe D, et al. A Systematic Review of Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitor to Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors for Maintenance Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients. American journal of transplantation: official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. 2014. 10.1111/ajt.12795 .
    1. Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Toupance O, Westeel PF, Etienne I, Thervet E, et al. Efficacy on renal function of early conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus 3 months after renal transplantation: concept study. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(5):1115–23. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02615.x
    1. Gaston RS, Cecka JM, Kasiske BL, Fieberg AM, Leduc R, Cosio FC, et al. Evidence for antibody-mediated injury as a major determinant of late kidney allograft failure. Transplantation. 90(1):68–74. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e065de
    1. Haririan A, Kiangkitiwan B, Kukuruga D, Cooper M, Hurley H, Drachenberg C, et al. The impact of c4d pattern and donor-specific antibody on graft survival in recipients requiring indication renal allograft biopsy. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(12):2758–67. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02836.x
    1. Hidalgo LG, Campbell PM, Sis B, Einecke G, Mengel M, Chang J, et al. De novo donor-specific antibody at the time of kidney transplant biopsy associates with microvascular pathology and late graft failure. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(11):2532–41. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02800.x
    1. Kedainis RL, Koch MJ, Brennan DC, Liapis H. Focal C4d+ in renal allografts is associated with the presence of donor-specific antibodies and decreased allograft survival. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(4):812–9. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02555.x
    1. Einecke G, Sis B, Reeve J, Mengel M, Campbell PM, Hidalgo LG, et al. Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(11):2520–31. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02799.x
    1. Mao Q, Terasaki PI, Cai J, El-Awar N, Rebellato L. Analysis of HLA class I specific antibodies in patients with failed allografts. Transplantation. 2007;83(1):54–61. .
    1. Mannon RB, Matas AJ, Grande J, Leduc R, Connett J, Kasiske B, et al. Inflammation in areas of tubular atrophy in kidney allograft biopsies: a potent predictor of allograft failure. Am J Transplant. 10(9):2066–73. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03240.x
    1. Grinyo JM, Bestard O, Torras J, Cruzado JM. Optimal immunosuppression to prevent chronic allograft dysfunction. Kidney Int Suppl. 2010;(119):S66-70. Epub 2010/12/01. ki2010426 [pii] 10.1038/ki.2010.426 .
    1. Gaber AO, Monaco AP, Russell JA, Lebranchu Y, Mohty M. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): 25 years and new frontiers in solid organ transplantation and haematology. Drugs. 2010;70(6):691–732. Epub 2010/04/17. 4 [pii] 10.2165/11315940-000000000-00000 .
    1. Hardinger KL, Brennan DC, Klein CL. Selection of induction therapy in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2013;26(7):662–72. Epub 2013/01/03. 10.1111/tri.12043 .
    1. Brennan DC, Flavin K, Lowell JA, Howard TK, Shenoy S, Burgess S, et al. A randomized, double-blinded comparison of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam for induction immunosuppressive therapy in adult renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1999;67(7):1011–8. Epub 1999/04/30. .
    1. Gaber AO, First MR, Tesi RJ, Gaston RS, Mendez R, Mulloy LL, et al. Results of the double-blind, randomized, multicenter, phase III clinical trial of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam in the treatment of acute graft rejection episodes after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1998;66(1):29–37. Epub 1998/07/29. .
    1. Brennan DC, Daller JA, Lake KD, Cibrik D, Del Castillo D. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355(19):1967–77. .
    1. Brennan DC, Schnitzler MA. Long-term results of rabbit antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab induction. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;359(16):1736–8. Epub 2008/10/17. 359/16/1736 [pii] 10.1056/NEJMc0805714 .
    1. Miles CD, Skorupa JY, Sandoz JP, Rigley TH, Nielsen KJ, Stevens RB. Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus. Clin Transplant. 2011;25(6):898–904. Epub 2010/11/17. 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01353.x .
    1. Stevens RB. Modern approaches to combining sirolimus with calcineurin inhibitors. Transplantation proceedings. 2008;40(10 Suppl):S21–4. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.012
    1. Matas AJ, Granger D, Kaufman DB, Sarwal MM, Ferguson RM, Woodle ES, et al. Steroid minimization for sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01282.x
    1. Srivastava A, Muruganandham K, Vinodh PB, Singh P, Dubey D, Kapoor R, et al. Post-renal transplant surgical complications with newer immunosuppressive drugs: mycophenolate mofetil vs. m-TOR inhibitors. International urology and nephrology. 42(2):279–84. 10.1007/s11255-009-9601-6
    1. Pengel LH, Liu LQ, Morris PJ. Do wound complications or lymphoceles occur more often in solid organ transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transpl Int. 2011;24(12):1216–30. Epub 2011/10/01. 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01357.x .
    1. Nashan B, Citterio F. Wound healing complications and the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a critical review of the literature. Transplantation. 2012;94(6):547–61. Epub 2012/09/04. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182551021 .
    1. Salgo R, Gossmann J, Schofer H, Kachel HG, Kuck J, Geiger H, et al. Switch to a sirolimus-based immunosuppression in long-term renal transplant recipients: reduced rate of (pre-)malignancies and nonmelanoma skin cancer in a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(6):1385–93. Epub 2010/02/04. AJT2997 [pii] 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02997.x .
    1. Bunnapradist S, Vincenti F. Transplantation: To convert or not to convert: lessons from the CONVERT trial. Nature reviews. 2009;5(7):371–3. 10.1038/nrneph.2009.94
    1. Matas AJ, Granger D, Kaufman DB, Sarwal MM, Ferguson RM, Woodle ES, et al. Steroid minimization for sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2011;25(3):457–67. Epub 2010/05/26. CTR1282 [pii] 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01282.x .
    1. Meier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Howard RJ, Fujita S, Kaplan B. Sirolimus in combination with tacrolimus is associated with worse renal allograft survival compared to mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(9):2273–80. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01019.x .
    1. Henderson LK, Nankivell BJ, Chapman JR. Surveillance protocol kidney transplant biopsies: their evolving role in clinical practice. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(8):1570–5. Epub 2011/07/30. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03677.x .
    1. Salomon DR. Protocol biopsies should be part of the routine management of kidney transplant recipients. Con. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40(4):674–7. Epub 2002/09/27. S027263860200104X [pii]. .
    1. Matas AJ, Kandaswamy R, Humar A, Payne WD, Dunn DL, Najarian JS, et al. Long-term immunosuppression, without maintenance prednisone, after kidney transplantation. Ann Surg. 2004;240(3):510–6; discussion 6–7. Epub 2004/08/21. 00000658-200409000-00012 [pii].
    1. Kandaswamy R, Melancon JK, Dunn T, Tan M, Casingal V, Humar A, et al. A prospective randomized trial of steroid-free maintenance regimens in kidney transplant recipients—an interim analysis. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(6):1529–36. Epub 2005/05/13. AJT885 [pii] 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00885.x .
    1. Suszynski TM, Gillingham KJ, Rizzari MD, Dunn TB, Payne WD, Chinnakotla S, et al. Prospective randomized trial of maintenance immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of prednisone in adult kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(4):961–70. Epub 2013/02/26. 10.1111/ajt.12166
    1. Kaden J, May G, Volp A, Wesslau C. Improved long-term survival after intra-operative single high-dose ATG-Fresenius induction in renal transplantation: a single centre experience. Ann Transplant. 2009;14(3):7–17. .
    1. Kyllonen LE, Eklund BH, Pesonen EJ, Salmela KT. Single bolus antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation with cyclosporine triple immunosuppression: efficacy and safety. Transplantation. 2007;84(1):75–82. .
    1. Shapiro R, Basu A, Tan H, Gray E, Kahn A, Randhawa P, et al. Kidney transplantation under minimal immunosuppression after pretransplant lymphoid depletion with Thymoglobulin or Campath. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200(4):505–15; quiz A59-61. .
    1. Starzl TE, Murase N, Abu-Elmagd K, Gray EA, Shapiro R, Eghtesad B, et al. Tolerogenic immunosuppression for organ transplantation. Lancet. 2003;361(9368):1502–10. .
    1. Stevens RB, Foster KW, Miles CD, Lane JT, Kalil AC, Florescu DF, et al. A randomized 2x2 factorial trial, part 1: single-dose rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction may improve renal transplantation outcomes. Transplantation. 2015;99(1):197–209. 10.1097/TP.0000000000000250
    1. Gore SM. Graft survival after renal transplantation: agenda for analysis. Kidney Int. 1983;24(4):516–25. Epub 1983/10/01. .
    1. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM. Statistical principles in experimental design. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991. xiii, 1057 p. p.
    1. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):461–70. .
    1. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Sis B, Halloran PF, Birk PE, et al. Banff '05 Meeting Report: differential diagnosis of chronic allograft injury and elimination of chronic allograft nephropathy ('CAN'). Am J Transplant. 2007;7(3):518–26. .
    1. Mengel M, Reeve J, Bunnag S, Einecke G, Jhangri GS, Sis B, et al. Scoring total inflammation is superior to the current Banff inflammation score in predicting outcome and the degree of molecular disturbance in renal allografts. Am J Transplant. 2009;9(8):1859–67. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02727.x .
    1. Stevens RB, Mercer DF, Grant WJ, Freifeld AG, Lane JT, Groggel GC, et al. Randomized trial of single-dose versus divided-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction in renal transplantation: an interim report. Transplantation. 2008;85(10):1391–9. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181722fad
    1. Coresh J, Astor BC, McQuillan G, Kusek J, Greene T, Van Lente F, et al. Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39(5):920–9. Epub 2002/04/30. S0272-6386(02)36252-8 [pii] 10.1053/ajkd.2002.32765 .
    1. Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, Fleming J, Greenberg N, Greene T, et al. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem. 2006;52(1):5–18. Epub 2005/12/08. clinchem.2005.0525144 [pii] 10.1373/clinchem.2005.0525144 .
    1. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data: Springer Verlag; 2009.
    1. Nyberg SL, Matas AJ, Kremers WK, Thostenson JD, Larson TS, Prieto M, et al. Improved scoring system to assess adult donors for cadaver renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(6):715–21. .
    1. Mulay AV, Cockfield S, Stryker R, Fergusson D, Knoll GA. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: a systematic review of the evidence. Transplantation. 2006;82(9):1153–62. .
    1. Weir MR, Mulgaonkar S, Chan L, Shidban H, Waid TH, Preston D, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial. Kidney Int. 10.1038/ki.2010.492
    1. Lebranchu Y, Thierry A, Thervet E, Buchler M, Etienne I, Westeel PF, et al. Efficacy and safety of early cyclosporine conversion to sirolimus with continued MMF-four-year results of the Postconcept study. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(8):1665–75. Epub 2011/07/30. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03637.x .
    1. Knight SR, Morris PJ. Steroid avoidance or withdrawal in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2011;91(5):e25; author reply e6-7. Epub 2011/02/22. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318208e6d9 00007890-201103150-00018 [pii]. .
    1. Zhang X, Huang H, Han S, Fu S, Wang L. Is it safe to withdraw steroids within seven days of renal transplantation? Clin Transplant. 2013;27(1):1–8. 10.1111/ctr.12015 .
    1. Kaden J, Strobelt V, May G. Short and long-term results after pretransplant high-dose single ATG-fresenius bolus in cadaveric kidney transplantation. Transplantation proceedings. 1998;30(8):4011–4. .
    1. Stevens RB, Lane JT, Boerner BP, Miles CD, Rigley TH, Sandoz JP, et al. Single-dose rATG induction at renal transplantation: superior renal function and glucoregulation with less hypomagnesemia. Clin Transplant. 2012;26(1):123–32. Epub 2011/03/16. 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01425.x .
    1. Vincenti F, Charpentier B, Vanrenterghem Y, Rostaing L, Bresnahan B, Darji P, et al. A phase III study of belatacept-based immunosuppression regimens versus cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients (BENEFIT study). Am J Transplant. 2010;10(3):535–46. Epub 2010/04/27. AJT3005 [pii] 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.03005.x .
    1. Vincenti F, Larsen CP, Alberu J, Bresnahan B, Garcia VD, Kothari J, et al. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT, a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(1):210–7. Epub 2011/10/14. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03785.x .
    1. Takeuchi H, Okuyama K, Konno O, Jojima Y, Akashi I, Nakamura Y, et al. Optimal dose and target trough level in cyclosporine and tacrolimus conversion in renal transplantation as evaluated by lymphocyte drug sensitivity and pharmacokinetic parameters. Transplantation proceedings. 2005;37(4):1745–7. Epub 2005/05/28. S0041-1345(05)00192-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.02.075 .
    1. Pestana JO, Grinyo JM, Vanrenterghem Y, Becker T, Campistol JM, Florman S, et al. Three-year outcomes from BENEFIT-EXT: a phase III study of belatacept versus cyclosporine in recipients of extended criteria donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(3):630–9. Epub 2012/02/04. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03914.x .
    1. Ferguson R, Grinyo J, Vincenti F, Kaufman DB, Woodle ES, Marder BA, et al. Immunosuppression with belatacept-based, corticosteroid-avoiding regimens in de novo kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2011;11(1):66–76. Epub 2010/12/01. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03338.x .
    1. Kirk AD, Guasch A, Xu H, Cheeseman J, Mead SI, Ghali A, et al. Renal Transplantation Using Belatacept Without Maintenance Steroids or Calcineurin Inhibitors. Am J Transplant. 2014. Epub 2014/04/02. 10.1111/ajt.12712 .
    1. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O'Connell PJ, Chapman JR, Allen RD. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity: longitudinal assessment by protocol histology. Transplantation. 2004;78(4):557–65. Epub 2004/09/28. .
    1. Weir MR, Wali RK. Minimizing the risk of chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation. 2009;87(8 Suppl):S14–8. Epub 2009/04/28. 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a079c0 00007890-200904271-00004 [pii]. .
    1. Weir MR, Blahut S, Drachenburg C, Young C, Papademitriou J, Klassen DK, et al. Late calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal as a strategy to prevent graft loss in patients with suboptimal kidney transplant function. Am J Nephrol. 2004;24(4):379–86. Epub 2004/07/09. 10.1159/000079390 79390 [pii]. .

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir