Concordance of End-of-Life Care With End-of-Life Wishes in an Integrated Health Care System

David P Glass, Susan E Wang, Paul M Minardi, Michael H Kanter, David P Glass, Susan E Wang, Paul M Minardi, Michael H Kanter

Abstract

Importance: There is widespread consensus on the challenges to meeting the end-of-life wishes of decedents in the US. However, there is broad but not always recognized success in meeting wishes among decedents 65 years and older.

Objective: To assess how well end-of-life wishes of decedents 65 years and older are met in the last year of life.

Design, setting, and participants: This quality improvement study involved 3 planned samples of family members or informants identified as the primary contact in the medical record of Kaiser Permanente Southern California decedents. The first sample was 715 decedents, 65 years or older, who died between April 1 and May 31, 2017. The second was a high-cost sample of 332 decedents, 65 years or older, who died between June 1, 2016, and May 31, 2017, and whose costs in the last year of life were in the top 10% of the costs of all decedents. The third was a lower-cost sample with 655 decedents whose costs were not in the top 10%. The survey was fielded between December 19, 2017, and February 8, 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: Meeting end-of-life wishes, discussions with next of kin and physicians, types of discordant care, and perceptions of amount of care received.

Results: Surveys were completed by 715 of the 2281 next of kin in the all-decedent sample (mean [SD] decedent age, 80.9 [8.9] years; 361 [50.5%] male) for a 31% response rate; in 332 of the 1339 next of kin in the high-cost sample (mean [SD] decedent age, 75.5 [7.1] years; 194 [48.4%] male) for a 25% response rate; and in 659 of 2058 in the lower-cost sample (mean [SD] decedent age, 81.6 [8.8] years) for a 32% response rate. Respondents noted that high percentages of decedents received treatment that was concordant with their desires: 601 (88.9%) had their wishes met, 39 (5.9%) received a treatment they did not want, and 554 (84.1%) filled out an advance directive. A total of 509 respondents (82.5%) believed the amount of care was the right amount. Those with the highest costs had their wishes met at lower rates than those with lower costs (250 [80.1%] vs 553 [89.6%]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this Kaiser Permanente Southern California cohort, a large proportion of decedents 65 years and older had end-of-life discussions and documentation, had their wishes met, and received the amount of care they thought appropriate.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.. Expected Increase in Wishes Met if…
Figure.. Expected Increase in Wishes Met if 100% of Decedents Receive Key Interventions
Data are the expected percentage point increase in those who strongly agree with the statement “Kaiser Permanente gave care and treatment over the last year of my loved one’s life that met my loved one’s wishes.” The 6 items listed are the significant drivers from an all-decedent sample found in an ordinary least squares regression (R2 = .43) associated with meeting end-of-life wishes.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Care at the End of Life , Field MJ, Cassel CK, eds. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. National Academies Press; 1997.
    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Approaching Death . Addressing Key End of Life Issues. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. National Academies Press; 2014.
    1. Kale MS, Ornstein KA, Smith CB, Kelley AS. End-of-life discussions with older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(10):1962-1967. doi:10.1111/jgs.14285
    1. The Conversation Project . National survey. 2018. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. California Healthcare Foundation . Final chapter: Californians’ attitudes and experiences with death and dying. 2012. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. California Healthcare Foundation . Help wanted: Californians’ views and experiences of serious illness and end-of-life care. 2019. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. Bernacki RE, Block SD; American College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force . Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1994-2003. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271
    1. Bernacki R, Paladino J, Neville BA, et al. . Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in outpatient oncology: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;174(12):1994-2003. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271
    1. You JJ, Downar J, Fowler RA, et al. ; Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network . Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):549-556. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7732
    1. Yingling J, Keeley M. A failure to communicate: let’s get real about improving communication at the end of life. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007;24(2):95-97. doi:10.1177/1049909106297244
    1. Frank A. Why not talk about death? cosmos and culture: commentary on science and society. NPR. April 13, 2018. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. PEW Research Center . Views on end-of-life medical treatments. August 11, 2015. November 21, 2013. Accessed February 15, 2021.
    1. Dalal S, Bruera E. End-of-life care matters: palliative cancer care results in better care and lower costs. Oncologist. 2017;22(4):361-368. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0277
    1. Rauch J. How not to die. The Atlantic. May 2013. Accessed July 7, 2020.
    1. Comer AR, Hickman SE, Slaven JE, et al. . Assessment of discordance between surrogate care goals and medical treatment provided to older adults with serious illness. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e205179. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5179
    1. Turley M, Wang S, Meng D, Garrido T, Kanter MH. The feasibility of automating assessment of concordance between advance care preferences and care received near the end of life. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019;45(2):123-130. doi:10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.013
    1. Figueroa JFSJ, McNally K, Stade D, Lipsitz SR, Dalal AK. Discordance between patient and provider. J Hosp Med. 2016;11(9):615-619. doi:10.1002/jhm.2569
    1. Teno JM, Gozalo P, Trivedi AN, et al. . Site of death, place of care, and health care transitions among US Medicare beneficiaries, 2000-2015. JAMA. 2018;320(3):264-271. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.8981
    1. Lee RY, Brumback LC, Sathitratanacheewin S, et al. . Association of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment with ICU admission among patients hospitalized near the end of life. JAMA. 2020;323(10):950-960. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.22523
    1. Wright AA, Keating NL, Ayanian JZ, et al. . Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life. JAMA. 2016;315(3):284-292. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.18604
    1. Teno JM, Freedman VA, Kasper JD, Gozalo P, Mor V. Is care for the dying improving in the United States? J Palliat Med. 2015;18(8):662-666. doi:10.1089/jpm.2015.0039
    1. Zhang B, Wright AA, Huskamp HA, et al. . Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(5):480-488. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.587
    1. University of Michigan, National Polling on Healthy Aging . Too much of a good thing? overuse of health care. March 2018. Accessed February 25, 2021. .
    1. NBC News. Many Americans overtreated to death. July 6, 2010. Accessed February 25, 2021. .
    1. Szabo L. Treatment overkill: never too late to operate? surgery near end of life is common, costly. Kaiser Health News. March 2018. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. Gawande A. The cost conundrum: what a Texas town can teach us about health care. The New Yorker. May 25, 2009. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. Gawande A. Being Mortal. Henry Holt and Co; 2014.
    1. Riley GF, Lubitz JD. Long-term trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(2):565-576. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01082.x
    1. Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US health care system: estimated costs and potential for savings. JAMA. 2019;322(15):1501-1509. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.13978
    1. Sanders JJ, Curtis JR, Tulsky JA. Achieving goal-concordant care: a conceptual model and approach to measuring serious illness communication and its impact. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(S2):S17-S27. doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0459
    1. Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute. Quality improvement vs research. 2020. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. SQUIRE . Standards for quality improvement reporting excellence. 2020. Accessed November 30, 2020.
    1. Koebnick C, Langer-Gould AM, Gould MK, et al. . Sociodemographic characteristics of members of a large, integrated health care system: comparison with US Census Bureau data. Perm J. 2012;16(3):37-41. doi:10.7812/TPP/12-031
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . Assessment tools for palliative care. 2016. Accessed February 25, 2021. .
    1. Downey L, Curtis JR, Lafferty WE, Herting JR, Engelberg RA. The Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD): empirical domains and theoretical perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(1):9-22. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.012
    1. University of Washinton Medicine , UW School of Medicine. Review materials created by the Palliative & End-of-Life Care Research Program: Instruments. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. Casarett D, Shreve S, Luhrs C, et al. . Measuring families’ perceptions of care across a health care system: preliminary experience with the Family Assessment of Treatment at End of Life Short Form (FATE-S). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;40(6):801-809. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.03.019
    1. Anhang Price R, Stucky B, Parast L, et al. . Development of valid and reliable measures of patient and family experiences of hospice care for public reporting. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(7):924-932. doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0594
    1. Smith D, Kuzla N, Thorpe J, Scott L, Ersek M. Exploring nonresponse bias in the Department of Veterans Affairs’ bereaved family survey. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(10):858-864. doi:10.1089/jpm.2015.0050
    1. Addington-Hall J, McPherson C. After-death interviews with surrogates/bereaved family members: some issues of validity. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22(3):784-790. doi:10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00330-X
    1. United Kingdom Office for National Statistics . National Survey of Bereaved People (VOICES). 2015. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. Teno JM, Clarridge B, Casey V, Edgman-Levitan S, Fowler J. Validation of toolkit after-death bereaved family member interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22(3):752-758. doi:10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00331-1
    1. Kalton G, Flores-Cervantes I. Weighting methods. J Off Stat.2003;19:81-97.
    1. Graubard BI, Korn EL. Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics. 1999;55(2):652-659. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00652.x
    1. Kaiser Family Foundation . Serious illness late in life: the public’s views and experiences. 2017. November 2, 2017. Accessed February 25, 2021.
    1. Yadav KN, Gabler NB, Cooney E, et al. . Approximately one in three US adults completes any type of advance directive for end-of-life care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(7):1244-1251. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0175
    1. Khandelwal N, Curtis JR, Freedman VA, et al. . How often is end-of-life care in the United States inconsistent with patients’ goals of care? J Palliat Med. 2017;20(12):1400-1404. doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0065
    1. Haines L, Rahman OK, Sanders JJ, Johnson K, Kelley A. Factors that impact family perception of goal-concordant care at the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(8):927-932. doi:10.1089/jpm.2018.0508
    1. Mack JW, Cronin A, Keating NL, et al. . Associations between end-of-life discussion characteristics and care received near death: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(35):4387-4395. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.43.6055
    1. Johnson SB, Butow PN, Kerridge I, Bell ML, Tattersall MHN. How well do current measures assess the impact of advance care planning on concordance between patient preferences for end-of-life care and the care received: a methodological review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55(2):480-495. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.008
    1. French E, McCauley J, Aragon M, et al. . End-of-life medical spending in last twelve months of life is lower than previously reported. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2017;36:1211-1217. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0174.
    1. Einav L, Finkelstein A, Mullainathan S, Obermeyer Z. Predictive modeling of U.S. health care spending in late life. Science. 2018;360(6396):1462-1465. doi:10.1126/science.aar5045
    1. Aldridge MD, Kelley AS. The myth regarding the high cost of end-of-life care. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(12):2411-2415. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302889
    1. Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):493-497. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.5.493
    1. Mayland C, Williams E, Ellershaw J. How well do current instruments using bereaved relatives’ views evaluate care for dying patients? Palliat Med. 2008;22(2):133-144. doi:10.1177/0269216307085742
    1. Mayland CR, Williams EM, Addington-Hall J, Cox TF, Ellershaw JE. Assessing the quality of care for dying patients from the bereaved relatives’ perspective: further validation of “Evaluating care and health outcomes—for the dying.” J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(4):687-696. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.05.013

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir