Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use

Sabine Gabrysch, Oona M R Campbell, Sabine Gabrysch, Oona M R Campbell

Abstract

Background: Skilled attendance at childbirth is crucial for decreasing maternal and neonatal mortality, yet many women in low- and middle-income countries deliver outside of health facilities, without skilled help. The main conceptual framework in this field implicitly looks at home births with complications. We expand this to include "preventive" facility delivery for uncomplicated childbirth, and review the kinds of determinants studied in the literature, their hypothesized mechanisms of action and the typical findings, as well as methodological difficulties encountered.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Ovid databases for reviews and ascertained relevant articles from these and other sources. Twenty determinants identified were grouped under four themes: (1) sociocultural factors, (2) perceived benefit/need of skilled attendance, (3) economic accessibility and (4) physical accessibility.

Results: There is ample evidence that higher maternal age, education and household wealth and lower parity increase use, as does urban residence. Facility use in the previous delivery and antenatal care use are also highly predictive of health facility use for the index delivery, though this may be due to confounding by service availability and other factors. Obstetric complications also increase use but are rarely studied. Quality of care is judged to be essential in qualitative studies but is not easily measured in surveys, or without linking facility records with women. Distance to health facilities decreases use, but is also difficult to determine. Challenges in comparing results between studies include differences in methods, context-specificity and the substantial overlap between complex variables.

Conclusion: Studies of the determinants of skilled attendance concentrate on sociocultural and economic accessibility variables and neglect variables of perceived benefit/need and physical accessibility. To draw valid conclusions, it is important to consider as many influential factors as possible in any analysis of delivery service use. The increasing availability of georeferenced data provides the opportunity to link health facility data with large-scale household data, enabling researchers to explore the influences of distance and service quality.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Delay phases and factors affecting use of delivery care and maternal mortality (adapted from Thaddeus & Maine). The three delays for emergency care-seeking are unchanged from the framework presented by Thaddeus and Maine. We conceptually separated preventive care-seeking. Only a first and second phase are relevant for receiving normal preventive delivery care. If a woman who is receiving such preventive care at a health facility then develops a complication, her survival will depend on whether she receives adequate and appropriate treatment in time (third delay of emergency care-seeking). Since she is already in a facility, skilled providers should be able to discover this quickly (no first emergency delay) and she does not need to travel far if it can be handled there (no second emergency delay). For those complications that cannot be handled at that facility and that require referral to a higher-level facility, she will need to travel to a referral facility, possibly with help from the first facility (second emergency delay).

References

    1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5.
    1. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. Lancet. 2006;368:1189–1200. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69380-X.
    1. Stanton C, Lawn JE, Rahman H, Wilczynska-Ketende K, Hill K. Stillbirth rates: delivering estimates in 190 countries. Lancet. 2006;367:1487–1494. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68586-3.
    1. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA Maternal Mortality in 2000: Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. Geneva. 2004.
    1. WHO Reduction of maternal mortality. A joint WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World Bank statement. Geneva. 1999.
    1. Campbell OM, Graham WJ. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284–1299. doi: 10.1080/09540120050042918.
    1. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1091–1110. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7.
    1. Fishbein M. The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care. 2000;12:273–278. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.01.006.
    1. Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:812–819.
    1. Burgard S. Race and pregnancy-related care in Brazil and South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1127–1146. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00140-0.
    1. Elo IT. Utilization of maternal health-care services in Peru: the role of women's education. Health Transit Rev. 1992;2:49–69.
    1. Glei DA, Goldman N, Rodriguez G. Utilization of care during pregnancy in rural Guatemala: does obstetrical need matter? Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:2447–2463. doi: 10.1363/3200606.
    1. Navaneetham K, Dharmalingam A. Utilization of maternal health care services in Southern India. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1849–1869. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.004.
    1. Reynolds HW, Wong EL, Tucker H. Adolescents' use of maternal and child health services in developing countries. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32:6–16. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.007.
    1. Bell J, Curtis SL, Alayón S. DHS Analytical Studies No 7. ORC Macro and International Research Partnership for Skilled Attendance for Everyone (SAFE). Calverton, Maryland USA; 2003. Trends in delivery care in six countries.
    1. Magadi MA, Agwanda AO, Obare FO. A comparative analysis of the use of maternal health services between teenagers and older mothers in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1311–1325. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.034.
    1. Duong DV, Binns CW, Lee AH. Utilization of delivery services at the primary health care level in rural Vietnam. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:2585–2595. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.007.
    1. Gyimah SO, Takyi BK, Addai I. Challenges to the reproductive-health needs of African women: on religion and maternal health utilization in Ghana. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2930–2944. doi: 10.1177/146642409411400304.
    1. Mekonnen Y, Mekonnen A. Factors influencing the use of maternal healthcare services in Ethiopia. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21:374–382.
    1. Nwakoby BN. Use of obstetric services in rural Nigeria. J R Soc Health. 1994;114:132–136. doi: 10.1177/146642409411400304.
    1. Letamo G, Rakgoasi SD. Factors associated with non-use of maternal health services in Botswana. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003;21:40–47.
    1. Onah HE, Ikeako LC, Iloabachie GC. Factors associated with the use of maternity services in Enugu, southeastern Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:1870–1878. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057422.
    1. Stekelenburg J, Kyanamina S, Mukelabai M, Wolffers I, van Roosmalen J. Waiting too long: low use of maternal health services in Kalabo, Zambia. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9:390–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01202.x.
    1. Stephenson R, Baschieri A, Clements S, Hennink M, Madise N. Contextual influences on the use of health facilities for childbirth in Africa. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:84–93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.057422.
    1. Mesko N, Osrin D, Tamang S, Shrestha BP, Manandhar DS, Manandhar M, Standing H, Costello AM. Care for perinatal illness in rural Nepal: a descriptive study with cross-sectional and qualitative components. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2003;3:3. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02176-1.
    1. Mrisho M, Schellenberg JA, Mushi AK, Obrist B, Mshinda H, Tanner M, Schellenberg D. Factors affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:862–872. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.022.
    1. Kyomuhendo GB. Low use of rural maternity services in Uganda: impact of women's status, traditional beliefs and limited resources. Reprod Health Matters. 2003;11:16–26. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02176-1.
    1. Brentlinger PE, Sanchez-Perez HJ, Cedeno MA, Morales LG, Hernan MA, Micek MA, Ford D. Pregnancy outcomes, site of delivery, and community schisms in regions affected by the armed conflict in Chiapas, Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:1001–1014. doi: 10.2307/2061874.
    1. De Broe S. Diversity in the use of pregnancy-related care among ethnic groups in Guatemala. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2005;31:199–205. doi: 10.1783/1471189054483889.
    1. Pebley AR, Goldman N, Rodriguez G. Prenatal and delivery care and childhood immunization in Guatemala: do family and community matter? Demography. 1996;33:231–247. doi: 10.2307/2061874.
    1. Potter JE. Utilizacion de los servicios de salud materna en el Mexico rural [Use of maternal health services in rural Mexico] Salud Publica Mex. 1988;30:387–402.
    1. Short S, Zhang F. Use of maternal health services in rural China. Popul Stud (Camb) 2004;58:3–19. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.4.451.
    1. Celik Y, Hotchkiss DR. The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1797–1806. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00418-9.
    1. Toan NV, Hoa HT, Trong PV, Hojer B, Persson LA, Sundstrom K. Utilisation of reproductive health services in rural Vietnam; are there equal opportunities to plan and protect pregnancies? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1996;50:451–455. doi: 10.1136/jech.50.4.451.
    1. Addai I. Determinants of use of maternal-child health services in rural Ghana. J Biosoc Sci. 2000;32:1–15.
    1. Magadi M, Diamond I, Rodrigues RN. The determinants of delivery care in Kenya. Soc Biol. 2000;47:164–188.
    1. Yanagisawa S, Oum S, Wakai S. Determinants of skilled birth attendance in rural Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11:238–251. doi: 10.1080/00324720600895934.
    1. Stephenson R, Tsui AO. Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India. Stud Fam Plann. 2002;33:309–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2002.00309.x.
    1. Gage AJ, Guirlene Calixte M. Effects of the physical accessibility of maternal health services on their use in rural Haiti. Popul Stud (Camb) 2006;60:271–288. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<333::AID-HEC202>;2-K.
    1. Gage AJ. Barriers to the utilization of maternal health care in rural Mali. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:1666–1682. doi: 10.1363/3201706.
    1. Hodgkin D. Household characteristics affecting where mothers deliver in rural Kenya. Health Econ. 1996;5:333–340. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199607)5:4<333::AID-HEC202>;2-K.
    1. Furuta M, Salway S. Women's position within the household as a determinant of maternal health care use in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2006;32:17–27. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00411-4.
    1. Grosse RN, Auffrey C. Literacy and health status in developing countries. Annu Rev Public Health. 1989;10:281–297. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1192.
    1. Raghupathy S. Education and the use of maternal health care in Thailand. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:459–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00032.x.
    1. Singh-Manoux A, Clarke P, Marmot M. Multiple measures of socio-economic position and psychosocial health: proximal and distal measures. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31:1192–1199. doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0001. discussion 1199–1200.
    1. Falkingham J. Inequality and changes in women's use of maternal health-care services in Tajikistan. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;34:32–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00032.x.
    1. Royston E, Armstrong S. Preventing Maternal Deaths. Geneva: WHO; 1989.
    1. Bloom SS, Wypij D, Das Gupta M. Dimensions of women's autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography. 2001;38:67–78. doi: 10.1353/dem.2001.0001.
    1. Bhatia JC, Cleland J. Determinants of maternal care in a region of South India. Health Transition Review. 1995;5:127–142.
    1. Li J. Gender inequality, family planning, and maternal and child care in a rural Chinese county. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:695–708. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.041.
    1. Obermeyer CM, Potter JE. Maternal health care utilization in Jordan: a study of patterns and determinants. Stud Fam Plann. 1991;22:177–187. doi: 10.2307/1966644.
    1. Phoxay C, Okumura J, Nakamura Y, Wakai S. Influence of women's knowledge on maternal health care utilization in southern Laos. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2001;13:13–19.
    1. Marston C, Cleland J. Do unintended pregnancies carried to term lead to adverse outcomes for mother and child? An assessment in five developing countries. Popul Stud (Camb) 2003;57:77–93. doi: 10.1017/S002193200100339X.
    1. Amooti-Kaguna B, Nuwaha F. Factors influencing choice of delivery sites in Rakai district of Uganda. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:203–213. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00275-0.
    1. Griffiths P, Stephenson R. Understanding users' perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in Maharashtra, India. J Biosoc Sci. 2001;33:339–359. doi: 10.1017/S002193200100339X.
    1. D'Ambruoso L, Abbey M, Hussein J. Please understand when I cry out in pain: women's accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2005;5:140. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00148-4.
    1. Nilses C, Knutsson A. Förlossningsvård i Addis Abeba, Etiopien: Trots tillgängliga klinker föder de flesta kvinnor hemma [Obstetrics in Addis Abeba, Ethiopia: In spite of access to clinics, most women give birth at home] Lakartidningen. 2002;99:3862–3864.
    1. Paul BK, Rumsey DJ. Utilization of health facilities and trained birth attendants for childbirth in rural Bangladesh: an empirical study. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1755–1765. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00148-4.
    1. Afsana K, Rashid SF. The challenges of meeting rural Bangladeshi women's needs in delivery care. Reprod Health Matters. 2001;9:79–89. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(01)90094-1.
    1. MacKeith N, Chinganya OJ, Ahmed Y, Murray SF. Zambian women's experiences of urban maternity care: results from a community survey in Lusaka. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003;7:92–102. doi: 10.2307/3583349.
    1. Tsui AO, Ukwuani F, Guilkey DK, Angeles G. Working Paper WP-02-60. MEASURE Evaluation; 2002. Health Program Effects on Individual Use of Services.
    1. Hotchkiss DR, Krasovec K, El-Idrissi MDZ-E, Eckert E, Karim AM. Working Paper WP-03-68. MEASURE Evaluation; 2003. The Role of User Charges and Structural Attributes of Quality on the Use of Maternal Health Services in Morocco.
    1. Hounton S, Chapman G, Menten J, De Brouwere V, Ensor T, Sombié I, Meda N, Ronsmans C. Accessibility and utilisation of delivery care within a Skilled Care Initiative in rural Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health. 2008;13 Suppl 1:44–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02086.x.
    1. Mayhew M, Hansen PM, Peters DH, Edward A, Singh LP, Dwivedi V, Mashkoor A, Burnham G. Determinants of skilled birth attendant utilization in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional study. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:1849–1856. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.123471.
    1. Mishra V, Retherford RD. DHS Working Papers. Calverton: MEASURE DHS; 2006. The effect of ANC on professional assistance at delivery in rural India.
    1. Telfer ML, Rowley JT, Walraven GE. Experiences of mothers with antenatal, delivery and postpartum care in rural Gambia. Afr J Reprod Health. 2002;6:74–83. doi: 10.2307/3583148.
    1. Anwar I, Sami M, Akhtar N, Chowdhury ME, Salma U, Rahman M, Koblinsky M. Inequity in maternal health-care services: evidence from home-based skilled-birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:252–259. doi: 10.2471/BLT.07.042754.
    1. Chowdhury RI, Islam MA, Gulshan J, Chakraborty N. Delivery complications and healthcare-seeking behaviour: the Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey, 1999–2000. Health Soc Care Community. 2007;15:254–264.
    1. Sharma SK, Sawangdee Y, Sirirassamee B. Access to health: women's status and utilization of maternal health services in Nepal. J Biosoc Sci. 2007;39:671–692. doi: 10.1017/S0021932007001952.
    1. Rahman MH, Mosley WH, Ahmed S, Akhter HH. Does service accessibility reduce socioeconomic differentials in maternity care seeking? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. J Biosoc Sci. 2008;40:19–33. doi: 10.1017/S0021932007002258.
    1. Bolam A, Manandhar DS, Shrestha P, Ellis M, Malla K, Costello AM. Factors affecting home delivery in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Health Policy Plan. 1998;13:152–158. doi: 10.1093/heapol/13.2.152.
    1. Mahmud Khan M, Hotchkiss DR, Berruti AA, Hutchinson PL. Geographic aspects of poverty and health in Tanzania: does living in a poor area matter? Health Policy Plan. 2006;21:110–122. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czj008.
    1. Montgomery MR, Hewett PC. Urban poverty and health in developing countries: household and neighborhood effects. Demography. 2005;42:397–425. doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0020.
    1. Mekonnen Y, Mekonnen A. DHS Further Analysis Reports. Orc Macro. Calverton, Maryland, USA; 2002. Utilization of maternal health care services in Ethiopia.
    1. Anson O. Utilization of maternal care in rural HeBei Province, the People's Republic of China: individual and structural characteristics. Health Policy. 2004;70:197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.03.001.
    1. Rose M, Abderrahim N, Stanton C, Helsel D. MEASURE Evaluation Technical Report Series No 9. Carolina Population Center. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2001. Maternity Care: A Comparative Report on the Availability and Use of Maternity Services. Data from the Demographic and Health Surveys Women's Module & Services Availability Module 1993–1996.
    1. Chowdhury ME, Ronsmans C, Killewo J, Anwar I, Gausia K, Das-Gupta S, Blum LS, Dieltiens G, Marshall T, Saha S, et al. Equity in use of home-based or facility-based skilled obstetric care in rural Bangladesh: an observational study. Lancet. 2006;367:327–332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68070-7.
    1. Greenland S, O'Rourke K. On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. Biostatistics. 2001;2:463–471. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.4.463.
    1. Ikeako LC, Onah HE, Iloabachie GC. Influence of formal maternal education on the use of maternity services in Enugu, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26:30–34. doi: 10.1080/01443610500364004.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir