Using information and communication technologies (ICTs) to solve the repressed demand for primary dental care in the Brazilian Unified Health System due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled study protocol nested with a before-and-after study including economic analysis

Karina Haibara Natal, Thais Gomes Machado, Fabiana Bracco, Luiz Ivan Lemos, Maria Eduarda Vigano, Gabriela Manco Machado, Jhandira Daibelis Yampa-Vargas, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato, Edson Hilan Gomes Lucena, Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti, Cícero Inacio Silva, Guido Lemos Souza Filho, Mary Caroline Skelton Macedo, Fernanda Campos Almeida Carrer, Mariana Minatel Braga, Karina Haibara Natal, Thais Gomes Machado, Fabiana Bracco, Luiz Ivan Lemos, Maria Eduarda Vigano, Gabriela Manco Machado, Jhandira Daibelis Yampa-Vargas, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato, Edson Hilan Gomes Lucena, Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti, Cícero Inacio Silva, Guido Lemos Souza Filho, Mary Caroline Skelton Macedo, Fernanda Campos Almeida Carrer, Mariana Minatel Braga

Abstract

Background: With the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of children had their dental care interrupted or postponed, generating a pent-up demand for primary care. To minimize the impact of this outage, information and communication technologies (ICT) could be an alternative. The aim of this study is to elucidate the impact of implementing the ICTs in primary dental care for children on resolving the pent-up demand for primary dental care to children in the national health system service (SUS) due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Different research strategies are being proposed to demonstrate such effect and extrapolating findings to a real-world context to guide further research, practice and policies: two clinical trials (one randomized controlled by the waiting list trial (RCT) and a before-and-after study), one simulation study to prospect trial results to a broader population and three economic evaluations using different effects. Children enrolled in a reference dental unit will be invited to participate in the before-and-after study for trials. The first 368 families will be randomized for the RCT to the intervention vs waiting list. All participants will receive the intervention, but the waiting list group will be assessed before the intervention is available for them. The intervention comprises standardized non-face-to-face primary dental care using the V4H platform. The problem-solving and the family's perception will be the primary outcomes set for the before-and-after study and RCT, respectively. They will be measured 2 weeks after randomization. Based on trial findings, we will develop theoretical models to estimate how the intervention could benefit the population included in the national health system. Three economic evaluations will be carried out considering different trial effects (cost-effectiveness analyses). A societal perspective and the pandemic time horizon will be considered. Possible social impact (inequalities) will also be explored.

Discussion: This ongoing trial may be an essential contribution to clarify positive and negative aspects related to the use of technologies for non-face-to-face dental care for children. Trial products may bring relevant contributions to the pandemic context and the post-pandemic period. Potential benefits may be feasible to implement and preserve in the health system even in the post-pandemic period. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT04798599 (registered March 2021).

Keywords: Child; Coronavirus infections; Teledentistry; Telemonitoring; Teleorientation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Teletrailer program logo—program for non-face-to-face primary dental care for children, the intervention tested in TeleDent-COVID-19
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The architecture of studies proposed to demonstrate the effect of implementing the non-face-to-face primary dental care for children using technological resources and extrapolating these findings to a real-world context to guide further research, practice and policies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic diagram representing the workflow for conciliating the studies and the time schedule of enrolment, interventions, assessments, and visits for participants
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Standard Operational Procedures (SOP) that were used to guide the non-face-to-face consultation in the Teletrailer program
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Clinical decision-making protocol to meet the patients’ and families’ reported demands related to oral care
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness type), respective effects, questions to be answered and possible subgroup analyses foreseen
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Cost components to be valued for the economic evaluations
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Diagram for interpretation of costs and effects in the cost-effectiveness plan

References

    1. Schulz-Weidner N, Schlenz MA, Krämer N, Boukhobza S, Bekes K. Impact and perspectives of pediatric dental care during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding unvaccinated children: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212117.
    1. Fux-Noy A, Mattar L, Shmueli A, Halperson E, Ram D, Moskovitz M. Oral health care delivery for children during COVID-19 pandemic—a retrospective study. Front Public Health. 2021;9(May):1–6.
    1. Üstün N, Akgöl BB, Bayram M. Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric dental attendance. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(11):6185–6191. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03917-5.
    1. Meng X, Deng Y, Dai Z, Meng Z. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect , the company ’ s public news and information. WwwElsevierCom/Locate/Amjoto. 2020;(January):1–6.
    1. Korth J, Wilde B, Dol S, Anastasiou OE, Krawczyk A, Jahn M, et al. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company’s public news and information. 2020;(January).
    1. Iavicoli S, Boccunii F, Buresti G, Gagliardiid D, Persechino B, Valenti A, et al. Risk assessment at work and prevention strategies on COVID-19 in Italy. PLoS ONE [Internet] 2021;16(3 March):1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248874.
    1. ADA. ADA recommending dentists postpone elective procedures. 2020.
    1. Chisini LA, Costa FS, Demarco GT, da Silveira ER, Demarco FF. COVID-19 pandemic impact on paediatric dentistry treatments in the Brazilian Public Health System. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;31(1):31–34. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12741.
    1. Da Costa CB, Peralta FDS, Ferreira De Mello ALS. How has teledentistry been applied in public dental health services? An integrative review. Telemed e-Health. 2020;26(7):945–954. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0122.
    1. Asociación Latinoamericana O, Rahman N, Nathwani S, Kandiah T, Al-Halabi M, Salami A, et al. A systematic review on the validity of teledentistry. Telemed e-Health [Internet] 2020;24(3):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.12.004.
    1. Alves FA, Saunders D, Sandhu S, Xu Y, de Mendonça NF, Treister NS. Implication of COVID-19 in oral oncology practices in Brazil, Canada, and the United States. Oral Dis. 2020;23:793–795.
    1. Estai M, Kanagasingam Y, Tennant M, Bunt S. A systematic review of the research evidence for the benefits of teledentistry. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(3):147–156. doi: 10.1177/1357633X16689433.
    1. Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-1.
    1. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2010;36(5):452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
    1. Digioia A, Lorenz H, Greenhouse PK, Bertoty DA, Rocks SD. A patient-centered model to improve metrics without cost increase: viewing all care through the eyes of patients and families. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40(12):540–546. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181fc1.
    1. Gold M. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Med Care. 1996;34(12 Suppl):DS197–DS199.
    1. Ellwein LB, Drummond M. Economic analysis alongside clinical trials: bias in the assessment of economic outcomes. Int J Technol Assess. 1996;12(4):691–697. doi: 10.1017/S0266462300010977.
    1. Andrade MV, Maia AC, Cardoso CS, Alkmim MB, Ribeiro ALP. Cost-benefit of the telecardiology service in the state of Minas Gerais: Minas Telecardio project. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011;97(4):307–316. doi: 10.1590/S0066-782X2011005000080.
    1. Chan A, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG. 2013 statement : defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2016;158(3):200–207. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Thorn JC, Davies CF, Brookes ST, Noble SM, Dritsaki M, Gray E, et al. Content of Health Economics Analysis Plans (HEAPs) for Trial-based economic evaluations: expert delphi consensus survey. Value Heal [Internet] 2021;24(4):539–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.002.
    1. Rahman N, Nathwani S, Kandiah T. Teledentistry from a patient perspective during the coronavirus pandemic. Br Dent J. 2020;229(3):1–4.
    1. Watson D, Clark LA. Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: recurrent and emergent issues. J Pers Assess. 1997;68(2):267–96. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_4.
    1. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
    1. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. A conceptual model service its quality and implications for future research. Res Pap [Internet] 1985;49(4):41–50.
    1. Moita GF, Queiroz Barbosa AC, Reis Raposo VM. Quality Saúde – uma adaptação transcultural multicêntrica dos constructos da escala Servqual de satisfação para o SUS, por translação de conhecimento de especialistas e usuários. Rev do Serviço Público. 2019;70(2):325–364. doi: 10.21874/rsp.v70i2.3142.
    1. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry L. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. J Reatiling. 1988;64:12–40.
    1. de Andrade LAF, Salazar PEL, Leopoldino KDM, Montenegro CB. Avaliação da qualidade da atenção primária à saúde segundo o nível de satisfação dos idosos. Rev Gauch Enferm. 2019;40:e20180389. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180389.
    1. Zun AB, Ibrahim MI, Hamid AA. Level of satisfaction on service quality dimensions based on SERVQUAL model among patients attending 1 Malaysia clinic in Kota Bharu, Malaysia. Oman Med J. 2018;33(5):416–422. doi: 10.5001/omj.2018.76.
    1. Allen M, Spencer A, Gibson A, Matthews J, Allwood A, Prosser S et al. Health Services and Delivery Research. Right cot, right place, right time: improving the design and organisation of neonatal care networks—a computer simulation study. Southampt NIHR Journals Libr.
    1. Ministério da Saúde B. Resultados Principais. Pesqui Nac Saúde Bucal [Internet]. 2011. .
    1. Zanotto BS, Etges APBS, Siqueira AC, da Silva RS, Bastos C, de Araujo AL, et al. Economic evaluation of a telemedicine service to expand primary health care in Rio Grande do Sul: Teleoftalmo’s microcosting analysis. Cienc e Saude Coletiva. 2020;25(4):1349–1360. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020254.28992019.
    1. Clarke M, Fursse J, Brown-Connolly NE, Sharma U, Jones R. Evaluation of the National Health Service (NHS) direct pilot telehealth program: cost-effectiveness analysis. Telemed J E Health. 2018;24(1):67–76. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0280.
    1. Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ. 2004;329(7473):1017. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1017.
    1. Jeggle LM, Baker SR, Schwendicke F. Changing dentists’ carious tissue removal behavior: qualitative study and behavioral change simulation experiment. J Dent [Internet] 2019;81(September 2018):43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.12.010.
    1. Richardson M, Khouja CL, Sutcliffe K, Thomas J. Using the theoretical domains framework and the behavioural change wheel in an overarching synthesis of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):1–16. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024950.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Heal Care. 2005;14(1):26–33. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.
    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RBRW. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
    1. Kanavos P, Ferrario A, Tafuri G, Siviero P. Managing risk and uncertainty in health technology introduction: the role of managed entry agreements. Global Policy. 2017;8(S2):84–92. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12386.
    1. Grimm SE, Strong M, Brennan A, Wailoo AJ. The HTA risk analysis chart: visualising the need for and potential value of managed entry agreements in health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(12):1287–96. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0562-9.
    1. Jaffe DH, Lee L, Huynh S, Haskell TP. Health inequalities in the use of telehealth in the United States in the lens of COVID-19. Popul Health Manag. 2020;23(5):368–377. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0186.
    1. Marcin JP, Shaikh U, Steinhorn RH. Addressing health disparities in rural communities using telehealth. Pediatr Res. 2016;79(1–2):169–76. doi: 10.1038/pr.2015.192.
    1. Reeves J, Ayers JW, Longhurst CA. Telehealth in the COVID-19 era: a balancing act to avoid harm. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):1–6. doi: 10.2196/24785.

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir