Measurement of fasted state gastric antral motility before and after a standard bioavailability and bioequivalence 240 mL drink of water: Validation of MRI method against concomitant perfused manometry in healthy participants

Khaled Heissam, Nichola Abrehart, Caroline L Hoad, Jeff Wright, Alex Menys, Kathryn Murray, Paul M Glover, Geoffrey Hebbard, Penny A Gowland, Jason Baker, William L Hasler, Robin C Spiller, Maura Corsetti, James G Brasseur, Bart Hens, Kerby Shedden, Joseph Dickens, Deanna M Mudie, Greg E Amidon, Gordon L Amidon, Luca Marciani, Khaled Heissam, Nichola Abrehart, Caroline L Hoad, Jeff Wright, Alex Menys, Kathryn Murray, Paul M Glover, Geoffrey Hebbard, Penny A Gowland, Jason Baker, William L Hasler, Robin C Spiller, Maura Corsetti, James G Brasseur, Bart Hens, Kerby Shedden, Joseph Dickens, Deanna M Mudie, Greg E Amidon, Gordon L Amidon, Luca Marciani

Abstract

Objective: The gastrointestinal environment in which drug products need to disintegrate before the drug can dissolve and be absorbed has not been studied in detail due to limitations, especially invasiveness of existing techniques. Minimal in vivo data is available on undisturbed gastrointestinal motility to improve relevance of predictive dissolution models and in silico tools such as physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging methods could provide novel data and insights that can be used as a reference to validate and, if necessary, optimize these models. The conventional method for measuring gastrointestinal motility is via a manometric technique involving intubation. Nevertheless, it is feasible to measure gastrointestinal motility with magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this study was is to develop and validate a magnetic resonance imaging method using the most recent semi-automated analysis method against concomitant perfused manometry method.

Material and methods: Eighteen healthy fasted participants were recruited for this study. The participants were intubated with a water-perfused manometry catheter. Subsequently, stomach motility was assessed by cine-MRI acquired at intervals, of 3.5min sets, at coronal oblique planes through the abdomen and by simultaneous water perfused manometry, before and after administration of a standard bioavailability / bioequivalence 8 ounces (~240mL) drink of water. The magnetic resonance imaging motility images were analysed using Spatio-Temporal Motility analysis STMM techniques. The area under the curve of the gastric motility contractions was calculated for each set and compared between techniques. The study visit was then repeated one week later.

Results: Data from 15 participants was analysed. There was a good correlation between the MRI antral motility plots area under the curve and corresponding perfused manometry motility area under the curve (r = 0.860) during both antral contractions and quiescence.

Conclusion: Non-invasive dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of gastric antral motility coupled with recently developed, semi-automated magnetic resonance imaging data processing techniques correlated well with simultaneous, 'gold standard' water perfused manometry. This will be particularly helpful for research purposes related to oral absorption where the absorption of a drug is highly depending on the underlying gastrointestinal processes such as gastric emptying, gastrointestinal motility and availability of residual fluid volumes.

Clinical trial: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03191045.

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: the author AM is the CEO of Motilent Limited.

Figures

Fig 1. Study diagram.
Fig 1. Study diagram.
Schematic diagram of the study day timeline.
Fig 2. Image analysis.
Fig 2. Image analysis.
Example of MRI data analysis. The stomach wall boundaries and the axis of the stomach are shown in green. The yellow lines represent the lumen diameter perpendicular to the stomach axis. AC, ascending colon; TC, transverse colon; GB, gall bladder.
Fig 3. MRI and manometry plots.
Fig 3. MRI and manometry plots.
Examples of MRI gastric antral motility plots (in red) and corresponding perfused manometry traces (in blue) from different participants, during antral contractions (A and B) and quiescence (C).
Fig 4. Comparison of MRI and manometry…
Fig 4. Comparison of MRI and manometry mean area under the curves.
Mean (± SEM) values of manometry AUC for each participant plotted against the corresponding mean MRI AUC (n = 15) during one of the visits (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = 0.860).
Fig 5. Comparison of MRI and manometry…
Fig 5. Comparison of MRI and manometry individual area under the curves.
Scatter plot of individual values of MRI antral motility for each 3.5 min imaging block AUC and the corresponding 3.5 min perfused manometry motility AUC for all participants, thereby providing n = 421 data points (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r = 0.843).
Fig 6. Time courses of gastric antral…
Fig 6. Time courses of gastric antral motility.
Time courses of the area under the curve of gastric antral contractile activity observed with MRI (solid line) and water-perfused manometry (dotted line) aggregated for all subjects at consecutive intervals (mean ± SD).

References

    1. Davis SS, Hardy JG, Fara JW. Transit of pharmaceutical dosage forms through the small intestine. Gut. 1986;27: 886–92. 10.1136/gut.27.8.886 .
    1. Oberle RL, Amidon GL. The influence of variable gastric emptying and intestinal transit rates on the plasma level curve of cimetidine: an explanation for the double peak phenomenon. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987;15: 529–44. 10.1007/BF01061761 .
    1. Oberle RL, Chen TS, Lloyd C, Barnett JL, Owyang C, Meyer J, et al. The influence of the interdigestive migrating myoelectric complex on the gastric emptyign of liquids. Gastroenterology. 1990;99: 1275–82. 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91150-5 .
    1. Meyer JH, Mayer EA, Jehn D, Gu Y, Fink AS, Fried M. Gastric processing and emptying of fat. Gastroenterology. 1986;90: 1176–87. 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90383-5 .
    1. Williams NS, Miller J, Elashoff J, Meyer JH. Canine resistances to gastric emptying of liquid nutrients after ulcer surgery. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31: 273–80. 10.1007/BF01318119 .
    1. Meyer JH, Doty JE. GI transit and absorption of solid food: multiple effects of guar. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988;48: 267–73. 10.1093/ajcn/48.2.267 .
    1. Rhie JK, Hayashi Y, Welage LS, Frens J, Wald RJ, Barnett JL, et al. Drug marker absorption in relation to pellet size, gastric motility and viscous meals in humans. Pharm Res. 1998;15: 233–8. 10.1023/a:1011962501270 .
    1. Mudie DM, Murray K, Hoad CL, Pritchard SE, Garnett MC, Amidon GL, et al. Quantification of gastrointestinal liquid volumes and distribution following a 240 mL dose of water in the fasted state. Mol Pharmaceut. 2014;11: 3039–47. 10.1021/mp500210c .
    1. Koziolek M, Grimm M, Garbacz G, Kuehn J-P, Weitschies W. Intragastric volume changes after Intake of a high-caloric, high-fat standard breakfast in healthy human subjects investigated by MRI. Mol Pharmaceut. 2014;11: 1632–9. 10.1021/mp500022u .
    1. Schiller C, Frohlich CP, Giessmann T, Siegmund W, Monnikes H, Hosten N, et al. Intestinal fluid volumes and transit of dosage forms as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22: 971–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02683.x .
    1. Murray K, Hoad CL, Mudie DM, Wright J, Heissam K, Abrehart N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging quantification of fasted state colonic liquid pockets in healthy humans. Mol Pharmaceut. 2017;14: 2629–38. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00095 .
    1. Fox M, Hebbard G, Janiak P, Brasseur JG, Ghosh S, Thumshirn M, et al. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16: 533–42. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00539.x .
    1. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout A, et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27: 160–74. 10.1111/nmo.12477 .
    1. Camilleri M, Hasler WL, Parkman HP, Quigley EMM, Soffer E. Measurement of gastrointestinal motility in the GI laboratory. Gastroenterology. 1998;115: 747–62. 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70155-6 .
    1. Marciani L. Assessment of gastrointestinal motor functions by MRI: a comprehensive review. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23: 399–407. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01670.x .
    1. Szarka LA, Camilleri M. Methods for measurement of gastric motility. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009;296: G461–G75. 10.1152/ajpgi.90467.2008 .
    1. Kwiatek MA, Steingoetter A, Pal A, Menne D, Brasseur JG, Hebbard GS, et al. Quantification of distal antral contractile motility in healthy human stomach with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24: 1101–9. 10.1002/jmri.20738 .
    1. Cho J, Lee YJ, Kim YH, Shin CM, Kim JM, Chang W, et al. Quantitative MRI evaluation of gastric motility in patients with Parkinson's disease: correlation of dyspeptic symptoms with volumetry and motility indices. PLOS ONE. 2019;14 10.1371/journal.pone.0216396 .
    1. de Jonge CS, Smout A, Nederveen AJ, Stoker J. Evaluation of gastrointestinal motility with MRI: advances, challenges and opportunities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30 10.1111/nmo.13257 .
    1. Wright J, Adams V, Hykin J, Gowland P, Issa B, Boulby P, et al. The measurement of gastric motor function and transit in man by echo planar magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Mater Phys. 1994;2: 467–9. 10.1007/BF01705299
    1. de Zwart IM, de Roos A. MRI for the evaluation of gastric physiology. Eur Radiol. 2010;20: 2609–16. 10.1007/s00330-010-1850-3 .
    1. Camilleri M, Linden DR. Measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motor functions in humans and animals. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2: 412–28. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2016.04.003 .
    1. Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Papanikolaou N, Holtmann G, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF, et al. Real time high resolution magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of gastric motility disorders. Gut. 2004;53: 1256–61. 10.1136/gut.2003.038588 .
    1. Faas H, Hebbard GS, Feinle C, Kunz P, Brasseur JG, Indireshkumar K, et al. Pressure-geometry relationship in the antroduodenal region in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;281: G1214–G20. 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.281.5.G1214 .
    1. Hayakawa N, Nakamoto Y, Chen-Yoshikawa TF, Kido A, Ishimori T, Fujimoto K, et al. Gastric motility and emptying assessment by magnetic resonance imaging after lung transplantation: correlation with gastric emptying scintigraphy. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42: 818–24. 10.1007/s00261-016-0959-5 .
    1. Feinle C, Kunz P, Boesiger P, Fried M, Schwizer W. Scintigraphic validation of a magnetic resonance imaging method to study gastric emptying of a solid meal in humans. Gut. 1999;44: 106–11. 10.1136/gut.44.1.106 .
    1. Hoad CL, Parker H, Hudders N, Costigan C, Cox EF, Perkins AC, et al. Measurement of gastric meal and secretion volumes using magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60: 1367–83. 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/1367 .
    1. Khalaf A, Hoad CL, Blackshaw E, Alyami J, Spiller RC, Gowland PA, et al. Simultaneous measurement of gastric emptying of a soup test meal using MRI and gamma scintigraphy. Diagnostics. 2020;10 10.3390/diagnostics10030170 .
    1. Wright J, Evans D, Gowland P, Mansfield P. Validation of antroduodenal motility measurements made by echo- planar magnetic resonance imaging. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 1999;11: 19–25. 10.1046/j.1365-2982.1999.00135.x .
    1. Indireshkumar K, Brasseur JG, Faas H, Hebbard GS, Kunz P, Dent J, et al. Relative contributions of "pressure pump" and "peristaltic pump" to gastric emptying. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2000;278: G604–G16. 10.1152/ajpgi.2000.278.4.G604 .
    1. Menys A, Hoad C, Spiller R, Scott SM, Atkinson D, Marciani L, et al. Spatio-temporal motility MRI analysis of the stomach and colon. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31 10.1111/nmo.13557 .
    1. FDA. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products: general considerations. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) 2003.
    1. FDA. Guidance for industry: food-effect Bioavailability and fed Bioequivalence studies. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) 2002.
    1. Menys A, Hamy V, Makanyanga J, Hoad C, Gowland P, Odille F, et al. Dual registration of abdominal motion for motility assessment in free-breathing data sets acquired using dynamic MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59: 4603–19. 10.1088/0031-9155/59/16/4603 .
    1. Paixao P, Bermejo M, Hens B, Tsume Y, Dickens J, Shedden K, et al. Gastric emptying and intestinal appearance of nonabsorbable drugs phenol red and paromomycin in human subjects: A multi-compartment stomach approach. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;129: 162–74. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.05.033 .
    1. Menys A, Keszthelyi D, Fitzke H, Fikree A, Atkinson D, Aziz Q, et al. A magnetic resonance imaging study of gastric motor function in patients with dyspepsia associated with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome-Hypermobility Type: A feasibility study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29 10.1111/nmo.13090 .
    1. Brasseur JG, Dodds WJ. Interpretation of intraluminal manometric measurements in terms of swallowing mechanics. Dysphagia. 1991;6: 100–19. 10.1007/BF02493487 .
    1. Nicosia MA, Brasseur JG. A mathematical model for estimating muscle tension in vivo during esophageal bolus transport. J Theor Biol. 2002;219: 235–55. 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3118 .
    1. Kirchhoff S, Nicolaus M, Schirra J, Reiser MF, Goeke B, Lienemann A. Assessment of colon motility using simultaneous manometric and functional cine-MRI analysis: preliminary results. Abdom Imaging. 2011;36: 24–30. 10.1007/s00261-010-9599-3 .
    1. Schwizer W, Fox M, Steingotter A. Non-invasive investigation of gastrointestinal functions with magnetic resonance imaging: towards an "ideal" investigation of gastrointestinal function. Gut. 2003;52: 34–9. 10.1136/gut.52.1.34 .
    1. Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Juli CF, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU. Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21: 370–5. 10.1002/jmri.20284 .
    1. Khalaf A, Hoad CL, Spiller RC, Gowland PA, Moran GW, Marciani L. Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of gastrointestinal motor function and fluid distribution. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2015;6: 140–9. 10.4291/wjgp.v6.i4.140 .
    1. Tanaka Y, Goto T, Kataoka M, Sakuma S, Yamashita S. Impact of luminal fluid volume on the drug absorption after oral administration: analysis based on in vivo drug concentration-time profile in the gastrointestinal tract. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104: 3120–7. 10.1002/jps.24433 .
    1. Pal A, Indireshkumar K, Schwizer W, Abrahamsson B, Fried M, Brasseur JG. Gastric flow and mixing studied using computer simulation. Proc Royal Soc B. 2004;271: 2587–94. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2886 .
    1. Mullerlissner SA, Schattenmann G, Siewert JR, Blum AL. Effect of a transpyloric tube on gastric emptying and duodenogastric reflux in the dog. Digestion. 1983;28: 176–80. 10.1159/000198983 .
    1. Treier R, Steingoetter A, Weishaupt D, Goetze O, Boesiger P, Fried M, et al. Gastric motor function and emptying in the right decubitus and seated body position as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;23: 331–8. 10.1002/jmri.20507
    1. Steingoetter A, Fox M, Treier R, Weishaupt D, Marincek B, Boesiger P, et al. Effects of posture on the physiology of gastric emptying: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41: 1155–64. 10.1080/00365520600610451
    1. Bermejo M, Hens B, Dickens J, Mudie D, Paixao P, Tsume Y, et al. A mechanistic physiologically-based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) approach to assess the in vivo performance of an orally administered drug product: from IVIVC to IVIVP. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12 10.3390/pharmaceutics12010074 .
    1. Hens B, Bolger MB. Application of a dynamic fluid and pH model to simulate intraluminal and systemic concentrations of a weak base in GastroPlus (TM). J Pharm Sci. 2019;108: 305–15. 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.10.041 .

Source: PubMed

3
Suscribir