Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of valsartan in patients with chronic stable heart failure

Inder S Anand, Anita Deswal, Dean J Kereiakes, Das Purkayastha, Dion H Zappe, Inder S Anand, Anita Deswal, Dean J Kereiakes, Das Purkayastha, Dion H Zappe

Abstract

Background: The safety of once-daily (qd) dosing of valsartan in heart failure (HF) patients is not known.

Hypothesis: This 10-week, double-blind trial examined the relative safety and efficacy of valsartan administered qd versus twice-daily (bid).

Methods: HF patients (NYHA class II-III) receiving diuretics (87%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (98%), beta-blockers (92%), aldosterone antagonists (25%), or digoxin (32%) were randomized to valsartan 40 mg bid (n = 60) or 80 mg qd (n = 55) and titrated to a maximum dose of 320 mg/day; doubling the dose every 2 weeks. Clinical and biochemical parameters were measured at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10.

Results: The average dose of valsartan at the end of study was 245 mg in the bid group vs 256 mg in the qd group (P = NS). Similar proportions of patients tolerated qd vs bid dosing (bid 67% vs qd 68%). Outcome measures including reduction in blood pressure, incidence of hypotension, renal impairment, orthostatic dizziness or fatigue, changes in serum K(+), creatinine, cystatin-C, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar between the 2 groups at all time-points. Brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased and plasma renin activity increased from baseline by the same amount in both groups at all time-points.

Conclusion: Valsartan administered qd has a similar safety and tolerability profile with comparable 24-hour RAAS blockade, as assessed by increases in PRA, as bid dosing in patients with moderate to severe (NYHA class II-III) heart failure.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00294086.

Keywords: angiotensin receptor blocker; heart failure; valsartan.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of patients tolerating valsartan once-daily (qd) or twice-daily (bid) dosing regimen using observed cases. Using data from observed cases, the percentage of patients able to tolerate the dosing regimen at the end of the study was 78% for bid dosing and 72% for qd dosing (P = 0.56). Inability to tolerate the dosing regimen was defined as any of the following: serum potassium ≥6.0 mEq/L, elevations in serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dL and increased by >50% from baseline, reduction in standing SBP (<90 mmHg), symptoms related to hypotension (eg, syncope, faintness, or orthostatic dizziness), worsening of NYHA functional class (eg, fatigue or breathlessness) in patients with stable CHF (NYHA class II–III).

References

    1. The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS) N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429–1435.
    1. The SOLVD Investigators Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293–302.
    1. Packer M, Bristow MR, Cohn JN, et al. for the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1349–1355.
    1. CIBIS II Investigators and Committees The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II): a randomized trial. Lancet. 1999;353:9–13.
    1. Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) Study Group Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure. Lancet. 1999;353:2001–2007.
    1. Packer M, Coats AJ, Fowler MB, et al. for the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study Group Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1651–1658.
    1. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation. 2009;2009;119:e391–e479.
    1. European Society of Cardiology. Heart Failure Association of the ESC (HFA) European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2008. Eur J Heart Fail. 2008;10:933–989.
    1. Heart Failure Society of America Executive summary: HFSA 2006 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline. J Card Fail. 2006;12:10–38.
    1. Cohn JN, Tognoni G, for the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1667–1675.
    1. McMurray JJ, Ostergren J, Swedberg K, et al. for the CHARM Investigators and Committees Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trial. Lancet. 2003;362:767–771.
    1. Cohn JN, Tognoni G, Glazer RD, et al. Rationale and design of the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial: a large multinational trial to assess the effects of valsartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker, on morbidity and mortality in chronic congestive heart failure. J Card Fail. 1999;5:155–160.
    1. Baruch L, Anand I, Cohen IS, et al. for the Vasodilator Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT) Study Group Augmented short- and long-term hemodynamic and hormonal effects of an angiotensin receptor blocker added to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with heart failure. Circulation. 1999;99:2658–2664.
    1. Grubb A, Nyman U, Björk J, et al. Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1420–1431.
    1. Oparil S, Dyke S, Harris F, et al. The efficacy and safety of valsartan compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. Clin Ther. 1996;18:797–810.
    1. Pool J, Oparil S, Hedner T, et al. Dose-responsive antihypertensive efficacy of valsartan, a new angiotensin II-receptor blocker. Clin Ther. 1998;20:1106–1114.
    1. Black HR, Graff A, Shute D, et al. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy, tolerability and safety compared to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril. J Hum Hypertens. 1997;11:483–489.
    1. Willenheimer R, Helmers C, Pantev E, et al. for the Heart Failure Valsartan Exercise Capacity Evaluation Study Group Safety and efficacy of valsartan versus enalapril in heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol. 2002;85:261–270.
    1. De Tommasi E, Iacoviello M, Romito R, et al. Comparison of the effect of valsartan and lisinopril on autonomic nervous system activity in chronic heart failure. Am Heart J. 2003;146:854–859.
    1. Weinberg MS, Weinberg AJ, Zappe DH. Effectively targeting the renin-angiotensin system in cardiovascular and renal disease: rationale for using angiotensin II receptor blockers in combination with angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2000;1:217–233.
    1. Jacobsen P, Andersen S, Jensen BR, Parving HH. Additive effect of ACE inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade in type I diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14:992–999.
    1. McMurray J, Cohen-Solal A, Dietz R, et al. Practical recommendations for the use of ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, aldosterone antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: putting guidelines into practice. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005;7:710–712.
    1. Latif F, Tandon S, Obeleniene R, et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with 80 and 160 mg valsartan in healthy, normotensive subjects. J Card Fail. 2001;7:265–268.
    1. Maillard MP, Würzner G, Nussberger J, Centeno C, Burnier M, Brunner HR. Comparative angiotensin II receptor blockade in healthy volunteers: the importance of dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;71:68–76.
    1. Latini R, Masson S, Anand I, et al. for the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators Effects of valsartan on circulating brain natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine in symptomatic chronic heart failure: the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) Circulation. 2002;106:2454–2458.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir